---
date: 2001-12-10
title: December 10, 2001 Minutes
source: 2001-12/2001-12-10_December 10, 2001_Minutes.pdf
pages: 1
---

December 10, 2001
EXECUTIVE SESSION

EXECUTIVE SESSION
STOCKBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 10, 2001

Council discussed purchasing real estate located at 176 Burke Street from Kathy Townsend.

Merle Manders, CMC
City Clerk

REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE MINUTES
HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA DECEMBER 10, 2001

The Regular Meeting of the Stockbridge City Council was held on December 10, 2001 at 6:00 P.M. Interim
Mayor Pro Tem Ronnie Simmons presided and members present were HaroldCochran, Fred Evans, W. A.
Gardner and Fletcher Turner.

Harold Cochran made a motion to convene, W. A. Gardner seconded, and motion carried.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to approve minutes of November 12 and November 19, 2001 City Council
Meetings, Harold Cochran seconded, and motion carried.

Mr. Simmons welcomed Nan Lee, Director of the Henry County Chamber of Commerce. Mrs. Lee introduced
her staff.

BUDGET HEARING: Harold Cochran made a motion to approve adoption of the 2002 Proposed Budget;
seconded by Fred Evans, and motion carried.
PLANNING AND ZONING

VARIANCE

ALVIN HOBGOOD of McDonough, Ga requested a variance for property located in Land Lots 2 and 31 of
the 7th District, located at 2400 Highway 42 North. The property contains approximately 86.0 acres and the
request is to increase the height of a proposed business sign.

Fred Gardiner, Henry County Planner, advised the Council that staff approved the request with one condition:

1. The sign shall be monument base consisting matching brick from the primary structure, the
design to be approved by the Planning and Zoning staff.

Fred Evans made a motion to approve with one condition; Fletcher Turner seconded, and motion carried.

SUMMIT PROPERTIES, INC. of Atlanta, Georgia requested a variance for property located in Land Lot 57
of the 12th District, off Hanover Parkway. The property contains approximately 38.3 acres and the request
is for a reduction in the required parking for an apartment complex.

Bert Foster, Henry County Planner, advised Council that staff has reviewed this request from the standpoint
that the reduction would reduce the amount of impervious surface caused by the three parking spaces per
unit. If the request is approved it would reduce the parking spaces to two per unit and reduce the amount of
storm water runoff generated by the large area of impervious surface. Planning staff recommends approval.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to approve request to reduce the parking spaces from three to two; Fletcher
Turner seconded, and motion carried.

STEVE HARRISON, 40 Jonesboro Street, McDonough, Georgia requested a variance from the storm water
detention Code Section 8.14.020. Mr. Harrison advises he has discussed with Henry County and they have
no problem with his request.
William W. DeLoach, engineer, advised that basically they originally had an above ground storage pond for
the detention of storm water and the City ordinance requires storm water be underground. They propose to
redesign the parking lot area and make it part of the parking lot; which means changing the plans. They can
make it above ground and there want be anything growing in the pond. It will be part of the pavement. Mr.
Simmons said that after reviewing the plan, the ground water drains from the front to the back of the property
and a weir will take care of the problem. Mr. DeLoach said he discussed this with Henry County and they
have no objection to this change.

Mr. Simmons asked Frederick Gardiner if Henry County has reviewed the plan and if they have a problem
with the plans being changed from underground retention to a concrete weir empting to the rear of the
property.

Bruce Vail advised Council that this is a request for a variance that may not have been advertised and the
Council needs to make sure that advertising for a variance has taken place. If it is a variance request from
the zoning ordinance it appears to be applicable.

Mr. DeLoach stated that it is his understanding that the Mayor and Council could approve a variance. Mr.
Vail responded that that is true, but if it is a request for a variance it goes to Planning and Zoning first for staff
review. Planning and Zoning staff is responsible for making sure an advertisement announcing a hearing on
the variance is placed in the legal organ of Henry County. Advertising precedes the Council actually hearing
the variance.

Mr. Simmons advised Mr. Harrison that the Council appears to have no problem with making that
consideration but the question is the Council wants to make sure the variance is handled legally and the
Council want have any problems down the road.

