Category: City Council

STOCKBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL Mayor At–Large Work Session Meeting Agenda July 28, 2026 6:00 PM Jayden L. Williams Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander Council District 5 Councilmember LaKeisha Gantt Council District 1 Councilmember Antwan Cloud Council District 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. Council District 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber Council District 4 CITY MANAGER Stockbridge City Hall Shawn Edmondson 4640 N. Henry Blvd. INTERIM CITY CLERK Stockbridge, GA 30281 Cassandra Lester CITY TREASURER Frank Milazi CITY ATTORNEY Quinton G. Washington Website: www.stockbridgega.org Phone: 770-389-7900 Fax: 770-389-7912 Translation and Interpretation Services are available with (7) days prior notice. Please contact the City’s Human Resource Manager at 770-389-7908 for assistance. AGENDA WORK SESSION MEETING CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2026 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA REVIEW OF THE MINUTES 1 Review Work Session Minutes Dated July 01, 2026 2 Review Council Meeting Minutes Dated July 13, 2026 3 Review Special Called Meeting Minutes Dated July 17, 2026 PUBLIC COMMENTS - All persons wishing to speak for public comment must sign in with the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the meeting. You must sign your name, address, and phone number. You will be able to address the Mayor and Council for three (3) minutes. Speakers must respect all members of the elected body, officials, and staff. Defamation, unruliness and/or swearing will not be tolerated while meetings are in session. CEREMONIAL: Swearing-In of Planning Commission Member Mills Johnson DISCUSSION ITEM 4 Council consideration to name the ballroom inside the Merle Manders Conference Center the "Cie Cie McGhee Ballroom," honoring our former events manager and Women in Radio Hall of Fame member. - Presented by: Quinton Washington NEW BUSINESS 5 Request For Proposals (RFP) No. 2026-00074: City of Stockbridge Comprehensive Residential Waste Collection & Disposal Services. Start date of the contact will be February 1, 2027. - Presented by: Decius Aaron Page | 3 6 Council Consideration to approve the purchase of an Elgin Regen X Street Sweeper under a Georgia statewide contract with Environmental Products Group (EPG). - Presented by: Decius Aaron 7 Hillcrest Street Stormwater Project: Council Consideration to approve Professional Pipeline to replace the culvert and stabilize the slope on Hillcrest Street near the intersection of Bowen Street Council Consideration to approve Professional Pipeline to replace the culvert and stabilize the slope on Hillcrest Street near the intersection of Bowen Street. - Presented by: Decius Aaron 8 Council Consideration for approval of 2026 Budget Amendment - Presented by: Frank Milazi 9 Council Consideration to approve the Walt Stephens Trail Project Service Agreement: Council Consideration to approve the Walt Stephens Trail Project Service Agreement. The PATH Design Team (PATH) will provide full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1mile, ten (10) foot wide, concrete multi-use trail along Walt Stephens Road. - Presented by: 10 Contract Approval For On-Call Professional Planning Services With T.S.W. Design: Council consideration of a resolution authorizing the approval of an oncall professional planning services contract with TSW Design to provide planning, zoning, redevelopment, transportation, housing, and related planning services on an as-needed basis for the City of Stockbridge. The contract will enable the City to efficiently obtain specialized planning expertise through task orders to support current and future planning initiatives. - Presented by: Ryan Anderson 11 Request Council for consideration of moving our Financial System into Cloud Based - Presented by: Frank Milazi MAYOR'S COMMENTS (Mayor Jayden Williams) EXECUTIVE SESSION (Exemptions to the Georgia Open Meetings Acts) ANNOUNCEMENTS OF UPCOMING MEETINGS & EVENTS City Council Meetings are held on the second Monday of each month, and Work Sessions are held the last Tuesday of the month at the Stockbridge City Hall - City Council Chamber. Meeting times and dates may change. Please visit www.stockbridgega.org for updates. The City of Stockbridge adheres to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you need auxiliary services to July 28, 2026 6:00 PM 4640 N. Henry Stockbridge, GA 30281 Phone: (770) 389-7900 Page | 4 participate in the meetings, please contact City Hall at 770-389-7900 in advance. ADJOURNMENT July 28, 2026 6:00 PM 4640 N. Henry Stockbridge, GA 30281 Phone: (770) 389-7900 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JULY 1ST, 2026 6:00 P.M. Mayor & City Council Mayor Jayden L. Willams At-Large Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander – Council District 5 Councilmember LaKeisha Gantt – Council District 1 Councilmember Antwan Cloud – Council District 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. – Council District 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber – Council District 4 Administration Shawn Edmondson – City Manager Frank Milazi – City Treasurer Cassandra Lester – Interim City Clerk Quinton Washington – City Attorney Megan McCullough – Associate Attorney Mission: To provide visionary leadership and superior municipal services that enhance the quality of life for citizens while creating a welcoming business atmosphere focused on sustainability and expansion of tourism and cultural events. Call to Order The Work Session Meeting of the Stockbridge City Council was called to order by Mayor Jayden L. Williams at 6:02 PM. Invocation The invocation was delivered by Mayor Williams and was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call Interim Clerk Lester called the roll. A quorum was established. Councilmember Gantt arrived at approximately 6:03 PM. Councilmember Berry arrived at approximately 6:08pm Adoption of the Agenda Mayor Williams called for a motion to adopt the agenda. Councilmember Barber asked to remove the following item from the consent agenda for discussion. 1|Page # 3: CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE TAD EXPANSION: SEEKING COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR A RESOLUTION TO EXPAND THE TAD MAP TO INCLUDE LARGE COMMERCIAL PARCELS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREAS THAT WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TAX ALLOCATION DISTRICT Motion to adopt the agenda as amended by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 4-0. Review of the Minutes Review the June 8th City Council Summary Minutes – No Action. Public Comments One Public Comment: Kathy Walker of 200 Hunting Court. Ms. Walker expressed concerns about recent construction where grading resulted in the removal of mature trees. She emphasized that young replacement trees cannot adequately replace this lost natural buffer. Walker voiced her disappointment when Councilwoman Yolanda Barber’s requests to bring this issue back for public discussion were ignored by the council. She commended Elton Alexander for his recent town hall. Ms. Walker highlighted a sewer smell noticed in the community. She reports that she was told came from the developer letting their license expire. She continued that meetings intended to address these concerns were canceled which raises serious questions about communication, oversight, transparency, and responsiveness from city officials. Presentation CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE TAD APPLICATION: SEEKING COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR A RESOLUTION TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO THE HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR COMMITMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE TAX ALLOCATION DISTRICT #1 Economic Development Director William Smith presented an overview of Tax Allocation District #1 and the process by which the City of Stockbridge would submit a formal application to the Henry County Board of Education requesting their commitment to participate in the district. Council and staff discussed the background of the TAD, with Smith clarifying that a TAD is not a built-in tax increase. Rather, as property values within the designated area increase, the incremental tax revenue generated above the established base value is captured and reinvested into the redevelopment area to fund improvements and attract capital. After the presentation the discussion moved into expanding the Tax Allocation District map to include large commercial parcels in the redevelopment areas that were not included in the Tax Allocation District #1. Continued discussion touched on the legal framework underpinning the TAD expansion. It was noted that once a redevelopment area is formally established under state law, the city gains redevelopment powers, including the authority to create a TAD, but only 2|Page within that designated area. The expansion resolution would bring in large commercial parcels that were not captured in the original TAD #1 boundary. Mr. Smith clarified “Before we present anything to the Board of Education, we wanted to expand the TAD within that boundary to give it maximum impact, the application that we put together that will go to the Board of Education, it does include those parcels. But we did not want to send the application until we have permission and consent from you all about what you want to afford – so making sure that having all those parcels included is something you want to afford.” Motion to approve the TAD application made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexader; Seconded by Councilmember Gantt. The motion passed 4-1. Councilmember Barber opposed. CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE TAD EXPANSION: SEEKING COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR A RESOLUTION TO EXPAND THE TAD MAP TO INCLUDE LARGE COMMERCIAL PARCELS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREAS THAT WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE TAX ALLOCATION DISTRICT #1 This item was discussed in the above presentation. New Business TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2026-03. (CITYWIDE) CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 9, CHAPTER 9.09 OF THE STOCKBRIDGE MUNICODE TO ALLOW VARIOUS CHANGES TO BE MADE FOR LICENSING AND REGULATION Business Services Manager Uneeda Smith-Sellars presented the proposed text amendment and explained that the revisions were intended to strengthen enforcement of occupational tax and business licensing requirements by establishing a graduated penalty structure for businesses that fail to comply with City regulations. Council discussed the effectiveness of the existing fee schedule and whether the current penalties provided sufficient incentive for businesses to comply. It was noted that some businesses have found it more economical to pay repeated fines than to obtain or renew the required business license, thereby undermining the City's enforcement efforts. Staff clarified that when a Code Compliance Officer issues a citation, the matter proceeds to Municipal Court where the judge has discretion to enforce the ordinance and may grant additional time for compliance. Staff further explained that courts generally rely upon the penalty schedule established by ordinance and that a clearly defined tiered fine structure would provide greater consistency in enforcement. Councilmembers discussed implementing escalating fines rather than imposing the same penalty for repeated violations. Members expressed concern that maintaining a flat $300 penalty for each offense failed to deter continued noncompliance. Staff recommended adopting a graduated penalty schedule that would increase with each subsequent violation while remaining within the limits authorized under Georgia law. 3|Page During discussion, staff advised that municipal ordinance penalties are subject to statutory limitations and recommended establishing a maximum administrative penalty of $1,800, after which the business license would be subject to revocation. Staff further recommended authorizing the City Manager to revoke a business license upon reaching the maximum penalty threshold, with reinstatement requiring approval by the City Council after exhaustion of the administrative and judicial enforcement processes. Following discussion, Council reached consensus that the initial penalty should be increased substantially to encourage prompt compliance and reduce repeat violations. Approved Tiered Fee Schedule Council approved the following graduated penalty schedule for businesses failing to comply with occupational tax and business licensing requirements: Violation Approved Fine First Violation $600 Second Violation (after 30 days) $1,200 Third Violation $1,800 After Third Violation Business License Subject to Suspension/Revocation Under the approved amendment, once the business reaches the maximum penalty of $1,800, the business license becomes subject to suspension or revocation. Reinstatement of the license would require further action by the City Council following the applicable administrative process. Motion to approve the proposed revisions and incorporating the revised graduated fee schedule as follows: • First violation: $600 • Second violation (after 30 days): $1,200 • Third violation: $1,800 • Upon the third unpaid violation, the business license shall become subject to suspension or revocation. Made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; The motion passed unanimously 5-0. 4|Page COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED FLOST DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH HENRY COUNTY AND THE MUNICIPALITIES THEREIN City Attorney Megan McCulloch presented a resolution for Council's consideration approving the proposed Floating Local Option Sales Tax (FLOST) distribution schedule and authorizing the mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement with Henry County and the participating municipalities. She explained that the proposed distribution allocates 13.28% of the municipal share to the City of Stockbridge based on an agreedupon formula utilizing 2004 population data and Georgia Municipal Association guidance, with an adjustment recognizing Hampton's population growth. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander provided additional context regarding the purpose of the legislation established under Senate Bill 33, explaining that the proposed 1% sales tax would be dedicated exclusively to reducing property taxes and would require voter approval during the November referendum. Alexander noted that, if approved by voters, the measure could substantially reduce the City's property tax millage while also providing county property tax relief for residents. He emphasized that the sales tax revenues could only be used for property tax reduction and that implementation would occur only if approved by voters. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander then thanked Henry County officials and the municipalities for collaboratively reaching the proposed distribution agreement. During discussion, Council clarified that the projected FLOST revenue would replace property tax revenue rather than generate additional revenue for the City. Staff further explained that the proposed funding structure would allow visitors and non-residents contributing through sales taxes, including hotel guests and travelers, to help offset local property taxes. Council discussed the anticipated financial benefits to both city and county taxpayers. Motion to approve made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 5-0. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A BLIGHT TAX Community Development Director Ryan Anderson & City Attorney Megan McCulloch presented the proposed Blighted Property Tax Ordinance, explaining that the ordinance is intended to establish a process for identifying and taxing qualifying blighted properties within the City of Stockbridge. The proposal defines blighted property through specific criteria and establishes the legal authority under state law to implement a Community Redevelopment Tax Program. Revenues generated from the tax would be dedicated exclusively to community redevelopment activities. Staff outlined the proposed enforcement process, which includes property identification, inspection, technical review, determination by the appropriate code enforcement officials, notification to the property owner, and formal designation as blighted. 5|Page Once designated, qualifying properties would be subject to a tax rate equal to ten (10) times the City's adopted millage rate, with revenues deposited into a Community Redevelopment Fund. In addition, designated properties would be placed on a public Blighted Property Registry and assessed an annual $1,500 regulatory fee. The City Attorney advised Council that revisions were still being made to merge staff's administrative recommendations with the draft ordinance presented to Council. She recommended postponing action until a second reading to ensure the ordinance was fully refined and consistent. Council expressed strong support for creating stronger enforcement mechanisms to address long-standing blighted properties throughout the city, including vacant commercial buildings, abandoned hotels, stalled construction projects, and neglected residential properties that are not owner-occupied. Councilmembers emphasized the need for an efficient enforcement process that complies with state law while minimizing unnecessary administrative delays. Discussion also included: • Clarification that the ordinance targets non-owner-occupied residential properties, commercial, industrial, and vacant structures, rather than primary residences. • The importance of establishing clear legal definitions of blight to support enforcement. • Concerns that property owners have historically paid existing fines without correcting violations, prompting discussion about whether the tax penalty should be increased beyond the proposed ten-times millage rate. Staff noted that state law permits penalties of up to twenty-five (25) times the adopted millage rate. • An estimated enforcement timeline of approximately 30 to 90 days, depending on property conditions, compliance efforts, and procedural requirements. Following discussion, Council agreed additional revisions were appropriate before adoption. A motion was made and seconded to advance the proposed Blighted Property Tax Ordinance to a second reading following incorporation of staff and legal revisions. Motion to move this to a second reading made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Gantt. The motion passed 5-0. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT AND RETRIEVAL REQUIREMENTS Motion to remove this item from the agenda made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander. The motion passed 3-1-1. Councilmember Cloud Abstained. Councilmember Barber Opposed. 6|Page CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER INTERGOVERNMENTAL MOU FOR OFF-DUTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES AT THE VYSTAR AMPHITHEATER AT THE BRIDGE AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SIMILAR AGREEMENTS WITH HENRY COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES Motion to approve by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed unanimously 5-0. Executive Session Council convened to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing real estate, legal, personnel matters and cybersecurity matters. Motion to adjourn into Executive Session made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 4-0. Motion to end Executive Session was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 5-0. Action from Executive Session None Adjournment Motion to adjourn was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:16 pm. Respectfully submitted by: ______________________________ ______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk Jayden L. Williams, Mayor 7|Page CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MONDAY JULY 13, 2026 6:00 P.M. Mayor & City Council Mayor Jayden L. Willams At-Large Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander – Council District 5 Councilmember LaKeisha Gantt – Council District 1 Councilmember Antwan Cloud – Council District 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. – Council District 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber – Council District 4 Administration Shawn Edmondson – City Manager Frank Milazi – City Treasurer Cassandra Lester – Interim City Clerk Quinton Washington – City Attorney Megan McCullough – Associate Attorney Mission: To provide visionary leadership and superior municipal services that enhance the quality of life for citizens while creating a welcoming business atmosphere focused on sustainability and expansion of tourism and cultural events. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Meeting was called to order at 6:04 PM INVOCATION The invocation led by Councilmember Kyle Berry and The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all. ROLL CALL A quorum was established. Councilmember Gantt arrived at 6:24 pm ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Motion to adopt the agenda was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 4-0. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES June 2, 2026 Henry County BOC Called Joint Meeting with Cities regarding TSPLOST2 Motion to adopt made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 4-0. 1|Page June 8th City Council Summary Minutes Motion to adopt made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander: Seconded Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 4-0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Kathy Walker (200 Hunting Court) raised concerns about the loss of a natural buffer, ongoing construction impacts, and a lack of transparency in city communications, including the unavailability of meeting audio and public access to meeting transcripts. Jontay Holmes (206 Hunting Court) described significant structural disturbance to homes from construction activity and expressed concern about a large mound of excavated dirt behind residences posing a mudslide risk, calling for an approved buffer. Following public comments, Councilmember Barber requested a status update on the Tranquil Trails development from City Attorney or the City Manager. The City Attorney stated she had no information to provide. City Manager Shawn Edmondson reported that the developer was in the process of applying for a permit and is still in the process of doing so. Councilmember Barber inquired whether it was proper for the developer to continue moving dirt without a building permit; the City Manager confirmed that activity was a separate process that they could proceed (moving dirt) prior to the issuance of a building permit. CONSENT AGENDA Council Consideration to appoint a member to the Planning Commission: Mills Johnson was nominated as the District 1 representative to the Planning Commission. Motion to appoint Mills Johnson as the District 1 representative to the Planning Commission was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 4-0. OLD BUSINESS Second read of an ordinance establishing the City of Stockbridge Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive program for Blighted Properties pursuant to Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Georgia Constitution and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12, et. Seq. City Attorney Megan McCulloch presented the second reading of the Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive Program ordinance for blighted properties. The ordinance is designed as a redevelopment tool, applying only to properties meeting defined blight criteria — not broadly to any vacant property. The final version incorporated language from both the City Attorney's draft and staff's proposed version, the latter of which added a voluntary remediation agreement process. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander expressed a preference for a single compliance deadline rather than multiple, emphasizing the need to address long-standing blighted commercial properties along North Henry Boulevard. 2|Page Attorney McCulloch confirmed that a preliminary determination triggers a 45-day cure period through a voluntary remediation agreement, after which non-compliant properties proceed to a final determination and municipal court, where a judge holds authority to impose a tax rate of twenty-five (25) times the standard rate. The ordinance applies to non-owner-occupied residential and commercial properties; primary residences are excluded. Blight Determination Process and Procedures: Initiation of Action: • A determination that a property may be blighted can be initiated by: o Petition from more than five residents (not from the same household), o Resolution by the City Council, o Internal community development department findings. Preliminary Determination: • An inspection and preliminary determination phase occur when the property is assessed. Properties meeting blight criteria enter an initial phase allowing for voluntary remediation. Voluntary Remediation Agreement (Off Ramp): • Property owners may enter into a voluntary remediation agreement with the Community Development Department. This agreement allows property owners to remediate changes within an agreed timeframe. If remediation occurs timely, properties can remain eligible for tax incentives. This voluntary agreement acts as an off ramp early in the process to encourage quick resolution. Final Determination and Legal Enforcement: • If the property owner fails to comply with the remediation within the agreed period (approximately 45 days cure period), the process moves forward. This leads to a final formal determination of blight. The case can then proceed to municipal court for enforcement. The court can impose penalties such as a tax increase of up to twenty-five (25) times the regular tax on blighted properties (focused on nonowner-occupied residential and commercial properties; primary residences are excluded) Mayor Pro Tem Alexander expressed a preference for having only one off ramp in the process to avoid delays. It was recommended to set a date certain by which property owners must be 100% compliant to avoid penalties. Motion to adopt the ordinance as described, with one compliance off-ramp and final determination by a municipal court judge, was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 4-0. REQUEST TO AMEND THE AGENDA: Councilmember Barber requested an amendment to the agenda to include a discussion item. Barber moved to discuss the creation of a program similar to "Code Cares" called 3|Page "Bridge Cares.";Seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion failed 2-0-2. Councilmember Cloud and Mayor Pro Tem Alexander abstained. NEW BUSINESS Scope Of Services Under Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 With Whitley Engineering, Inc. Community Development Director Ryan Anderson presented a proposed scope-ofservice amendment to the existing Whitley Engineering contract to implement a Home Land Disturbance Permit (HLDP) review program. Under this program, each individual unit within a master civil plan would require its own land disturbance permit, in addition to the existing plan-level LDP review, to enhance oversight of erosion and stormwater control. The amendment carries no cost to the city; property owners/developers would pay a $300 fee per unit, of which $200 is retained by the city and $100 is paid to Whitley Engineering for the individual review, not to exceed $25,000 in fees to Whitley Engineering per calendar year. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander requested that the scope of the amendment include a requirement that surrounding property owners be formally notified — by mail, using the same distance requirements as the public hearing process — prior to the issuance of any land disturbance permit no matter how long the permitting process has taken. City Manager Edmondson acknowledged that notification requirements exist in the code, and Anderson confirmed this condition would be incorporated into Whitley Engineering's review process. Councilmember Barber sought clarification on the financial impact, confirming there is no cost to the city. Motion to approve the amended scope of services under Contract No. RFP 20240001 with Whitley Engineering, Inc., including the requirement for surrounding-area notification prior to permit issuance, was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 4-1. Councilmember Barber opposed. MAYOR'S COMMENTS There were no comments. EXECUTIVE SESSION (EXEMPTIONS TO THE GEORGIA OPEN MEETINGS ACT) Council convened to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing real estate, legal, personnel matters and cybersecurity matters. Motion to adjourn into Executive Session made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 5-0. Motion to end Executive Session and return to the meeting was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 50. Mayor Williams was not present. 4|Page Action from Executive Session A motion to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Phlanx Holdings LLC for property located at 101 and 102 Love Street, conditioned upon completion of due diligence and review of existing leases, was made by Councilmember Gantt and seconded by Councilmember Cloud. Discussion: Councilmember Barber asked if there was an appraisal for the property. Attorney McCulloch advised that the governing body will have an opportunity to review the appraisal during the due diligence period, which is about 75 days, and if within that time the city does not want to move forward, all the city is out is the earnest money. She further clarified that the rent rolls and the leases are a part of that due diligence period. Councilmember Barber asked: So, this is gonna have to come back to us once you receive the appraisal? Attorney McCulloch advised that “you will receive the appraisal and a summary of the rest of the due diligence items. And if you would like to see the due diligence items themselves, I'm sure that we can make those available to you.” The motion passed unanimously 5-0. ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Councilmember Berry The motion passed unanimously 5-0 The meeting adjourned at 9:53 pm. Respectfully submitted by: ______________________________ ______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk Jayden L. Williams, Mayor 5|Page SPECIAL CALLED MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES FRIDAY, JULY 17, 2026 6:00 P.M. Mayor & City Council Mayor Jayden L. Willams At-Large Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander – Council District 5 Councilmember LaKeisha Gantt – Council District 1 Councilmember Antwan Cloud – Council District 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. – Council District 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber – Council District 4 Administration Shawn Edmondson – City Manager Frank Milazi – City Treasurer Cassandra Lester – Interim City Clerk Quinton Washington – City Attorney Megan McCullough – Associate Attorney Mission: To provide visionary leadership and superior municipal services that enhance the quality of life for citizens while creating a welcoming business atmosphere focused on sustainability and expansion of tourism and cultural events. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Williams called the Special Called Meeting to order at 6:00 PM. The Mayor led the invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Interim City Clerk Cassandra Lester conducted the roll call. A quorum was established. Councilmember Kyle Berry arrived at 6:14 during executive session. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Motion to adopt the agenda made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Alexander Vote: Approved unanimously 4-0. EXECUTIVE SESSION (Exemptions to the Georgia Open Meetings Act O.C.G.A. § 50-14-1) Mayor Williams requested a motion to go into executive session for litigation, cybersecurity, real estate, and other matters. Motion to convene into executive session for real estate, cyber security, personnel, and litigation made by Councilmember Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Cloud. 1|Pa ge Vote: Approved unanimously 4-0 Before leaving the dais, Councilmember Gantt addressed the public, explaining that this meeting was specifically for an executive session. She clarified that she was uncertain if a vote would take place. Acknowledging the citizens from District 1, she informed them about a community meeting scheduled for August 5th at 6 PM in the City Hall chambers to discuss issues with the developers. She also noted that the citizens would receive a notification about the meeting. The Council entered executive session at 6:02 pm. The Council concluded executive session at 9:15 PM. Motion to end executive session and return to the special called meeting made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Councilmember Berry: Vote: Approved unanimously 5-0. From executive session Mayor Pro Tem Alexander read the following resolution for council consideration: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA TEMPORARILY SUSPENDING CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE PRIVILEGES AND ACCESS OF MAYOR JAYDEN WILLIAMS, PENDING FUTURE ACTION OF COUNCIL; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge ("City") is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia and is charged with protecting the safety, security, and efficient operation of municipal government, including City personnel, facilities, property, information systems, and public resources; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted administrative policies governing physical security, access to non-public municipal facilities, the issuance and use of Cityowned vehicles, purchasing cards, fuel cards, and other City-issued property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain temporary administrative measures are necessary to protect City operations, safeguard City employees, and ensure appropriate stewardship of public resources; and WHEREAS, these temporary measures are administrative in nature, do not constitute a determination regarding the merits of any allegations, and are intended solely to preserve the orderly operation of City government; and 2|Pa ge WHEREAS, nothing in this Resolution shall be construed as removing, suspending, or otherwise altering any elected office or authority granted by the Constitution or laws of the State of Georgia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF PURCHASING AND FUEL CARD PRIVILEGES. Effective immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, all City-issued purchasing card ("P-Card") and fuel card privileges issued to Mayor Jayden Williams are hereby suspended pending further action by the City Council or until otherwise authorized by the City Manager. For any trainings, events, or meetings requiring a purchase, such purchase must be pre-approved by the City Manager or his designee, and paid directly by the City. All purchases and expenses submitted for reimbursement must be processed through the Office of the City Manager, and are subject to approval by the City Manager or his designee until further action by the Council. SECTION 2. SUSPENSION OF USE OF CITY-OWNED VEHICLES. Effective immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, all privileges regarding the use and operation of City-owned vehicles issued to Mayor Jayden Williams are hereby suspended pending further action of the City Council or until otherwise authorized by the City Manager. SECTION 3. SUSPENSION OF ALL INITIATIVES OF THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR. Effective immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, all initiatives of the Office of the Mayor are hereby suspended pending further action of the City Council or until otherwise authorized by the City Manager. SECTION 4. RESTRICTION ON ACCESS TO NON-PUBLIC AREAS. Effective immediately, Mayor Jayden Williams shall not access secured or nonpublic areas of City-owned or City-controlled facilities except: 1. as necessary to attend duly noticed public meetings or official proceedings; 2. with the prior authorization of the City Manager or his or her designee; or 3. as otherwise required by law. Nothing herein restricts access to areas generally open to the public. SECTION 5. RETURN OF CITY PROPERTY. Mayor Jayden Williams shall immediately, but in no instance later than noon, Monday, July 20, 2026, return the following City property to the City Manager,: 1. any City-issued vehicle; 2. all keys, key fobs, access cards, gate transmitters, and other access devices; 3|Pa ge 3. any City-issued fuel cards, purchasing cards, credit cards, or similar payment instruments; and 4. any additional City-owned equipment or property identified by the City Manager. The City Manager shall inventory all returned property and document compliance. If City property is not returned by the deadline established herein, the City Attorney is authorized to pursue any lawful civil or criminal remedies available to the City, including referral of the matter to the appropriate law enforcement agency for investigation of potential unlawful retention or conversion of public property, as may be authorized under applicable Georgia law, including O.C.G.A. § 16-8-4, if warranted by the facts. SECTION 6. COMMUNICATIONS WITH CITY STAFF. To protect City employees and promote orderly municipal operations, any communications by Mayor Jayden Williams directed to City employees shall be coordinated through the City Manager or the City Manager's designee unless otherwise required by law or authorized by the City Manager or City Council. Nothing in this Section prohibits communications occurring during duly noticed public meetings or otherwise required by law. SECTION 7. RESTRICTION ON NON-EMPLOYEE ACCESS. Except as otherwise authorized by the City Manager, no person accompanying Mayor Jayden Williams, who is not a City employee, contractor, or other authorized governmental representative shall be permitted access to secured or non-public areas of City facilities. SECTION 8. PRESERVATION OF LEGAL RIGHTS. Nothing contained in this Resolution: 1. constitutes a finding of misconduct; 2. limits any constitutional, statutory, or charter authority possessed by Mayor Jayden Williams; 3. waives any rights of the City or Mayor Jayden Williams under applicable law; or 4. prejudges the outcome of any pending investigation, hearing, or other proceeding. SECTION 9. ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLEMENTATION. The City Manager, City Attorney, Chief of Police, Human Resources Director, Finance Director, Information Technology Director, and all other appropriate City officials are authorized and directed to take all administrative actions reasonably necessary to implement this Resolution in a manner consistent with applicable law and City policy. 4|Pa ge SECTION 10. DURATION. The restrictions imposed by this Resolution shall remain in effect until the adoption of a subsequent resolution of Council rescinding or modifying these restrictions. SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY. If any part of this resolution is adjudged invalid, such judgment shall not affect the remainder of this resolution. SECTION 12. CITY ATTORNEY’S AUTHORITY. Pursuant to the City's charter and with explicit consent of the City Council, the City Attorney is duly authorized to make requisite amendments to all contracts, ordinances, resolutions, and documents, as may be necessary, in order to secure conformity with the express intent of the City Council and to ensure adherence to all pertinent laws and ordinances of the City. SECTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED THIS 17th OF JULY, 2026. Mayor Pro Tem Alexader made a motion to temporarily suspend the administrative privileges of the Mayor and authorized the city attorney to engage an independent investigator to look into the evidence in the resolution adopted; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. Councilmember Barber commented, "I believe in accountability. I support this. I approve." Vote: Approved unanimously, 5-0. ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn made by Councilmember Berry: Seconded by Councilmember Gantt: Vote: Approved unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:26 pm Respectfully submitted by: ______________________________ ______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk Jayden L. Williams, Mayor 5|Pa ge 07/22/2026 N/A ✔ N/A Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander Governing Body Discussion Item: Naming of the Merle Manders Conference Center's Ballroom Council Consideration to name the Merle Manders Conference Center's ballroom, the "Cie Cie McGhee Ballroom" honoring the city's former events manager and Women in Radio Hall of Fame member. ✔ N/A N/A Discussion item. PROJECT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA, AND THE PATH FOUNDATION, INC., FOR TRAIL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT: WALT STEPHENS TRAIL THIS PROJECT AGREEMENT (“PSA”) is made and entered into this ______ day of __________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA (“City”) and PATH FOUNDATION, INC. ("PATH"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City entered into a Master Agreement with PATH (as at any time modified or amended, the “Master Agreement”) to establish the framework within which the City and PATH will proceed to implement specific projects related to the design and management of a trail network within the City; and WHEREAS, the Master Agreement provides that the parties will work together to determine the terms and conditions for specific projects for the trail network, each to be memorialized in a project agreement (each a “Project Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the parties have identified the project described in Exhibit A attached hereto (“Project”) as a specific project under the Master Agreement and desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions to govern the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally found hereby, agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS; PROJECT DESCRIPTION Terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Master Agreement. The Project and scope of work are described in Exhibit A attached hereto. 