Bruce Vail stated that Mr. Harrison is requesting the Council grant a variance regarding the storm water
drainage ordinance and Mr. Harrison has come before the Council asking for the variance and understands
Henry County has no problem with the request. Mr. Vail asked Mr. Gardiner if the variance request has been
submitted to Henry County and has the request been advertised? Mr. Gardiner responded that Henry County
Planning Commission has not advertised it.

Mr. DeLoach asked if there is such a requirement and Mr. Gardiner responded that there is a requirement
for the variance to be advertised in the legal organ for Henry County and the property posted.

Fred Evans made a motion to table; Fletcher Turner seconded, and motion carried.
REZONING

DAVIS DEVELOPMENT of Stockbridge, Georgia requested rezoning from C-1 (neighborhood commercial)
and C-2 (general commercial) to RM (multi-family residential) for property located in Land Lot 4 of the 12th
District and Lot 13 of the 6th District, located off Rock Quarry Road. The property contains approximately
36.58 acres and the request is for a luxury apartment home community.

Fred Gardiner advised the Council that the Planning Commission recommends approval of this request with
conditions:

1. A thirty-foot (30’) buffer shall be preserved along the portions of the proposed development
where it abuts commercial development. Where vegetation is limited in density, the developer
shall plant trees consistent with existing vegetation to compensate, as approved by Planning
and Zoning Department.

2. All buildings shall be constructed of brick, stone, stucco, or any combination thereof.

3. There shall be sidewalks throughout the development, also along Rock Quarry and
North Park Trail connecting the development with the commercial developments along
the said corridors.

4. The interior lighting plan should consist of lights of downcast lighting of moderate
brightness. Where buildings back into wooded areas, lights should be motion sensitive.

Robert Parnell, Lancaster Associates, representing Davis Developments, Inc. regarding planning and
engineering issues, stated they do not have any issues with the four (4) conditions mentioned. They do have
several other items they would like to clarify. Their site plan shows a 3.0 parking ratio, they would like to
reduce the ration to 2.0 at this hearing. This would allow them to build an environmental sensitive product.
Their maximum building height will be forty-six (46”) feet. The maximum number of units per building will be
thirty-five (35’). Fifty percent (50%) of the building will be brick, stucco or stone. Office uses and commercial
area will represent smart-growth. As their application indicates, the density will be 8.0 per acre. In order to
get to the City’s requirements for 8.0 density they had to add a junior olympic swimming pool, club house,
2,400 lineal feet of walking trail, tennis courts, basketball and multi-use field for soccer, baseball and softball.
There is a significant amount of wetlands to rear of the property, which limits the ability to develop separate
baseball and soccer fields.
A.J.Welch asked how was the density calculated? Mr. Parnell responded on gross acreage. Mr. Welch stated
that is a problem with the calculations. The ordinance requires a different calculation and to grant anything
different, a specific variance must be requested on those specific issues. This has been brought up on
several occasions and made clear to the property owners what they had to do. On gross calculations, they
have to take into consideration the flood plain issues and a variance would have to be granted. Each request
is handled on a case-by-case basis.

Mr. Parnell advised that they would like to include the variance in their existing application. Mr. Welch stated
that it takes a separate application that has to be recommended by Henry County Planning and Zoning before
the variance can be considered by the City.

Bruce Vail asked Mr. Parnell if they presented a request for a variance on the parking requirement to Planning
and Zoning? Mr. Parnell responded they presented their intention to come before the Council with request
for a variance on the parking requirements although they indicated that it was not their decision to make but
the Mayor and Council’s decision. Also, they mentioned to Planning Commission that the site did contain
flood plain and they were projecting density on total acreage. At this point, A. J. Welch stated this method of
calculation raises an objectionable issue. Gad Woodall said that his understanding of the ordinance is that
to allow for the density to go to eight (8) units per acre and to utilize the wetlands or flood plain area for that
density when you are putting in the amity package described in the ordinance. A. J. Welch pointed out that
this is determined on a case-by-case basis. In order for the Council to consider the request, Planning and
Zoning must certify that those issues were brought up and discussed by Planning and Zoning. Mr. Welch
asked if these issues were discussed at the Planning and Zoning meeting? Fredrick Gardiner replied that
they were discussed. Within the report to the Council, it states that the applicant will be seeking a variance
to reduce the parking spaces per unit from three (3) to two and one half (2.5). The report states that Planning
and Zoning has no objection to proceeding with regarding the variance on this request.