3. TERM; TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by providing thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Upon termination, PATH shall be compensated for all services rendered and costs incurred up to the effective termination date, provided such costs are reasonable and properly documented. The City shall not be liable for any anticipated profits, unperformed services, or other consequential damages beyond the termination date. This Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue in effect until the date on which the Project covered by this Agreement has been completed and all obligations of the parties hereunder have been discharged. Subject to any local, state or federal law that may limit its term, this Agreement shall automatically renew upon the same terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement for four (4) one-year terms unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall terminate upon expiration of the term of the Master Agreement (or its earlier termination in accordance with its terms), unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. 4. BUDGET; PAYMENT TERMS The proposed budget and sources of funding for the design and management of the Project are described in Exhibit B attached hereto. Payment terms for the Project are as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. 5. DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS POINT OF CONTACT PATH shall provide the City with an updated primary point of contact each year for the duration of this Agreement. This designated individual shall be responsible for coordinating all communications, approvals, and reporting between PATH and the City. PATH shall notify the City in writing of any changes to the designated contact within ten (10) business days of such change. A. Documentation. PATH will send documentation of the status of the Project in the form and frequency requested by the City Representative. Such documentation shall indicate the progress of specific activities on the Project schedule. B. Records/Audit. PATH will maintain records and accounts in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of completion of the Project. The City Representative shall have the right to examine and copy the records and accounts at all reasonable times, with reasonable advance notification. The City reserves the right to audit such records and accounts at any time during the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and ending 365 days after completion of the Project. 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The preliminary schedule for the Project is described in Exhibit D attached hereto. As adjustments in the Project schedule become necessary, the City and PATH shall cooperate in developing a revision to the Project schedule and amending this Agreement. 7. SUCCESSORS/ASSIGNS; NO ASSIGNMENT/DELEGATION; NO PERSONAL LIABILITY This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that no party shall be authorized to delegate performance of any of its duties hereunder to any other person or entity, nor shall either party assign any of its rights or remedies under this Agreement to any person or entity, which restriction on assignments and delegations shall apply to those occurring by operation of law, as well as by contract, merger, or consolidation. Any assignment or delegation in breach of this Agreement shall be void. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any elected officials, officers, directors, employees, or agents of the City or PATH, nor shall it be construed as giving any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than the parties to this Agreement. 8. GOVERNING LAW/VENUE The City shall have the final authority over project approvals, changes, and completion determinations. PATH shall comply with all directives issued by the City regarding project management and execution. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been made and performed in City of Stockbridge, Georgia. For the purpose of venue, all suits or cause of action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in the courts of Henry County, Georgia. 9. AMENDMENTS; NOTICES This Agreement may be modified or amended by the parties in writing. Written notice by one party to the other shall be sent as provided in the Master Agreement. 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement and the Master Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and no representation (oral or written) not incorporated herein or therein shall be binding on the parties. 11. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall continue to be valid and enforceable. 12. TIME OF ESSENCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in three (3) counterparts (each to be considered as an original but all taken together to constitute one and the same agreement) by their authorized representative, on the day and year first written. PATH FOUNDATION, INC. By: (SEAL) _____________________________________ Signature Greta G. deMayo _______________________ Printed Name Executive Director ______________________ Title Date: July 8, 2026 ________________________ ATTEST: ________________________________ Secretary [SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE] CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA By: ATTEST: _____________________________________ Jayden L. Williams, Mayor Date: _____________________________________ _______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk (SEAL) Approved as to form: ___________________________________________ Quinton G. Washington, City Attorney EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK The PATH Design Team (PATH) will provide full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1-mile, ten-foot wide, concrete multi-use trail along Walt Stephens Road. The project begins at the SE corner of Walt Stephens Rd and Monarch Village Way, crosses Walt Stephens at the existing traffic signal, continues east as a 10’ sidepath with 5’ to 10’ landscape buffer, crosses I-75 via existing road bridge, turns into a private property to tie into the programmed trail by the proposed development on Flippen Road. Figure 1 – Walt Stephens Trail Scope Map TASK 1 – Survey Services: 1a. Topographic/Utility Survey Upon Notice to Proceed, PATH will coordinate with owner and property stakeholders to send out notification via letters. The project surveyor will conduct a topographic/utility survey of the project areas. The surveying services will be performed to meet the standards for surveying trail corridors. Specific scope of services includes: • Boundary line verification – research, locate property monumentation, and perform property analysis of approximately forty-one (41) parcels of land for subject project corridor, including research of right-of-way plans. • topography (2’ contours) within the trail alignment locating substantial visible improvements • stormwater structures top and inverts • locate visible or marked utilities • locate trees 10” in diameter and larger within survey corridor. • streets, sidewalks, and intersections • existing cut-ins for driveways • • • • • • buildings including accessory buildings, small structures retaining walls, privacy and security fences all site elements for the scope area crossing Interstate 75, the project survey will locate the improvements along the top of bridge only, and will not collect field data below the bridge. coordination and checking underground utility designating (SUE Level B) 1b. Easement Plats and Legal Descriptions Upon acceptance of the Design Development document (60%) and the easement graphics, the project surveyor will prepare easement plats and legal descriptions for acquiring necessary permanent easements and temporary construction easements. One (1) temporary easement and one (1) permanent easement plat and legal description are anticipated for the parcel below: Map Key # Address Parcel ID Owner 1 4251 Walt Stephens Rd 031-02007002 MENG TRUST Task 1 Deliverables: • • • AutoCAD/Civil 3D File Stamped survey file in pdf format Two (2) legal descriptions with exhibit maps (PDF) TASK 2 – 30% Schematic Design: Project Kick-off: Upon receiving the project survey, PATH will conduct a virtual project kickoff meeting with PATH’s Design Team and City of Stockbridge to review project scope and schedules, discuss important deliverables and design milestones, and address any project concerns. Recurring Project Meetings: PATH will meet monthly with PATH’s Design Team and City of Stockbridge as needed during an anticipated 13-month design duration. Property Stakeholders Coordination: PATH will coordinate with the City PM to conduct several meetings at design milestones with the private property stakeholder to ensure clear communication of the proposed design. Meetings will be held virtually at the end of schematic design (30% CDs) to collect property stakeholders’ feedback, and at the end of design development (60% CDs) for their agreement to the required easement acquisition to complete real estate acquisition. PATH design team will assist with all meeting materials needed, including PowerPoint presentation(s) and digital/hard copies of design document(s). Easement Plats and Legal Descriptions will be produced based on agreed 60% design and easement graphics. See task 1b. 30% Schematic Design: Utilizing the survey file, PATH will create schematic design drawings including proposed alignment, rough grading, length and location of structures if any, and any amenity areas. PATH shall prepare 30% Schematic Design Documents as described below: • Composite Map • 30% Alignment Construction Plans • 30% Plan View and Section Graphics • 30% Cost Estimate PATH will hold a design review meeting followed by a site meeting as needed with property owners and City of Stockbridge to collect feedback on the schematic design document. Task 2 Deliverables: • A 30% CDs submission will be made for review comments, as digital PDF • Plan view and typical section graphics (.pdf) • Preliminary easement graphics • 30% Design Cost Estimate • PATH/City of Stockbridge Team Meeting – biweekly meetings and unlimited number of electronic messaging (i.e. web conference/ conference call) Task 3 - 60% Design Development During 60% Design Development, PATH will conduct on-going coordination with City of Stockbridge and submit progress reports as requested. Each report will include task accomplishments, status of deliverables, and expected upcoming activities. PATH will participate in continued monthly project implementation meetings as requested to discuss key issues or opportunities that arise to keep the project on schedule and within budget. Based on the acceptance of the 30% Schematic Design documents and the agreed cost estimate, PATH shall prepare 60% Design Development Documents for the project. The documents will further refine and articulate the project elements established in 30% design drawings and address all comments received from the 30% Design Submittal. 3a. Civil Engineering & Hydrological Analysis: PATH design team will prepare construction documents to adhere to the City of Stockbridge policy for stormwater management for public facilities, the department of public works requirements. This trail project falls into the category as a linear transportation project being constructed by the City of Stockbridge, therefore, the stormwater infeasibility report will be submitted to obtain the infeasibility determination by the administrator. 3b. Structural Engineering: PATH design team will provide design and detail for a series of retaining walls on the side of the proposed trail. The proposed retaining walls are assumed to be concrete walls possibly supported by helical piles, to be determined with geotechnical report. The PATH design team will coordinate with GDOT bridge office to obtain any as-built drawings for the existing Walt Stephens Road bridge over I-75. Assuming the drawings are available, the project structural engineer will provide calculations and details for a new jersey barrier and trail slab on the bridge. Miscellaneous details for maintaining drainage, expansion joints, etc. are assumed. The calculations will be limited to comparing the new loading with the original bridge design capacities. A full re-analysis of the bridge is not anticipated as necessary therefore is excluded in this proposal. 3c. Geotechnical Services: Based on site assessment, six (6) SPT borings are proposed; two for each estimated wall section. The borings will be extended depths of 15 to 20 feet below existing grades or refusal on rock, whichever is shallower. The borings will characterize the soil composition and relative density, as well as the depth of potential unsuitable soils, partially weathered to competent rock or groundwater. The drilling operations will be supervised by our field engineer, who will maintain logs of boring. The boring logs will indicate the depth, classification, relative density or consistency of the soils encountered, depth to rock or groundwater and any unusual subsurface conditions noted. Following the field exploration, an engineering report will be prepared outlining the findings of the exploration. The allowable soil bearing pressure of the existing soils and the recommended foundation type and bearing depth will be provided based on the findings of the borings. The recommended lateral earth pressures and coefficient of friction values for the design of the proposed retaining wall structures will be provided. The presence of potentially unsuitable soils which could require undercutting or excavation and replacement or recommendations for deep foundations for the retaining wall foundations will also be discussed. 60% Construction Document Submittal: PATH Design Team shall prepare 60% Construction Documents as described below: • Project Cover Sheet/ Index/ General Notes • Composite Map • Existing Conditions • Tree Removal and Replacement Plan • Typical Sections • Construction Plans (Layout and Grading) • Construction Details for all trail related work within the scope of the project • Stormwater Pipe Design and Profiles • Structural Plans and Details • Signing and Marking Plans – includes trail signature using the Stockbridge trail sign standard • Landscape Plans • Erosion, Sedimentation and Pollution Control Plans with a NPDES Comprehensive Monitoring Program (CMP) Task 3 Deliverables: • 60% Design for Construction submission will be made to City of Stockbridge for review comments as digital PDF • 60% Design for Construction Cost Estimate • Geotechnical Report • Calculations for proposed trail and barriers on existing road bridge over I-75 • PATH/City of Stockbridge Team Meeting – monthly meetings and unlimited number of electronic messaging (i.e. web conference/ conference call) TASK 4 – Permit Coordination: As a part of the design for construction process, PATH will submit applications necessary for the project to be approved by City of Stockbridge, GDOT and any other public agencies having jurisdiction during the 60% design for construction phase. The PATH team will meet with the review agencies needed to keep the permitting as concise and timely as possible. 4a. Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) special encroachment permit All encroachments within property owned by the Georgia Department of Transportation will be determined within 60% construction documents to prepare all encroachment applications and documents. All permit applications will be submitted prior to 100% Construction Documents. PATH team will submit/manage GDOT permitting through the Georgia Permit Application System (GPAS) under access permits to generate a permit ID. This design contract specifically excludes the generation of any plans required to go through the Georgia Department of Transportation Plan Development Process, which is a requirement of most federally funded grants. Task 4 Deliverables • PATH shall coordinate with all review comments from City of Stockbridge, GDOT, and any public agencies having jurisdiction of the project and ensure comments are addressed and incorporated into the Issue for Permit Construction Document submittal. TASK 5 – 100% Construction Documents: PATH will address all agency and stakeholders’ comments to create the 100% Construction Documents that will be issued for final approval and stamped by the required agencies and municipal departments. This process is a negotiation with the municipalities to ensure the permitted set of drawings is constructible, value engineered and not burdened with unnecessary comments and expense from the permitting authorities. Task 5 Deliverables • PATH shall create the 100% Construction Documents/Permit Set as per any final review comments to finalize all permitting required for the project • 100% Cost Estimate TASK 6 – Bid Assistance: PATH Design Team will assist the City of Stockbridge with the bidding process, providing a bid item list, description of the scope of work for the City’s advertisement purposes, attending one (1) pre-bid meeting, responding to RFIs during the bidding process, and preparing addenda as appropriate. PATH will assist City of Stockbridge in evaluating the contractor’s submitted bidding documents and will provide a recommendation for the City’s consideration. TASK 7 – Contract Administration: PATH will provide construction administration throughout the anticipated 12-month construction timeframe on an hourly rate basis. PATH Design Team will provide construction administration for this project. Tasks include: • Attending one (1) pre-construction meeting • Prepare Notice of Intent (NOI) for NPDES permit prior to construction • Provide 7-day letter as needed • Coordination with Contractor and Utility Companies • Attending site meetings and preparing supplemental drawings as needed • Responding to RFIs during construction phase • Review and approval of submittals • Review and approval of Contractor’s pay applications • Review of Contractor’s change orders as needed. • Coordinate and conduct final inspection and prepare final punch item list • • Prepare Notice of Termination (NOT) to end NPDES permit coverage for construction sites once final stabilization is achieved. Process project’s close out documents. TASK 8 – Construction Management PATH will provide construction management services and assign a PATH PM to the project to work alongside City of Stockbridge and lead the project through design, engineering, permitting and construction. These services will bring PATH’s knowledge and expertise building trails throughout the southeast to the project. The PATH PM will provide hands-on assistance to manage the project schedule, cost and quality. The goals of the PATH PM will be to reduce overall project costs, assist with contract negotiations, reduce change orders, and eliminate unnecessary scope and costs. The industry standard value for construction management services is 6% of the construction cost but is provided with no cost to the City of Stockbridge within this scope of services. Scope Exclusions: The following services are not included under this Agreement, and will be furnished by others or their agent, as noted: • 25’ State Stream Buffer encroachment application with EPD • Architectural design or site work associated with proposed facilities (i.e. architectural renderings, sketches, elevations, footings/ foundations, etc.) • As-built surveys or construction staking • Easement acquisition fee • Electrical or mechanical engineering • Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) • Flood Study and No-rise Certificate • Improvements to any existing public rights-of-way or utilities that may be additional requirements by the city that have not been identified elsewhere in this scope and would not exclusively serve the development • Sanitary sewer and/or water distribution system design • Services associated with variances, waivers, modifications and/or any relief from local, state or federal regulations • Services related to air, solid waste, and/or hazardous waste permits • Services related to noise abatement or endangered species • Services related to rezoning or annexation of property • Services requiring FEMA approvals such as CLOMAR; A LOMAR and ASBUILT survey • Soft-surface Trail Design • Structural engineering and geotechnical services • Traffic engineering, signal design, or traffic studies and/or signal warrants • Variance or Special Use Permits for the development • Water collections for water quality samples or submittals to NPDES for water quality monitoring reports • Wetland delineation and Army Corps permitting for disturbance within jurisdictional wetlands • WFIs and BFIs EXHIBIT B BUDGET Proposed budget and sources of funding for full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1-mile, ten-foot wide, concrete multi-use trail project know as “Walt Stephens Trail”. The project begins at the SE corner of Walt Stephens Rd and Monarch Village Way, crosses Walt Stephens at the existing traffic signal, continues east as a 10’ sidepath with 5’ to 10’ landscape buffer, crosses I-75 via existing road bridge, turns into a private property to tie into the programmed trail by the proposed development on Flippen Road. Acquisition P&E Construction Management Construction Total Budget for Project: Budget Cost $ TBD $ 216,835.00 $ *346,440.00 $ 2,783,165.00 $ 3,346,440.00 Funding from Transportation Enhancement (GDOT) $ Funding from Recreational Trails (GDNR) $ Funding from City of Stockbridge (SPLOST) $ 3,000,000.00 Other City of Stockbridge Funding $ 0.00 Funding from PATH Foundation (in-kind) $ * 346,440.00 TOTAL $ 3,346,440.00 *PATH will provide construction management services at no cost to the City (valued at 6% of construction costs). EXHIBIT C PAYMENT TERMS PATH has agreed to construction management services, as described in Exhibit A, at no cost to the City; provided however, PATH shall be entitled to reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs expended for this Project that have been pre-approved by the City, as may be invoiced in accordance with the provisions of Article III of the Master Agreement. EXHIBIT D PROJECT SCHEDULE* TASK/SERVICE TIMELINE Complete Survey Month 1 - 2 30% Design Month 3 - 4 Geotech Investigation, Property Stakeholder Review Coordination Month 5 - 6 60% Design and Permitting Submittal Month 7 - 9 Permitting Coordination Month 10 Finalize Permitting, 100% Construction Documents Month 11 - 13 Advertise for Bid, Award Construction Contract, Issue NTP Month 14 - 16 *This indicates a general outline of the Project schedule and is subject to change by the parties. July 28, 2026 ✔ ✔ ✔ Decius T. Aaron Public Works Council Consideration to approve the Walt Stephens Trail Project Service Agreement in the amount of $216,835.00. The funding source is from TSPLOST account number 335-42200-541447. The PATH Design Team (PATH) will provide full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1-mile, ten (10) foot wide, concrete multi-use trail along Walt Stephens Road. ✔ $216,835.00 ✔ The project begins at the SE corner of Walt Stephens Rd and Monarch Village Way, crosses Walt Stephens at the existing traffic signal, continues east as a ten (10) foot side path with five (5) to ten (10) foot landscape buffer, crosses I75 via existing road bridge, turns into a private property to tie into the programmed trail by the proposed development on Flippen Road. Public Works recommends approval. July 28, 2026 ✔ ✔ Decius T. Aaron Public Works Council Consideration to approve the purchase of an Elgin Regen X Street Sweeper under Georgia statewide contract number 99999-001-SPD0000177-0009 with Environmental Products Group (EPG) in the amount of $353,700.00. Funding source is from account number 510-42500-542500 (Equipment) in the Stormwater FY 2026 budget. The City currently has 2 streetsweepers in its fleet. The life cycle of a streetsweeper is 5-7 years. One streetsweeper was purchased in FY 2017 and the other was purchased in FY 2022. ✔ $353,700.00 ✔ Regular sweeping prevents leaves, trash, and sediment from clogging storm drains. This mitigates localized flooding during heavy rains and ensures our compliance with our MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) permit by keeping pollutants out of our waterways. Keeping our roadways and gutters clear reduces vehicular hazards caused by slick debris. Routine cleaning also supports civic pride by reducing litter and blowing dust, significantly improving the overall quality of life for our residents. Public Works recommends approval. CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Revenue Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND CURRENT BUDGET 100-00000-311200 REAL PROP-PRIOR YEAR 300.00 100-00000-311500 INTANGIBLE RECORDING TAX 150,000.00 100-00000-311600 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER 60,000.00 100-00000-311710 FRANCHISE TAX-ELECTRIC 2,500,000.00 100-00000-311715 FRANCHISE TAX - EMC 0.00 100-00000-311720 FRANCHISE TAX-COLLEGE PK. 8,000.00 100-00000-311730 FRANCHISE TAX-GAS 180,000.00 100-00000-311750 FRANCHISE TAX-TELV CABLE 150,000.00 100-00000-311760 FRANCHISE TAX-TELEPHONE 20,000.00 100-00000-311790 FRANCHISE TAX-OTHER 500.00 100-00000-313100 LOCAL OPTION SALES/USE TX 10,000,000.00 100-00000-313110 HCTC - AVT TAX 800,000.00 100-00000-314201 BEER TAX 350,000.00 100-00000-314202 LIQUOR TAX-PACKAGE SALES 350,000.00 100-00000-314203 WINE TAX 180,000.00 100-00000-314204 CONSUMPTION TAX - LIQUOR 150,000.00 100-00000-316100 OCCUPATIONAL TAX 2,000,000.00 100-00000-316112 GA MUNICIPAL LICENSE FEE 60,000.00 100-00000-316113 MISC BUSINESS TAX 5,000.00 100-00000-316150 OCCUPATIONAL TAX ADMIN. 100,000.00 100-00000-316200 INSURANCE PREMIUM TAX 3,500,000.00 100-00000-316300 Financial Institution Taxes 130,000.00 100-00000-318000 CITY PROPERTY TAX 7,400,000.00 100-00000-318001 CITY MOBILE HOME TAX 7,500.00 100-00000-318002 CITY PROPERTY TAX N.O.D. 125.00 100-00000-318003 MOBILE HOME PENALTY 170.00 100-00000-319110 PEN & INT-REAL PROP 25,000.00 100-00000-319111 FORECLOSED/VACANT-REG FEE 2,000.00 100-00000-319902 PENALTY/INTEREST STREET LIGHTS 0.00 100-00000-321110 OT ALCOHOLIC BEV-BEER 75,000.00 100-00000-321120 OT ALCOHOLIC BEV-WINE 70,000.00 100-00000-321130 OT ALCOHOLIC BEV-LIQUOR 70,000.00 100-00000-321140 ALCOHOLIC BEV-SPEC. EVENT 200,000.00 100-00000-321200 OT REGULATORY FEE 25,000.00 100-00000-321500 SIGN PERMIT FEE 0.00 100-00000-322200 COMM - BUILDING PERMIT 60,000.00 100-00000-322201 BSD - MECH, ELEC, PLUMBING PERMIT FEES - COMMER25.00 100-00000-322203 BSD - OTHER PERMIT FEES - COMMERCIAL 500,000.00 100-00000-322204 RES - BUILDING PERMIT 500,000.00 100-00000-322205 BSD - MECH,ELEC,PLUMBING - PERMIT FEES RESIDENT. 160.00 100-00000-322207 BSD - OTHER PERMIT FEES RESIDENTIAL 1,000.00 100-00000-322215 ZONING VERIFICATION FEES 6,000.00 100-00000-322800 RESUBMITTAL FEE 0.00 100-00000-322990 FILM REVENUE 1,000.00 100-00000-323100 OCCUPATIONAL TAX PENALTY 45,000.00 100-00000-323101 LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT 60,000.00 100-00000-323902 MAINTENANCE BOND FEE 210.00 100-00000-323904 PERFORMANCE BOND FEE 1,000.00 100-00000-324210 PENALTY FEES 6,000.00 100-00000-334313 GRANTS - MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 100-00000-334317 BULLETPROOF VEST GRANT 0.00 100-00000-341300 COMMUNITY DEV ADMIN FEE 20,000.00 100-00000-341301 BSD - PLAN CHECK FEES - RESIDENTIAL 25,000.00 100-00000-341302 P&Z ZONING 85,000.00 100-00000-341304 P&Z ADMIN 5,000.00 100-00000-341305 PZ - REZONING APP FEE - DRI 200.00 100-00000-341306 PZ - ZONING CERTIFICATION FEE 100.00 100-00000-341400 PRINTING & DUPLICAT SRVCS 2,000.00 100-00000-341910 OTHER-ELECTION QUAL FEE 4,500.00 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 72,313.04 38,334.35 0.09 1,437.95 6,733.83 121,142.96 67,538.82 4,354.20 164.39 3,837,819.89 380,480.03 154,536.14 117,443.90 79,244.35 104,930.60 1,525,356.33 43,638.10 22,350.75 82,832.91 0.00 136,663.65 470,918.49 7,906.49 192.87 160.28 25,233.11 1,400.00 575.75 67,350.00 65,100.00 190,000.00 4,324.05 23,775.00 180.00 255,833.88 0.00 0.00 454,367.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 300.00 112,051.40 88,605.00 0.00 0.00 950.00 340.67 4,418.00 37,850.00 0.00 103,964.30 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 386.80 0.00 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 300.00 150,000.00 60,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,500.00 8,000.00 180,000.00 150,000.00 20,000.00 500.00 10,000,000.00 800,000.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 180,000.00 150,000.00 2,000,000.00 60,000.00 5,000.00 100,000.00 3,500,000.00 145,000.00 7,000,000.00 8,200.00 300.00 300.00 2,700.00 2,000.00 600.00 75,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 200,000.00 25,000.00 180.00 300,000.00 25.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 160.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 11,500.00 90,000.00 210.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 400.00 0.00 40,000.00 25,000.00 105,000.00 5,000.00 200.00 100.00 2,000.00 4,500.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 100-00000-342120 100-00000-342201 100-00000-342202 100-00000-342203 100-00000-342204 100-00000-342900 100-00000-342902 100-00000-342903 100-00000-343400 100-00000-343410 100-00000-349300 100-00000-349400 100-00000-351140 100-00000-351909 100-00000-361000 100-00000-381000 100-00000-381100 100-00000-381200 100-00000-381300 100-00000-383000 100-00000-389006 100-00000-389008 100-00000-389011 100-00000-389012 100-00000-389013 100-00000-389014 100-00000-389015 100-00000-389017 100-00000-389019 100-00000-389022 100-00000-389025 100-00000-389026 100-00000-389030 100-00000-389031 100-00000-389034 100-00000-389038 100-00000-391100 100-00000-391560 100-00000-392200 REPORTS - POLICE DEPT FIRE FEES FIRE - CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FIRE - INSPECTION FEES FIRE - OTHER FEES AND CHARGES OTHER SERVICE FEES HIDTA REIMBURSEMENT POLICE VEHICLE STIPEND RIGHT OF WAY STREET LIGHTS BAD CHECK FEES OPENEDGE MERCHANT FEE FINES & FORFEITURES MISCELLANEOUS COURT INTEREST REVENUES RENTS & ROYALTIES SPRINT COM - RENT PARK PAVILION RENTAL T-MOBILE TOWER LEASE INS.REIM.DAM./STOLEN PROP JULY 4TH EVENT SPONSORSHIP VOLUNTEER GALA SPONSORSHIP Misc Revenue YOUTH COUNCIL FUNDRAISER CITY EVENTS REVENUE BRIDGEFEST SPONSORSHIP TASTY TUESDAY/FOOD TRUCK SPONSORSHIP RESTITUTION,DAMAGE TO COS VETERAN'S DAY SPONSORSHIP MEMORIAL DAY MARCH SPONSORSHIP COMMUNITY DONATIONS - POLICE DISTRICT 1 SPONSORSHIP MISCELLANEOUS DISTRICT 5 SPONSORSHIP JUNETEENTH EVENT SPONSORSHIP MAIN STREET/ECONOMIC DEV SPONSORS OPERATING TRANSFER IN TRANSFER IN COMMUNITY CENTER PROPERTY SALE 20,000.00 90,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 220.00 10,500.00 0.00 6,000.00 2,500.00 15,000.00 125.00 7,500.00 1,400,000.00 0.00 450,000.00 0.00 53,000.00 80,000.00 15,250.00 1,150.00 0.00 0.00 2,003.00 120.00 6,700.00 9,300.00 5,980.00 212.00 3,000.00 500.00 12,400.00 50.00 25,000.00 6,000.00 5,200.00 300.00 5,238,390.00 8,500.00 500,000.00 37,880,690.00 15,633.95 73,462.20 0.00 (135.00) 0.00 0.00 12,308.71 1,500.00 2,540.00 15,692.41 175.00 0.00 664,051.18 855.00 316,691.83 4,500.00 0.00 30,285.00 57,094.10 11,172.10 8,700.00 500.00 (96.78) 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 1,300.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 3,250.00 0.00 (19,499.22) 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 58,578.71 (4,150.15) 0.00 9,977,908.66 20,000.00 90,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 220.00 10,500.00 13,000.00 6,000.00 2,600.00 16,000.00 200.00 7,500.00 1,400,000.00 1,000.00 450,000.00 4,500.00 53,000.00 80,000.00 58,000.00 12,000.00 8,700.00 500.00 2,003.00 120.00 6,700.00 9,300.00 5,980.00 212.00 3,000.00 500.00 12,400.00 50.00 10,000.00 6,000.00 1,500.00 300.00 5,809,030.00 0.00 0.00 37,880,690.00 Expenses GOVERNING BODY 100-11000-531700 100-11100-511100 100-11100-511120 100-11100-511121 100-11100-511300 100-11100-512100 100-11100-512110 100-11100-512111 100-11100-512200 100-11100-512400 100-11100-512851 100-11100-521101 100-11100-521210 100-11100-521217 100-11100-521222 100-11100-521240 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE REGULAR EMPLOYEE SALARIES MAYOR COUNCIL OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION HRA DEDUCTIBLE OFFICIAL/ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTING,ANNUAL AUDIT LEGAL IT TOTAL TECH APPRAISALS CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 135,345.00 24,000.00 100,000.00 2,500.00 107,828.00 985.00 1,000.00 3,798.00 34,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 291.37 65,406.86 11,200.02 50,000.10 1,728.20 59,651.14 1,178.97 337.62 1,854.88 23,506.44 0.00 14,242.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 291.00 135,345.00 24,000.00 100,000.00 2,500.00 107,828.00 985.00 1,000.00 3,798.00 34,000.00 4,000.00 14,243.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 100-11100-521301 100-11100-522210 100-11100-522220 100-11100-523231 100-11100-523235 100-11100-523242 100-11100-523243 100-11100-523244 100-11100-523247 100-11100-523248 100-11100-523249 100-11100-523310 100-11100-523400 100-11100-523500 100-11100-523501 100-11100-523502 100-11100-523503 100-11100-523504 100-11100-523505 100-11100-523506 100-11100-523507 100-11100-523600 100-11100-523601 100-11100-523602 100-11100-523603 100-11100-523604 100-11100-523605 100-11100-523606 100-11100-523700 100-11100-523702 100-11100-523703 100-11100-523704 100-11100-523705 100-11100-523706 100-11100-523707 100-11100-523911 100-11100-523912 100-11100-523913 100-11100-523914 100-11100-523915 100-11100-523916 100-11100-531130 100-11100-531700 100-11100-531701 100-11100-531747 100-11100-531750 100-11100-531751 100-11100-531752 100-11100-531753 100-11100-531754 100-11100-531755 100-11100-531756 CODIFICATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAINTENANCE & CLEANING CELL PHONES VERIZON WIRELESS CELL PHONES MAYOR CELL PHONES DISTRICT 5 CELL PHONES DISTRICT 3 CELL PHONES DISTRICT 1 CELL PHONES DISTRICT 4 CELL PHONES DISTRICT 2 PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL AUTO EXPENSE TRAVEL MAYOR TRAVEL DISTRICT 5 TRAVEL DISTRICT 3 TRAVEL DISTRICT 1 TRAVEL DISTRICT 4 TRAVEL DISTRICT 2 DUES & FEES DUES & FEES MAYOR DUES & FEES DISTRICT 5 DUES & FEES DISTRICT 3 DUES & FEES DISTRICT 1 DUES & FEES DISTRICT 4 DUES & FEES DISTRICT 2 EDUCATION & TRAINING EDUCATION & TRAINING MAYOR EDUCATION & TRAINING DISTRICT 5 EDUCATION & TRAINING DISTRICT 3 EDUCATION & TRAINING DISTRICT 1 EDUCATION & TRAINING DISTRICT 4 EDUCATION & TRAINING DISTRICT 2 COUNCIL INITIATIVES MAYOR COUNCIL INITIATIVES DISTRICT 5 COUNCIL INITIATIVES DISTRICT 3 COUNCIL INITIATIVES DISTRICT 1 COUNCIL INTIATIVES DISTRICT 4 COUNCIL INITIATIVES DISTRICT 2 OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE CIVIC EVENTS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS MAYOR UNIFORMS DISTRICT 5 UNIFORMS DISTRICT 3 UNIFORMS DISTRICT 1 UNIFORMS DISTRICT 4 UNIFORMS DISTRICT 2 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 24,000.00 100,000.00 2,500.00 7,758.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 2,000.00 5,700.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 5,400.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 400.00 300.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 779,214.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 866.08 1,678.00 0.00 8,343.92 4,515.19 4,801.17 4,717.08 567.00 4,333.92 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (4,240.00) 5,171.02 1,890.00 15.00 275.00 905.00 2,197.76 5,744.77 1,550.13 3,219.72 1,321.92 3,704.13 443.13 768.16 2,632.90 2,637.38 1,583.50 0.00 249.54 1,006.85 204.00 189.98 0.00 299.80 292,990.35 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 24,000.00 85,757.00 2,500.00 3,518.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,100.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 9,655.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100.00 2,000.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 6,240.00 5,700.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 5,745.00 5,000.00 4,393.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 2,709.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 400.00 300.00 1,007.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 779,214.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 CITY CLERK 100-11300-511100 100-11300-511200 100-11300-511300 100-11300-512100 100-11300-512101 100-11300-512110 100-11300-512111 100-11300-512200 100-11300-512400 100-11300-512600 100-11300-512800 100-11300-512851 100-11300-521301 100-11300-523231 100-11300-523310 100-11300-523400 100-11300-523500 100-11300-523600 100-11300-523700 100-11300-523850 100-11300-523940 100-11300-531110 100-11300-531120 100-11300-531130 100-11300-531132 100-11300-531140 100-11300-531600 100-11300-531701 100-11300-531725 100-11300-531747 100-11300-531748 100-11300-531750 100-11300-542400 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL FEES GRP INS GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROG. HRA DEDUCTIBLE CODIFICATION CELL PHONES PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING PERSONNEL SERVICE POSTAGE COMPUTER EXPENSE ELECTION EXPENSE OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMITTEE EXPENSE SUPPLIES & MATERIALS SMALL EQUIPMENT - NON CAPITAL HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE PROMOTIONAL ITEMS MUNICIPAL DINNERS YOUTH COUNCIL UNIFORMS COMPUTER SOFTWARE CURRENT BUDGET 241,960.00 68,563.00 0.00 37,265.00 1,500.00 730.00 1,000.00 3,508.00 32,000.00 500.00 500.00 9,000.00 32,000.00 500.00 25,000.00 2,500.00 6,000.00 3,000.00 6,500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 16,846.00 5,000.00 8,000.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 3,700.00 10,500.00 29,400.00 800.00 6,000.00 560,772.00 YTD ACTIVITY 96,635.64 30,081.27 37.50 13,468.95 0.00 115.23 86.58 1,388.47 22,123.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,673.34 0.00 250.00 473.84 870.00 451.84 1,581.65 0.00 17.03 0.00 2,715.50 869.63 0.00 193.14 23.00 1,140.72 0.00 0.00 9,475.85 302.10 1,188.00 193,162.96 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 241,960.00 68,563.00 100.00 37,265.00 1,500.00 730.00 1,000.00 3,508.00 32,000.00 500.00 500.00 8,900.00 32,000.00 500.00 25,000.00 2,500.00 6,000.00 3,000.00 6,500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 16,846.00 5,000.00 8,000.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 3,700.00 10,500.00 29,400.00 800.00 6,000.00 560,772.00 EXECUTIVE 100-13000-511100 100-13000-512100 100-13000-512110 100-13000-512111 100-13000-512200 100-13000-512400 100-13000-512401 100-13000-512600 100-13000-512850 100-13000-521201 100-13000-523400 100-13000-523500 100-13000-523600 100-13000-523700 100-13000-523940 100-13000-531130 100-13000-531140 100-13000-531700 100-13000-531701 100-13000-531750 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE HRA REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE UNIFORMS CURRENT BUDGET 616,722.00 45,522.00 529.00 1,000.00 8,950.00 50,000.00 21,200.00 3,000.00 12,000.00 80,500.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 8,000.00 10,000.00 100.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 11,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 911,523.00 YTD ACTIVITY 258,768.20 38,839.78 1,638.90 225.72 3,707.95 34,568.28 10,991.39 0.00 0.00 57,983.65 473.84 18,926.64 2,315.90 2,910.50 51.49 2,819.24 462.01 12,233.60 6,039.49 1,735.62 454,692.20 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 616,722.00 45,522.00 1,729.00 1,000.00 8,950.00 50,000.00 21,200.00 3,000.00 10,800.00 80,500.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 8,000.00 10,000.00 100.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 12,234.00 7,000.00 5,766.00 911,523.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 FINANCE 100-15100-511100 100-15100-512100 100-15100-512101 100-15100-512110 100-15100-512111 100-15100-512200 100-15100-512400 100-15100-512600 100-15100-512700 100-15100-512800 100-15100-512851 100-15100-521100 100-15100-521210 100-15100-521223 100-15100-522210 100-15100-522320 100-15100-523110 100-15100-523400 100-15100-523500 100-15100-523600 100-15100-523700 100-15100-523850 100-15100-523851 100-15100-523855 100-15100-523901 100-15100-523905 100-15100-523940 100-15100-531130 100-15100-531140 100-15100-531700 100-15100-531701 100-15100-531750 100-15100-541406 100-15100-542300 100-15100-542400 100-15100-542500 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL FEES GRP INS GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WORKER'S COMPENSATION EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROG. HRA DEDUCTIBLE CONSULTANT FEES ACCOUNTING,ANNUAL AUDIT PAYROLL FEES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE INSURANCE GEN. LIABILITY PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING PERSONNEL SERVICE FINANCE INTERN CONTRACT SERVICES BANK CHARGES COLLECTION FEE HENRY COUNTY POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE UNIFORMS STORM WATER/PROPERTY TAX FURNITURE & FIXTURES COMPUTER SOFTWARE EQUIPMENT CURRENT BUDGET 868,940.00 144,098.00 3,000.00 1,878.00 1,250.00 14,339.00 66,000.00 5,300.00 292,600.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 65,000.00 100,000.00 33,000.00 65,000.00 500.00 680,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 6,000.00 15,000.00 70,000.00 7,000.00 120,000.00 35,000.00 8,000.00 2,500.00 5,332.00 5,668.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 20,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 2,696,405.00 YTD ACTIVITY 419,433.87 71,965.66 1,593.00 2,584.11 519.82 6,005.29 45,630.12 0.00 229,745.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 86,000.00 12,424.60 0.00 0.00 266,489.31 1,010.07 10,261.79 1,649.30 4,796.00 43,725.00 0.00 73,100.00 44,063.75 7,572.91 289.92 4,388.03 1,206.60 57.87 4,902.33 693.