Mr. Welch asked if the second issue concerning the density and the counting of the flood plain? Mr. Gardiner
replied that it was not presented to the Planning and Zoning.

Mr. Parnell refuted Mr. Gardiner stating that it was mentioned at the Planning and Zoning meeting that the
density was based on total acreage and that the site did contain wetlands and flood plains. If you project
acreage and number of units, it works out to eight (8) per acre.

Mr. Gardiner replied that they did discuss the flood plain issue as part of the density and when they calculated,
they used the overall acreage of the property to calculate density.
Mr. Welch stated that it sounds like the density issue and the parking lot variance was presented at the
Planning and Zoning meeting. The Council can make the decision on the issued of whether or not they will
be allowed to count the total number of acres in the entire project with eight (8) units per acre on the total
area. The total area is 36.58 acres, including the wetlands and flood plain. The City will have to know how
many acres of usable land they have so the Council can determine how many units will be put on the usable
acreage. Then the City’s record is clear on what is granted.

Mr. Simmons stated that the total acreage of the project is 36.58 and the question that Mr. Welch brought up
is the number of units on the usable acres, which is the total acreage minus the wetlands and flood plain.

Mr. Welch reminded the Council, they have to know this information before they can vote on this matter
because if they vote to give full credit for the flood plain this will be setting precedent because the Council
has never given full credit for the total acreage.

Mr. Simmons suggested the Council move on to the next item on the agenda and Mr. Parnell and Mr. Woodall
can go outside the Council Chamber to find the figures needed and the Council can come back to the issue
later in this meeting.

Toward the end of the meeting, A. J. Welch informed the Council that Mr. Parnell requested the Council table
until the January, 2002 meeting.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to table; Fletcher Turner seconded, and motion carried.

HANS M. BRODER, JR. of Stockbridge, Georgia requested rezoning from RA (residential agricultural) to PD
(planned development) for property located in Land Lots 5 and 12 of the 6th District, located at I-75 and
Flippen Road and St. Ives Parkway. The property contains approximately 52.7 acres and the request is for
a golf facility and residential development.

The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request from RA (residential agricultural) to PD
(planned development) with conditions:

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL:
1. All homes shall be single-family detached dwellings and have a two-car garage.

2. The minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet with the following setbacks:

Front yard setback - 30 feet
Side yard setback - 10 feet
Rear yard setback - 30 feet

3. The development shall have underground utilities; sidewalks on both sides of the street,
streetlights and all residential dwellings shall have full sodded yards.

4. All homes shall have front façades consisting of a majority of masonry material (brick,
stone, stucco, or any combination thereof).

5. Development shall be constructed to the approved conceptual plan approved by the
Planning Commission and City of Stockbridge; any deviation from said plan shall have
to be approved by the Planning Commission.

6. A pedestrian path (cross hatched on existing pavement) shall be designated across St.
Ives Drive to the golf course, to allow for connectivity. A sign shall be installed to denote
the golf path to drivers.

COMMERCIAL – C-2 (general commercial) and C-3 (heavy commercial)

1. The developer shall submit a lighting plan to Planning and Zoning as part of the preliminary
plan review process. The lighting scheme should be conducive to a neighborhood
development, which will not impose excessive lighting on surrounding residents. All lighting
should be of a moderate brightness and height.

2. The parking area shall be paved.

3. All buildings shall be of residential architecture, with preference given to siding,
brick, stone, or stucco exteriors (no factory metal walls with baked-on painted
finishes).
4. The signage shall be ground mounted and constructed of brick stone or stucco
or any combination thereof, and non-illuminated. Also, shall not exceed eight (8)
feet in height and 60 square feet in area.

5. Dumpster shall be installed with enclosure to be constructed of three sides of
brick matching the building.

Mr. Gardiner informed the Council that the Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions.
Hans Broder stated that all of the conditions are agreeable with him. Mr. Welch advised Council his staff
has reviewed this request and the rezoning complies as long as the Council adopts with the conditions.

Fred Evans made a motion to approve rezoning from RA (residential agricultural) to PD (planned
development) with conditions; Fletcher Turner seconded, and motion carried.