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,779.08 1,344,886.66 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 868,940.00 144,098.00 3,000.00 2,628.00 1,250.00 14,339.00 66,000.00 5,300.00 292,600.00 2,000.00 19,250.00 65,000.00 100,000.00 33,000.00 46,300.00 500.00 680,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 6,000.00 15,000.00 70,000.00 7,000.00 120,000.00 44,064.00 8,000.00 2,500.00 5,332.00 5,668.00 1,000.00 4,903.00 1,000.00 20,000.00 1,000.00 18,700.00 4,033.00 2,696,405.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 NON-DEPARTMENTAL CURRENT BUDGET 100-15110-521100 CONSULTANT FEES 80,000.00 100-15110-521217 LEGAL 500,000.00 100-15110-521218 LEGAL, OTHER 200,000.00 100-15110-521335 SHREDING 2,000.00 100-15110-522250 AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR (ADMIN. VEHICLES) 3,000.00 100-15110-522320 RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE 7,000.00 100-15110-523600 DUES & FEES (GMA DUES) 30,000.00 100-15110-523945 WEBSITE 30,000.00 100-15110-523946 SEE CLICK FIX SOFTWARE 3,000.00 100-15110-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS (CITY HALL) 12,000.00 100-15110-541100 LAND ACQUISITION 3,000,000.00 100-15110-542402 AGENDA SOFTWARE 20,000.00 100-15110-542403 CITY-WIDE DIGITAL SOFTWARE CONVERSION 25,000.00 100-15110-542526 OPENGOV 50,000.00 100-15110-561000 NON-DEPARTMENTAL DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 0.00 100-15110-571000 ABATEMENT PROGRAM 15,000.00 100-15110-579000 CONTINGENCIES 202,428.00 4,179,428.00 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 170,462.50 12,677.22 2,280.53 1,302.29 1,361.70 12,375.82 30,000.00 2,533.18 4,469.91 10,000.00 8,542.78 5,641.65 0.00 (24,192.00) 0.00 0.00 237,455.58 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 80,000.00 500,000.00 200,000.00 2,281.00 3,000.00 7,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 3,000.00 11,719.00 3,000,000.00 20,000.00 25,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 202,428.00 4,179,428.00 BUSINESS SERVICES 100-15160-511100 REGULAR SALARIES 100-15160-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 100-15160-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 100-15160-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 100-15160-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 100-15160-512400 PENSION 100-15160-512700 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 100-15160-512851 HRA DEDUCTIBLE 100-15160-521201 PROFESSIONAL FEES 100-15160-522341 COPIER RENTAL 100-15160-523400 PRINTING & BINDING 100-15160-523500 TRAVEL 100-15160-523600 DUES & FEES 100-15160-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 100-15160-523940 POSTAGE 100-15160-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 100-15160-531600 SMALL EQUIPMENT - NON CAPITAL 100-15160-531750 UNIFORMS YTD ACTIVITY 90,339.12 24,546.48 1,212.90 154.15 1,252.95 8,950.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 536.82 1,358.62 0.00 410.00 1,283.06 1,509.80 0.00 0.00 131,554.34 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 193,128.00 24,561.00 1,287.00 405.00 2,590.00 12,946.00 1,618.00 3,100.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 3,500.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 7,000.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 2,000.00 275,635.00 CURRENT BUDGET 193,128.00 22,761.00 187.00 405.00 2,590.00 12,946.00 1,618.00 6,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 3,500.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 7,000.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 2,000.00 275,635.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CURRENT BUDGET 100-15350-511100 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES 244,178.00 100-15350-511300 OVERTIME 1,000.00 100-15350-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 58,140.00 100-15350-512101 FEES GRP INS 1,500.00 100-15350-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 567.00 100-15350-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 3,000.00 100-15350-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 3,555.00 100-15350-512400 PENSION 30,000.00 100-15350-512600 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1,500.00 100-15350-512700 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6,000.00 100-15350-512800 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROG. 30,000.00 100-15350-512851 HRA DEDUCTIBLE 6,000.00 100-15350-521213 IT SERVICES FOR FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION 30,000.00 100-15350-521216 IT SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS 20,000.00 100-15350-521217 IT SERVICES FOR GOV OS 6,000.00 100-15350-521222 IT TOTAL TECH 25,000.00 100-15350-521351 IT SERVICES (CONTRACTED) 55,000.00 100-15350-521352 IT SERVICES FOR PHONE SYSTEM 250,000.00 100-15350-521353 IT SERVICES FOR INTERNET SERVICES 30,000.00 100-15350-522210 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 10,000.00 100-15350-522340 AT&T CLUB SERVICE 40,000.00 100-15350-522341 COPIER RENTAL 50,000.00 100-15350-523245 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 20,000.00 100-15350-523500 TRAVEL 21,000.00 100-15350-523600 DUES & FEES 1,500.00 100-15350-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 3,450.00 100-15350-523851 INTERN HELP 3,500.00 100-15350-531110 COMPUTER EXPENSE 350,000.00 100-15350-531130 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,000.00 100-15350-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 10,500.00 100-15350-531142 HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP 2,500.00 100-15350-531750 UNIFORMS 750.00 100-15350-541400 COMPUTER NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 100,000.00 100-15350-542400 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 200,000.00 100-15350-542500 EQUIPMENT 50,000.00 1,667,640.00 YTD ACTIVITY 90,510.58 7.91 23,715.20 0.00 688.04 72.90 1,279.96 20,740.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,297.66 6,122.70 33,600.00 167,898.34 2,906.40 0.00 0.00 18,301.62 642.79 288.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 35,416.87 0.00 3,378.47 0.00 626.48 52,715.54 79,826.97 49,042.90 593,580.31 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 244,178.00 1,000.00 58,140.00 1,500.00 767.00 3,000.00 3,555.00 30,000.00 1,500.00 6,000.00 30,000.00 5,800.00 30,000.00 20,000.00 6,000.00 25,000.00 55,000.00 250,000.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 40,000.00 50,000.00 20,000.00 21,000.00 1,500.00 3,450.00 3,500.00 350,000.00 3,000.00 10,500.00 2,500.00 750.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 50,000.00 1,667,640.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 HUMAN RESOURCES 100-15400-511100 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES 100-15400-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 100-15400-512101 FEES GRP INS 100-15400-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 100-15400-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 100-15400-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 100-15400-512400 PENSION 100-15400-512600 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 100-15400-512700 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 100-15400-512800 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROG. 100-15400-512851 HRA DEDUCTIBLE 100-15400-521100 CONSULTANT FEES 100-15400-521222 PAYROLL SOFTWARE 100-15400-522210 MAINTENANCE AGEEMENTS 100-15400-522320 RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE 100-15400-523110 INSURANCE GEN. LIABILITY 100-15400-523300 ADVERTISING 100-15400-523400 PRINTING & BINDING 100-15400-523500 TRAVEL 100-15400-523600 DUES & FEES 100-15400-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 100-15400-523708 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 100-15400-523850 PERSONNEL SERVICE 100-15400-523851 INTERN HELP 100-15400-523855 CONTRACT SERVICES 100-15400-523930 DRUG TESTING, VACCINES 100-15400-523937 HEALTH & WELLNESS 100-15400-523940 POSTAGE 100-15400-531130 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-15400-531700 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 100-15400-531701 HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE 100-15400-531750 UNIFORM CURRENT BUDGET 246,172.00 24,844.00 0.00 448.00 1,334.00 3,570.00 30,667.00 1,600.00 37,200.00 0.00 6,000.00 24,000.00 30,000.00 500.00 6,000.00 220,000.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 3,000.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 300.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 7,000.00 300.00 874,435.00 YTD ACTIVITY 149,162.26 29,066.40 3,724.00 3,978.06 146.68 1,704.99 21,202.14 0.00 36,300.89 7,500.00 0.00 3,800.00 7,834.35 0.00 2,960.40 204,488.89 0.00 810.52 1,650.72 360.00 2,549.00 5,961.35 121.50 7,127.75 0.00 8,226.00 35,608.25 3,375.45 560.21 5,334.58 7,325.71 0.00 550,880.10 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 242,641.00 29,067.00 3,725.00 3,979.00 1,334.00 3,570.00 30,667.00 1,600.00 37,200.00 7,500.00 1,777.00 24,000.00 18,775.00 500.00 6,000.00 220,000.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 46,624.00 3,000.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 3,676.00 2,000.00 5,674.00 7,326.00 300.00 874,435.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CURRENT BUDGET 100-15650-511100 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES 215,712.00 100-15650-511300 OVERTIME 25,000.00 100-15650-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 40,000.00 100-15650-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 1,500.00 100-15650-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 1,000.00 100-15650-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 3,491.00 100-15650-512400 PENSION 3,000.00 100-15650-512851 HRA, DEDUCTIBLE 6,000.00 100-15650-521200 PROFESSIONAL FEES 5,000.00 100-15650-521230 ENGINEERING FEES 4,000.00 100-15650-522210 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 50,000.00 100-15650-522219 LANDSCAPING 330,000.00 100-15650-522220 MAINTENANCE & CLEANING 34,000.00 100-15650-522230 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 11,000.00 100-15650-522250 AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR 3,500.00 100-15650-522310 Rental of Land and Building 1,200.00 100-15650-522318 FACILITY CLEANING POLICE DEPT 31,000.00 100-15650-522319 FACILITY CLEANING PW ADMIN 12,000.00 100-15650-522320 RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE 0.00 100-15650-522321 FACILITY CLEANING CITY HALL 38,000.00 100-15650-522322 FACILITY CLEANING MMCC 38,000.00 100-15650-522323 FACILITY CLEANING TSCC 8,500.00 100-15650-522324 FACILITY CLEANING MUNICIPAL COURT 15,000.00 100-15650-522325 FACILITY CLEANING MAINTENANCE SHOP 10,000.00 100-15650-522326 FACILITY CLEANING WWTP 9,000.00 100-15650-522333 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS CITY HALL 19,700.00 100-15650-522334 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS MMCC 20,400.00 100-15650-522335 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS TSCC 5,000.00 100-15650-522336 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS MUNICIPAL COURT 6,965.00 100-15650-522337 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS MAINTENANCE SHOP 5,000.00 100-15650-522338 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS WWTP 7,000.00 100-15650-522339 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS PW ADMIN 4,000.00 100-15650-522340 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS POLICE DEPARTMENT 10,000.00 100-15650-523310 PUBLIC NOTICES 200.00 100-15650-523500 TRAVEL 3,000.00 100-15650-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 6,000.00 100-15650-523901 BANK CHARGES 0.00 100-15650-531130 OFFICE SUPPLIES 500.00 100-15650-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 8,000.00 100-15650-531142 HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. 3,500.00 100-15650-531143 SECURITY UPGRADE 85,000.00 100-15650-531224 GA PWR,LIGHTS,CAR CHRG 20,000.00 100-15650-531225 GA PWR,4640 CITY HALL 120,000.00 100-15650-531271 Admin Vehicles 29,600.00 100-15650-531700 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,500.00 100-15650-531720 SIGNS 500.00 100-15650-531740 TIRE EXPENSE 1,000.00 100-15650-531750 UNIFORMS 4,000.00 100-15650-541330 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS CITY HALL 21,300.00 100-15650-542500 Equipment 13,035.00 1,291,103.00 YTD ACTIVITY 98,418.50 540.00 20,992.55 433.68 161.33 1,414.32 2,074.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,580.00 168,661.57 7,043.49 2,894.20 30.86 0.00 12,900.00 3,750.00 657.40 16,050.00 16,050.00 3,900.00 5,400.00 3,750.00 3,900.00 11,778.43 16,395.83 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 551.50 312.50 399.50 0.00 0.00 695.00 65.00 0.00 3,765.18 2,524.89 46,171.52 3,956.22 45,288.68 6,140.85 0.00 100.00 0.00 1,036.01 0.00 0.00 526,783.09 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 215,712.00 25,000.00 40,000.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 3,491.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 5,000.00 4,000.00 50,000.00 330,000.00 34,000.00 11,000.00 3,500.00 1,200.00 31,000.00 12,000.00 658.00 38,000.00 38,000.00 8,500.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 9,000.00 19,700.00 20,400.00 5,000.00 6,965.00 5,000.00 7,000.00 4,000.00 10,000.00 200.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 65.00 500.00 8,000.00 3,500.00 85,000.00 20,000.00 120,000.00 29,600.00 777.00 500.00 1,000.00 4,000.00 21,300.00 13,035.00 1,291,103.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 MUNICIPAL COURT 100-25000-511140 100-25000-511141 100-25000-511142 100-25000-511300 100-25000-512100 100-25000-512110 100-25000-512111 100-25000-512200 100-25000-512400 100-25000-512851 100-25000-521221 100-25000-521225 100-25000-521310 100-25000-521335 100-25000-523310 100-25000-523400 100-25000-523500 100-25000-523600 100-25000-523700 100-25000-523850 100-25000-523851 100-25000-523940 100-25000-531130 100-25000-531140 100-25000-531211 100-25000-531227 100-25000-531701 100-25000-531750 100-25000-541200 100-25000-542300 100-25000-573001 100-25000-573002 100-25000-573003 100-25000-573004 100-25000-573005 100-25000-573006 100-25000-573007 100-25000-573008 100-25000-573009 100-25000-573010 100-25000-573011 100-25000-573020 JUDGE SOLICITOR COURT CLERK & ASSISTANTS OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION HRA, DEDUCTIBLE LEGAL - INDIGENT INTERPRETER COURT SOFTWARE SHREDING PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING PERSONNEL SERVICE INTERN HELP POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS NTRL GAS,4545 MUNI COURT GA PWR,4602 MUNICIPAL CRT HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE UNIFORMS Site Improvements FURNITURE & FIXTURES BRAIN & SPINAL INJURY STATE PROBATION SYS FUND FINES 10% JAIL VICTIMS ASSIST. FUND BOND REFUND GA CRIME VICTIM'S FUND CTY DRUG ABUSE TR AND EDU P. O. A&B FUND P. O. TRAINING FUND INDIGENT DEFENSE FUND DRIVERS ED/TRAINING FUND WITNESS FEES CURRENT BUDGET 65,000.00 30,000.00 240,648.00 2,000.00 105,516.00 830.00 1,000.00 4,460.00 23,000.00 6,000.00 40,000.00 3,000.00 35,000.00 2,000.00 200.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 11,800.00 10,500.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 1,800.00 15,000.00 500.00 750.00 550.00 5,000.00 6,400.00 2,200.00 50,000.00 25,000.00 35,000.00 3,250.00 7,900.00 55,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 916,804.00 YTD ACTIVITY 32,500.02 0.00 114,401.95 1,219.02 24,467.33 1,234.67 146.52 2,130.02 15,901.44 0.00 13,200.00 0.00 16,748.64 589.44 0.00 1,212.18 850.28 250.00 260.00 8,418.68 0.00 385.92 945.96 (2.82) 1,502.38 6,025.06 650.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,850.57 178.13 24,572.83 12,379.45 0.00 182.00 2,803.11 29,276.21 23,739.32 24,757.29 6,784.50 0.00 369,560.87 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 65,000.00 30,000.00 240,648.00 2,000.00 105,516.00 1,280.00 1,000.00 4,460.00 23,000.00 5,550.00 40,000.00 3,000.00 35,000.00 2,000.00 200.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 11,800.00 10,500.00 3,000.00 1,900.00 100.00 1,800.00 15,000.00 651.00 750.00 550.00 5,000.00 6,400.00 2,200.00 50,000.00 25,000.00 34,849.00 3,250.00 7,900.00 55,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 916,804.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 100-32100-511100 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES 100-32100-511200 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 100-32100-511300 OVERTIME 100-32100-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 100-32100-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 100-32100-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 100-32100-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 100-32100-512400 PENSION 100-32100-512851 HRA DEDUCTIBLE 100-32100-521201 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100-32100-521335 SHREDING 100-32100-522200 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 100-32100-522210 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 100-32100-522250 AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR 100-32100-522320 RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE 100-32100-523110 LIABILITY INSURANCE 100-32100-523220 GEORGIA TECHNOLOGY AUTH. 100-32100-523400 PRINTING & BINDING 100-32100-523500 TRAVEL 100-32100-523600 DUES & FEES 100-32100-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 100-32100-523855 CONTRACT SERVICES 100-32100-523929 PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 100-32100-523930 DRUG TESTING, VACCINES 100-32100-523940 POSTAGE 100-32100-531130 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-32100-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 100-32100-531211 NTRL GAS, 4545 MUNI COURT 100-32100-531222 GA POWER ELECTRICITY 100-32100-531270 ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-32100-531600 SMALL EQUIPMENT 100-32100-531606 K-9 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 100-32100-531700 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 100-32100-531701 HOSPITAL/FOOD/BEVERAGE 100-32100-531725 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 100-32100-531750 UNIFORMS 100-32100-531780 COMMUNITY ENAGAGEMENT 100-32100-542300 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 100-32100-542400 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 100-32100-542500 EQUIPMENT 100-32100-573008 P. O. A&B FUND 100-32100-573013 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND CURRENT BUDGET 6,636,440.00 160,000.00 230,000.00 1,525,418.00 19,044.00 7,800.00 125,911.00 111,500.00 20,000.00 6,000.00 3,100.00 7,500.00 1,300.00 180,000.00 2,000.00 15,000.00 50.00 6,100.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 50,000.00 397,000.00 40,000.00 1,300.00 14,000.00 15,000.00 65,000.00 15,500.00 40,000.00 220,000.00 40,000.00 5,000.00 500.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 100,000.00 15,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 7,345.00 10,182,808.00 YTD ACTIVITY 2,517,761.15 71,424.44 244,464.56 779,114.44 29,234.12 4,497.85 40,154.57 77,087.28 2,000.00 5,102.50 1,381.87 1,411.79 0.00 67,830.32 657.96 7,761.52 0.00 2,631.08 14,330.97 6,682.42 22,570.11 251,930.07 10,545.00 1,293.00 1,597.70 5,441.15 28,368.15 4,890.45 4,920.40 114,792.09 5,504.20 3,066.14 0.00 3,480.92 2,368.74 52,382.12 2,771.34 645.93 0.00 8,441.56 6,465.00 7,279.50 4,412,282.41 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 6,536,440.00 145,400.00 244,600.00 1,525,418.00 29,344.00 7,800.00 125,911.00 111,500.00 9,700.00 6,000.00 3,100.00 7,500.00 1,300.00 180,000.00 2,000.00 15,000.00 50.00 6,100.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 50,000.00 397,000.00 40,000.00 1,300.00 14,000.00 15,000.00 65,000.00 15,500.00 40,000.00 320,000.00 40,000.00 5,000.00 500.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 100,000.00 15,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 7,345.00 10,182,808.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 PUBLIC WORKS 100-42200-511100 100-42200-511300 100-42200-512100 100-42200-512110 100-42200-512111 100-42200-512200 100-42200-512400 100-42200-512851 100-42200-521201 100-42200-521230 100-42200-522000 100-42200-522210 100-42200-522220 100-42200-522224 100-42200-522230 100-42200-522241 100-42200-522242 100-42200-522250 100-42200-522253 100-42200-522320 100-42200-523310 100-42200-523400 100-42200-523500 100-42200-523600 100-42200-523700 100-42200-523850 100-42200-523960 100-42200-531130 100-42200-531140 100-42200-531142 100-42200-531145 100-42200-531211 100-42200-531222 100-42200-531233 100-42200-531270 100-42200-531700 100-42200-531710 100-42200-531720 100-42200-531740 100-42200-531750 100-42200-542400 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION HRA, DEDUCTIBLE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING FEES ROW LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAINTENANCE & CLEANING TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPAIRS LMIG S013642-PRC,3 STRTS STREET/TRACK MAIN. & REP. AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR DAMAGE TO CITIZEN VEHICLE RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING PERSONNEL SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT/REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. MOSQUITO SPRAYING NTRL GAS,4545 MUNI COURT GA POWER ELECTRICITY STREET LIGHTS, OUTSIDE ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS SIGNS TIRE EXPENSE UNIFORMS COMPUTER SOFTWARE CURRENT BUDGET 1,600,000.00 50,000.00 479,022.00 4,630.00 4,500.00 23,952.00 300,000.00 40,000.00 67,000.00 5,000.00 380,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 200,000.00 35,000.00 300,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100.00 600.00 7,000.00 1,000.00 20,000.00 58,000.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 28,000.00 20,000.00 1,500.00 9,000.00 40,000.00 900,000.00 65,000.00 2,500.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 7,500.00 20,000.00 35,000.00 4,900,804.00 YTD ACTIVITY 637,090.67 37,523.63 250,943.25 10,547.27 1,351.71 9,617.70 207,409.74 1,098.63 22,821.92 0.00 72,910.57 0.00 0.00 89,667.62 9,548.73 2,848.50 5,608.60 12,251.64 0.00 608.95 0.00 511.36 2,986.95 0.00 1,940.00 5,717.30 0.00 707.87 17,181.26 8,053.88 0.00 1,220.14 98,942.21 398,572.80 33,095.16 2,550.82 0.00 4,551.82 1,917.44 6,388.88 24,266.86 1,980,453.88 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 1,600,000.00 50,000.00 479,022.00 10,630.00 4,500.00 23,952.00 300,000.00 34,000.00 67,000.00 5,000.00 380,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 200,000.00 35,000.00 300,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100.00 600.00 7,000.00 1,000.00 20,000.00 58,000.00 2,500.00 949.00 28,000.00 20,000.00 1,500.00 9,000.00 98,943.00 841,057.00 65,000.00 2,551.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 7,500.00 20,000.00 35,000.00 4,900,804.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 CITY EVENTS 100-61900-511100 100-61900-511300 100-61900-512100 100-61900-512110 100-61900-512111 100-61900-512200 100-61900-512400 100-61900-512600 100-61900-512851 100-61900-523300 100-61900-531701 100-61900-531705 100-61900-531710 100-61900-531720 100-61900-531727 100-61900-531731 100-61900-531732 100-61900-531733 100-61900-531734 100-61900-531736 100-61900-531737 100-61900-531757 100-61900-531758 100-61900-531759 100-61900-531760 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE HRA DEDUCTIBLE ADVERTISING HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE HOLIDAY FEST/TREE LIGHTING CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS SIGNS MEMORIAL DAY MARCH PRETTY IN PINK CAREER FAIRS 9/11 CEREMONY BRIDGEFEST FOOD TRUCKS VETERAN'S DAY PARADE BACK TO SCHOOL JULY 4TH EVENT JUNETEENTH EVENT VOLUNTEER GALA CURRENT BUDGET 548,625.00 10,000.00 118,153.00 1,208.00 0.00 6,598.00 60,000.00 10,000.00 14,000.00 35,000.00 5,000.00 40,000.00 15,000.00 4,500.00 5,000.00 45,000.00 2,000.00 4,500.00 150,000.00 34,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 170,000.00 125,500.00 15,000.00 1,449,584.00 YTD ACTIVITY 253,386.48 14,293.77 83,943.18 3,316.58 482.46 3,759.18 41,481.96 0.00 0.00 29.95 1,420.36 0.00 0.00 767.56 2,894.46 0.00 607.08 1,404.35 23,052.75 13,407.06 14,676.07 3,480.00 53,594.04 118,660.85 16,663.48 651,321.62 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 548,625.00 14,400.00 118,153.00 3,408.00 500.00 6,598.00 60,000.00 5,600.00 11,300.00 35,000.00 5,000.00 40,000.00 15,000.00 4,500.00 3,336.00 45,000.00 2,000.00 4,500.00 150,000.00 34,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 170,000.00 125,500.00 16,664.00 1,449,584.00 PARKS 100-62200-522224 100-62200-522225 100-62200-522230 100-62200-523240 100-62200-531140 100-62200-531142 100-62200-531222 100-62200-531700 100-62200-541209 100-62200-542500 FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE BRIDGE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPAIRS AT&T CLUB SERVICE SUPPLIES & MATERIALS HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. GA POWER ELECTRICITY MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE IMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMENT CURRENT BUDGET 10,000.00 5,000.00 26,000.00 (5,000.00) 16,900.00 4,000.00 180,000.00 200.00 8,100.00 10,000.00 255,200.00 YTD ACTIVITY 1,598.97 0.00 8,954.00 0.00 11,980.50 2,129.00 42,884.81 0.00 8,075.00 0.00 75,622.28 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 10,000.00 5,000.00 26,000.00 (5,000.00) 16,900.00 4,000.00 180,000.00 200.00 8,100.00 10,000.00 255,200.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 PERMITTING 100-72000-511100 100-72000-512100 100-72000-512110 100-72000-512111 100-72000-512200 100-72000-512400 100-72000-521200 100-72000-521203 100-72000-521310 100-72000-522250 100-72000-523400 100-72000-523500 100-72000-523600 100-72000-523700 100-72000-523850 100-72000-523851 100-72000-523940 100-72000-531100 100-72000-531140 100-72000-531270 100-72000-531750 100-72000-542300 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION PROFESSIONAL FEES CONSULTING SERVICES - ENGINEERING SOFTWARE AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING PERSONNEL SERVICES INTERN HELP POSTAGE GEN SUPPLIES & MAT OFFICE SUPPLIES ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL UNIFORMS FURNITURE & FIXTURES PLANNING AND ZONING 100-74100-511100 REGULAR SALARIES 100-74100-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 100-74100-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 100-74100-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 100-74100-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 100-74100-512400 PENSION 100-74100-512600 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 100-74100-512700 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 100-74100-512851 HRA DEDUCTIBLE 100-74100-521150 ZONING BOARD STIPEND 100-74100-521200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100-74100-521300 TECHNICAL SERVICES 100-74100-522250 AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR 100-74100-523300 ADVERTISEMENT 100-74100-523400 PRINTING & BINDING 100-74100-523500 TRAVEL 100-74100-523501 ZONING ADVISORY BOARD TRAVEL 100-74100-523600 DUES & FEES 100-74100-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 100-74100-523701 ZONING ADVISORY BD ED & TRAINING 100-74100-523850 PERSONNEL SERVICES 100-74100-523851 INTERN HELP 100-74100-523940 POSTAGE 100-74100-531100 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 100-74100-531270 ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-74100-531400 BOOKS & PERIODICALS 100-74100-531600 SMALL EQUIPMENT - NON-CAPITAL 100-74100-531701 HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE 100-74100-531750 UNIFORMS 100-74100-542200 VEHICLES 100-74100-542300 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 100-74100-542400 COMPUTER SOFTWARE CURRENT BUDGET 383,624.00 108,930.00 1,782.00 1,000.00 5,025.00 20,000.00 5,000.00 100,000.00 110,000.00 6,700.00 1,500.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 15,000.00 111,300.00 7,500.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 7,000.00 921,361.00 YTD ACTIVITY 192,869.81 49,237.64 2,637.02 304.32 2,781.18 13,827.30 0.00 20,000.00 66,568.00 6,488.31 132.00 1,993.66 298.00 2,622.50 720.00 1,916.00 0.00 99.94 147.28 1,150.11 105.00 0.00 363,898.07 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 383,624.00 108,030.00 2,682.00 1,000.00 5,025.00 20,000.00 5,000.00 100,000.00 110,000.00 6,700.00 1,500.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 15,000.00 111,300.00 7,500.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 7,000.00 921,361.00 CURRENT BUDGET 482,167.00 60,000.00 1,002.00 1,000.00 6,382.00 61,800.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 10,000.00 5,600.00 200,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 55,000.00 2,000.00 1,200.00 8,000.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 200,000.00 (100,000.00) 3,500.00 1,103,651.00 YTD ACTIVITY 214,181.83 24,960.60 1,634.82 224.94 3,014.77 42,726.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 323.00 25,360.85 0.00 0.00 60.60 575.41 647.11 0.00 449.65 1,161.92 837.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,573.18 140.23 0.00 5,265.00 2,560.71 0.00 94,910.00 0.00 0.00 420,608.04 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 482,167.00 59,300.00 1,702.00 1,000.00 6,382.00 61,800.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 10,000.00 5,600.00 200,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 55,000.00 2,000.00 1,200.00 8,000.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 200,000.00 (100,000.00) 3,500.00 1,103,651.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 100-75100-511100 REGULAR SALARIES 100-75100-511300 OVERTIME 100-75100-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 100-75100-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 100-75100-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 100-75100-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 100-75100-512400 PENSION 100-75100-512600 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 100-75100-512851 HRA DEDUCTIBLE 100-75100-521200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100-75100-523400 PRINTING & BINDING 100-75100-523500 TRAVEL 100-75100-523600 DUES & FEES 100-75100-523700 EDUCATION & TRAINING 100-75100-523708 Ed Incentives 100-75100-523851 INTERN HELP 100-75100-523940 POSTAGE 100-75100-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 100-75100-531701 HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE 100-75100-531750 UNIFORMS 100-75100-542400 Computer Software MAIN STREET 100-75500-511100 100-75500-511300 100-75500-512100 100-75500-512110 100-75500-512111 100-75500-512200 100-75500-512400 100-75500-512600 100-75500-512851 100-75500-521200 100-75500-523400 100-75500-523500 100-75500-523520 100-75500-523600 100-75500-523700 100-75500-523720 100-75500-523851 100-75500-523940 100-75500-523945 100-75500-531140 100-75500-531227 100-75500-531701 100-75500-531707 100-75500-531724 100-75500-531725 100-75500-531750 CURRENT BUDGET 278,160.00 0.00 60,932.00 1,121.00 3,000.00 4,033.00 30,900.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 74,000.00 500.00 6,000.00 2,000.00 11,800.00 33,500.00 3,500.00 250.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 250.00 10,200.00 537,646.00 YTD ACTIVITY 98,976.36 307.31 24,316.28 338.44 150.04 1,410.58 21,363.18 0.00 0.00 46,600.75 53.00 548.53 99.00 6,187.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,088.32 227.71 0.00 6,408.00 209,075.25 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 278,160.00 350.00 60,932.00 1,121.00 3,000.00 4,033.00 30,900.00 6,000.00 5,650.00 74,000.00 500.00 6,000.00 2,000.00 11,800.00 33,500.00 3,500.00 250.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 250.00 10,200.00 537,646.00 CURRENT BUDGET REGULAR SALARIES 133,438.00 OVERTIME 1,000.00 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 26,939.00 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 620.00 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 1,000.00 MEDICARE 1.45% 1,935.00 PENSION 20,000.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 600.00 HRA, DEDUCTIBLE 4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL FEES 6,000.00 PRINTING & BINDING 2,000.00 TRAVEL 7,000.00 MAIN STREET BOARD TRAVEL 2,000.00 DUES & FEES 1,300.00 EDUCATION & TRAINING 4,000.00 MAIN STREET BOARD EDUCATION & TRAINING 2,500.00 INTERN HELP 3,500.00 POSTAGE 100.00 WEB SITE 4,000.00 SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 1,000.00 GA PWR, MAIN STREET 0.00 HOSPITALITY/FOOD/BEVERAGE 3,000.00 ENTERTAINMENT 5,000.00 DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION 8,000.00 PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES 1,000.00 Uniforms 1,000.00 240,932.00 YTD ACTIVITY 50,742.12 10.09 10,359.50 303.80 66.60 720.49 13,827.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.48 2,844.10 2,393.82 790.00 2,992.56 0.00 0.00 2.96 2,249.00 15.92 2,705.09 1,428.39 1,864.00 0.00 270.00 0.00 93,811.22 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 133,438.00 1,000.00 26,939.00 620.00 1,000.00 1,935.00 20,000.00 600.00 4,000.00 6,000.00 2,000.00 6,606.00 2,394.00 1,300.00 4,000.00 2,500.00 3,500.00 100.00 4,000.00 1,000.00 2,706.00 3,000.00 5,000.00 5,294.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 240,932.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 GIS 100-75700-511100 100-75700-512100 100-75700-512110 100-75700-512111 100-75700-512200 100-75700-512400 100-75700-512851 100-75700-521200 100-75700-521310 100-75700-523400 100-75700-523500 100-75700-523600 100-75700-523700 100-75700-531140 100-75700-531725 100-75700-531750 OTHER FINANCING 100-90000-611276 100-90000-611300 100-90000-611650 100-90000-612020 100-90000-612040 CURRENT BUDGET 75,404.00 0.00 248.00 1,000.00 1,093.00 6,500.00 2,000.00 15,000.00 19,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 700.00 2,500.00 3,000.00 300.00 4,000.00 135,745.00 YTD ACTIVITY 34,138.70 6,268.90 225.60 39.96 494.48 4,493.88 0.00 0.00 11,386.96 1,532.83 0.00 62.50 690.00 3,461.83 0.00 1,279.50 64,075.14 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 69,004.00 6,400.00 248.00 1,000.00 1,093.00 6,500.00 2,000.00 14,538.00 19,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 700.00 2,500.00 3,462.00 300.00 4,000.00 135,745.00 CURRENT BUDGET TRANSFER GF AND CEMETERY 20,000.00 TRANSFER GF AND SDDA 435,000.00 TRANSFER TO/FROM URA 1,205,000.00 TRANSFER TO/FROM PFA FUND 1,500,000.00 TRANSFER TO/FROM AMPHITHEATER OPERATING 840,000.00 4,000,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 68,332.00 1,074,528.50 1,436,363.75 0.00 2,579,224.25 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 20,000.00 435,000.00 1,205,000.00 1,500,000.00 840,000.00 4,000,000.00 CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 131,591.26 131,591.26 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 0.00 0.00 CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 7,908.52 7,908.52 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 1,482.08 1,494.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 CURRENT BUDGET 937,000.00 937,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 351,724.75 351,724.75 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 937,000.00 937,000.00 0.00 135,000.00 200,000.00 50,000.00 30,000.00 300,000.00 152,000.00 10,000.00 60,000.00 937,000.00 (81.34) 0.00 0.00 6,247.06 10,428.72 1,669.87 491,429.14 394.49 0.00 510,087.94 0.00 135,000.00 200,000.00 50,000.00 30,000.00 300,000.00 152,000.00 10,000.00 60,000.00 937,000.00 REGULAR EMPLOYEE SALARIES GRP INSUR MEDICAL / DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION HRA DEDUCTABLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOFTWARE PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING SUPPLIES & MATERIALS PROMOTIONAL ITEMS UNIFORMS Fund: 210 - CONFISCATED ASSETS FUND Revenue 210-00000-351325 FEDERAL CONFISCATED ASSETS Fund: 211 - PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE FUND Revenue 211-00000-351320 PROPERTY & EVIDENCE FUNDS Expense 211-15100-523901 211-32100-573000 BANK CHARGES PROPERTY & EVIDENCE FUNDS DISBURSEMENT Fund: 212 - REDSPEED FUND Revenue 212-00000-351320 REDSPEED FUNDS Expense 212-32100-522250 212-32100-523855 212-32100-531110 212-32100-531140 212-32100-531750 212-32100-541300 212-32100-542200 212-32100-542300 212-32100-542500 AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR CONTRACT SERVICES COMPUTER EXPENSE SUPPLIES & MATERIALS UNIFORMS BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS VEHICLES FURNITURE & FIXTURES EQUIPMENT CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Fund: 255 - GRANT FUND Revenue CURRENT BUDGET 255-00000-333100 GRANT AWARDS - FEDERAL 0.00 255-00000-334315 GEORGIA OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY (GOHS) 0.00 255-00000-334316 LMIG 0.00 255-00000-334319 COPS HIRING PROGRAM GRANT 1,400,000.00 1,400,000.00 Expense 255-32100-511100 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES 0.00 255-32100-512100 GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL 0.00 255-32100-512110 GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 0.00 255-32100-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 0.00 255-32100-512200 MEDICARE 1.45% 0.00 255-32100-521105 JAG CONSULTANT FEES - MENTAL HLT GRANT 100,000.00 255-32100-521202 GRANTS MATCH 800,000.00 255-32100-523500 TRAVEL 0.00 255-32100-531140 SUPPLIES & MATERIAL 0.00 255-32100-531270 ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL 0.00 255-32100-531750 UNIFORMS 0.00 255-32100-542200 VEHICLES 0.00 255-32100-542500 EQUIPMENT 0.00 255-32100-521100 CONSULTANT FEES 0.00 900,000.00 Fund: 275 - HOTEL/MOTEL TAX Revenue 275-00000-314100 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX Expense 275-15100-523310 275-15100-523600 275-15100-531713 275-15100-531714 275-15100-531717 275-15100-531718 275-15100-531719 275-15100-531720 275-15100-531730 275-15100-531733 275-15100-542500 275-15100-572000 PUBLIC NOTICES DUES & FEES PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES - MAIN STREET PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES - ECO DELVP PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES - MERLE ADVERTISEMENT - MERLE ADVERTISEMENT - TED CITY QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER TOURISM CITY EVENT,MEMORIAL MARCH OTHER - WAYFINDING SIGNAGE H.C. CHAMBER 2% / 3.5% 8/1/2015 Fund: 291 - TAD (Tax Allocation District) Fund Revenue 291-00000-318000 TAD REVENUE YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 18,923.34 289,737.51 200,255.39 508,916.24 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 822,972.00 0.00 0.00 1,400,000.00 2,222,972.00 361,477.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,145.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (72.50) 0.00 0.00 366,550.30 144,240.00 38,409.00 6,327.00 2,593.00 18,633.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 149,508.00 6,000.00 4,845.00 1,202.00 148,215.00 300,000.00 822,972.00 CURRENT BUDGET 424,800.00 424,800.00 YTD ACTIVITY 526,537.40 526,537.40 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 530,000.00 530,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 80,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 300,000.00 424,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 171.96 0.00 181,164.77 181,336.73 800.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 79,800.00 200.00 10,000.00 300,000.00 424,800.00 CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 59,610.86 59,610.86 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 0.00 0.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Fund: 320 - SPLOST V FUND Revenue 320-00000-337500 SPLOST V Expense 320-43300-541108 320-43300-541406 320-43300-541483 320-44200-523849 320-44200-542200 320-62200-521220 320-90000-612020 WATER PROJECTS STORMWATER PROJECTS NEW MAINTENANCE SHOP VEHICLES EQUIPMENT SEWER PROJECT AMPHITHEATER WAYFINDING PROGRAM Fund: 335 - TSPLOST 1 Revenue 335-00000-337500 TSPLOST 1 Expense 335-42200-521200 335-42200-541404 335-42200-541405 335-42200-541409 335-42200-541436 335-42200-541447 335-42500-541436 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 0.00 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 28,907.27 0.00 154,050.00 180,900.00 0.00 559,142.73 77,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 18,600.00 25,700.00 0.00 43,800.85 95,959.73 0.00 184,060.58 28,907.27 18,600.00 154,050.00 137,099.15 43,800.85 540,542.73 77,000.00 1,000,000.00 CURRENT BUDGET 7,200,000.00 7,200,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 3,215,188.05 3,215,188.05 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 7,200,000.00 7,200,000.00 1,101,000.00 200,000.00 3,000,000.00 200,000.00 40,017.72 1,585,769.28 673,213.00 400,000.00 7,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,451,485.51 42,221.00 0.00 144,635.00 0.00 470,850.83 2,109,192.34 1,101,000.00 200,000.00 3,000,000.00 200,000.00 40,017.72 1,514,918.28 673,213.00 470,851.00 7,200,000.00 CURRENT BUDGET 13,200,000.00 13,200,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 3,127,982.25 3,127,982.25 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 13,200,000.00 13,200,000.00 672,555.00 139,750.00 1,937,373.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 327,445.00 7,622,877.00 13,200,000.00 0.00 11,625.00 0.00 12,910.00 2,077,547.00 66,768.42 85,540.00 2,254,390.42 659,645.00 139,750.00 1,937,373.00 12,910.00 2,500,000.00 327,445.00 7,622,877.00 13,200,000.00 CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 1,187.35 1,187.35 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 0.00 0.00 CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 578.71 578.71 6/30/26 AMENDMENT WTP CAPACITY REVIEW WILLOW SPRINGS SEWER PROJECT WWTP IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT LABOR - WATER INFRASTRUCTURE VEHICLES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSFER TO/FROM GENERAL FUND Fund: 321 - SPLOST VI Revenue 321-00000-337500 SPLOST VI Expense 321-15110-541470 321-15110-542515 321-42200-541318 321-42200-542200 321-42200-542500 321-43300-541405 321-61900-541300 321-75100-541500 CURRENT BUDGET 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SIDEWALKS NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT BRIDGE MAINTENANCE ROADS TRAILS ROADS Fund: 340 - CAPITAL PROJECT GRANT FUND - LCI Expense 340-15100-523901 BANK CHARGES Fund: 346 - SPLOST III FUND Expense 346-90000-612004 TRANSFERS SPLOST III/GF 0.