HANS M. BRODER, JR. of Stockbridge, Georgia requested rezoning from RA (residential agricultural) to C-
2 (general commercial) for property located in Land Lot 6 of the 12th District, for property located at I-75 and
Flippen Road. The property contains approximately 5.34 acres and the request is for retail and commercial
development.

Fredrick Gardiner advised Council the Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions:

1. There shall be no reduction in the required forty-foot (40’) landscaped buffer along
all adjacent properties zoned for residential uses.

2. All structures located on the site shall be constructed of a combination of brick,
and or stone, and or stucco.

3. Landscaping plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Staff.

4. An exterior lighting plan shall be respective to the surrounding residential
neighborhood, which will not impose excessive lighting on residents. The plan
shall require that all lighting be of moderate brightness and consist of downcast
lighting.

5. The sign shall be monument base consisting of matching brick from the primary
structure, the design to be approved by the Planning and Zoning staff.

6. Dumpster shall be installed with enclosure to be constructed of three sides of brick
matching the building.

7. Developer shall install acceleration and deceleration lanes in accordance with
Henry County Department of Transportation standards and review.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to approve rezoning from C-1 (neighborhood commercial) to C-2 (general
commercial) with all conditions; Harold Cochran seconded, and motion carried.

FRED AND SHIRLEY RAINER of McDonough, Georgia request rezoning from C-2 (general commercial) to
OI (office/institutional) for property located in Land Lot 61 of the 12th District, located at 106 East Atlanta
Road. The property contains approximately 0.859 acres and the request is for a church.

Fredrick Gardiner advised Council that the Planning Commission approved request for rezoning with the
following condition.

1. Any future plans for expansion must be approved the Henry County Planning and
Zoning Department prior to any such action taking place.

Mr. Simmons asked if parking regulations have been met with the request for Church use at this site. Mr.
Welch responded that City Code prevents parking on city streets and if this happens, citations will be issued.
If they have sufficient parking for present intended use, they are technically entitled to that use and may go
forward. This is to move forward in compliance with the City’s resolution saying that all properties for Church
use shall be rezoned for the proper zoning use by January 1, 2002.

Fred Evans made a motion to approve rezoning from C-2 (general commercial) to OI (office institutional)
with one condition; seconded by Fletcher Turner, and motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS

PRIK-THAL RESTAURANT, 620 Eagles Landing Parkway requested a license to serve beer and wine.
Applicant has completed all required documents and background check.

Fred Evans made a motion to approve application to serve beer and wind; Fletcher Turner seconded, and
motion carried

RONNIE SHAW, representing the Homeowner Association, The Terrace at Eagles Landing has written the
Council requesting steps that can be taken to reduce noise in their neighborhood caused by trains. No one
from The Terrace at Eagles Landing was present.

Councilman Simmons stated for the record that there is nothing the Council can do about railroad property
or advise the homeowners what to do. When this property was purchased and developed the railroad had
already been there for many generations.

Bruce Vail advised that the Federal Government by virtue the Interstate Commerce is pretty much pre-
emptied. The Council could adopt a resolution asking the railroad to try to reduce noise but in terms of
compelling the railway to modify it’s operations or take some remedial steps regarding their tracks are set-up
the Council would not be successful.

Ted Strickland reported that there are approximately 34 trains per day. The trains are long and the Federal
Law requires they sound their horn before they get to each crossing. Ted Strickland was instructed to contact
the railroad to see if they would be receptive to reducing horn noise.

No action taken.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND SHORT TERM WORK PROGRAM. A Resolution for
transmittal of an updated Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and Short Term Work Program (STWP) to
submit the annual update covering the five-year period 2001 – 2005 to the Atlanta Regional Commission for
review.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to adopt a Resolution to forward the CIE and STWP to the Atlanta Regional
Commission for review and authorize the Mayor Kelley and Clerk to sign the Resolution on behalf of the City
Council; Fletcher Turner seconded, and motion carried.
DERICK PALMER, 117 Club Circle, to discuss alleged property damage caused by backup of sewerage line.
Mr. Palmer did not appear.

ORDINANCES

AMENDMENT TO VIDEO POKER ORDINANCE (9.41.110) This ordinance will amend the City’s code
according to new legislation and will be effective immediately.

Bruce Vail advised the Council that this ordinance incorporates the definition of commercial gambling and
gambling device that is found in State law. The purpose is to pickup the devices that have been outlawed
recently by the General Assembly, which will include as of the beginning of January, 2002.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to adopt the amendment to the Video Poker Ordinance; Fred Evans seconded,
and motion carried.

HOME OCCUPATIONS

TRELLIS STRICKLAND, 143 Windsong Drive – Construction Management Services, LLC. Ms. Strickland
advised that she would be doing contract management work and some residential building. Councilman
Simmons advised Ms. Strickland that she could only operate an office. There can be no employee reporting
to work, no sub-contractors coming by to pickup their checks on Friday or any other day, and no clients at
the home.

Ms. Strickland said she has another location in Atlanta where checks will be picked-up. Equipment will also
be stored at the Atlanta site. She plans to work in the Stockbridge area. Mr. Simmons has a problem with
traffic that will be created. Councilman Cochran asked if any vehicles or customers would be coming to her
home? Ms. Strickland responded no, that she only wants to have her office in her home with a fax machine,
copier, telephone and computer. No supplies will be delivered to her home. No signs.

Mr. Simmons asked where she would meet with customers to discuss the construction of their home and
possibly a presentation. Ms. Strickland said they would meet on the job site.
Council Simmons pointed out that residential areas are for residents. When home occupation licenses are
issued there are more vehicles in the neighborhoods and parking in the streets. Large trucks making
deliveries. With a construction type business this could grow to a large problem and the Council has to take
care of the neighborhoods within the City.

Council Simmons recommended Ms. Strickland contact her Home Owner Association to determine if the
association allows home occupations. Mr. Welch suggested Ms. Strickland should also furnish the City a
copy of the title of her property to determine if there are restrictive covenants to prevent her from operating a
home occupation. The City cannot issue a license if there are restrictive covenants. If there are no restrictive
covenants, Ms. Strickland must furnish a letter from her association stating they have no objections.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to table; Harold Cochran, and motion carried.

GORDON L. DELANCEY A. 116A Lambert Drive – Home Remodeling

Mr. Delancey failed to appear and no action was taken.

THOMAS LEMBERG, 400 Big Leaf Walk (The Magnolia’s @ Eagles Landing) – Requested a Home
Occupation for a Building Design and Construction Company. Mr. Lemberg explained that he would be doing
interior design. His father is an architect based out of his own home and he designs on the computer through
auto-pad.

Mr. Simmons asked Mr. Lemberg where he gets his customers? Mr. Lemberg responded that most are from
word-of-mouth and they meet at the customer’s office. He is into interior designs and not the construction
end of the business.

Fred Evans made a motion to approve; Fletcher Turner seconded, and passed unanimously.

MICHAEL GALVIN – 147 Windsong Drive (Windsong Plantation) – Requesting a home occupation license
to operated a Real Estate Investment. Mr. Galvin purchases investment properties for people who want to
invest in real estate. He does no advertising and gets his customers through word-of-mouth. No customers
come to his house. Mr. Simmons pointed out that he must comply with Homeowners Association rules.
Fred Evans made a motion to approve; Harold Cochran seconded, and motion carried.

RUSSELL W. JENKINS – 511 Kettletoft Court (Glenn Addy) – Requested a home occupation license to
operate a Janitorial Service. Mr. Jenkins explained that he and his partners plan to open a light industrial
janitorial service and they would be using his residence as a storage place for chemical and equipment.
There would be no signs on his residence and no vehicles for the business will be parked in the street.

Councilman Simmons stated that the Council cannot accept the storage of commercial materials, particularly
chemicals in a residential area and they must find an off-site location. An office could be considered but not
the storage of chemical or equipment.

Mr. Jenkins explained that the chemicals would be light industrial cleaning chemicals such as what everyone
uses in their home. Mr. Simmons responded that the question remains that vehicles will be coming in and
out of the subdivision unloading supplies and that is not natural to a residential area.

Bruce Vail pointed out that other janitorial service companies have sought licenses to operate out of their
homes. The have indicated that they intend to use their homes only for office purposes. The janitorial
materials they are using are stored off-site for example in a customer building. They have not come before
the Council requesting to store materials at their homes.