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Fund: 350 - URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Revenue 350-00000-391100 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN Expense 350-80000-581300 350-80000-582300 PRINCIPAL-OTHER DEBT INTEREST-OTHER DEBT Fund: 355 - DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Revenue 355-00000-389030 MISC REVENUE Expense 355-15100-521201 355-15100-521220 355-15100-523110 355-15100-523310 355-15100-523400 355-15100-523500 355-15100-523600 355-15100-523700 355-15100-531130 355-15100-531140 355-15100-531700 355-15100-531703 355-15100-541101 355-90000-611355 PROFESSIONAL FEES LEGAL LIABILITY INSURANCE PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING Travel DUES AND FEES Education and Training OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE HOSPITALITY FACADE GRANT OPERATING TRANS OUT Fund: 357 - CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Revenue 357-00000-389030 MISC REVENUE 357-00000-391100 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN Expense 357-15100-521201 357-15100-521220 357-15100-523110 357-15100-523310 357-15100-523400 357-15100-523500 357-15100-523600 357-15100-523700 357-15100-523940 357-15100-531130 357-15100-531140 357-15100-531700 357-15100-531703 357-15100-541101 357-90000-611275 PROFESSIONAL FEES LEGAL LIABILITY INSURANCE PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES AND FEES EDUCATION AND TRAINING POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE HOSPITALITY FACADE GRANT TRANSFER TO/FROM GF CURRENT BUDGET 1,204,766.00 1,204,766.00 YTD ACTIVITY 1,074,528.50 1,074,528.50 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 1,204,766.00 1,204,766.00 1,039,731.00 165,035.00 1,204,766.00 930,000.00 144,528.50 1,074,528.50 1,039,731.00 165,035.00 1,204,766.00 CURRENT BUDGET 336,100.00 336,100.00 YTD ACTIVITY 1,323.28 1,323.28 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 336,100.00 336,100.00 1,500.00 12,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 30,000.00 250,000.00 336,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.98 0.00 0.00 3.98 1,500.00 12,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 30,000.00 250,000.00 336,100.00 CURRENT BUDGET 120,832.00 0.00 120,832.00 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 68,332.00 68,332.00 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 120,832.00 0.00 120,832.00 25,000.00 36,000.00 1,500.00 150.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 1,500.00 4,500.00 182.00 1,500.00 52,500.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 25,000.00 16,500.00 173,332.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.98 0.00 0.00 3.98 25,000.00 36,000.00 1,500.00 150.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 1,500.00 4,500.00 182.00 1,500.00 52,500.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 25,000.00 16,500.00 173,332.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Fund: 360 - PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY PROJECT FUND Revenue 360-00000-391100 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 360-00000-393205 BOND CAPITALIZED INTEREST - PFA CURRENT BUDGET 1,000,000.00 60.00 1,000,060.00 YTD ACTIVITY 1,436,363.75 0.00 1,436,363.75 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 1,000,000.00 60.00 1,000,060.00 60.00 773,676.00 226,324.00 1,000,060.00 1,725.09 1,295,000.00 141,363.75 1,438,088.84 60.00 773,676.00 226,324.00 1,000,060.00 Fund: 375 - IMPACT FEE FUND Revenue CURRENT BUDGET 375-00000-341323 IMPACT FEES - PARKS AND RECREATION 0.00 375-00000-341325 IMPACT FEES - ROADS 0.00 375-00000-341326 IMPACT FEES - ADMINISTRATIVE 0.00 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 226,998.14 233,670.10 13,563.34 474,231.58 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CURRENT BUDGET 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 18,800.00 1,200.00 20,000.00 13,000.00 1,600.00 400.00 5,000.00 20,000.00 104.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 104.30 13,000.00 1,600.00 400.00 5,000.00 20,000.00 CURRENT BUDGET 194,472.00 947,500.00 40,000.00 4,500.00 561,000.00 25,000.00 315,000.00 180,000.00 25,000.00 3,500.00 86,000.00 135,000.00 729,660.00 575,000.00 200,000.00 471,000.00 175,000.00 130,000.00 20,000.00 2,100.00 50,000.00 5,000.00 55,000.00 194,472.00 48,500.00 5,172,704.00 YTD ACTIVITY 0.00 264,578.42 26,769.71 1,716.12 253,543.55 14,934.41 125,232.20 120,678.48 57,160.48 1,090.91 87,000.00 116,000.00 470,838.65 326,711.66 49,020.95 270,731.62 173,577.27 91,282.01 79,500.00 859.50 47,682.74 1,550.00 138,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,718,458.68 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 194,472.00 947,500.00 40,000.00 4,500.00 561,000.00 25,000.00 315,000.00 180,000.00 25,000.00 3,500.00 86,000.00 135,000.00 729,660.00 575,000.00 200,000.00 471,000.00 175,000.00 130,000.00 20,000.00 2,100.00 50,000.00 5,000.00 193,000.00 56,472.00 48,500.00 5,172,704.00 Expense 360-15100-523901 360-80000-581300 360-80000-582300 BANK CHARGES PRINCIPAL-OTHER DEBT INTEREST EXPENSE - OTHER DEBT Fund: 495 - CEMETERY FUND Revenue 495-00000-361000 INTEREST REVENUES 495-00000-389030 CEMETERY USE FEE Expense 495-15650-522220 495-15650-531600 495-15650-531700 495-15650-541200 MAINTENANCE & CLEANING SMALL EQUIPMENT - NON-CAPITAL MISC EXPENSE SITE IMPROVEMENTS Fund: 505 - WATER & SEWER Revenue 505-00000-391100 OPERATING - TRANSFERS IN 505-43300-344230 SEWER RESIDENTIAL 505-43300-344231 SEWER HC LEXINGTON SQUARE 505-43300-344232 SEWER COLLECTION FEE HC 505-43300-344233 SEWER APTS/MOBILE HOMES 505-43300-344234 SEWER HC B OF ED,3 CONYER 505-43300-344235 SEWER COMMERCIAL 505-43300-344236 SEWER BASE RESIDENTIAL 505-43300-344237 SEWER BASE COMMERCIAL 505-43300-344239 WILDWIND SEWER 505-43300-344240 SEWER CONNECT 505-43300-344299 SEWER IMPACT FEES 505-44200-344210 WATER RESIDENTIAL 505-44200-344211 WATER APTS./MH 505-44200-344212 WATER IRRIGATION 505-44200-344215 WATER COMMERCIAL 505-44200-344216 WATER BASE RESIDENTIAL 505-44200-344217 WATER BASE COMMERCIAL 505-44200-344220 WATER CONNECT 505-44200-344221 WATER 2ND FIRELINE METERS 505-44200-344290 LATE FEES 505-44200-344295 RECONNECT FEE 505-44200-344299 WATER IMPACT FEES 505-44200-361000 INTEREST REVENUES 505-44200-389040 FROM RESERVES CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Expense 505-43300-511100 505-43300-511300 505-43300-512100 505-43300-512110 505-43300-512111 505-43300-512200 505-43300-512401 505-43300-512850 505-43300-521201 505-43300-521230 505-43300-521341 505-43300-522200 505-43300-522210 505-43300-522220 505-43300-522229 505-43300-522231 505-43300-522232 505-43300-522234 505-43300-522235 505-43300-522240 505-43300-522250 505-43300-522255 505-43300-522320 505-43300-523310 505-43300-523400 505-43300-523500 505-43300-523600 505-43300-523700 505-43300-523849 505-43300-523905 505-43300-523930 505-43300-523940 505-43300-523990 505-43300-531130 505-43300-531140 505-43300-531142 505-43300-531214 505-43300-531221 505-43300-531223 505-43300-531229 505-43300-531270 505-43300-531510 505-43300-531700 505-43300-531703 505-43300-531706 505-43300-531720 505-43300-531740 505-43300-531750 505-43300-541462 505-43300-541477 505-43300-542400 505-43300-542517 505-43300-573105 505-43300-573110 505-43300-611103 505-44200-511100 505-44200-511300 505-44200-512100 505-44200-512110 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS HRA REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING FEES TESTING - ANALYTICAL COST REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAINTENANCE & CLEANING EQUIPMENT REPAIRS - PLANT EQPMNT REPAIR PUMP STATIO REPAIR, WWTP PLANT PUMP STATION ROADS REPAIR VACCUM CLEAN SEWER LINES STREET REPAIRS/MAINTENANC AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING CONTRACT LABOR COLL. FEE HENRY COUNTY DRUG TESTING, VACCINES POSTAGE LANDFILL FEES OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. ENERGY - NATURAL GAS SNAPPING SHOALS EMC GA POWER LIFT STATIONS GA POWER - WWTP ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL PUMP STATION WATER PURCHASES MISC EXPENSE LAB SUPPLIES/OTHER CHEMICALS SIGNS TIRE EXPENSE UNIFORMS S2180730 WWTP FCLTY IMP WALTER WAY LIFT STATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE WATERSHED MONITORING I&II CONSENT ORDER - FINE BAD DEBT EXP. W/S TRANSFER TO/FROM GEN.FUND REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE 505-44200-512111 GROUP INSURANCE VISION 618,000.00 55,000.00 266,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 8,000.00 72,500.00 8,000.00 15,000.00 35,000.00 25,000.00 6,700.00 20,000.00 4,000.00 75,000.00 50,000.00 75,000.00 2,500.00 18,650.00 69,650.00 40,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 5,000.00 9,300.00 7,500.00 4,000.00 12,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 27,600.00 65,000.00 2,500.00 45,000.00 15,000.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 60,000.00 226,200.00 25,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 25,000.00 105,000.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 10,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 8,500.00 25,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 506,000.00 45,000.00 230,000.00 2,000.00 249,992.12 21,198.86 98,808.20 3,359.30 443.04 3,843.16 50,124.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,213.00 1,380.50 4,789.33 0.00 29,623.43 10,238.64 13,783.76 0.00 6,395.50 15,300.00 19,780.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,848.79 1,286.00 278.80 1,855.00 0.00 4,170.42 0.00 4,294.83 27,859.56 415.20 5,936.60 1,442.69 150.20 5,565.69 18,779.18 112,102.80 7,738.95 100.29 956.09 7,106.41 35,728.54 0.00 5,506.51 3,195.59 0.00 59,093.19 7,116.18 0.00 0.00 (62.17) 58,000.00 272,758.22 25,702.92 68,677.93 2,835.24 618,000.00 55,000.00 265,600.00 3,400.00 1,000.00 8,000.00 72,500.00 8,000.00 15,000.00 35,000.00 25,000.00 6,700.00 20,000.00 4,000.00 75,000.00 50,000.00 75,000.00 2,500.00 18,650.00 69,650.00 40,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 5,000.00 9,300.00 7,500.00 4,000.00 12,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 27,600.00 65,000.00 2,500.00 45,000.00 15,000.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 60,000.00 226,200.00 25,000.00 150.00 39,850.00 25,000.00 105,000.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 10,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 8,500.00 25,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 506,000.00 45,000.00 230,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 369.62 1,000.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE 505-44200-512200 505-44200-512401 505-44200-512850 505-44200-521201 505-44200-521230 505-44200-521305 505-44200-522210 505-44200-522220 505-44200-522231 505-44200-522240 505-44200-522250 505-44200-522255 505-44200-522320 505-44200-523110 505-44200-523245 505-44200-523250 505-44200-523310 505-44200-523400 505-44200-523500 505-44200-523600 505-44200-523700 505-44200-523840 505-44200-523940 505-44200-531130 505-44200-531140 505-44200-531142 505-44200-531221 505-44200-531229 505-44200-531270 505-44200-531510 505-44200-531703 505-44200-531706 505-44200-531740 505-44200-531750 505-44200-542500 505-44200-561000 505-80000-581300 505-80000-582300 505-90000-611103 BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 MEDICARE 1.45% RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS HRA REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING FEES WATER TEST MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAINTENANCE & CLEANING EQPMNT REPAIR PUMP STATIO STREET REPAIRS/MAINTENANC AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE LIABILITY INSURANCE CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS USA MOBILITY 770 201 0149 PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING COLLECTION AGENCY SRVICES POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. SNAPPING SHOALS EMC GA POWER - WTP ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL INV PCH FOR RSALE-WATER LAB SUPPLIES/OTHER CHEMICALS TIRE EXPENSE UNIFORMS EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION PRINCIPAL-OTHER DEBT INTEREST-OTHER DEBT TRANSFER TO GEN.FUND Fund: 510 - STORMWATER Revenue 510-00000-319900 PENALTY/INTEREST STRMWTR 510-00000-349700 STORMWATER FEES 510-00000-349800 STORMWATER FEES PRIOR YRS 510-00000-389040 FROM RESERVES 5,000.00 50,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 12,804.00 147,803.00 1,000.00 30,000.00 65,000.00 7,500.00 1,500.00 5,000.00 67,196.00 8,000.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 7,300.00 4,200.00 1,500.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 22,600.00 2,500.00 110,000.00 20,000.00 40,000.00 17,197.00 25,000.00 812,060.00 5,500.00 12,500.00 3,500.00 10,000.00 55,000.00 100,000.00 105,472.00 25,000.00 64,000.00 4,978,232.00 4,300.90 34,568.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,268.00 84,213.87 500.00 16,180.79 23,489.50 1,420.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 913.18 0.00 2,644.51 0.00 122.40 1,632.00 60.89 4,413.22 421.22 46,655.09 1,312.00 18,139.99 1,302.89 16,023.45 523,450.66 805.72 1,447.00 981.08 2,211.58 0.00 (214,894.68) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,849,666.84 5,000.00 50,000.00 5,000.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 12,804.00 147,803.00 1,000.00 30,000.00 65,000.00 7,500.00 1,500.00 5,000.00 67,196.00 8,000.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 7,300.00 4,200.00 1,500.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 22,600.00 2,500.00 110,000.00 20,000.00 40,000.00 17,197.00 25,000.00 812,060.00 5,500.00 12,500.00 3,500.00 10,000.00 55,000.00 100,000.00 105,472.00 25,000.00 64,000.00 4,978,232.00 CURRENT BUDGET 1,500.00 912,000.00 160,700.00 69,600.00 1,143,800.00 YTD ACTIVITY 3,683.26 2,248.44 74,291.16 0.00 80,222.86 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 1,500.00 912,000.00 160,700.00 69,600.00 1,143,800.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Expense 510-42500-511100 510-42500-511300 510-42500-512100 510-42500-512110 510-42500-512111 510-42500-512200 510-42500-512400 510-42500-512850 510-42500-521201 510-42500-521230 510-42500-522230 510-42500-522240 510-42500-522250 510-42500-523304 510-42500-523310 510-42500-523400 510-42500-523500 510-42500-523600 510-42500-523700 510-42500-523852 510-42500-523905 510-42500-523990 510-42500-531130 510-42500-531140 510-42500-531142 510-42500-531270 510-42500-531700 510-42500-531740 510-42500-531750 510-42500-542500 510-42500-542515 510-42500-542518 510-42500-561000 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% PENSION HRA REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL FEES ENGINEERING FEES EQUIPMENT REPAIRS STREET REPAIRS/MAINTENANC AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR PERMITS/ANNUAL REPORT PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING NOI IMPLEMENTATION COLL. FEE HENRY COUNTY LANDFILL FEES OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE TIRE EXPENSE UNIFORMS EQUIPMENT STORMWATER REPAIR WATERSHED ASSES. PHASE II DEPRECIATION Fund: 540 - SANITATION SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Revenue 540-00000-319901 PENALTY/INTEREST SANI 540-00000-344110 SAN-REVENUE 540-00000-344130 SAN-RECYCLED MAT REVENUE 540-00000-349801 SANI-PRIOR YEARS REVENUE 540-00000-381000 RENTS & ROYALTIES 540-00000-389040 FROM RESERVES 400,000.00 5,500.00 83,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 65,000.00 8,000.00 15,000.00 35,593.00 15,000.00 5,500.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 7,000.00 1,000.00 7,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 1,500.00 7,500.00 3,500.00 17,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 6,000.00 359,407.00 300,000.00 0.00 65,000.00 1,478,000.00 184,469.73 2,683.03 53,390.63 1,813.47 338.48 2,673.67 44,938.80 0.00 2,758.98 6,915.00 5,683.80 0.00 2,250.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,573.82 118.80 907.00 0.00 614.58 3,342.00 506.90 3,589.74 355.24 12,452.70 939.89 169.50 2,724.17 5,707.00 102,525.00 0.00 21,853.02 465,295.79 400,000.00 5,500.00 83,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 65,000.00 8,000.00 15,000.00 35,593.00 15,000.00 5,500.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 7,000.00 1,000.00 7,000.00 4,000.00 615.00 15,000.00 1,500.00 7,500.00 3,500.00 17,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 6,000.00 358,792.00 300,000.00 0.00 65,000.00 1,478,000.00 CURRENT BUDGET 1,000.00 2,777,500.00 1,500.00 4,406.00 115,000.00 237,458.00 3,136,864.00 YTD ACTIVITY 3,823.47 92,829.60 0.00 11,384.50 56,444.35 0.00 164,481.92 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 1,000.00 2,777,500.00 1,500.00 4,406.00 115,000.00 237,458.00 3,136,864.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Expense 540-45200-511100 540-45200-511300 540-45200-512100 540-45200-512110 540-45200-512111 540-45200-512200 540-45200-512401 540-45200-512850 540-45200-521230 540-45200-522250 540-45200-522252 540-45200-522254 540-45200-523310 540-45200-523400 540-45200-523700 540-45200-523940 540-45200-523990 540-45200-523991 540-45200-524000 540-45200-531130 540-45200-531140 540-45200-531270 540-45200-531740 540-45200-561000 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL GROUP INSURANCE LIFE GROUP INSURANCE VISION MEDICARE 1.45% RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS HRA REIMBURSEMENT ENGINEERING FEES AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR DAMAGE TO CITIZEN ITEMS SANITATION DISCOUNT PUBLIC NOTICES PRINTING & BINDING EDUCATION & TRAINING POSTAGE LANDFILL FEES Sanitation Collections Outsourcing SWMP COST JT. HC AND CITY OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS ENERGY-GASOLINE/DIESEL TIRE EXPENSE DEPRECIATION Fund: 555 - MERLE MANDERS CONFERENCE CENTER Revenue 555-00000-381000 RENTS & ROYALTIES 555-00000-381201 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 555-00000-381205 TABLE RENTALS 555-00000-381215 AUDIO EQUIPMENT RENTAL 555-00000-381220 PODIUM RENTAL 555-00000-381225 PROJECTOR RENTAL 555-00000-381230 PROJECTION SCREEN RENTAL 555-00000-381305 STAGE RENTAL 555-00000-389002 DAMAGE FEES 555-00000-389007 CANCELLATION FEE 555-00000-389018 CLIENT EVENT ATTENDANT 555-00000-391100 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 53,764.00 5,000.00 45,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 800.00 10,800.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 1,190,000.00 1,700,000.00 45,000.00 500.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 25,000.00 3,136,864.00 26,296.00 0.00 18,735.34 609.59 111.54 364.54 7,466.76 0.00 3,660.00 0.00 0.00 8,514.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 291,293.60 667,149.17 1,451.24 0.00 0.00 3,049.73 0.00 (0.08) 1,028,701.43 53,764.00 5,000.00 45,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 800.00 10,800.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 1,190,000.00 1,700,000.00 45,000.00 500.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 25,000.00 3,136,864.00 CURRENT BUDGET 113,834.00 3,000.00 200.00 600.00 300.00 500.00 100.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 7,000.00 160,000.00 286,534.00 YTD ACTIVITY 84,977.50 0.00 0.00 200.00 100.00 750.00 200.00 2,750.00 0.00 550.00 4,950.00 0.00 94,477.50 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 113,834.00 3,000.00 200.00 600.00 300.00 500.00 100.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 7,000.00 160,000.00 286,534.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Expense 555-15650-511100 555-15650-511300 555-15650-512100 555-15650-512200 555-15650-512850 555-15650-521201 555-15650-522200 555-15650-522210 555-15650-522320 555-15650-523300 555-15650-523400 555-15650-523500 555-15650-523600 555-15650-523700 555-15650-523850 555-15650-523851 555-15650-523902 555-15650-523933 555-15650-523940 555-15650-531130 555-15650-531140 555-15650-531142 555-15650-531213 555-15650-531232 555-15650-531271 555-15650-531708 555-15650-531710 555-15650-531720 555-15650-531740 555-15650-531750 555-15650-542200 555-15650-542300 555-15650-542500 555-15650-542502 555-15650-561000 REGULAR EMPL. SALARIES OVERTIME GRP INSRNC MEDICAL/DENTAL MEDICARE 1.45% HRA REIMBURSEMENT PROFESSIONAL FEES REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE Advertising PRINTING & BINDING TRAVEL DUES & FEES EDUCATION & TRAINING Personnel Services CLIENT EVENT ATTENDANT MERCHANT FEES CREDIT CARD LINEN POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES & MATERIALS HAND TOOLS & SMALL EQUIP. NATURAL GAS GEORGIA POWER FUEL FOOD AND BEVERAGE CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS SIGNS TIRE EXPENSE UNIFORMS VEHICLES FURNITURE & FIXTURES EQUIPMENT MISCELLANEOUS DEPRECIATION Fund: 560 - TED STRICKLAND COMMUNITY CENTER Revenue 560-00000-391100 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 1,550.00 3,500.00 500.00 3,000.00 7,000.00 3,500.00 3,000.00 1,200.00 3,500.00 15,000.00 2,000.00 2,550.00 10,000.00 250.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,300.00 25,000.00 4,000.00 500.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 750.00 1,300.00 29,000.00 5,000.00 2,250.00 34,250.00 0.00 186,400.00 3,360.36 786.96 86.00 52.52 0.00 0.00 337.91 0.00 2,611.20 1,500.00 2,418.23 1,269.00 16.99 0.00 2,828.25 0.00 0.00 2,059.75 0.00 3,011.71 2,561.61 0.00 3,929.30 14,914.32 2,712.76 643.26 564.97 645.54 749.52 978.07 28,728.00 0.00 0.00 1,656.26 (18,131.02) 60,291.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 1,550.00 3,500.00 500.00 3,000.00 7,000.00 3,500.00 3,000.00 1,200.00 3,500.00 15,000.00 2,000.00 2,550.00 10,000.00 250.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,300.00 25,000.00 4,000.00 500.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 750.00 1,300.00 29,000.00 5,000.00 2,250.00 34,250.00 0.00 186,400.00 CURRENT BUDGET 0.00 YTD ACTIVITY 4,150.15 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 0.00 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET AMENDMENT JUNE 30, 2026 Fund: 565 - AMPHITHEATER COMPLEX Revenue 565-00000-347300 TICKET SALES 565-00000-347305 CONCESSION SALES 565-00000-347306 PARKING 565-00000-381000 RENTS & ROYALTIES 565-00000-389030 MISCELLANEOUS 565-00000-389045 SPONSORSHIPS Expense 565-61800-521100 565-61800-521201 565-61800-521204 565-61800-521205 565-61800-521206 565-61800-521207 565-61800-521300 565-61800-521310 565-61800-522210 565-61800-522219 565-61800-522220 565-61800-522230 565-61800-522320 565-61800-523240 565-61800-523300 565-61800-531140 565-61800-531211 565-61800-531222 565-61800-531233 565-61800-531700 565-61800-541300 565-61800-542300 565-61800-542500 CONSULTANT FEES PROFESSIONAL FEES ENTERTAINMENT/TALENT FEE PRODUCTION SERVICES SECURITY USHER/BOX OFFICE TECHNICAL SERVICES SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE & CLEANING EQUIPMENT REPAIRS RENTAL OF EQUIP & VEHICLE AT&T CLUB SERVICE ADVERTISING SUPPLIES & MATERIALS NATURAL GAS GA POWER ELECTRICITY STREET LIGHTS, OUTSIDE MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS FURNITURE & FIXTURES EQUIPMENT 0.00 4,150.15 0.00 CURRENT BUDGET 2,000,000.00 45,000.00 0.00 840,000.00 0.00 115,000.00 3,000,000.00 YTD ACTIVITY 913,645.49 36,015.76 28,447.66 7,878.20 6,162.53 154,500.00 1,146,649.64 6/30/26 AMENDMENT 2,000,000.00 45,000.00 29,000.00 765,337.00 6,163.00 154,500.00 3,000,000.00 120,000.00 150,000.00 1,400,000.00 485,500.00 30,000.00 35,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 55,665.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 54,335.00 0.00 114,500.00 40,000.00 1,000.00 85,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 90,000.00 20,000.00 252,000.00 3,000,000.00 21,570.00 137,754.83 1,370,000.00 291,409.83 27,421.85 20,139.97 746.17 5,378.00 6,385.00 42,126.00 23,464.98 8,590.85 0.00 3,589.96 55,826.32 25,317.27 174.14 37,805.20 0.00 2,750.82 37,080.00 7,068.13 203,389.77 2,327,989.09 120,000.00 150,000.00 1,400,000.00 485,500.00 30,000.00 35,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 55,665.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 54,335.00 0.00 114,500.00 40,000.00 1,000.00 85,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 90,000.00 20,000.00 252,000.00 3,000,000.00 STATE OF GEORGIA HENRY COUNTY CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE ORDINANCE NO. x A RESOLUTION FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT 2026-02 AMENDING THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026; AS REQUIRED TO KEEP BUDGET IN BALALNCE BY MAKING ADJUSTMENTS TO ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES THEREOF; TO REPEAL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge ("City") is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia and is charged with providing public services to residents located within the corporate limits of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City adopted its operating budget for fiscal year 2026 ("FY2026") in December of 2025; and, WHEREAS, Section 6.27 (b) of the City Charter provides that the City Council by majority vote may make changes in the appropriations contained in the current operating budget at any regular meeting or special or emergency meeting called for such purposes; and, WHEREAS, the City Treasurer has presented a proposal for Budget Amendment 2026-02, a resolution to amend the FY2026 Operating Budgets in the amount of $105,200.00 as presented to Council attached and incorporated as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the proposal has been reviewed and approved by Council and Mayor; THEREFORE, IT IS NOW HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Adoption by Budget Amendment 2026-03. Council approved an amendment to the City FY2026 Operating Budget in the amount of $105,200.00 as presented to Council attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. Public Record. This document shall be maintained as a public record by the City Clerk and shall be accessible to the public during all normal business hours of the City of Stockbridge. SECTION 3. City Attorney Authority. Pursuant to the City's charter and with explicit consent of the City Counsel, the City Attorney is duly authorized to make requisite amendments to all contracts, ordinances, resolutions, and documents, as may be necessary, in order to secure conformity with the express intent of the City Council and to ensure adherence to all pertinent laws and ordinances of the City. 1 SECTION 4. Attestation. The City Clerk is authorized to execute, attest to, and seal any documents which may be necessary to effectuate this ordinance, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. SECTION 5. Severability. To the extent any portion of this Ordinance is declared to be invalid, unenforceable, or non-binding, that shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. Except as otherwise provided herein, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Stockbridge as provided in the City Charter. SO ORDAINED this 28th day of July 2026. , Mayor ATTEST: (SEAL), City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: QUINTON G. WASHINGTON, City Attorney 2 CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE FY2026 BUDGET AMENDMNT # 2 JULY 28, 2026 FRANK S. MILAZI, CPFA, CPFIM, CPM CITY TREASURER/CFO CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE STATE OF GEORGIA HENRY COUNTY CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE ORDINANCE NO. x A RESOLUTION FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT 2026-02 AMENDING THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026; AS REQUIRED TO KEEP BUDGET IN BALALNCE BY MAKING ADJUSTMENTS TO ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES THEREOF; TO REPEAL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge ("City") is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia and is charged with providing public services to residents located within the corporate limits of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City adopted its operating budget for fiscal year 2026 ("FY2026") in December of 2025; and, WHEREAS, Section 6.27 (b) of the City Charter provides that the City Council by majority vote may make changes in the appropriations contained in the current operating budget at any regular meeting or special or emergency meeting called for such purposes; and, WHEREAS, the City Treasurer has presented a proposal for Budget Amendment 2026-02, a resolution to amend the FY2026 Operating Budgets in the amount of $105,200.00 as presented to Council attached and incorporated as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the proposal has been reviewed and approved by Council and Mayor; THEREFORE, IT IS NOW HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Adoption by Budget Amendment 2026-03. Council approved an amendment to the City FY2026 Operating Budget in the amount of $105,200.00 as presented to Council attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. Public Record. This document shall be maintained as a public record by the City Clerk and shall be accessible to the public during all normal business hours of the City of Stockbridge. SECTION 3. City Attorney Authority. Pursuant to the City's charter and with explicit consent of the City Counsel, the City Attorney is duly authorized to make requisite amendments to all contracts, ordinances, resolutions, and documents, as may be necessary, in order to secure conformity with the express intent of the City Council and to ensure adherence to all pertinent laws and ordinances of the City. 1 SECTION 4. Attestation. The City Clerk is authorized to execute, attest to, and seal any documents which may be necessary to effectuate this ordinance, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. SECTION 5. Severability. To the extent any portion of this Ordinance is declared to be invalid, unenforceable, or non-binding, that shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. Except as otherwise provided herein, all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Stockbridge as provided in the City Charter. SO ORDAINED this 28th day of July 2026. , Mayor ATTEST: (SEAL), City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: QUINTON G. WASHINGTON, City Attorney 2 PROJECT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA, AND THE PATH FOUNDATION, INC., FOR TRAIL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT: WALT STEPHENS TRAIL THIS PROJECT AGREEMENT (“PSA”) is made and entered into this ______ day of __________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA (“City”) and PATH FOUNDATION, INC. ("PATH"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City entered into a Master Agreement with PATH (as at any time modified or amended, the “Master Agreement”) to establish the framework within which the City and PATH will proceed to implement specific projects related to the design and management of a trail network within the City; and WHEREAS, the Master Agreement provides that the parties will work together to determine the terms and conditions for specific projects for the trail network, each to be memorialized in a project agreement (each a “Project Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the parties have identified the project described in Exhibit A attached hereto (“Project”) as a specific project under the Master Agreement and desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions to govern the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally found hereby, agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS; PROJECT DESCRIPTION Terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Master Agreement. The Project and scope of work are described in Exhibit A attached hereto. 3. TERM; TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by providing thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Upon termination, PATH shall be compensated for all services rendered and costs incurred up to the effective termination date, provided such costs are reasonable and properly documented. The City shall not be liable for any anticipated profits, unperformed services, or other consequential damages beyond the termination date. This Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue in effect until the date on which the Project covered by this Agreement has been completed and all obligations of the parties hereunder have been discharged. Subject to any local, state or federal law that may limit its term, this Agreement shall automatically renew upon the same terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement for four (4) one-year terms unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall terminate upon expiration of the term of the Master Agreement (or its earlier termination in accordance with its terms), unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. 4. BUDGET; PAYMENT TERMS The proposed budget and sources of funding for the design and management of the Project are described in Exhibit B attached hereto. Payment terms for the Project are as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. 5. DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS POINT OF CONTACT PATH shall provide the City with an updated primary point of contact each year for the duration of this Agreement. This designated individual shall be responsible for coordinating all communications, approvals, and reporting between PATH and the City. PATH shall notify the City in writing of any changes to the designated contact within ten (10) business days of such change. A. Documentation. PATH will send documentation of the status of the Project in the form and frequency requested by the City Representative. Such documentation shall indicate the progress of specific activities on the Project schedule. B. Records/Audit. PATH will maintain records and accounts in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of completion of the Project. The City Representative shall have the right to examine and copy the records and accounts at all reasonable times, with reasonable advance notification. The City reserves the right to audit such records and accounts at any time during the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and ending 365 days after completion of the Project. 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The preliminary schedule for the Project is described in Exhibit D attached hereto. As adjustments in the Project schedule become necessary, the City and PATH shall cooperate in developing a revision to the Project schedule and amending this Agreement. 7. SUCCESSORS/ASSIGNS; NO ASSIGNMENT/DELEGATION; NO PERSONAL LIABILITY This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that no party shall be authorized to delegate performance of any of its duties hereunder to any other person or entity, nor shall either party assign any of its rights or remedies under this Agreement to any person or entity, which restriction on assignments and delegations shall apply to those occurring by operation of law, as well as by contract, merger, or consolidation. Any assignment or delegation in breach of this Agreement shall be void. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any elected officials, officers, directors, employees, or agents of the City or PATH, nor shall it be construed as giving any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than the parties to this Agreement. 8. GOVERNING LAW/VENUE The City shall have the final authority over project approvals, changes, and completion determinations. PATH shall comply with all directives issued by the City regarding project management and execution. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been made and performed in City of Stockbridge, Georgia. For the purpose of venue, all suits or cause of action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in the courts of Henry County, Georgia. 9. AMENDMENTS; NOTICES This Agreement may be modified or amended by the parties in writing. Written notice by one party to the other shall be sent as provided in the Master Agreement. 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement and the Master Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and no representation (oral or written) not incorporated herein or therein shall be binding on the parties. 11. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall continue to be valid and enforceable. 12. TIME OF ESSENCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in three (3) counterparts (each to be considered as an original but all taken together to constitute one and the same agreement) by their authorized representative, on the day and year first written. PATH FOUNDATION, INC. By: (SEAL) _____________________________________ Signature Greta G. deMayo _______________________ Printed Name Executive Director ______________________ Title Date: July 8, 2026 ________________________ ATTEST: ________________________________ Secretary [SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE] CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA By: ATTEST: _____________________________________ Jayden L. Williams, Mayor Date: _____________________________________ _______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk (SEAL) Approved as to form: ___________________________________________ Quinton G. Washington, City Attorney EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK The PATH Design Team (PATH) will provide full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1-mile, ten-foot wide, concrete multi-use trail along Walt Stephens Road. The project begins at the SE corner of Walt Stephens Rd and Monarch Village Way, crosses Walt Stephens at the existing traffic signal, continues east as a 10’ sidepath with 5’ to 10’ landscape buffer, crosses I-75 via existing road bridge, turns into a private property to tie into the programmed trail by the proposed development on Flippen Road. Figure 1 – Walt Stephens Trail Scope Map TASK 1 – Survey Services: 1a. Topographic/Utility Survey Upon Notice to Proceed, PATH will coordinate with owner and property stakeholders to send out notification via letters. The project surveyor will conduct a topographic/utility survey of the project areas. The surveying services will be performed to meet the standards for surveying trail corridors. Specific scope of services includes: • Boundary line verification – research, locate property monumentation, and perform property analysis of approximately forty-one (41) parcels of land for subject project corridor, including research of right-of-way plans. • topography (2’ contours) within the trail alignment locating substantial visible improvements • stormwater structures top and inverts • locate visible or marked utilities • locate trees 10” in diameter and larger within survey corridor. • streets, sidewalks, and intersections • existing cut-ins for driveways • • • • • • buildings including accessory buildings, small structures retaining walls, privacy and security fences all site elements for the scope area crossing Interstate 75, the project survey will locate the improvements along the top of bridge only, and will not collect field data below the bridge. coordination and checking underground utility designating (SUE Level B) 1b. Easement Plats and Legal Descriptions Upon acceptance of the Design Development document (60%) and the easement graphics, the project surveyor will prepare easement plats and legal descriptions for acquiring necessary permanent easements and temporary construction easements. One (1) temporary easement and one (1) permanent easement plat and legal description are anticipated for the parcel below: Map Key # Address Parcel ID Owner 1 4251 Walt Stephens Rd 031-02007002 MENG TRUST Task 1 Deliverables: • • • AutoCAD/Civil 3D File Stamped survey file in pdf format Two (2) legal descriptions with exhibit maps (PDF) TASK 2 – 30% Schematic Design: Project Kick-off: Upon receiving the project survey, PATH will conduct a virtual project kickoff meeting with PATH’s Design Team and City of Stockbridge to review project scope and schedules, discuss important deliverables and design milestones, and address any project concerns. Recurring Project Meetings: PATH will meet monthly with PATH’s Design Team and City of Stockbridge as needed during an anticipated 13-month design duration. Property Stakeholders Coordination: PATH will coordinate with the City PM to conduct several meetings at design milestones with the private property stakeholder to ensure clear communication of the proposed design. Meetings will be held virtually at the end of schematic design (30% CDs) to collect property stakeholders’ feedback, and at the end of design development (60% CDs) for their agreement to the required easement acquisition to complete real estate acquisition. PATH design team will assist with all meeting materials needed, including PowerPoint presentation(s) and digital/hard copies of design document(s). Easement Plats and Legal Descriptions will be produced based on agreed 60% design and easement graphics. See task 1b. 30% Schematic Design: Utilizing the survey file, PATH will create schematic design drawings including proposed alignment, rough grading, length and location of structures if any, and any amenity areas. PATH shall prepare 30% Schematic Design Documents as described below: • Composite Map • 30% Alignment Construction Plans • 30% Plan View and Section Graphics • 30% Cost Estimate PATH will hold a design review meeting followed by a site meeting as needed with property owners and City of Stockbridge to collect feedback on the schematic design document. Task 2 Deliverables: • A 30% CDs submission will be made for review comments, as digital PDF • Plan view and typical section graphics (.pdf) • Preliminary easement graphics • 30% Design Cost Estimate • PATH/City of Stockbridge Team Meeting – biweekly meetings and unlimited number of electronic messaging (i.e. web conference/ conference call) Task 3 - 60% Design Development During 60% Design Development, PATH will conduct on-going coordination with City of Stockbridge and submit progress reports as requested. Each report will include task accomplishments, status of deliverables, and expected upcoming activities. PATH will participate in continued monthly project implementation meetings as requested to discuss key issues or opportunities that arise to keep the project on schedule and within budget. Based on the acceptance of the 30% Schematic Design documents and the agreed cost estimate, PATH shall prepare 60% Design Development Documents for the project. The documents will further refine and articulate the project elements established in 30% design drawings and address all comments received from the 30% Design Submittal. 3a. Civil Engineering & Hydrological Analysis: PATH design team will prepare construction documents to adhere to the City of Stockbridge policy for stormwater management for public facilities, the department of public works requirements. This trail project falls into the category as a linear transportation project being constructed by the City of Stockbridge, therefore, the stormwater infeasibility report will be submitted to obtain the infeasibility determination by the administrator. 3b. Structural Engineering: PATH design team will provide design and detail for a series of retaining walls on the side of the proposed trail. The proposed retaining walls are assumed to be concrete walls possibly supported by helical piles, to be determined with geotechnical report. The PATH design team will coordinate with GDOT bridge office to obtain any as-built drawings for the existing Walt Stephens Road bridge over I-75. Assuming the drawings are available, the project structural engineer will provide calculations and details for a new jersey barrier and trail slab on the bridge. Miscellaneous details for maintaining drainage, expansion joints, etc. are assumed. The calculations will be limited to comparing the new loading with the original bridge design capacities. A full re-analysis of the bridge is not anticipated as necessary therefore is excluded in this proposal. 3c. Geotechnical Services: Based on site assessment, six (6) SPT borings are proposed; two for each estimated wall section. The borings will be extended depths of 15 to 20 feet below existing grades or refusal on rock, whichever is shallower. The borings will characterize the soil composition and relative density, as well as the depth of potential unsuitable soils, partially weathered to competent rock or groundwater. The drilling operations will be supervised by our field engineer, who will maintain logs of boring. The boring logs will indicate the depth, classification, relative density or consistency of the soils encountered, depth to rock or groundwater and any unusual subsurface conditions noted. Following the field exploration, an engineering report will be prepared outlining the findings of the exploration. The allowable soil bearing pressure of the existing soils and the recommended foundation type and bearing depth will be provided based on the findings of the borings. The recommended lateral earth pressures and coefficient of friction values for the design of the proposed retaining wall structures will be provided. The presence of potentially unsuitable soils which could require undercutting or excavation and replacement or recommendations for deep foundations for the retaining wall foundations will also be discussed. 60% Construction Document Submittal: PATH Design Team shall prepare 60% Construction Documents as described below: • Project Cover Sheet/ Index/ General Notes • Composite Map • Existing Conditions • Tree Removal and Replacement Plan • Typical Sections • Construction Plans (Layout and Grading) • Construction Details for all trail related work within the scope of the project • Stormwater Pipe Design and Profiles • Structural Plans and Details • Signing and Marking Plans – includes trail signature using the Stockbridge trail sign standard • Landscape Plans • Erosion, Sedimentation and Pollution Control Plans with a NPDES Comprehensive Monitoring Program (CMP) Task 3 Deliverables: • 60% Design for Construction submission will be made to City of Stockbridge for review comments as digital PDF • 60% Design for Construction Cost Estimate • Geotechnical Report • Calculations for proposed trail and barriers on existing road bridge over I-75 • PATH/City of Stockbridge Team Meeting – monthly meetings and unlimited number of electronic messaging (i.e. web conference/ conference call) TASK 4 – Permit Coordination: As a part of the design for construction process, PATH will submit applications necessary for the project to be approved by City of Stockbridge, GDOT and any other public agencies having jurisdiction during the 60% design for construction phase. The PATH team will meet with the review agencies needed to keep the permitting as concise and timely as possible. 4a. Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) special encroachment permit All encroachments within property owned by the Georgia Department of Transportation will be determined within 60% construction documents to prepare all encroachment applications and documents. All permit applications will be submitted prior to 100% Construction Documents. PATH team will submit/manage GDOT permitting through the Georgia Permit Application System (GPAS) under access permits to generate a permit ID. This design contract specifically excludes the generation of any plans required to go through the Georgia Department of Transportation Plan Development Process, which is a requirement of most federally funded grants. Task 4 Deliverables • PATH shall coordinate with all review comments from City of Stockbridge, GDOT, and any public agencies having jurisdiction of the project and ensure comments are addressed and incorporated into the Issue for Permit Construction Document submittal. TASK 5 – 100% Construction Documents: PATH will address all agency and stakeholders’ comments to create the 100% Construction Documents that will be issued for final approval and stamped by the required agencies and municipal departments. This process is a negotiation with the municipalities to ensure the permitted set of drawings is constructible, value engineered and not burdened with unnecessary comments and expense from the permitting authorities. Task 5 Deliverables • PATH shall create the 100% Construction Documents/Permit Set as per any final review comments to finalize all permitting required for the project • 100% Cost Estimate TASK 6 – Bid Assistance: PATH Design Team will assist the City of Stockbridge with the bidding process, providing a bid item list, description of the scope of work for the City’s advertisement purposes, attending one (1) pre-bid meeting, responding to RFIs during the bidding process, and preparing addenda as appropriate. PATH will assist City of Stockbridge in evaluating the contractor’s submitted bidding documents and will provide a recommendation for the City’s consideration. TASK 7 – Contract Administration: PATH will provide construction administration throughout the anticipated 12-month construction timeframe on an hourly rate basis. PATH Design Team will provide construction administration for this project. Tasks include: • Attending one (1) pre-construction meeting • Prepare Notice of Intent (NOI) for NPDES permit prior to construction • Provide 7-day letter as needed • Coordination with Contractor and Utility Companies • Attending site meetings and preparing supplemental drawings as needed • Responding to RFIs during construction phase • Review and approval of submittals • Review and approval of Contractor’s pay applications • Review of Contractor’s change orders as needed. • Coordinate and conduct final inspection and prepare final punch item list • • Prepare Notice of Termination (NOT) to end NPDES permit coverage for construction sites once final stabilization is achieved. Process project’s close out documents. TASK 8 – Construction Management PATH will provide construction management services and assign a PATH PM to the project to work alongside City of Stockbridge and lead the project through design, engineering, permitting and construction. These services will bring PATH’s knowledge and expertise building trails throughout the southeast to the project. The PATH PM will provide hands-on assistance to manage the project schedule, cost and quality. The goals of the PATH PM will be to reduce overall project costs, assist with contract negotiations, reduce change orders, and eliminate unnecessary scope and costs. The industry standard value for construction management services is 6% of the construction cost but is provided with no cost to the City of Stockbridge within this scope of services. Scope Exclusions: The following services are not included under this Agreement, and will be furnished by others or their agent, as noted: • 25’ State Stream Buffer encroachment application with EPD • Architectural design or site work associated with proposed facilities (i.e. architectural renderings, sketches, elevations, footings/ foundations, etc.) • As-built surveys or construction staking • Easement acquisition fee • Electrical or mechanical engineering • Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) • Flood Study and No-rise Certificate • Improvements to any existing public rights-of-way or utilities that may be additional requirements by the city that have not been identified elsewhere in this scope and would not exclusively serve the development • Sanitary sewer and/or water distribution system design • Services associated with variances, waivers, modifications and/or any relief from local, state or federal regulations • Services related to air, solid waste, and/or hazardous waste permits • Services related to noise abatement or endangered species • Services related to rezoning or annexation of property • Services requiring FEMA approvals such as CLOMAR; A LOMAR and ASBUILT survey • Soft-surface Trail Design • Structural engineering and geotechnical services • Traffic engineering, signal design, or traffic studies and/or signal warrants • Variance or Special Use Permits for the development • Water collections for water quality samples or submittals to NPDES for water quality monitoring reports • Wetland delineation and Army Corps permitting for disturbance within jurisdictional wetlands • WFIs and BFIs EXHIBIT B BUDGET Proposed budget and sources of funding for full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1-mile, ten-foot wide, concrete multi-use trail project know as “Walt Stephens Trail”. The project begins at the SE corner of Walt Stephens Rd and Monarch Village Way, crosses Walt Stephens at the existing traffic signal, continues east as a 10’ sidepath with 5’ to 10’ landscape buffer, crosses I-75 via existing road bridge, turns into a private property to tie into the programmed trail by the proposed development on Flippen Road. Acquisition P&E Construction Management Construction Total Budget for Project: Budget Cost $ TBD $ 216,835.00 $ *346,440.00 $ 2,783,165.00 $ 3,346,440.00 Funding from Transportation Enhancement (GDOT) $ Funding from Recreational Trails (GDNR) $ Funding from City of Stockbridge (SPLOST) $ 3,000,000.00 Other City of Stockbridge Funding $ 0.00 Funding from PATH Foundation (in-kind) $ * 346,440.00 TOTAL $ 3,346,440.00 *PATH will provide construction management services at no cost to the City (valued at 6% of construction costs). EXHIBIT C PAYMENT TERMS PATH has agreed to construction management services, as described in Exhibit A, at no cost to the City; provided however, PATH shall be entitled to reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs expended for this Project that have been pre-approved by the City, as may be invoiced in accordance with the provisions of Article III of the Master Agreement. EXHIBIT D PROJECT SCHEDULE* TASK/SERVICE TIMELINE Complete Survey Month 1 - 2 30% Design Month 3 - 4 Geotech Investigation, Property Stakeholder Review Coordination Month 5 - 6 60% Design and Permitting Submittal Month 7 - 9 Permitting Coordination Month 10 Finalize Permitting, 100% Construction Documents Month 11 - 13 Advertise for Bid, Award Construction Contract, Issue NTP Month 14 - 16 *This indicates a general outline of the Project schedule and is subject to change by the parties. July 28, 2026 ✔ ✔ ✔ Decius T. Aaron Public Works Council Consideration to approve the Walt Stephens Trail Project Service Agreement in the amount of $216,835.00. The funding source is from TSPLOST account number 335-42200-541447. The PATH Design Team (PATH) will provide full professional services for surveying, landscape architecture, engineering, permitting, contract administration, and construction management for the 1.1-mile, ten (10) foot wide, concrete multi-use trail along Walt Stephens Road. ✔ $216,835.00 ✔ The project begins at the SE corner of Walt Stephens Rd and Monarch Village Way, crosses Walt Stephens at the existing traffic signal, continues east as a ten (10) foot side path with five (5) to ten (10) foot landscape buffer, crosses I75 via existing road bridge, turns into a private property to tie into the programmed trail by the proposed development on Flippen Road. Public Works recommends approval. EXHIBIT C SAP Criteria / RFP Documents REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS The proposal must contain the information outlined below. Please include a title on each page of your proposal and number the pages to ensure proper identification. 1. Cover Letter 2. Executive Summary 3. Evaluation and Selection Criteria 1. Cover/Transmittal Letter Each proposal must include a Cover/Transmittal Letter that briefly summarizes the qualifications and experience relevant to the scope. Please include in the letter the following: i. Company information, including the name of the company (including any dba names); headquarters and parent company locations; and a brief history of the company. ii. Company’s mailing address, contact person, telephone number for the primary contact person, and email address. iii. A principal or officer of the company authorized to execute contracts or other similar documents on the firm’s behalf must sign the letter. 2. Cost Proposal Requirements Offerors shall submit a schedule of fully burdened hourly rates for all proposed personnel classifications anticipated to perform services under this contract. Hourly rates shall include all direct and indirect costs, overhead, administrative expenses, and profit. Hourly rates shall remain firm for the initial contract term. Task orders may be issued on a negotiated lump-sum basis or time-and-materials basis, at the City’s discretion. The City reserves the right to negotiate pricing for each task order based on the defined scope of services. 3. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Offerors shall disclose any current or recent (within the past three years) representation of private developers, property owners, or entities with active or pending development 40 interests within the City of Stockbridge. Offerors shall also disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise during the term of the contract. The City reserves the right to determine whether any disclosed conflict constitutes a material conflict and to require mitigation measures as a condition of contract award 3. Executive Summary Executive Summary: An executive summary letter should include the key elements of the respondents’ RFP and an overview of the team. Indicate the address and telephone number of the respondent’s office located nearest to Stockbridge, Georgia, and the office from which the proposal will be managed. II. RFP EVENT DATES AND SUBMISSION RFP Number: 2026-00009 On-Call Planning Services Questions Due: Monday, June 8th, at 5 PM EST Proposal Due Date: Wednesday, June 17th, by 2 PM EST Proposals shall only be accepted online through the Bonfire Portal Bonfire Portal All submissions are due at the specified location, no later than the date and time herein. The RFP package must include detailed information relative to the Request for Proposal Process and Selection Criteria, as required. The Proposal Letter is included as page two (2) of this RFP and Exhibits C-I must be attached to Bonfire and must be signed by a person authorized to legally bind the company. III. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCESS a. All RFPs received will be reviewed by the Purchasing Manager to ensure that all administrative requirements of the RFP package have been met by the Offerors. Each RFP will be reviewed to ensure that the Offeror submitted all information required in the RFP and that all documents requiring a signature have been signed. Failure to meet these requirements may be cause for rejection. All RFP’s that meet the administrative requirements will then be turned over to the evaluation committee for further evaluation. b. The Evaluation Committee will review all submittals received and rank Offerors 41 based on submittal information required in the Evaluation and Selection Criteria. Discussions may be conducted by the City of Stockbridge with the apparent highestranking offeror who submits an RFP determined to be reasonably susceptible to selection for award, for clarification and to assure full understanding and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and revision of statements, and such revisions may be permitted after submissions and prior to award. In conducting any such discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by competing Offerors. Cost will be considered but will not be the sole determining factor. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to amend the RFP prior to the date of the RFP submission. Addenda will be posted to the Bonfire Portal c. Awards of contract shall be made to one responsible offeror who has successfully submitted an RFP and been ranked by the Evaluation Committee, considering all the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP. No other factors or criteria shall be used in the evaluation. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to reject all RFP’s submitted in response to this RFP. IV. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCESS 1. Relevant Municipal Planning Experience – 25 Points Demonstrated experience providing professional planning services for municipalities of similar size and complexity, including Comprehensive Plan implementation and small area planning. 2. Experience with Small Area Studies – 25 Points Specific experience developing Small Area Plans, corridor studies, master plans, or similar focused planning efforts, including public engagement and implementation strategies. 3. Technical Expertise in Priority Areas – 20 Points Demonstrated expertise in housing redevelopment, transportation planning, zoning analysis, land use policy, and urban design. 4. Project Team Qualifications & Capacity – 15 Points Qualifications, availability, and experience of key personnel assigned to this contract, 42 including the ability to manage approximately three (3) task orders annually. 5. Public Engagement Approach – 10 Points Proposed methodology for conducting meaningful stakeholder and community engagement. 6. Cost Proposal – 5 Points Reasonableness and competitiveness of the submitted hourly rate schedule and overall pricing structure. The City reserves the right to conduct interviews, request clarifications, or request bestand-final offers if deemed necessary. Award shall be made to the highest-ranked, responsible Offeror whose proposal is determined to be in the best interest of the City V. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS a. Vendors responding to this RFP need to become a registered Vendor to sell products or services to the City of Stockbridge. Please note that the vendor file is a good source for vendor information, but not the only source. Registration does not guarantee that your firm will be solicited for any or all requirements. The vendor file will also be used to support financial transactions with vendors, including invoice payments. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to email: City of Stockbridge Purchasing Office Jandrews@stockbridgega.org b. Prior to the due date, a submitted RFP may be withdrawn by the Offeror by submitting a written request to the Buyer named herein. A person authorized to sign for the Offeror must sign all such requests. The City reserves the right to add provisions to the contract to be consistent with the successful Offeror's offer and to negotiate with the successful Offeror other additions to, deletions from, and/or changes in the language in the Contract, provided that no such addition, deletion or change in Contract language would, in the sole discretion of the City affect the evaluation criteria set forth herein, or give the successful Offeror a competitive advantage. Any exceptions to the agreement must be clearly identified, accompany the Offeror's RFP 43 and be attached to the agreement. Offerors are cautioned that any exception submitted that will give the Offeror a competitive advantage over another Offeror or that will cause a failure to meet a mandatory requirement of the RFP will not be accepted. Prior to award, the apparent winning Offeror(s) may be required to enter discussions with the City to resolve any contractual differences before an award is made. These discussions are to be finalized, and all exceptions resolved within one (1) week of notification; if not, this could lead to rejection of the Offeror's proposal. Offeror will not retype the enclosed contract. This criterion evaluates the proposer’s organizational structure, staffing capacity, and proposed supervisory approach. VI. CERTIFICATION By my signature below, it is certified that my firm can meet all terms of the statement of Proposal and will perform the services specified, and for the privilege of doing so on the City of Stockbridge premises. I understand that, upon proper acceptance of this offer by the City of Stockbridge, a contract will thereby be created. Given under my hand this 26 day of May , 20 26 . TSW Name of Firm Signature Principal Title 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 850 Business Address Atlanta, GA 30309 End of Exhibit C 44 RFP NO: 2026-0009 / DUE: June 17, 2026 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services City of Fairbun Comprehensive Plan SUBMITTED BY: TSW Primary Contact: Adam Williamson, AICP, PLA, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge / Lead Planner 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 850 Atlanta, GA 30309 Main: 404.873.6730 Direct: 470.751.2366 Email: awilliamson@tsw-design.com Web: www.tsw-design.com TSW TEAM PROPOSAL: Table of Contents Section 1: Cover/Transmittal Letter.....1 Section 2: Executive Summary.....2 TSW Team Overview TSW KB Advisory Group Purpose Possible Section 3: Evaluation & Selection Criteria.....4 Section 3A: Relevant Municipal Planning Experience.....4 One Chamblee Comprehensive Plan + Town Center Pattern Book Gainesville Comprehensive Plan City of Powder Springs Planning Initiatives Section 3B: Experience with Small Area Studies.....8 Section 3C: Technical Expertise in Priority Areas.....9 Key Planning Elements Section 3D: Project Team Qualifications & Capacity.....11 Organizational Chart Team Resumes Ability to Manage Multiple Task Orders Section 3E: Public Engagement Approach.....24 Creative Outreach and Engagement Strategy A Year Without Dots Visioning Graphics Previous Community Engagement Efforts Section 3F: Cost Proposal.....29 Section 4: Conflict of Interest Disclosure.....30 Appendix.....31 Addendum No. 1 TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services ii SECTION 1: Cover/Transmittal Letter May 26, 2026 1447 Peachtree Street NE Suite 850 Atlanta, GA 30309 www.tsw-design.com Dear Selection Committee: Tunnell-Spangler & Associates d/b/a TSW is excited to submit this proposal to provide the City of Stockbridge with On-Call Planning Services to the City of Stockbridge. Building on our ongoing Architectural On-Call Services contract, we value the opportunity to continue supporting the City through thoughtful, implementation-focused planning that advances your community vision and strategic priorities. Through our work with the City, TSW has developed a strong understanding of Stockbridge’s character, goals, and opportunities. Our involvement in projects such as the Amphitheater, Police Headquarters Renovation, Arts Center, and Parks System Master Plan has allowed us to collaborate closely with City leadership, staff, and community stakeholders. These experiences provide a meaningful foundation as we expand our partnership into planning services, bringing continuity, insight, and a deep respect for the community we’re helping to shape. TSW, founded in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1990, brings more than 35 years of experience in planning, urban design, landscape architecture, and architecture, with a proven ability to translate community vision into actionable strategies and implementable outcomes. Our planning approach is rooted in collaboration, data-informed decision-making, and a commitment to creating livable, connected, and economically vibrant communities. We understand the importance of aligning policy, design, and investment to support long-term success, and we are well-positioned to assist the City in navigating growth while preserving its unique identity. Equally important, our team brings established relationships that will enhance project efficiency and coordination, including through our subconsultant, KB Advisory, which is actively supporting the City on related efforts. Together, we offer a cohesive and informed team that understands current priorities, maintains strong working relationships, and can deliver immediate value. Below is a list that shows each firm followed by their main role. ‚ TSW – architecture, interiors, landscape architecture, and project management ‚ KB Advisory Group – economic and workforce development planning ‚ Purpose Possible - arts, culture, historic resources, and community engagement Our team is fully committed and available to dedicate the time, personnel, and resources necessary to support potential projects. All key project staff and subconsultants identified in our proposal are confirmed and available to provide the specified services, and our firm will prioritize this effort to ensure timely and high-quality deliverables. We understand the importance of seamless team coordination and will ensure continuity of staff and resources throughout the duration of the contract. We appreciate the opportunity to continue partnering with the City of Stockbridge and supporting its future through forward-thinking planning services. We are confident that our experience, established relationships, and commitment to implementation make us a strong partner for this effort. Sincerely, Adam Williamson, Principal-in-Charge / Lead Planner Direct: 470.751.2451 Email: awilliamson@tsw-design.com TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 1 SECTION 2: Executive Summary TSW Team Overview The TSW Team has been assembled based on each firm’s extensive experience with a variety of projects and previous successful team collaboration. Below is a list that shows each firm followed by their main role for a potential project. ‚ ‚ ‚ TSW – planning and project management KB Advisory Group – economic and workforce development planning Purpose Possible - arts, culture, and historic resources; community engagement TSW has worked with all of our team firms over the past five years on various municipal facilities and private development projects. TSW has outstanding relationships with these firms and understands the strengths and expertise that each firm brings to the team. Because of our previous work history, our team is able to quickly assess a scope of work, determine roles and responsibilities, and commence work immediately following contract negotiations. TSW - Planning and Project Management Tunnell-Spangler & Associates, Inc. d/b/a TSW, founded in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1990, is a full-service planning, architecture, and landscape architecture firm comprised of talented professionals who work collaboratively to provide our clients with extraordinary designs for communities, buildings, and greenspaces. With 39 employees in our Atlanta (GA) headquarters and 12 staff members in our other offices in Tulsa (OK), Chattanooga (TN), and Lexington (KY), our size allows our principals to be handson in every aspect of a project and enables more multidisciplinary collaboration. TSW works throughout the Southeast on a variety of projects, including on-call/on-demand municipal contracts, civic and community buildings, downtown master plans, streetscape plans, coding and guidelines, and park and recreation projects. TSW has extensive experience planning and designing civic buildings, including site selection, building programming, space design, and full architecture and landscape architecture services going through to construction administration. TSW leads multidisciplinary teams, working closely with municipalities, to develop buildings that reflect vernacular architecture characteristics. We also focus on sustainability, incorporating innovative design techniques for better building performance equating to lower energy consumption and maintenance costs. TSW was founded in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1990, and is led by four Principals: Adam Williamson, Caleb Racicot, Bryan Bays, and Heather Hubble. TSW’s personnel includes 51 employees (47 full-time), several of whom work in multiple studios. Our staff members include: ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ 5 registered architects 7 project architect designers 1 registered interior designer 12 registered landscape architects 5 landscape designers ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ 1 transportation engineer 17 planners (12 with AICP accreditation) 8 LEED Accredited Professionals 5 administrative employees TSW Contact Information Adam Williamson, Principal-in-Charge / Lead Landscape Architect 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 850, Atlanta, GA 30309 Main: 404.873.6730 / Direct: 470.751.2451 Email: awilliamson@tsw-design.com / Web: www.tsw-design.com TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 2 SECTION 2: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KB Advisory Group - Economic and Workforce Development Planning KB Advisory Group provides real estate and economic development consulting services to cities, counties, developers, community districts, nonprofits, and design firms throughout the Southeast. Our team examines how real estate investment and economic activity impact the broader economy of a designated area. We look at the direct impacts—every dollar spent or job worked in the area—and determine how much additional money is spent or how many jobs are supported in the broader economic ecosystem. KB Advisory Group utilizes over 25 years of nationwide experience to help clients determine what works from a market perspective. Our work incorporates: ‚ ‚ Analyzing the demographic drivers of markets and their potential. Analyzing the most suitable land use alternatives for a site or project, including the optimal mix of residential, office, industrial, retail, and hospitality and tourism uses. KB Advisory Group’s experience analyzing real estate development for a vast spectrum of clients gives it a unique perspective on the trends and a well-earned acumen in determining how to act successfully in the context of those trends. KB Advisory Group Contact Information Geoff Koski, President 999 Peachtree Steet NE, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30309 Phone: 404.845.3550 Email: geoff@kbagroup.com / Web: www.kbagroup.com Purpose Possible - Arts, Culture, and Historic Resources; Community Engagement Purpose Possible™ powers mission-driven organizations to transform communities. We accomplish this by providing resources that allow your organizational leadership and staff to focus on their mission-driven work! We can take on the rest. Our services focus on helping organizations meet today’s demands. We are thinkers AND doers. We PLAN, PROVIDE, and PRODUCE solutions for sustainable expansion and growth. Our diverse team of professionals has deep experience in leadership, fundraising, organizational strategy, communications, community engagement, philanthropic and CSR program management, and much more. How we work: ‚ ‚ ‚ Purpose Possible consultants work remotely, providing expert services without the commitment of a fulltime hire. A member of our senior team is assigned to be your primary contact and manage additional team members as needed. As a client, you benefit from the expertise of our entire team. From strategy and design to associates and management—our team leverages collective resources to deliver comprehensive solutions. Purpose Possible Contact Information Susannah Darrow, CEO + Founding Partner 830 Glenwood Avenue SE, Suite 510, #236, Atlanta, GA 30316 Phone: 404.273.0671 Email: sdarrow@purposepossible.com / Web: www.purposepossible.com TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 3 SECTION 3A: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA Relevant Municipal Planning Experience One Chamblee Comprehensive Plan + Town Center Pattern Book Chamblee, Georgia TSW led a consultant team to develop the City of Chamblee’s recent comprehensive plan update. Chamblee has completed many recent planning efforts, including their Multi-modal Transportation Plan, various Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) plans, the Rail Trail Expansion studies, the Strategic Economic Development Plan, and the Automated Shuttle Feasibility Study and Design Plan. Chamblee has also seen a lot of new development in both its downtown area and the Peachtree Boulevard corridor since its last comprehensive plan update in 2014. The scope of this comprehensive plan update was to: ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Determine what elements in the current plan is working, and what needs improvement; Make specific recommendations for land use and future development, and create additional guidelines for infill development; Develop a plan for economic development that builds off of the City’s Strategic Economic Development Plan; Make recommendations for increasing walkability and bikeability; and Develop a plan for increased sustainability. The planning process involved an extensive public outreach effort with stakeholder interviews, an online and paper survey, four public meetings, two pop-up events to gather input and advertise upcoming meetings and regular meetings with a 35-person steering committee that included deep dives into plan recommendations and site visits to areas of inspiration in and around Chamblee. The comprehensive plan update created a more defined vision for the City of Chamblee using the results of the TSW Team’s analyses, observations, and public input, and based on the recommendations of the aforementioned previous planning efforts. Following the Comprehensive Planning process, TSW’s planning, architecture, and landscape architecture studios collaborated to develop and adopt a legally binding pattern book for the historic heart of Chamblee - an area currently undergoing redevelopment. The pattern book includes zoning regulations, a regulating plan, a master plan, architectural patterns, and landscape patterns. Central to the pattern book is the master plan, which builds on the existing character by blending contemporary design with railroadinspired elements in the landscape, streetscape, and architecture. Three words define the history of the past and the contemporary design of present day to become the inspiration for the master plan: authentic, utilitarian, and refined. PROJECT SIMILARITIES ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Project Management Inventory and Analysis Small Area Plans Community Engagement Project and Policy Recommendations TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 4 SECTION 3A: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - RELEVANT MUNICIPAL PLANNING EXPERIENCE GPA Award for Outstanding Planning Process TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 5 SECTION 3A: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - RELEVANT MUNICIPAL PLANNING EXPERIENCE Gainesville Comprehensive Plan Gainesville, GA TSW led a multidisciplinary team to develop the City of Gainesville’s Comprehensive Plan update. Gainesville has experienced steady growth over the last decade and changing demographics, and will see that reflected in new development over time. The goals of the Comprehensive Plan update were threefold: condense and prioritize years worth of policy recommendations, anticipate where development energy is heading and develop aspirational design ideas, and create a graphic, easy-to-read plan document. The comprehensive plan includes goals, strategies, action items, and other tools that recommend best practices for development decisions that address economic development, transportation, housing, and other factors addressing Gainesville. The plan made updates to both the Character Area Map by condensing some classifications and making necessary updates to policies and implementation measures. The plan also features proposals for how three key redevelopment areas identified by both City staff and stakeholders could be re-imagined as new mixed-use centers that can satisfy demand for more commercial and housing, and how they can be integrated into the Highlands to Islands trail network. Lastly, an implementation plan outlines a list of projects and includes descriptions of funding strategies and the people involved with enacting the plan. Throughout the process, the community had many opportunities to give their input via virtual meetings, in-person public meetings, online surveys and activities, and at a booth during a yearly festival. CLIENT: City of Gainesville PROJECT STATUS: Adopted in 2022 PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: • • • Revised Character Area Map and Future Land Use Map Three small area plans with 3-D renderings Hybrid virtual and in-person engagement TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 6 SECTION 3A: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - RELEVANT MUNICIPAL PLANNING EXPERIENCE City of Powder Springs Planning Initiatives Powder Springs, GA TSW has worked with the City of Powder Springs and the Powder Springs community for more than a decade on numerous planning and design projects that have helped transform their downtown area into a vibrant, mixed-use environment and will continue to guide future redevelopment. Planning efforts for the City include: ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ CLIENT: Thurman Springs Park and Amphitheater (2021) SPRINGS IN MOTION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ Livable Centers Initiative Update (2016) Supplemental Study for Downtown Concept (2016) Springs in Motion Comprehensive Plan (2017) Branding and Signage Options (2018) Springs in Motion Comprehensive Plan Update (2021) Thurman Springs Park and Amphitheater Planning and Full Landscape Architecture and Architectural Design (2018-2021) Development Review (2022-2024) Unified Development Code Updates (2023) Moratorium Study (2023) Design Guidelines (2024) Downtown Development Authority Planning (2024) Signage Update (2024) Feasibility Study for Two Sites (2026) Livable Centers Initiative Study Update (2026) ADOPTED DECEMBER 6, 2021 Keck & Wood KB Advisory Group City of Powder Springs and Powder Springs Downtown Development Authority Comprehensive Plan Update (2021) RECOGNITION ƒ ƒ Georgia Planning Association - Outstanding Plan Implementation Atlanta Regional Commission - Development of Excellence - Great Places Award for Powder Springs LCI Implementation: Town Green and Historic Building Renovations DDA Planning (2024) TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 7 SECTION 3B: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA Experience with Small Area Studies City of Sandy Springs North End Design Concepts Atlanta BeltLine Pittsburgh Yards Redevelopment Master Plan City of Augusta Cherry Tree Crossing Redevelopment City of Atlanta Old Fourth Ward Master Plan About the ConCePt PlAn: This plan shows one option for the design of the site. it is conceptual and includes the following estimates: - 150,000 to 200,000 square feet of commercial space - 700 to 900 multifamily units - 80 to 100 townhomes - 300 to 400 single family lots - school MilledGeville road wH eele rocky Creek Park ss r leGend d oa sinGle FaMily loT Community Garden MUlTiFaMily BUildinG Go rd TownHoUse on CoMMerCial BUildinG Hw eXisTinG BUildinGs y neighborhood Center CCRC SITE: 24 ACRES - 540 multifamily units - 23 townhomes - 22 single family lots CCrC school village Center Jen nin Gs ad ro de s an Br id Ge ad ro Kirkpatrick Heights/Greenwood Master Plan Development Concept Plan - Rocky Creek AUGUSTA SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Feburary 2013 Prepared by: Tunnell-Spangler-Walsh & Associates 0 200 600 1000 1400 2000ft NORTH TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 8 SECTION 3C: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA Technical Expertise in Priority Areas The TSW Team brings extensive experience to help communities guide strategic growth while preserving the values, identity, and qualities that make them unique. Our approach is rooted in community engagement, thoughtful analysis, and actionable implementation strategies that position cities for long-term success. For the City of Stockbridge, our scope of services is designed to ensure the City is prepared for future growth, redevelopment, and economic opportunity while protecting the character of existing neighborhoods and strengthening community identity. Through an inclusive and collaborative planning process, TSW will work closely with residents, business owners, community organizations, elected officials, stakeholders, and City