Mr. Jenkins said that within his contract that customers will provide storage facilities for equipment and
cleaning supplies to be used to be stored on site. If a future customer does not wish for his equipment and
cleaning supplies to be stored on their premises he would have to make arrangement elsewhere. If the
Council will not allow him to store supplies at his home, he will make arrangements to get an off-site building.

Mr. Simmons said it would be a better arrangement to store off premises and if the City receives complaints
regarding deliveries being made at his residence, the City would have to take appropriate action.

Mr. Jenkins restated his purpose regarding his home occupation license. He stated that he will only operate
an office from his home and any supplies that cannot be stored on the customer’s site will be stored
elsewhere. His partners live in the same subdivision and they will use the same vehicle so there will be no
additional traffic in the subdivision.
Fletcher Turner made a motion to approve; Fred Evans seconded and passed unanimously.

CAROLYN SKINNER, 121 LAMBERT STREET, complained about a noise nuisance she is having. She has
done everything possible to stop the noise at Chasers Bar and Grill on Rock Quarry Road. Mrs. Skinner
alleges she has had twenty (20) people to come to her because the noise is so loud. The police have written
tickets and they were dismissed because they didn’t have a decimal meter. She stated that under the
provision of ordinance ll.26.030 a decimal meter reading is not required for the noise nuisance law. Also, the
cars are parked up and down Rock Quarry Road can’t be given a parking ticket because someone has to be
in the car for them to be given a parking ticket and asked to move although there are “no parking” signs on
the street.

Mrs. Skinner stated that everyone says she needs to come before the Council to get this problem resolved.
The noise is so bad that my children were making straight A’s last year and since they have moved to Lambert
Street their grades have dropped to C’s, D’s and F’s. Mrs. Skinner stated that if she can’t sleep, she is sure
her kids can’t sleep. It’s not the music; it’s the boom, boom from the base drum. She can hear the booming
from Chaser’s over the trains.

Mrs. Skinner said she understands that Chaser’s has insulated the outside of the building and added
additional doors but that didn’t help. She calls Chaser’s and asked them to turn the music down. At times,
you can’t hear the band but the DJ comes on and you can hear him after 12:00 at night.

Ronnie Simmons noted that it’s been a couple of years since the Council has received a complaint. Ted
Strickland advised that he has talked with Mrs. Skinner about a month ago when she began to have problems.
The owner and employees have been advised of the complaint. The owner has been trying to co-operate to
get the noise level down. They have spent thousands of dollars to try to remedy the problem.

Councilman Evans lives in the neighborhood and he recently has not heard the music from Chaser’s but he
did hear it about five (5) years ago.

Ted Strickland noted that the street has been posted “no parking” for several year. Ronnie Simmons said
the City would contact the Police Department and have tickets issued if cars are parked along Rock Quarry
Road.

Councilman Simmons told Mrs. Skinner that the Council would take this under serious consideration. He
asked Ted Strickland and Fred Evans to investigate this matter. The owners are checking various ways to
get the music under control. Councilman Simmons said it was strange that no one from the apartments has
not called the City to complain. Mrs. Skinner stated that they call her and complain.

Mrs. Skinner said the police told her it is political and there is nothing she can do about the noise. She said
finally, the police wrote a citation and they were supposed to go to Court on December 13, 2001 but like she
said the tickets have been dismissed. Ted Strickland corrected Mr. Skinner and informed the Council that
the citations have not been dismissed and will be heard on December 13 as scheduled.

Ronnie Simmons thanked Mrs. Skinner for bringing this matter before the Council and the Council will monitor
the situation.

AFFIDAVIT RENEWAL FOR ALCOHOL LICENSE. Ronnie Simmons informed the Council that a number
of businesses have not filed their affidavit for renewal of their alcohol license. Bruce Vail suggested the City
contact each business individually by phone to remind them to return their Affidavit for Renewal.

EXECUTIVE SESSION

Fred Evans made a motion to go into Executive Session to discuss acquisition of real estate; W. A. Gardner
seconded, and motion carried.

W. A. Gardner made a motion to reconvene; Fred Evans seconded, and motion carried.

There being no additional business Fred Evans made a motion to adjourn; Harold Cochran seconded, and
motion carried. Meeting adjourned 7:50 P. M.

Respectfully submitted,

Merle Manders, CMD Ronnie
R. Simmons
City Clerk
Interim Mayor Pro Tem