staff to develop a shared vision and craft practical policy recommendations that support Stockbridge’s long-term goals. Key Planning Elements Housing Redevelopment As Stockbridge continues to grow and evolve, the TSW Team will evaluate housing trends, neighborhood conditions, and demographic shifts to identify opportunities for a broader range of housing choices while supporting neighborhood stability and quality of life. Recommendations will consider housing diversity, redevelopment pressures, housing affordability, and opportunities for reinvestment in existing neighborhoods. The TSW Team will identify opportunities for strategic housing redevelopment and reinvestment that support neighborhood revitalization, economic growth, and long-term community stability. Our approach will evaluate underutilized properties, aging housing stock, redevelopment corridors, and infill opportunities to encourage high-quality residential development that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and aligned with zoning policy. Transportation and Multimodal Mobility The TSW Team will assess the transportation network with a focus on improving mobility, safety, accessibility, and connectivity throughout the City. Recommendations will consider roadway efficiency, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, trail connectivity, transit opportunities, and corridor improvements that support both residents and economic development goals. City of Decatur Comprehensive Plan Update – Transportation Activity TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 9 SECTION 3C: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - TECHNICAL EXPERTISE IN PRIORITY AREAS Zoning Analysis The TSW Team will conduct a comprehensive review of the City’s existing zoning regulations and development patterns to evaluate alignment with the community’s long-term vision, future land use recommendations, and redevelopment goals. The analysis will identify opportunities to modernize zoning standards, address regulatory barriers, improve consistency between policy and implementation, and support high-quality development, redevelopment, and investment throughout the City. Land Use Policy The TSW Team will evaluate the City’s existing land use policies and development regulations to ensure they support the community’s long-term vision, economic development objectives, infrastructure capacity, and desired development character. Recommendations will identify opportunities to strengthen policy direction, improve regulatory alignment, encourage high-quality development and redevelopment, and provide greater predictability for future growth and investment. Urban Design The TSW Team will develop urban design recommendations that enhance the visual character, functionality, and identity of Stockbridge’s corridors, activity centers, gateways, and public spaces. Our approach will focus on creating attractive, walkable, and cohesive environments through context-sensitive design guidance, placemaking strategies, streetscape enhancements, and development character recommendations that support the City’s long-term vision and sense of place. City of Decatur Comprehensive Plan Update – Community Engagement Land Use Board TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 10 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA Project Team Qualifications & Capacity TSW TEAM PROJECT MANAGEMENT: Principal-in-Charge: Adam Williamson, AICP, PLA, LEED AP Project Managers: SMALL AREA PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING Jia Li, AICP, LEED AP + TSW Support Staff Anna Baggett + TSW Support Staff Nathan Brown + TSW Support Staff TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STREETSCAPE DESIGN ARTS, CULTURE, HISTORIC RESOURCES Bert Kuyrkendall, PE, AICP + TSW Support Staff David Argo + TSW Support Staff Taryn Janelle + Purpose Possible Support Staff ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Bryan Bays + KB Advisory Group Support Staff Elizabeth Low + Purpose Possible Support Staff TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 11 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Adam Williamson, AICP, PLA, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge / Lead Planner Availability: 30% Education: 1997 Bachelor of Landscape Architecture University of Georgia Professional Status: ƒ Registered Landscape Architect: GA (#1089), NC (#1769), and SC (#1064) ƒ American Institute of Certified Planners ƒ LEED Accredited Professional Professional Affiliations: ƒ APA / GPA ƒ Urban Land Institute ƒ CNU Awards: ‚ 2020 GPA Outstanding Planning Process for One Chamblee Comprehensive Plan ‚ 2019 APA Small Town and Rural Planning Division - Vernon Deines Award: Downtown Kingsport Master Plan Adam, a Principal at TSW with more than 25 years of experience, is a planner and landscape architect who specializes in planning and revitalization of downtowns and corridors. He has worked on a variety of implemented projects, including rural to urban master plans, coding efforts, streetscape revitalization projects, and parks and open spaces. Adam has extensive experience leading public charrettes and workshops to develop realistic community vision plans. Representative Projects: City of Duluth On-Call Planning and Design Services (Duluth, GA) - Principalin-Charge for Downtown Master Plan and Streetscape Improvements as part of on-call planning services for a 30-acre downtown area focusing on planning of mixed-use projects with a developer and City. The project included recommendations on how to improve the existing three acre downtown park and construction documents for Main Street and Parsons Alley that have outdoor dining, art, and entertainment space. City of Peachtree Corners On-Call Professional Engineering and Design Services (Peachtree Corners, GA) - Principal-in-Charge for on-call consultant services that focused on planning, landscape architecture, pedestrian bridge design, sidewalks, multi-use trail, and bikeway design projects. USDA Forest Service On-Call Services (Southeast Region) - Principal-in-Charge and Lead Planner for site planning, architectural design services, programming, landscape architecture, and civil engineering for Region 8 projects. Recent projects include site planning and design for the Puerto Rico’s Corridor 191 Recreation Sites, Chickasawhay Administrative Site, Bienville Ranger District Office, London Ranger Station Administrative Site, National Seed Lab Facilities, and Southeast Regional Office. Midtown Alliance Juniper and 12th Streets Streetscapes (Atlanta, GA) - Project Manager and Landscape Architect for streetscape master plan, guidelines, and construction documents for Atlanta arterial that connects Midtown to Downtown focused on stormwater management and includes a cycletrack. City of Goose Creek Comprehensive Plan (Goose Creek, SC) - Principal-inCharge for a major update to the City’s comprehensive plan that involved a robust public involvement strategy, an annexation plan, redevelopment ideas for under-utilized lands in the city, and preliminary zoning update recommendations. Fairfield County Conceptual Master Plan (Fairfield County, SC) - Principal-in-Charge for planning and design services for the Cook Road development alongI-77 to develop conceptual plan options and computer-generated renderings to show transitions from commercial to residential and commercial to industrial. Augusta Sustainable Development Implementation Program (Augusta, GA) Project Manager for HUD sponsored 4.5-mile corridor revitalization plan focused on multi-modal transportation, urban design, and affordable housing. The program also includes an extensive public outreach effort. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 12 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Jia Li, AICP, LEED AP Senior Associate / Small Area Plan Project Manager Jia is a community planner specializing in incorporating design into public and private planning efforts. Jia ‘s experience includes a range of projects: downtown master planning, community based urban redevelopment plans, urban design, and public policy initiatives. In addition, she has excellent hand and computer graphic skills that aid in communicating ideas and concepts. Availability: 50% Education: 2004 Master of City and Regional Planning Georgia Institute of Technology 2002 Master of Science in City Planning and Design, Tianjin University 1999 Bachelor of City Planning and Design, Tianjin University Professional Status: ‚ American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Affiliations: ‚ American Planning Association Awards: ‚ 2025 Georgia Planning Association Outstanding Plan Implementation Downtown Albany Master Plan ‚ 2020 Urban Guild Awards Design Excellence - Las Catalinas Beachtown Prior to joining TSW in Fall of 2006, Jia worked with the City of Atlanta as a senior planner, where she managed a variety of city-sponsored plans. Since joining TSW, she has built on this experience to successfully lead all facets of both public and private planning efforts. Representative Projects: Atlanta Beltline Pittsburgh Yards Redevelopment Master Plan (Atlanta, GA) Project Planner for small area plan to transform the 13.7-acre site into a mixed-use development that includes housing, commercial, light industrial, and community open space. The effort included a phased implementation plan and design guidelines for architectural character. City of Sandy Springs North End Design Redevelopment Concepts (Sandy Springs, GA) - Urban Designer for different scenarios of small area redevelopment concept plans for four underutilized redevelopment sites. Augusta Sustainable Development Implementation Program (Augusta, GA) Project Planner and Urban Designer for HUD sponsored corridor revitalization plan focused on multi-modal transportation, urban design, and affordable housing. The plan created detailed small area plans and implementation program for a cluster of transit-oriented development neighborhoods along the corridor. City of Albany Harlem District Revitalization Plan (Albany, GA) - Project Manager for district area-level planning for historic Harlem District that builds on the recommendations of the Downtown Albany Master Plan while focusing on historic preservation, public realm enhancements, and compatible infill development. Stonecrest Development Plan (Stonecrest, GA) - Project Manager and Planner for development plan that focuses on a mixed-use town center area, two village centers with surrounding residential, and a riverside resort area. The development includes a variety of residential options, including senior living, multifamily, townhome, cottage, and single-family. Special consideration was given to preserving natural areas and including habitat buffers between developed areas. Monroe Town Center LCI (Monroe, GA) - Project Planner for historic downtown core and gateway study focused on land use, urban design, and transportation solutions. The plan created a long term vision for promoting sustainable growth within its downtown core, along Broad Street, and in nearby neighborhoods. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 13 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Anna Baggett, AICP Associate / Comprehensive Plan Project Manager Anna joined TSW in 2022 as a community planner in the Planning Studio. With a strong background in land use policy, transportation, and climate resiliency, Anna manages and supports planning studies that manage growth with a focus on enhanced mobility and connectivity, sustainability, and community engagement. Availability: 30% Education: 2019 Master of City & Regional Planning Georgia Institute of Technology 2016 BBA Economics, Public Policy Emphasis, Minor in Geography University of Georgia Professional Status: ƒ American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Affiliations: ƒ Georgia Planning Association-Climate Working Group Founding Member ƒ East Atlanta Community Association (EACA) Land Use & Zoning Committee Member Awards: ƒ 2021 ARC Regional Excellence Award Visionary Planning: East Point City Agriculture Plan Anna previously worked at VHB as a community planner and the Atlanta Regional Commission as a Senior Planner. Representative Projects: City of Dunwoody Comrpehensive Plan, Georgetown Small Area Plan, and UDO Update. (Dunwoody, GA) - Project Manager for the update of Dunwoody’s 2025 Comprehensive Plan, including an innovative approach to future land use planning and “dot-less” public engagement. City of Brookhaven Bound for 2044 Comprehensive Plan (Brookhaven, GA) Deputy Project Manager for TSW’s role in updating the City of Brookhaven’s comprehensive plan. TSW’s role focused on future land use and character area policy, arts and culture priorities, and engagement. With strong character area foundations, the land use plan had a more nuanced approach, defining policies for specific sub-areas and integrating missing middle housing backed by technical analysis. Barrow County Comprehensive Plan (Barrow County, GA) - Planner for a full comprehensive plan update for Barrow County—a traditionally rural county facing growth pressures from both metro Atlanta and Athens, Georgia. The plan focused on guiding denser growth in areas with planned transportation and sewer infrastructure investments to preserve agricultural land from sprawling suburban development. Douglas County Comprehensive Plan Update and Special Area Studies (Douglas County, GA) - Deputy Project Manager for the development of Douglas County’s update to its comprehensive plan. The update focused on adding character areas that worked together with the County’s parcel-specific future land use plan. Small area plans tested out these new policies. Paulding County Comprehensive Plan* (Paulding County, GA) - Planner for development of Paulding County’s update to its comprehensive plan that was developed in coordination with the County’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The update focused on defining policies for community crossroads and special areas particularly around how to preserve rural character in the face of oncoming growth. City of College Park Comprehensive Plan Update* (College Park, GA) - Project Manager and Planner to guide future growth and development while maintaining College Parks unique character and diverse population. * projects completed at other firms/organizations TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 14 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Nathan Brown Associate / Zoning Project Manager Availability: 25% Education: 2015 Master of Historic Preservation Georgia State University 2011 Bachelor of Arts in Sociology University of Georgia Professional Affiliations: ƒ American Planning Association ƒ Georgia Planning Association ƒ Georgia Association of Zoning Administrators ƒ Urban Land Institute Nathan is an Associate at TSW in the Planning Studio. Nathan’s interest in planning began as a graduate student studying historic preservation and the history of the built environment at Georgia State University. With experience as a municipal planner at both the City of McDonough, Georgia, and the City of Atlanta, Nathan brings a diverse knowledge of urban, suburban and rural public policy. In addition to his professional experience, Nathan is also active in his neighborhood, serving as a member of the neighborhood Zoning Committee and as a volunteer soccer coach. Prior to joining TSW in January 2023, Nathan was an Urban Planner at the City of Atlanta and a City Planner at the City of McDonough. Representative Projects: City of Gainesville Unified Land Development Code (Gainesville, GA) - Project Manager and Planner for the update of the city’s ULDC, including a diagnostic review, legal review, and drafting of new code and updates to existing code. Update focus areas include permitted and special uses for residential and nonresidential zoning districts; Planned Unit Development standards, Subdivisions and Land Development standards; access, parking, and loading requirements; sign ordinance; buffers, landscaping, and tree protection; and zoning applications and procedures. New code focus areas include creation of a short term rental ordinance. City of Atlanta Zoning Ordinance Rewrite (Atlanta, GA) - Community planner for zoning ordinance rewrite that includes developing alternatives for public consideration, developing content and collateral material for Focused Workshops, and presentation preparation for Idea Labs. Hall County Unified Development Code (Hall County, GA) - Lead Planner for zoning ordinance rewrite that includes developing a unified development code, the creation of content and collateral material for Focused Workshops, and developing presentations for review of the draft code for the public and government representative. Henry County Comprehensive Development Plan Update (Henry County, GA) - Planner for the 10 year comprehensive plan update that includes analysis of existing land use, transportation, and economic factors to develop public policy for future growth, developing content and collateral material for Focused Workshops, and presentation preparation for public engagement. City of Atlanta Urban Planner (Atlanta, GA) - Planner for the Department of City Planning that included reviewing development plans for consistency with the city zoning ordinance, working with architects and engineers to achieve approval for entitlements, and administering the subdivision ordinance. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 15 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Bert Kuyrkendall, PE, AICP Senior Associate / Transportation Planning Availability: 20% Education: 1995 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Mississippi State University 1993 Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics Belhaven University Professional Status: ƒ Registered Engineer: AL, GA, MS, TN, KY ƒ American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Affiliations: ƒ APA ƒ CNU (Accredited) Bert, a Senior Associate at TSW, has more than 25 years of experience as a Transportation Planner and Engineer. Bert’s planning work focuses on helping cities and towns become more sustainable, just, and livable places. He has led and collaborated on numerous transportation plans, comprehensive plans, corridor studies, bike/ped network plans, and Complete Streets design projects. As an engineer and planner, Bert is able to bring a balanced approach to transportation planning and implementation. He has extensive experience in street and multimodal facility design, with a firm grasp on state and city/county design standards, including the ability to modify and draft new transportation standards. He has shepherded many projects from concept design and public input, to estimating and budgeting, grant application, schematic and engineering design, bidding, construction oversight, and maintenance. In addition to transportation consulting roles Bert served as City Transportation Engineer for the City of Chattanooga and Transportation Design Manager for the City of Birmingham. Representative Projects: Johnson City Downtown Parking and Circulation Study (Johnson City, TN) Led a comprehensive Downtown Parking and Circulation Study for Johnson City, TN, focused on improving mobility, accessibility, and future development readiness. Conducted data-driven analysis of existing parking and traffic conditions, developed circulation models, and forecasted long-term demand. Delivered phased recommendations integrating infrastructure, policy updates, and community input to enhance downtown vibrancy and efficiency. Johnson City Downtown Parking and Circulation Study (Johnson City, TN) Led a comprehensive Downtown Parking and Circulation Study for Johnson City, TN, focused on improving mobility, accessibility, and future development readiness. Conducted data-driven analysis of existing parking and traffic conditions, developed circulation models, and forecasted long-term demand. Delivered phased recommendations integrating infrastructure, policy updates, and community input to enhance downtown vibrancy and efficiency. Diamondhead Drive Protected Bike Lanes* (Diamondhead, MS) - Project/Design Lead for protected bike lanes project that was one of the first projects pursued by the City as recommended in the Envision Diamondhead Comprehensive City Plan. Work on the project included providing construction plans/drawings, developing project estimates, and reviewing bidding documents. Madison Comprehensive Plan* (Madison, AL) - Mobility Lead for Madison on Track 2045 Comprehensive Plan. Mobility plan components include: city-wide plan for streets, greenways, sidepaths, natural trails, and bikeways; prototypical street sections for future development; sidewalk mapping update and gap analysis; street connectivity analysis; travel demand model update; intersection improvement recommendations; and recommendations to accommodate proposed regional bus rapid transit. * projects completed at other firms/organizations TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 16 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY David Argo Associate / Streetscape Design David joined TSW in 2016 as a landscape designer. David brings a thoughtful approach to site design and a passion for small details. He has 4 years of experience as a landscape designer in a variety of project settings and has worked on numerous construction document packages. David is proficient with the Adobe Creative Suite, AutoCAD, and 3D modeling/rendering software. Availability: 35% Education: 1995 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Mississippi State University 1993 Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics Belhaven University Professional Status: ƒ Registered Engineer: AL, GA, MS, TN, KY ƒ American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Affiliations: ƒ APA ƒ CNU (Accredited) Prior to joining TSW in 2016, David interned with the University of Georgia Facilities Management Division, working with Landscape Architects, surveyors, sustainable design leaders, and grounds crews. Representative Projects: 5th Street Complete Street (Atlanta, GA) - Landscape Designer for the design and construction documents for Midtown Alliance and City of Atlanta. The project follows Midtown Alliance streetscape standards and focuses on complete street enhancements, including road diets, improved ADA access, bike lane improvements, and the addition of a protected two-way cycle track. Pace Street Corridor (Covington, GA) - Landscape Designer developing construction documents for a section of Pace Street in downtown Covington. The GDOT project included a road diet, new bike lanes, ADA-accessible curb ramps, and was flexibly-designed for future redevelopment. Douglasville Downtown Greenspace (Douglasville, GA) - Landscape Designer for the design and construction documents for a large community park adjacent to downtown. Phase one includes a lage community green and amphitheater, playground, bosque, stormwater boiswale, streetscape enhancements, and renovation of an existing pedestrian bridge. Phase two will include frontage and parking for four mixed-use buildings. Broad Street (Jonesboro, GA) - Landscape Designer producing construction documents for a park and streetscape adjacent to Downtown Jonesboro. Steetscape enhancements include on street parking and a planting/furniture zone buffer. Park enhancements include a greenspace, amphitheater pavilion, gateway signage, and plazas adjacent to an old firehouse, which is being renovated into a restaurant. Juniper Streetscape (Atlanta, GA) - Landscape Designer delevoping construction documents for an eleven-block Atlanta arterial that connects Midtown to Downtown. Project goals focused on stormwater management, protected bike lanes, addition of on street parking, and implementation of streetscape standards. Heritage Park (Perry, GA) - Landscape Designer producing construction documents for phase one of a community park that includes a large amphitheater and stage, along with appropriate parking. Phase two will include walking trails, splashpad, and a sculpture walk. Phase three will expand on the walking trails, and includes a large, grand open lawn that can fucntion as multiuse fields, as well as a dog park. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 17 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY TARYN JANELLE SENIOR CONSULTANT - 25% AVAILABILITY AS OF 6/1/26 tjanelle@purposepossible.com Atlanta, GA ABOUT ME Taryn is a creative who brings a passion for equitable leadership into her over 20 years of experience in arts education and arts administration, developing and implementing programs, training and managing diverse teams, and facilitating tough conversations to create value for stakeholders and encourage both productive and inclusive work cultures. EXPERTISE Program Development & Implementation Strategic Planning Process Development & Improvement Problem Resolution Cultural Planning CERTIFICATIONS Relationship Building & Management Succession Planning Board Development Facilitation of board meetings, retreats, and work sessions EDUCATION Inclusive Leadership Issued by Catalyst, 2021 Master of Business Administration Everest University, Tampa, FL Race, Gender, and Workplace Equity Issued by Catalyst, 2021 Bachelor of Fine Arts in Musical Theatre Shorter College, Rome, GA RECENT EXPERIENCE Purpose Possible, Senior Consultant | Atlanta, GA | 2020 - Present While at Purpose Possible, Taryn has participated in several of the firm’s cultural plans, including City of Norcross, Gwinnett Place CID, City of Atlanta District 2, a placemaking plan for Downtown Atlanta, Cumberland CID, City of Alpharetta, and is currently working with DeKalb County on a placemaking plan for the Presidential Parkway community and the cultural planning portion of the City of Avondale’s Downtown Masterplan. She has also supported a placemaking program design for Georgia Council for the Arts and is currently leading a creative placemaking and economic development grant program on behalf of Atlanta Beltline, Inc. In addition, Taryn has led the creation of multiple strategic plans including, but not limited to Georgia Ensemble Theatre, 100 Miles, Counter Narrative Project, Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies Coalition of Georgia, and Rebuilding Together Atlanta. 360 Arts BLVD, Founder | Atlanta, GA | 2017 - Present Led the organization through awards of over $15,000 in grants and development opportunities to creative professionals. Premiered two original works. Developed, wrote, and produced a touring production geared towards ages 3-7. Cultivated partnerships with arts organizations to provide a wide range of opportunities to creatives of all disciplines. Synchronicity Theatre, Director of Education | Atlanta, GA | 2012 - Present Expanded the department to include multiple programs while growing the number of sites from two to eleven. Hire, train, and manage a team of instructors across multiple locations. Develop curriculum across all programs and create show-specific educational resources. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 18 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY ELIZABETH LOW SENIOR CONSULTANT - 75% AVAILABILITY AS OF 6/1/26 Atlanta, GA elow@purposepossible.com ABOUT ME Elizabeth Low is a consultant and executive with deep knowledge of nonprofits, civic organizations, and public/private partnerships. With a deft hand, she works on organizational strategy for civic organizations, municipalities, and nonprofits. Elizabeth's work is intentionally intersectional, bringing together program leadership, stakeholder and community engagement, and effective communication within the nonprofit, business, civic and cultural sectors to create more vibrant, accessible, and equitable communities. EXPERTISE Social Responsibility & Impact Communications Stakeholder Engagement Strategic Branding & Marketing Board & Donor Engagement Multi-Million-Dollar Fundraising Cultural Plans Project Management Community Engagement Placemaking RECENT RELEVANT PROJECTS - AS COMMUNITY & PROJECT LEAD City of Atlanta City Council District 2 Arts & Culture Plan - completed 2024 Atlanta Downtown Improvement District Placemaking Plan - completed 2023 City of Norcross Arts & Culture Master Plan- completed 2023 City of Alpharetta Arts & Culture Master Plan - current Georgia Council for the Arts Statewide Placemaking Training Program - current Cumberland CID Creative Placemaking Study - current EDUCATION BA Communication The University of Arizona EXPERIENCE Purpose Possible, Community Engagement Project Lead| Atlanta, GA | 2022- Present Lead teams and develop strategic civic planning initiatives to produce clear and complex master plans with detailed research, vision, and actionable goals Manage relationships with clients, stakeholders, and outside consultants Design and lead stakeholder and community engagement initiatives Provide support to consultants across a variety of sectors, particularly the organizational development team Project Highlights: Master Cultural Plan - Atlanta District 2, Master Arts & Cultural Plan - City of Norcross, Atlanta Downtown Placemaking Plan, Central Atlanta Progress/Atlanta Downtown Improvement District, Cultural Plan - DeKalb County Presidential Parkway LCI, and Cultural Plan - City of Kennesaw LCI. Elizabeth M. Low Consulting, Owner & President | Atlanta, GA 2007 – Present Provide high-touch program development, marketing and communication strategy, and fundraising expertise for clients in large, complex organizations. Lead change management for critical projects and deliver projects on-time and within budget. Liaise with key stakeholders, building and engaging a thriving network of experts, donors, political/policy figures, and community members. Key clients: Conserve Lake County, NeighborSpace, University of Illinois at Chicago, and the Kaufman-Hall Healthcare Leadership Conference. Chicago Children’s Choir, Senior Director of External Affairs & Other titles | Chicago, IL Nov 2016 – Oct 2021 Led largest external-facing projects including annual fundraising program, marketing, communication strategy, and civic relations. Managed three direct reports, collaborated with corporate partners and 39-member high-profile Board of Directors. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 19 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Geoff Koski KB Advisory Group President and Owner Geoff Koski leads the 10-person real estate and economic development consulting firm KB Advisory Group. Geoff has over 20 years of experience researching, analyzing, and reporting real estate and community development trends across the U.S. His expertise facilitates clients’ wide-ranging real estate and economic development advisory needs. Geoff and his team typically focus on work in Georgia, assessing local housing markets, economic and fiscal impacts of new real estate projects, and developing strategies for their implementation. Projects include numerous types of residential, commercial, and mixeduse. Geoff often assists public and private sector clients in maximizing the value of their real estate and development opportunities and helping Georgia cities create and use tax allocation districts (TADs). Geoff is frequently cited in the press and at professional events as a local real estate development expert and participated as the market analyst on prestigious Urban Land Institute (ULI) Advisory Service Panels. Select Project Experience • City of East Point Economic Development Strategic Plan (2025), Director & Principal-in-Charge • Atlanta Beltline, Inc. 356 University Ave. Redevelopment Market and Financial Feasibility Analysis, Principal-in-Charge (2024) • City of Fairburn Economic Development Strategic Plan (2024), Principal-in-Charge • City of Stockbridge Economic Development Strategic Plan (2024), Principal-in-Charge • Housing at its Core: Affordability in the Atlanta 5-County Region for ULI Atlanta (2023) Prior Professional Experience • Director of Consulting – RCLCO Community Work Urban Land Institute (ULI) • Full Member • National Product Council – Redevelopment and Reuse • National Advisory Service Panels (x6) • ULI Atlanta o Advisory Board o Center for Leadership, 2016 o Past Chair – UrbanPlan Committee o Chair – Livable Communities Council • Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) o Regional Leadership Institute (RLI), 2021 • Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership (ANDP) – Advisory Board TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 999 Peachtree Street, Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30309 404.845.3550 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services www.kbagroup.com 20 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Tate Wilson, AICP KB Advisory Group Managing Director Tate Wilson applies her urban planning experience and interest in developing healthier cities as a senior contributor to KB Advisory Group. In addition to her past real estate market analysis work her experience includes promoting balanced and responsible growth through policy analysis, public engagement, and membership input at the Council for Quality Growth, where she engaged with regulatory issues related to land use, planning, development, and growth throughout metro Atlanta. Select Project Experience • City of Fairburn Comprehensive Plan (2025) • Atlanta Beltline, Inc. Murphy Crossing Redevelopment Market Feasibility Analysis (2025) • City of Dahlonega Revitalization Plan (2025) • City of Dacula Downton Mixed Use Real Estate Market Analysis (2025) Tate has managed projects for KB Advisory Group, including city-wide housing studies, Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) community redevelopment planning, real estate market analyses for private and public-sector clients, economic impact and development strategies for numerous community improvement districts (CIDs) in the Atlanta metro area. • City of Fairburn Economic Development Strategic Plan (2024) Education • Senior Policy Analyst - Council for Quality Growth, Atlanta, GA Master of City and Regional Planning, Georgia Institute of Technology Bachelor of Science, Oglethorpe University • City of Stockbridge Economic Development Strategic Plan (2024) • Housing at its Core: Affordability in the Atlanta 5-County Region for ULI Atlanta (2023) Prior Professional Experience • Real Estate Consultant - Noell Consulting Group • Mayor’s Office of Resilience - City of Atlanta, GA 999 Team Peachtree Street,| Suite 4002026-0009 Atlanta, GA 30309 404.845.3550 TSW Proposal RFP No. City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services www.kbagroup.com 21 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Gabby Oliverio, AICP KB Advisory Group Senior Manager Gabby Oliverio joined KB Advisory Group after completing her Master of Science in City & Regional Planning at Georgia Tech where she specialized in Economic Development. In her role, Gabby manages multiple projects and uses her experience to construct analysis models, create visualizations for data-driven storytelling, and develop short-term and long-term strategies for communities across Georgia and the southeast. While at KB Advisory Group, Gabby has applied her economic development background to help lead both city and countywide economic development strategic plans, conduct economic and fiscal impact analyses for public and private developments, and assist communities in leveraging economic development tools such as Tax Allocation Districts (TADs). Her other experience includes federal procurement in Washington, DC, with the General Services Administration and various roles with the Georgia Department of Economic Development. Select Project Experience • Cumberland Community Improvement District Economic Impact Assessment (2026) • City of Fairburn Comprehensive Plan (2025) • City of East Point Economic Development Strategic Plan (2025) • Decide DeKalb Strategic Economic Development Plan (2025) • Bartow County TAD #3 Redevelopment Plan (2024) • City of Fairburn Economic Development Strategic Plan (2024) • City of Stockbridge Economic Development Strategic Plan (2024) Prior Professional Experience Education • Realty Specialist, General Services Administration – Washington, DC Master of City and Regional Planning, Georgia Institute of Technology • Trade Assistant, Southern United States Trade Association – Atlanta, GA Bachelor of Science in Economics and International Affairs, Georgia Institute of Technology • Urban Agriculture Intern, Mayor’s Office of Resilience – City of Atlanta, GA • International Trade Intern, Georgia Department of Economic Development – Atlanta, GA 999 Peachtree Street, Suite 400 Atlanta, GA 30309 TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 404.845.3550 www.kbagroup.com 22 SECTION 3D: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS & CAPACITY Ability to Manage Multiple Task Orders TSW’s ability to successfully perform complex planning and architectural assignments is founded on over three decades of continuous service to Georgia municipalities and public agencies. Our multidisciplinary structure, combining planning, transportation planning, landscape architecture, and architecture, in one office, provides fully integrated project delivery from concept through construction. This structure allows our team to respond quickly to client needs, coordinate across disciplines internally, and manage multiple concurrent assignments efficiently without compromising quality. TSW maintains rigorous project management systems, including detailed work plans, QA/QC procedures, and milestone tracking to ensure deliverables are completed on schedule and within budget. Our project managers have extensive experience leading public-sector projects governed by municipal procurement and contracting requirements, and we consistently earn repeat work due to our responsiveness, technical accuracy, and ability to anticipate and resolve challenges before they impact schedules or budgets. Our firm’s demonstrated performance includes delivering a broad range of facility and master planning projects for local governments—each with unique programmatic, community, and budget constraints. In every case, TSW has met or exceeded client expectations by maintaining open communication, providing innovative yet buildable design solutions, and ensuring coordination with city staff, stakeholders, and contractors through every phase of the project. The TSW Team’s proven ability to manage scope, maintain quality, and meet tight timelines demonstrates our readiness to perform the full range of planning services requested by the City of Stockbridge. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 23 SECTION 3E: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA Public Engagement Approach Creative Outreach and Engagement Strategy TSW will implement a focused and community-centered engagement strategy tailored to the City of Stockbridge Planning Services RFP and the City’s unique growth, redevelopment, and community development priorities. Engagement will play a central role throughout the planning process, informing key decisions related to land use, zoning, redevelopment, mobility, housing, economic development, urban design, parks and recreation, and implementation priorities while ensuring broad and meaningful participation across the community. TSW views engagement as essential to both planning and successful implementation. By aligning outreach with major decision points and maintaining a transparent feedback loop, the process will build a shared vision that is community-supported, actionable, and reflective of local priorities. Our approach combines in-person engagement, targeted stakeholder coordination, and accessible digital tools to build awareness, encourage participation, and clearly demonstrate how public input shapes planning recommendations and policy direction. Key Audiences Engagement efforts will focus on stakeholders who shape and are impacted by the City’s future growth and development, with particular emphasis on reaching diverse and underrepresented populations. Key audiences include residents from established and emerging neighborhoods; business owners and property owners; developers and redevelopment stakeholders; community organizations and advocacy groups; youth and senior populations; local institutions and civic organizations; and City leadership, boards, commissions, and staff. Recognizing the importance of inclusive participation, TSW will prioritize accessible engagement opportunities and targeted outreach strategies designed to reduce barriers to participation and expand community involvement. The team will coordinate with local organizations, schools, faithbased groups, community networks, and existing outreach channels to connect with a broad crosssection of the Stockbridge community. Engagement by Phase Engagement activities will align with major project milestones and planning decisions throughout the process. During the existing conditions and visioning phase, engagement will focus on understanding community priorities, identifying opportunities and challenges, and defining a shared vision for Stockbridge’s future related to growth, redevelopment, mobility, housing, infrastructure, economic development, and quality of life. During concept and policy development, engagement will test land use scenarios, redevelopment opportunities, zoning considerations, transportation improvements, urban design concepts, and policy recommendations while gathering feedback on community preferences, priorities, and tradeoffs. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 24 SECTION 3E: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT APPROACH During plan refinement and implementation, engagement will confirm recommendations, prioritize improvements and action items, and support development of a realistic and phased implementation strategy aligned with City goals, operational capacity, and available funding opportunities. Each phase will be guided by targeted questions and engagement objectives to ensure community input directly informs plan development, policy direction, and implementation priorities throughout the process. Engagement Methods TSW will use a complementary mix of in-person and digital engagement tools to reach a broad audience and encourage meaningful participation. Engagement methods may include: ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Community workshops and public open houses Pop-up engagement events at community gathering spaces and City events Stakeholder interviews and small group discussions Interactive visioning exercises and design activities Corridor and neighborhood tours Online surveys and interactive mapping tools Social media outreach and digital engagement campaigns Presentations to boards, commissions, and community organizations Youth-focused and targeted stakeholder engagement activities The engagement process will emphasize visually compelling, interactive, and easy-to-understand materials that help participants understand opportunities, tradeoffs, and planning concepts. The following pages illustrate how these strategies will be brought to life through tailored engagement tools. Coordination, Integration, and Documentation TSW will coordinate closely with City staff, elected officials, project stakeholders, and advisory groups throughout the planning process. Engagement efforts will be integrated with ongoing City initiatives and coordinated with partner organizations and community groups to maximize participation and avoid duplication of outreach efforts. The TSW Team will monitor participation levels and adjust engagement strategies as needed to ensure meaningful involvement across audiences and geographic areas of the City. Engagement outcomes will be documented through summaries, visual materials, participation tracking, and milestone updates that clearly communicate how community feedback informs planning recommendations and implementation priorities. Through this collaborative and transparent process, TSW will help the City of Stockbridge build a shared vision for the future that is broadly supported, practical to implement, and reflective of the community’s aspirations and long-term goals. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 25 SECTION 3E: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT APPROACH A Year Without Dots Engaging the community is critical to comprehensive planning, but getting people engaged in highlevel, long-range planning can be a difficult task. Our team has spent the last year developing innovative activities and approaches that are not only fun and creative, but net high-quality feedback and buy-in. A Year Without Dots We Go the Extra Mile in Creating Fun, Meaningful Opportunities for Engagement Over the years, dot stickers have become more and more common as an easy-to-use tool for getting public feedback. But are they really the best tool for the job? And do they provide the most meaningful feedback? From August 2024 to August 2025, the TSW Planning Studio staff pledged to go a full year using in an effort to keep engagement fun, and—most of all—enriching for Over without the years, dot dots, stickers have become more and morefresh, common as an easy-to-use tool for getting community members. Bythey refraining from using TSW wasAnd able design creative engagement public feedback. But are really the best tooldots, for the job? dotothey provide the most meaningful methods that have resulted rewarding dialogues with community members and to some offull our feedback? From August 2024into August 2025, the TSW Planning Studio staff pledged go a strongest plans to date. The experiment was such a success that the team, although not tied to a year without using dots, in an effort to keep engagement fresh, fun, and—most of all—enriching for pledge, plans to continue through 2026 anddots, beyond. community members. By this refraining from using TSW was able to design creative engagement methods that have resulted in rewarding dialogues with community members and some of our strongest plans to date. The experiment was such a success that the team, although not tied to a pledge, plans to continue this through 2026 and beyond. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 26 Existing Buildings Future New Buildings SECTION 3E: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT APPROACH Thronateeska Potential Residential ROOSEVELT AVE Visioning Graphics Washington St. N. WASHINGTON ST Commercial TSW strongly believes in the power of marketing and graphic techniques to convey concepts, achieve consensus, and get people excited about ideas as part of the public engagement effort. We employ a Lee Hotel variety of these techniques as part of every project, including: design guidelines, executive summary documents, perspective renderings, AutoCAD street and building sections, SketchUp 3D modeling, FLINT AVE ArcGIS mapping, Revit computer-generated renderings, Photoshop before and after renderings, Gas Light Building PowerPoint presentations, Water, and visual preference and community surveys. Section Line Roads Gordon According to Oklahoma Hotel statues, roads were laid out on section lines numbered in progression from Central west to each and from north to south. Oklahoma Common has statutory right-of-widths of 0’, 33’, 49.5’ and 66’. These widths are based off road sections removed from the State Highway System and given Herald over to counties. The The County Highway System is a significant link in Oklahoma’s Transportation System comprising of 75% of Oklahoma’s road miles and over 60% of its bridges. the right-of-way fence lines. The client came up with the innovative approach to take advantage Jethro’s Coffee of the existing mature trees and the immediate shade they provide, by utilizing the space between them for a center median multi-use trail and Flintlanes RiverQuarium then building the vehicular travel along the outside of the existing trees, which turns a standard PINE AVE section line road into a boulevard. The width of thePretoria center median Front Streetthe trees and The that contains Market Fields path will Flintvary in multi-use width depending upon existing conditions but the section shown below accommodates a minimum width based on field measurements taken from the site. The Silvers One of the most unique opportunities on the site are the existing statutory section line corridors on E. 11th Street, E. 21st Street, and the southern Albanythat Exchange portion of Evans Road. was abandoned years ago but mature trees have grown up in rows along Future Front Street Market Phase II BROAD AVE Future Albany Museum of Art 44 ROBSON RANCH MASTER PLAN REPORT TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 27 SECTION 3E: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT APPROACH Previous Community Engagement Efforts TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 28 SECTION 3F: EVALUATION & SELECTION CRITERIA - COST PROPOSAL Cost Proposal See Exhibit I - Cost Proposal for TSW Team Hourly Rates TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 29 SECTION 4: Conflict of Interest Disclosure TSW has no current or recent representation of private developers, property owners, or entities with active or pending development interests within the City of Stockbridge. TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 30 Appendix TSW Team Proposal | RFP No. 2026-0009 City of Stockbridge On-Call Professional Planning Services 31 City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 ADDENDUM NO. 1 Questions & Answers Solicitation No.: RFP 2026-0009 Solicitation Title: On-Call Planning Services ATTENTION ALL POTENTIAL BIDDERS: X MUST ADDENDUM. READ CAREFULLY AND FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS. This addendum forms a part of the contract documents, modifies the original bidding documents and shall be as binding as if contained therein. X Return Addendum with Bid Submittal. Failure to do so may subject the Bidder to disqualification. X Return Completed Revised Bid Pricing Sheets with Bid Submittal. 1. ADDITIONS / CLARIFICATIONS / QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Q1. Exhibit C has two Section Threes (3. Conflict of Interest - bottom of page 40, and 3. Executive Summary - top of page 41). Can the City confirm if the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure is meant to be its own section or included with 2. Cost Proposal Requirements? A1. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure is intended to be a separate section of the proposal and is not part of the Cost Proposal Requirements section. Due to a numbering error in Exhibit C, both the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure and Executive Summary were inadvertently labeled as Section 3. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure should be included within the Technical Proposal submission and not within the Cost Proposal. Q2. Previous RFPs have included a Cost Proposal form. Is there a specific format that the City would like followed, or is the inclusion of rates at the discretion of the bidder? A2. No. Offerors may submit their own cost proposal format at their discretion, provided they comply with the requirements set forth in the Cost Proposal Requirements section. Q3. Is the expectation that proposing firms return completed forms, or is this intended for use by the City of Stockbridge only? For example, should proposing firms ask client references to complete the Reference Verification Form and include it with their proposal, or should proposing firms only fill out the reference organization name and project title on the form, allowing your team to contact the references directly? A3. The reference forms should simply be completed by the Offeror. It is only for internal use. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 Q4. On pages 40-41 of the RFP, there appears to be two separate items labeled as number 3: one is the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure, and the other is the Executive Summary. However, at the top of page 40, the conflict-of-interest form is not listed under the requested materials. Are proposing firms expected to provide both a Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure and an Executive Summary? If yes, please advise where you would like us to include the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure within our proposal. A4. Yes. Offerors are expected to provide both a Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure and an Executive Summary. The duplicate numbering in Exhibit C is a clerical error. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure should be treated as a separate proposal section and included within the Technical Proposal submission. It is not part of the Cost Proposal Requirements section and should not be included with the separate Cost Proposal submission. For organizational purposes, Offerors may include the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure immediately following the Executive Summary or as a separately labeled section within their Technical Proposal. Q5. Can the City please modify Exhibit H (Reference Verification Form) so that each reference begins on a separate page? This would allow us to send individual pages to each client for signature and return, without disclosing other clients’ reference information. A5. No. The City will not modify Exhibit H. Offerors are not required to obtain signatures or completed responses from their references. Exhibit H is intended to be completed and submitted by the Offeror as part of the proposal package for the City's internal evaluation process. Therefore, separate reference pages are not necessary. Q6. The Bonfire portal lists separate required upload fields for the Proposal Letter and Exhibits A–I. Could the City please clarify where Offerors should upload the full Technical Proposal response, including the Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria response, team qualifications, project experience, and public engagement approach? A6. Yes, these should be loaded separately into the appropriate fields. Q7. Exhibit C includes the Request for Proposal Process and outlines the required proposal content, including Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria, Cost Proposal Requirements, Conflict of Interest Disclosure, and certification. Should Offerors upload the full Technical Proposal response under Exhibit C – SAP and RFP Docs, or should it be uploaded under a different Bonfire field? A7. The full Technical Proposal should be uploaded under the Exhibit C – SAP and RFP Documents upload field. This submission should include the Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria responses, project experience, team qualifications, public engagement approach, and Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Cost information should not be included in this submission and must be uploaded separately under Exhibit I – Cost Proposal. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 Q8. The Bonfire portal shows Exhibit B – Scope of Work as a required PDF upload. Since Exhibit B appears to be the Scope of Work and Specifications and does not appear to include a proposer signature page, should Offerors upload an acknowledgment of Exhibit B, a signed copy of Exhibit B, or include the Technical Proposal response in this upload field? A8. Offerors are not required to sign Exhibit B. To satisfy the Bonfire upload requirement, Offerors may upload a copy of Exhibit B as provided in the solicitation documents. The Technical Proposal should be uploaded under Exhibit C and should not be uploaded in lieu of Exhibit B. Q9. The Bonfire portal shows Exhibit A – General Conditions as a required PDF upload. Should Offerors sign and upload the contract/general conditions pages at proposal submission, or is Exhibit A intended to be acknowledged and completed only by the awarded Service Provider? A9. Offerors are not required to execute the contract signature pages contained within Exhibit A at the proposal stage. Submission of a proposal constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the General Conditions. Formal execution of the contract documents will occur following award. Q10. Page 1 states that the Cost Proposal must be submitted as a separate document and that pricing information should not be included in any other section of the RFP submittal. Exhibit C also includes “Cost Proposal Requirements” within the proposal process section. Could the City please confirm that all pricing information should be included only in the separate Exhibit I – Cost Proposal upload and excluded from the Technical Proposal/Exhibit C response? A10. Yes, that is correct. Pricing should only be included in the Cost Proposal Exhibit and nowhere else in the responses. Q11. Exhibit H includes Reference Verification Forms with questions and signature lines. Should Offerors obtain completed and signed forms from references and upload them with the proposal, or should Offerors provide reference contact information for the City to verify directly? A11. Offerors should simply fill out the reference forms and submit them, as they are for internal evaluation process only. Q12. Exhibit H lists the solicitation number as RFP 2026-00004, while the solicitation is identified elsewhere as RFP 2026-00009 On-Call Professional Planning Services. Should Offerors revise the form to reference RFP 2026-00009, or submit the form exactly as provided? A12. The reference to RFP No. 2026-00004 is a clerical error. The correct solicitation number is RFP No. 2026-00009. Offerors should reference RFP No. 2026-00009 in all proposal documents and forms. Q13. Exhibit C requires disclosure of current or recent representation of private developers, property owners, or entities with active or pending development interests within the City of Stockbridge. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 Should this disclosure be included in the Technical Proposal/Exhibit C response, submitted as a separate upload, or included with the required forms? A13. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure should be included within the Offeror's Technical Proposal response under Exhibit C. A separate upload is not required unless otherwise specifically requested by the City. Offerors should clearly identify the disclosure as a separate section within their proposal. Q14. Exhibit E states that the Service Provider must secure a written drug-free workplace certification from any subcontractor. Could the City please confirm whether subconsultants are required to complete and sign Exhibit E — Drug-Free Workplace and submit it with the proposal, or whether Exhibit E is required only from the prime contractor at proposal submission, with subcontractor certifications provided after award if applicable? A14. This is only for the prime at this stage. If needed further certifications for subs can be gathered at a later time. Q15. Exhibit I states that this is an on-call contract with no guaranteed workload and that no total contract value should be proposed. Could the City please confirm that the Cost Proposal should include only the required fully burdened hourly rate schedule and task-order pricing approach, and that any total price field should be marked “Not Applicable”? A15. Yes, that is correct. Q16. Can you please provide a copy of the City of Stockbridge, GA, Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy mentioned in form Exhibit F - Purchasing Policy Addendum. A16. A copy of the City's Purchasing Policy is available on the City of Stockbridge website. The applicable link is provided in Exhibit F – Purchasing Policy Addendum. Q17. Have any of the Exhibit letters shifted from the previous RFP? Also, Exhibit H form (References), has the previous RFP number 2026-20004 instead of 2026-00009. Are there any other changes to the forms? I want to use our forms from the previous RFP and want to make sure the letters or content didn't change. Thanks! A17. Other than the correction of the solicitation number from RFP No. 2026-00004 to RFP No. 2026-00009, the City is not aware of any substantive changes to the referenced forms. Offerors should use the forms included with this solicitation and reference RFP No. 2026-00009 throughout their submission. Q18. Page 55 includes the formula “Lowest Overall Annual Contract Cost / Proposer’s Price x? = Price Score,” but the Evaluation Criteria list Cost Proposal as 5 points. Could the City please confirm the intended multiplier and how cost will be evaluated given that the contract is on-call with no guaranteed annual contract value? City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 A18. The formula referenced on Page 55 is intended only to illustrate the City's general approach to evaluating pricing. Because this is an on-call contract with no guaranteed annual contract value, Offerors are not required to submit an overall annual contract cost.Cost will be evaluated based on the reasonableness and competitiveness of the fully burdened hourly rate schedule submitted in Exhibit I. As stated in the Evaluation Criteria, the Cost Proposal is worth a maximum of five (5) points. The City reserves the right to consider the overall pricing structure, consistency of rates, and anticipated value to the City when assigning cost scores. Q19. For revitalization plans and DCA funding opportunities, is the City seeking grant identification and application support in addition to planning and implementation strategies? A19. Yes. The City anticipates that on-call services may include assistance with identifying potential funding opportunities, evaluating grant eligibility, and providing grant application support when requested. However, the specific scope of services for each task order will be defined by the City at the time of issuance. Q20. Does the City anticipate selecting a single consultant team or establishing a pool of qualified firms for on-call services? A20. The City currently anticipates awarding the contract to a single consultant team. The final award decision will be based on the evaluation of proposals and the City's determination of the firm that provides the best overall value and qualifications to meet the City's needs. Q21. Are we to submit hourly rates pertaining to page 54, Exhibit I, section A? Or, per section B, are we to submit a plan for by-task-order hourly rates? A21. Offerors should submit the hourly rates requested in Exhibit I, Section A. Pursuant to Exhibit I, Section B, the City anticipates negotiating and issuing individual task orders based upon the specific scope, staffing requirements, and level of effort associated with each assignment. Q22. Is there a budget for the overall on-call? A22. No specific funding amount has been established for the on-call contract. Services will be utilized on an as-needed basis and task orders will be issued subject to available funding, project needs, and City approval requirements. Q23. Could the City please define "housing redevelopment" as listed on page 42, section IV, item 3? A23. For purposes of this solicitation, "housing redevelopment" generally refers to planning, policy development, redevelopment strategies, market analysis, housing needs assessments, corridor and neighborhood revitalization initiatives, affordable and workforce housing strategies, redevelopment opportunity identification, and related implementation activities intended to support the City's housing and community development goals. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 In the event of any inconsistency between Bonfire upload field descriptions and the solicitation documents, the solicitation documents and any issued addenda shall govern. EXHIBIT D GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ACT AFFIDAVIT Contractor(s) Name: TSW Address: 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 850, Atlanta, GA 30309 By executing this affidavit, the undersigned person or entity verifies its compliance with O.C.G.A. § 1310-91, stating affirmatively that the individual, firm, or corporation that is registered with, is authorized to participate in, and is participating in the federal work authorization program commonly known as EVerify,* in accordance with the applicable provisions and deadlines established in O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91. The undersigned person or entity further agrees that it will continue to use the federal work authorization program throughout the contract period, and it will contract for the physical performance of services in satisfaction of such contract only with subcontractors who present an affidavit to the undersigned with the information required by O.C.GA. § 13-10-91(b). The undersigned person or entity further agrees to maintain records of such compliance and provide a copy of each such verification to the City of Stockbridge within five (5) business days after any subcontractor(s) is/are retained to perform such service. 208896 E Verify TM Company Identification Number BY: Authorized Officer or Agent April 24, 2009 Date of Authorization May 26, 2026 Date (Name of Person or Entity) Adam Williamson SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS THE 26 DAY OF May , 20_26 [NOTARY SEAL] Notary Public My Commission Expires: July 9, 2029 * or any subsequent replacement operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security or any equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), P.L. 99-60 45 EXHIBIT E DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE The undersigned certifies that the provisions of Code Sections 50-24-1 through 50-24-6 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the “Drug-free Workplace Act”, have been complied with in full. The undersigned further certifies that: (1) A drug-free workplace will be provided for the Service Provider’s employees during the performance of the Contract; and (2) Each Service Provider who hires a subcontractor to work in a drug-free workplace shall secure from the subcontractor the following written certification: “As part of the subcontracting agreement with (Service Provider), (subcontractor) certifies to the Service Provider that a drug-free workplace will be provided for the subcontractor’s employees during the performance of this Contract pursuant to paragraph (7) of the subsection (b) of Code Section 50-24-03.” Also, the undersigned further certifies that he/she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance or marijuana during the performance of the Contract. TSW Company Name BY: Authorized Officer or Agent May 26, 2026 Date (Service Provider Signature) Principal Title of Authorized Officer or Agent of Service Provider Adam Williamson Printed Name of Authorized Officer or Agent End of Exhibit E. 48 EXHIBIT F PURCHASING POLICY ADDENDUM I, Adam Williamson , hereby certify that I have received certify that I have received a copy of the City of Stockbridge, GA, Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy which can be found at https://stockbridgega.org/departments/procurement-division and agree to comply with all requirements of the City of Stockbridge, GA Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy to the extent the policy is applicable to the undersigned. BY: Authorized Officer or Agent May 26, 2026 Date (Service Provider Signature) Principal Title of Authorized Officer or Agent of Service Provider Adam Williamson Printed Name of Authorized Officer or Agent May 26, 2026 Date End of Exhibit F. 49 EXHIBIT G AFFIDAVIT VERIFYING STATUS FOR CITY PUBLIC BENEFIT APPLICATION By executing this affidavit under oath, as an applicant for a City of Stockbridge, Georgia Business License or Occupation Tax Certificate, Alcohol License, Taxi Permit, execution of contract or other public benefit as referenced in O.C.G.A. § 50-36-1, I am stating the following with respect to my application for a City of Stockbridge license/permit and /or contract for Adam Williamson [ Name of natural person applying on behalf of individual, business, corporation, partnership, or other private entity]: 1. X I am a United States citizen OR 2. I am a legal permanent resident 18 years of age or older or I am an otherwise qualified alien or non-immigrant under the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act 18 years of age or older and lawfully present in the United States. * In making the above representation under oath, I understand that any person who knowingly and willfully makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in an affidavit shall be guilty of a violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-10-20. Date: May 26, 2026 Signature of Applicant: Printed Name: Adam Williamson * Alien Registration number for non-citizens: ** PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF YOUR PERMANENT RESIDENT CARD, EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION, GREEN CARD, PASSPORT WITH A COPY OF YOUR DRIVER LICENSE, OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION AS ALLOWED UNDER THE LAW IF YOUR ARE A LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENT (#2).** Subscribed and Sworn Before Me, this the 26 day of May , 20 26 Notary Public: My Commission Expires: July 9, 2029 * Note: O.C.G.A.§ 50-36-1(e)(2) requires that aliens under the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, Title 8 U.S.C., as amended, provide their alien registration number. Because legal permanent residents are included in the Federal definition of “alien”, legal permanent residents must also provide their alien registration number. Qualified aliens that do not have an alien registration number may supply another identifying number below: End of Exhibit G. 50 EXHIBIT H REFERENCE VERIFICATION FORM SOLICITATION NUMBER: RFP 2026-00004 SOLICITATION TITLE: On-Call Professional Planning Services Proposing Firm (List name exactly as provided in the proposal): TSW Date of Verification: Reference Organization: May 27, 2026 City of Powder Springs Project Verified (include the Project Name / Title and brief description of the Project: Powder Springs Comprehensive Plan, Design Guidelines, and Thurman Springs Park & Amphitheater Person Contacted: Pam Conner Title of Contract: City Manager Telephone and extension: 770.943.1666 Email Address: pconner@cityofpowdersprings.org Questions: Yes/No 1. Were you satisfied with the Company/Organization’s overall performance? 2. Did the firm adhere to the scope of work and proposal requirements? 3. Did the firm provide service as agreed upon? Yes Yes Yes 4. Would you contract with this firm again? Yes Additional Comments (if any): The City has engaged this firm multiple times for more than a decade, which is indicative of the trust we place in them. Over the course of this longstanding relationship, the firm has consistently demonstrated a high degree of professionalism, expertise, and commitment. Their work has been invaluable and has contributed meaningfully to shaping our footprint and advancing our objectives Signature and Date: May 27, 2026 1 JULY 28, 2026 ✔ ✔ Ryan Anderson Community Development CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES WITH T.S.W. DESIGN. Council consideration of a resolution authorizing the approval of an on-call professional planning services contract with TSW Design to provide planning, zoning, redevelopment, transportation, housing, and related planning services on an asneeded basis for the City of Stockbridge. This contract will enable the City to efficiently obtain specialized planning expertise through task orders to support current and future planning initiatives. The City issued RFP No. 2026-0009 seeking qualified firms to provide professional on-call planning services, and proposals were evaluated based on experience, technical expertise, team qualifications, public engagement approach, and cost. Following the evaluation process, TSW Design received the highest overall score and is recommended for award based on its demonstrated qualifications, experience, and ability to meet the City's planning needs. The project fee amounts would vary based on the types and scopes of the individual tasks to be performed, to be determined as the needs arise. GL 100-74100-521200. Forecasted amount: $102,000. ✔ 102,000.00 Contract Approval for On-Call Professional Planning Services with TSW Design. Approval. 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Project Overview Project Details Reference ID 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services Project Name On-Call Planning Services Project Owner Jeremy Andrews Project Type RFP Department Purchasing Budget $0.00 - $0.00 Project Description The City of Stockbridge is soliciting proposals from qualified firms to provide professional planning services on an on-call, as-needed basis. This solicitation does not guarantee a minimum amount of work. Services will be authorized on an as-needed, task-order basis at the City’s sole discretion. Open Date May 18, 2026 3:00 PM EDT Close Date Jun 17, 2026 2:00 PM EDT Highest Scoring Supplier Score TSW Design 93.95 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 1 of 132 Conflict of Interest # Declaration of Conflict of Interest You have been chosen as a Committee member for this Evaluation. Please read the following information on conflict of interest to see if you have any problem or potential problem in serving on this committee. ## Code of Conduct All information related to submissions received from Suppliers or Service Providers must be kept confidential by Committee members. ## Conflict of Interest No member of a Committee shall participate in the evaluation if that Committee member or any member of his or her immediate family: * has direct or indirect financial interest in the award of the contract to any proponent; * is currently employed by, or is a consultant to or under contract to a proponent; * is negotiating or has an arrangement concerning future employment or contracting with any proponent; or, * has an ownership interest in, or is an officer or director of, any proponent. Please sign below acknowledging that you have received and read this information. If you have a conflict or potential conflict, please indicate your conflict on this acknowledgment form with information regarding the conflict. I have read and understood the provisions related to the conflict of interest when serving on the Evaluation Committee. If any such conflict of interest arises during the Committee’s review of this project, I will immediately report it to the Purchasing Director. Name Date Signed Has a Conflict of Interest? Al Barnes Jun 22, 2026 12:20 PM EDT No Veronica Green Jun 26, 2026 2:09 PM EDT No Jeremy Andrews Jun 22, 2026 11:25 AM EDT No William Smith Jun 29, 2026 3:39 PM EDT No Uneeda Smith-Sellers Jul 06, 2026 10:59 AM EDT No Tiffany Burke Jun 25, 2026 5:02 PM EDT No Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 2 of 132 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 3 of 132 Public Q&A #23 - Exhibit C Clarification TSW, May 27, 2026 3:26 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Exhibit C has two Section Threes (3. Conflict of Interest - bottom of page 40, and 3. Executive Summary - top of page 41). Can the City confirm if the Conflict of Interest Disclosure is meant to be its own section, or included with 2. Cost Proposal Requirements? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #22 - Cost Proposal Clarification TSW, May 27, 2026 3:30 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Previous RFPs have included a Cost Proposal form. Is there a specific format that the City would like followed, or is the inclusion of rates at the discretion of the bidder? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #21 - Regarding Exhibit H – Reference Verification Form Gresham Smith, May 27, 2026 5:09 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Is the expectation that proposing firms return completed forms, or is this intended for use by the City of Stockbridge only? For example, should proposing firms ask client references to complete the Reference Verification Form and include it with their proposal, or should proposing firms only fill out the reference organization name and project title on the form, allowing your team to contact the references directly? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 4 of 132 #20 - Conflict of Interest and Executive Summary Gresham Smith, May 27, 2026 5:10 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending On pages 40-41 of the RFP, there appears to be two separate items labeled as number 3: one is the Conflict of Interest Disclosure, and the other is the Executive Summary. However, at the top of page 40, the conflict of interest form is not listed under the requested materials. Are proposing firms expected to provide both a Conflict of Interest Disclosure and an Executive Summary? If yes, please advise where you would like us to include the Conflict of Interest Disclosure within our proposal. Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #19 - Inspire Questions- Exhibit H Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc., May 28, 2026 2:13 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Can the City please modify Exhibit H (Reference Verification Form) so that each reference begins on a separate page? This would allow us to send individual pages to each client for signature and return, without disclosing other clients’ reference information. Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #18 - Proposal Upload Location in Bonfire Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:15 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending The Bonfire portal lists separate required upload fields for the Proposal Letter and Exhibits A–I. Could the City please clarify where Offerors should upload the full Technical Proposal response, including the Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria response, team qualifications, project experience, and public engagement approach? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 5 of 132 All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #17 - Use of Exhibit C Upload Field Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:15 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Exhibit C includes the Request for Proposal Process and outlines the required proposal content, including Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria, Cost Proposal Requirements, Conflict of Interest Disclosure, and certification. Should Offerors upload the full Technical Proposal response under Exhibit C – SAP and RFP Docs, or should it be uploaded under a different Bonfire field? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #16 - Exhibit B Upload Requirement Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:16 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending The Bonfire portal shows Exhibit B – Scope of Work as a required PDF upload. Since Exhibit B appears to be the Scope of Work and Specifications and does not appear to include a proposer signature page, should Offerors upload an acknowledgment of Exhibit B, a signed copy of Exhibit B, or include the Technical Proposal response in this upload field? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #15 - Exhibit A Upload Requirement Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:16 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending The Bonfire portal shows Exhibit A – General Conditions as a required PDF upload. Should Offerors sign and upload the contract/general conditions pages at proposal submission, or is Exhibit A intended to be acknowledged and completed only by the awarded Service Provider? Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 6 of 132 Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:44 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #14 - Separate Cost Proposal Submission Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:17 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Page 1 states that the Cost Proposal must be submitted as a separate document and that pricing information should not be included in any other section of the RFP submittal. Exhibit C also includes “Cost Proposal Requirements” within the proposal process section. Could the City please confirm that all pricing information should be included only in the separate Exhibit I – Cost Proposal upload and excluded from the Technical Proposal/Exhibit C response? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #13 - Price Score Formula Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:19 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Page 55 includes the formula “Lowest Overall Annual Contract Cost / Proposer’s Price x ? = Price Score,” but the Evaluation Criteria list Cost Proposal as 5 points. Could the City please confirm the intended multiplier and how cost will be evaluated given that the contract is on-call with no guaranteed annual contract value? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #12 - Reference Verification Forms Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:20 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 7 of 132 Exhibit H includes Reference Verification Forms with questions and signature lines. Should Offerors obtain completed and signed forms from references and upload them with the proposal, or should Offerors provide reference contact information for the City to verify directly? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #11 - Reference Form RFP Number Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:20 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Exhibit H lists the solicitation number as RFP 2026-00004, while the solicitation is identified elsewhere as RFP 2026-00009 On-Call Professional Planning Services. Should Offerors revise the form to reference RFP 2026-00009, or submit the form exactly as provided? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #10 - Conflict of Interest Disclosure Location Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:20 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Exhibit C requires disclosure of current or recent representation of private developers, property owners, or entities with active or pending development interests within the City of Stockbridge. Should this disclosure be included in the Technical Proposal/Exhibit C response, submitted as a separate upload, or included with the required forms? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #9 - Exhibit E — Drug-Free Workplace / Subconsultant Requirement Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:21 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 8 of 132 Exhibit E states that the Service Provider must secure a written drug-free workplace certification from any subcontractor. Could the City please confirm whether subconsultants are required to complete and sign Exhibit E — Drug-Free Workplace and submit it with the proposal, or whether Exhibit E is required only from the prime contractor at proposal submission, with subcontractor certifications provided after award if applicable? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #8 - Cost Proposal Content / On-Call Pricing Pond & Company, Jun 03, 2026 4:22 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Exhibit I states that this is an on-call contract with no guaranteed workload and that no total contract value should be proposed. Could the City please confirm that the Cost Proposal should include only the required fully burdened hourly rate schedule and task-order pricing approach, and that any total price field should be marked “Not Applicable”? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #7 - Regarding Exhibit F - Purchasing Policy Addendum Gresham Smith, Jun 04, 2026 12:11 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Can you please provide a copy of the City of Stockbridge, GA, Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy mentioned in form Exhibit F - Purchasing Policy Addendum. Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #6 - Revised RFP Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 9 of 132 CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL, Jun 04, 2026 4:44 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Have any of the Exhibit letters shifted from the previous RFP? Also, Exhibit H form (References), has the previous RFP number 2026-20004 instead of 202600009. Are there any other changes to the forms? I want to use our forms from the previous RFP and want to make sure the letters or content didn't change. Thanks! Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #5 - Housing Redevelopment Kimley-Horn, Jun 08, 2026 4:08 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Could the City please define "housing redevelopment" as listed on page 42, section IV, item 3? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:43 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #4 - Budget Kimley-Horn, Jun 08, 2026 4:09 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Is there a budget for the overall on-call? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:42 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #3 - Hourly Rates Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 10 of 132 Kimley-Horn, Jun 08, 2026 4:10 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Are we to submit hourly rates pertaining to page 54, Exhibit I, section A? Or, per section B, are we to submit a plan for by-task-order hourly rates? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:42 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #2 - Consultant Team(s) Kimley-Horn, Jun 08, 2026 4:11 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending Does the City anticipate selecting a single consultant team or establishing a pool of qualified firms for on-call services? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:42 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. #1 - Grant Identification and Application Support Kimley-Horn, Jun 08, 2026 4:12 PM EDT, Not Public - Pending For revitalization plans and DCA funding opportunities, is the City seeking grant identification and application support in addition to planning and implementation strategies? Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:41 AM EDT, Public - Answered All questions have been answered via addendum 1. Thank you so much. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 11 of 132 Public Notices Addendum 1- Q&A Jeremy Andrews, Jun 12, 2026 9:40 AM EDT - Project Public Files changed Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 12 of 132 Internal Discussions No messages Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 13 of 132 Approvals No approval requests Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 14 of 132 Submissions Supplier Date Submitted Name Email Confirmation Code The Cratl Firm Jun 08, 2026 1:04 PM EDT Jocquin Turner jocquin@cratlcargo.co.site ODQ2OTky TSW Design Jun 16, 2026 4:11 PM EDT Jerrico Roland jroland@tsw-design.com ODUxODMy CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL Jun 17, 2026 9:45 AM EDT Brenda Farmer bfarmer@cplteam.com ODUyMTQy Kimley-Horn Jun 17, 2026 11:18 AM EDT Rhonda White rhonda.white@kimley-horn.com ODUyMjg5 Gresham Smith Jun 16, 2026 3:14 PM EDT Analynne Barlaan analynne.barlaan@greshamsmi th.com ODUxNzY2 Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. Jun 17, 2026 10:36 AM EDT Rachael Schulman marketing@inspireplacemaking .com ODUyMjE2 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 15 of 132 Pond & Company Jun 17, 2026 11:21 AM EDT Gina Putthoff putthoffg@pondco.com ODUyMjk4 Spinks Technologies, Inc. Jun 17, 2026 9:25 AM EDT Gerard Spinks gds@spinkstechnologies.com ODUyMTI1 SEAS Community Partners Jun 17, 2026 1:08 PM EDT Danita Doleman ddoleman@seaspartners.com ODUyNDY3 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 16 of 132 Project Criteria Criteria Points A - Experience 25 pts A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience 25 pts B - Studies 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies 25 pts C - Tech Expertise 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas 20 pts D - Team 15 pts Description Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate experience providing professional planning services for municipalities of similar size and complexity, including Comprehensive Plan implementation and small area planning? Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate experience developing Small Area Plans, corridor studies, master plans, or similar focused planning efforts, including public engagement and implementation strategies? Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate expertise in housing redevelopment, transportation planning, zoning analysis, land use policy, and urban design? Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 17 of 132 D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity 15 pts E - Engagement 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach 10 pts F - Cost 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal 5 pts Total 100 pts Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate the qualifications, availability, and experience of key personnel assigned to this contract, including the ability to manage approximately three (3) task orders annually? Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate a proposed methodology for conducting meaningful stakeholder and community engagement? Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate reasonableness and competitiveness of the submitted hourly rate schedule and overall pricing structure? Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 18 of 132 Scoring Summary Active Submissions Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Supplier / 100 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts TSW Design 93.95 pts 24.5 pts 24.5 pts 24.5 pts 24.5 pts CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL 91.8 pts 24 pts 24 pts 22.75 pts 22.75 pts Kimley-Horn 84.95 pts 24 pts 24 pts 22.5 pts 22.5 pts Pond & Company 83.25 pts 23.5 pts 23.5 pts 21.5 pts 21.5 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 19 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Supplier / 100 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Gresham Smith 82.75 pts 20.5 pts 20.5 pts 20.25 pts 20.25 pts Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. 78.3 pts 20.5 pts 20.5 pts 21 pts 21 pts The Cratl Firm 64.7 pts 16.25 pts 16.25 pts 14.5 pts 14.5 pts SEAS Community Partners 60.65 pts 16 pts 16 pts 15 pts 15 pts Spinks Technologies, Inc. 43 pts 9.5 pts 9.5 pts 8.75 pts 8.75 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 20 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Supplier / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts TSW Design 16.25 pts 16.25 pts 15 pts 15 pts 9.75 pts CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL 18.75 pts 18.75 pts 13.25 pts 13.25 pts 9.5 pts Kimley-Horn 15.75 pts 15.75 pts 11.75 pts 11.75 pts 8 pts Pond & Company 16.25 pts 16.25 pts 10.75 pts 10.75 pts 8 pts Gresham Smith 17.75 pts 17.75 pts 12.75 pts 12.75 pts 8.25 pts Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. 15.75 pts 15.75 pts 10.5 pts 10.5 pts 7.25 pts The Cratl Firm 13.5 pts 13.5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 6 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 21 of 132 C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Supplier / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts SEAS Community Partners 11.5 pts 11.5 pts 7.75 pts 7.75 pts 6 pts Spinks Technologies, Inc. 8.5 pts 8.5 pts 7 pts 7 pts 5.5 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Supplier / 10 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts TSW Design 9.75 pts 3.95 pts 3.95 pts CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and 9.5 pts 3.55 pts 3.55 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 22 of 132 E-1 - Public Engagement Approach F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 10 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Kimley-Horn 8 pts 2.95 pts 2.95 pts Pond & Company 8 pts 3.25 pts 3.25 pts Gresham Smith 8.25 pts 3.25 pts 3.25 pts Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. 7.25 pts 3.3 pts 3.3 pts The Cratl Firm 6 pts 4.45 pts 4.45 pts SEAS Community Partners 6 pts 4.4 pts 4.4 pts Supplier Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 23 of 132 E-1 - Public Engagement Approach F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Supplier / 10 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Spinks Technologies, Inc. 5.5 pts 3.75 pts 3.75 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 24 of 132 Proposal Scores The Cratl Firm - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 83 pts 22 pts 22 pts 21 pts 21 pts Al Barnes 35 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 pts Veronica Green 53 pts 15 pts 15 pts 10 pts 10 pts William Smith 70 pts 18 pts 18 pts 17 pts 17 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 25 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Average: 16.25 pts Average: 14.5 pts B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Calculated: ↓ 60.25 pts 16.25 pts 16.25 pts 14.5 pts 14.5 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts 18 pts 14 pts 14 pts 8 pts Al Barnes 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts Veronica Green 16 pts 16 pts 9 pts 9 pts 3 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 26 of 132 C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts William Smith 15 pts 15 pts 12 pts 12 pts 8 pts Average: 13.5 pts Average: 10 pts Average: ↓ Calculated: 13.5 pts ↓ 13.5 pts 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Al Barnes 5 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 27 of 132 10 pts 6 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Veronica Green 3 pts William Smith 8 pts 6 pts ↓ Calculated: 6 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 28 of 132 Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 4.45 pts 4.45 pts 4.45 pts Average: 4.45 pts ↓ Calculated: 4.45 pts 4.45 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 29 of 132 4.45 pts TSW Design - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 94 pts 24 pts 24 pts 25 pts 25 pts Al Barnes 85 pts 25 pts 25 pts 25 pts 25 pts Veronica Green 87 pts 24 pts 24 pts 23 pts 23 pts William Smith 94 pts 25 pts 25 pts 25 pts 25 pts Average: 24.5 pts Average: 24.5 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 30 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 90 pts 24.5 pts 24.5 pts 24.5 pts 24.5 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 pts 20 pts 15 pts 15 pts 10 pts Al Barnes 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 10 pts Veronica Green 16 pts 16 pts 15 pts 15 pts 9 pts William Smith 19 pts 19 pts 15 pts 15 pts 10 pts Average: 16.25 pts Average: 15 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 31 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 16.25 pts ↓ 16.25 pts 15 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 10 pts Al Barnes 10 pts Veronica Green 9 pts William Smith 10 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 32 of 132 15 pts 9.75 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 9.75 pts ↓ Calculated: 9.75 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.95 pts 3.95 pts 3.95 pts Average: 3.95 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 33 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 3.95 pts 3.95 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 34 of 132 3.95 pts CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 93 pts 25 pts 25 pts 25 pts 25 pts Al Barnes 90 pts 25 pts 25 pts 20 pts 20 pts Veronica Green 87 pts 24 pts 24 pts 24 pts 24 pts William Smith 83 pts 22 pts 22 pts 22 pts 22 pts Average: 24 pts Average: 22.75 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 35 of 132 Reviewer Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 25 pts ↓ Calculated: 88.25 pts 24 pts ↓ 24 pts 22.75 pts 22.75 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 19 pts 19 pts 14 pts 14 pts 10 pts Al Barnes 20 pts 20 pts 15 pts 15 pts 10 pts Veronica Green 19 pts 19 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 pts William Smith 17 pts 17 pts 14 pts 14 pts 8 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 36 of 132 Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Average: 18.75 pts Average: 13.25 pts Average: ↓ Calculated: 18.75 pts ↓ 18.75 pts 13.25 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 10 pts Al Barnes 10 pts Veronica Green 10 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 37 of 132 13.25 pts 9.5 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts William Smith 8 pts 9.5 pts ↓ Calculated: 9.5 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.55 pts 3.55 pts 3.55 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 38 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Average: 3.55 pts ↓ Calculated: 3.55 pts 3.55 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 39 of 132 3.55 pts Kimley-Horn - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 88 pts 24 pts 24 pts 23 pts 23 pts Al Barnes 65 pts 25 pts 25 pts 20 pts 20 pts Veronica Green 82 pts 23 pts 23 pts 23 pts 23 pts William Smith 93 pts 24 pts 24 pts 24 pts 24 pts Average: 24 pts Average: 22.5 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 40 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 82 pts 24 pts 24 pts 22.5 pts 22.5 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts 18 pts 14 pts 14 pts 9 pts Al Barnes 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts Veronica Green 15 pts 15 pts 13 pts 13 pts 8 pts William Smith 20 pts 20 pts 15 pts 15 pts 10 pts Average: 15.75 pts Average: 11.75 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 41 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 15.75 pts ↓ 15.75 pts 11.75 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 9 pts Al Barnes 5 pts Veronica Green 8 pts William Smith 10 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 42 of 132 11.75 pts 8 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 8 pts ↓ Calculated: 8 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 2.95 pts 2.95 pts 2.95 pts Average: 2.95 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 43 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 2.95 pts 2.95 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 44 of 132 2.95 pts Gresham Smith - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 78 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts Al Barnes 80 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts Veronica Green 75 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts William Smith 85 pts 22 pts 22 pts 21 pts 21 pts Average: 20.5 pts Average: 20.25 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 45 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 79.5 pts 20.5 pts 20.5 pts 20.25 pts 20.25 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 17 pts 17 pts 13 pts 13 pts 8 pts Al Barnes 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 pts Veronica Green 15 pts 15 pts 13 pts 13 pts 7 pts William Smith 19 pts 19 pts 15 pts 15 pts 8 pts Average: 17.75 pts Average: 12.75 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 46 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 17.75 pts ↓ 17.75 pts 12.75 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Al Barnes 10 pts Veronica Green 7 pts William Smith 8 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 47 of 132 12.75 pts 8.25 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 8.25 pts ↓ Calculated: 8.25 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.25 pts 3.25 pts 3.25 pts Average: 3.25 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 48 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 3.25 pts 3.25 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 49 of 132 3.25 pts Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 82 pts 21 pts 21 pts 22 pts 22 pts Al Barnes 50 pts 15 pts 15 pts 15 pts 15 pts Veronica Green 78 pts 23 pts 23 pts 23 pts 23 pts William Smith 90 pts 23 pts 23 pts 24 pts 24 pts Average: 20.5 pts Average: 21 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 50 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 75 pts 20.5 pts 20.5 pts 21 pts 21 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts 18 pts 13 pts 13 pts 8 pts Al Barnes 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts Veronica Green 16 pts 16 pts 10 pts 10 pts 6 pts William Smith 19 pts 19 pts 14 pts 14 pts 10 pts Average: 15.75 pts Average: 10.5 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 51 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 15.75 pts ↓ 15.75 pts 10.5 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Al Barnes 5 pts Veronica Green 6 pts William Smith 10 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 52 of 132 10.5 pts 7.25 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 7.25 pts ↓ Calculated: 7.25 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.3 pts 3.3 pts 3.3 pts Average: 3.3 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 53 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 3.3 pts 3.3 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 54 of 132 3.3 pts Pond & Company - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 88 pts 23 pts 23 pts 23 pts 23 pts Al Barnes 65 pts 25 pts 25 pts 20 pts 20 pts Veronica Green 81 pts 23 pts 23 pts 21 pts 21 pts William Smith 86 pts 23 pts 23 pts 22 pts 22 pts Average: 23.5 pts Average: 21.5 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 55 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 80 pts 23.5 pts 23.5 pts 21.5 pts 21.5 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 19 pts 19 pts 14 pts 14 pts 9 pts Al Barnes 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts Veronica Green 18 pts 18 pts 10 pts 10 pts 9 pts William Smith 18 pts 18 pts 14 pts 14 pts 9 pts Average: 16.25 pts Average: 10.75 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 56 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 16.25 pts ↓ 16.25 pts 10.75 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 9 pts Al Barnes 5 pts Veronica Green 9 pts William Smith 9 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 57 of 132 10.75 pts 8 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 8 pts ↓ Calculated: 8 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.25 pts 3.25 pts 3.25 pts Average: 3.25 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 58 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 3.25 pts 3.25 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 59 of 132 3.25 pts Spinks Technologies, Inc. - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 78 pts 21 pts 21 pts 20 pts 20 pts Al Barnes 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts Veronica Green 27 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts William Smith 52 pts 12 pts 12 pts 10 pts 10 pts Average: 9.5 pts Average: 8.75 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 60 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 39.25 pts 9.5 pts 9.5 pts 8.75 pts 8.75 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 17 pts 17 pts 12 pts 12 pts 8 pts Al Barnes 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts Veronica Green 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 7 pts William Smith 12 pts 12 pts 11 pts 11 pts 7 pts Average: 8.5 pts Average: 7 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 61 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 8.5 pts ↓ 8.5 pts 7 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Al Barnes 0 pts Veronica Green 7 pts William Smith 7 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 62 of 132 7 pts 5.5 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 5.5 pts ↓ Calculated: 5.5 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.75 pts 3.75 pts 3.75 pts Average: 3.75 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 63 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 3.75 pts 3.75 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 64 of 132 3.75 pts SEAS Community Partners - Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 82 pts 21 pts 21 pts 22 pts 22 pts Al Barnes 30 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 pts Veronica Green 35 pts 13 pts 13 pts 8 pts 8 pts William Smith 78 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts 20 pts Average: 16 pts Average: 15 pts ↓ Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 65 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies ↓ Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Calculated: 56.25 pts 16 pts 16 pts 15 pts 15 pts C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement Reviewer / 20 pts / 20 pts / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts 18 pts 13 pts 13 pts 8 pts Al Barnes 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 5 pts 0 pts Veronica Green 7 pts 7 pts 0 pts 0 pts 7 pts William Smith 16 pts 16 pts 13 pts 13 pts 9 pts Average: 11.5 pts Average: 7.75 pts Average: Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 66 of 132 B - Studies B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies Reviewer C - Tech Expertise C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 20 pts D - Team D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity E - Engagement / 15 pts / 15 pts / 10 pts ↓ Calculated: 11.5 pts ↓ 11.5 pts 7.75 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Al Barnes 0 pts Veronica Green 7 pts William Smith 9 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 67 of 132 7.75 pts 6 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach Reviewer / 10 pts 6 pts ↓ Calculated: 6 pts Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal Reviewer / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 4.4 pts 4.4 pts 4.4 pts Average: 4.4 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 68 of 132 Reviewer Total F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts / 5 pts ↓ Calculated: 4.4 pts 4.4 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 69 of 132 4.4 pts Proposal Score Comments The Cratl Firm - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 18 pts Other Limited municipal planning experience relative to competing firms. Al Barnes 10 pts Partially meets my expectations Basic Response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 22 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Veronica Green 15 pts Partially meets my expectations applicant provides general planning services but provides not examples of long range or small Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 70 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments area planning nor economic development plans B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 17 pts Other Proposal contains relevant planning experience but fewer examples of downtown master planning assignments. Al Barnes 10 pts Medium level of detail in response Basic response Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 71 of 132 Reviewer Veronica Green Score 10 pts Reason Comments Mostly complete response Applicant does not provided examples of small area planning or planning activities C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 15 pts Well-supported claim(s) Technical approach satisfies minimum qualifications but lacks the breadth and specialization demonstrated by higher-ranked firms. Al Barnes 5 pts Doesn't meet my expectations Response was basic Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 72 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments transportation planning and using urban design. Veronica Green 16 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Applicant has significant experience in zoning and the ability to assist in strategic planning and policy development. D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 12 pts Well-supported claim(s) Qualified staff with limited organizational depth for multiple concurrent planning assignments. Al Barnes 5 pts Partially meets my expectations Basic response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 14 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 73 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Veronica Green 9 pts Mostly complete response Identifies only two people on the project team. Specializes in operational planning activities Reason Comments E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score William Smith 8 pts Well-supported claim(s) Standard engagement process meeting minimum RFP expectations. Al Barnes 5 pts Partially meets my expectations Basic response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 74 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments methodology for community engagement. Veronica Green 3 pts Doesn't meet my expectations Doesn't provide a clear methodology for strategy for public engagement Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 4.45 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 75 of 132 TSW Design - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 25 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations Extensive portfolio of municipal planning projects throughout Georgia with demonstrated expertise in downtown revitalization, redevelopment strategies, comprehensive planning, zoning, and implementation. Experience is directly applicable to the City's objectives. Al Barnes 25 pts Well-supported claim(s) Claims are supported Uneeda Smith-Sellers 24 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 76 of 132 Reviewer Veronica Green Score 24 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) experience working on an on call basis with the city of Stockbridge and other cities of comparable size. Included the City of Augusta Redevelopment Project, Old Fourth Ward in Atlanta, and the Greenwood Master Plan. B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 25 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations Exceptional experience preparing downtown master plans, corridor plans, redevelopment strategies, and implementation-focused Small Area Plans. Portfolio demonstrates repeated success on projects of similar scale and complexity. Al Barnes 25 pts Well-supported claim(s) Experience developing small areas Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 77 of 132 Reviewer Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green Score 25 pts 23 pts Reason Comments Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) identified for small area plan as well as other areas of expertise useful on later tasks C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 19 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Excellent multidisciplinary team with strengths in urban design, placemaking, market analysis, economic development, landscape architecture, and implementation. One-point deduction reflects slightly less in-house engineering capacity than larger multidisciplinary firms. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 78 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments Al Barnes 10 pts Partially fits desired attributes Submitted what was required Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) city of decatur comp plan with a focus on housing and multimodalism Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 20 pts 16 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 15 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Highly qualified senior project team with nationally recognized planners, urban designers, and implementation specialists. Demonstrated capacity to manage Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 79 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments multiple municipal projects simultaneously. Al Barnes Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 15 pts 15 pts 15 pts Well-supported claim(s) Claims are supported Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Principal has experience with on call contracts for cities of comparable size. The Project Manager is a specialized small area planner with experience in revitalization and sustainable developmet E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 80 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 10 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Outstanding engagement strategy utilizing stakeholder interviews, design charrettes, visualization techniques, workshops, and collaborative planning methods that exceed minimum RFP requirements. Al Barnes 10 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted claims Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. High level of detail in response community center engagement strategy. Target approach to stakeholders. traditional methods, expanded targeted audience and includes social media as an outreach tool that may expand our public engagement reach Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 10 pts 9 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 81 of 132 F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 3.95 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 82 of 132 CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 22 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Good municipal planning experience supporting local governments across multiple planning disciplines. Al Barnes 25 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Submitted what was asked and examples to reference. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates strong relevant experience providing professional planning services for municipalities of similar size and complexity. The examples cited—including the City of Chamblee, City of Mulberry, City of Covington, and other Uneeda Smith-Sellers 25 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 83 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments comparable Georgia municipalities—show direct experience with comprehensive planning, master planning, land use policy, future development guidance, public engagement, and implementation-focused recommendations. This experience is relevant to the City’s needs because it reflects work in communities managing growth, redevelopment, transportation coordination, housing considerations, economic development, and preservation of community character. Veronica Green 24 pts High level of detail in response Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 84 of 132 Applicant team provided a documentation that it is capable of creating visionary and policy driven planning studies. Particularly with Douglas County Initiative where policy is central to the small area and corridor paln B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 22 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Relevant experience preparing neighborhood and corridor plans with implementation recommendations. Al Barnes 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was required. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience developing Small Area Plans, corridor studies, master plans, and similar focused planning efforts. The proposal reflects relevant planning expertise, including public engagement activities and implementation-oriented strategies designed to guide future decisionmaking and project execution. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 25 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 85 of 132 Reviewer Veronica Green Score 24 pts Reason Comments High level of detail in response Applicant specified the Douglas County Lee Rd Study as a small area plan and corridor study. Its strength is that it is policy-based growth. The plan focused on redevelopment and preservation and economic development efforts for the next twenty years. The Saint Rose Playbook is of particular interest because it takes existing infrastructure creates a plan to incorporate housing, workforce training and civic functions. Revitilization and Redevelopment with modern infrastructure is a central desire for the city and with the Covington Urban Redevelopmentt plan the applicant meets this criteria C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 86 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 17 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Competent planning team with appropriate technical capabilities. Proposal demonstrates less emphasis on placemaking and urban design innovation. Al Barnes 20 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Yes, Submitted examples to reference. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates expertise in what the City of Stockbridge is requesting. High level of detail in response The application notes that CPL has participated in numerous placemaking initiatives in the state of GA. The application does indicate that CPL can provide an large variety of planning activities for projects over the expected time period which may include efforts led by the DDA and Economic Development. The provided example of the suitability Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 19 pts 19 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 87 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments assessment for industrial recruitment of and policy building in Bethlehem. It is visionary in the efforts for Grand Etowah reimagining the city center as a village with a variety of housing options as well a economic and civic opportunities. Addtionally the complex planing fo rthe Snellville Town Center master plan which included a muli-disciplinary approach D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 14 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Experienced staff with sufficient organizational resources to complete assigned work. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 88 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments Al Barnes 15 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Strong candidates were submitted. Well-supported claim(s) Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate the qualifications, availability, and experience of key personnel assigned to this contract, including the ability to manage approximately three (3) task orders annually? Well-supported claim(s) The Principal in Charge has significant experience in the areas in which this contract will initially focus. The Project Manager however, does not have much document experience in this type of planning work. His primary skill set has been in code. It should be noted that in his prior work experience he was the project Manager for the Riverdale LCI and and Marietta. Gillam Sinharoy a Senior Planner has the most Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 14 pts 10 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 89 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments experience in the ares of initial interest E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 8 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Adequate public engagement process that satisfies RFP requirements but lacks innovative outreach techniques. Al Barnes 10 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Submitted examples to reference. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a strong and comprehensive methodology for conducting meaningful stakeholder and community engagement. The proposed approach meets and exceeds expectations by outlining Uneeda Smith-Sellers 10 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 90 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments effective strategies to engage stakeholders and community members throughout the planning process, promote inclusive participation, gather meaningful feedback, and incorporate input into final recommendations and implementation strategies. Veronica Green 10 pts High level of detail in response F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 91 of 132 The applicant demonstrated capability of creating public engagement that innovative in and interactives this was highlighted in the Mid City Stroll initiative. The type of activities were inclusive and memorable ensuring continued engagement. Additionally the applicant provided examples of traditional public engagement meeting the primary users where they were. Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 3.55 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 92 of 132 Kimley-Horn - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 24 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Extensive municipal planning and engineering experience with numerous redevelopment and downtown planning assignments. Excellent experience across Georgia and nationally. Al Barnes 25 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted well supported claims Uneeda Smith-Sellers 24 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Well-supported claim(s) Applicant has completed on call planning and small areas studies in comparable communities and has an extensive amount of resources from from the larger corporation. Veronica Green 23 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 93 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments Comp Planning in Chamblee, Small Areas studies in Gwinett and Peachtree corners mirror the city's needs and vision B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 24 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Strong history of corridor studies, downtown planning, and redevelopment planning. Demonstrated experience with implementation-oriented planning efforts comparable to the City's needs. Al Barnes 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Small area experience was submitted Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 94 of 132 Reviewer Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green Score 23 pts 23 pts Reason Comments Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. High level of detail in response Gwinnet Place Mall Revitalization, Peachtree Corners Small Area Plan and the Atlanta Small Area Plans have elements that mirror the city's needs. Also has flexibility for transportation studies and economic development plans C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 20 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Outstanding multidisciplinary capabilities including planning, transportation, engineering, utilities, economic development, GIS, and implementation. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 95 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments Comprehensive technical resources exceed project requirements. Al Barnes 10 pts Medium level of detail in response Detail was limited. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Veronica Green 15 pts High level of detail in response Applicant provided little emphasis on housing strategies D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 15 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations Highly experienced senior staff supported by one of the largest Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 96 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments multidisciplinary planning teams in the industry. Excellent organizational depth and project management capacity. Al Barnes Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 5 pts 14 pts 13 pts Mostly complete response Key personnel qualifications were submitted Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. High level of detail in response Project Manager has extensive experience around the greater Atlanta area, including on call planning, lci, and small area plan as well as transportation planning. Very little focus on housing strategies. Project Director has extensive experience with On-call projects. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 97 of 132 E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 10 pts High level of detail in response Comprehensive public engagement process utilizing digital engagement tools, stakeholder outreach, workshops, and community meetings designed to build consensus. Al Barnes 5 pts Medium level of detail in response Proposed community engagement Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Well-supported claim(s) Applicant used a data drive approach in conjunction with traditional methodology. Applicant is capable of target public engagement as well as digital platforms. Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 9 pts 8 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 98 of 132 F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 2.95 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 99 of 132 Gresham Smith - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 22 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Strong planning and transportation portfolio with significant publicsector experience. Proposal demonstrates relevant municipal expertise but less emphasis on transformational downtown planning. Al Barnes 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was requested Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) The applicant provided multiple examples of municipal planning, primarily focusing on transportation planning and comp plans for Veronica Green 20 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 100 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments comparable size cities. Small area studies are primarily LCI and CID B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 21 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Experience includes corridor planning and urban design; however, fewer examples of implementation-focused downtown master plans similar to the City's vision. Al Barnes 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was requested and examples. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 101 of 132 Reviewer Veronica Green Score 20 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Applicant primarily focuses on LCI and CID work. The applicant does state explicitly layoiut types of policies with vision for the noted studies. C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 19 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Highly capable multidisciplinary firm with strengths in planning, landscape architecture, transportation, and design. Excellent technical resources available. Al Barnes 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was requested Uneeda Smith-Sellers 17 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 102 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Veronica Green 15 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Applicant included a funding plan for Brighton TN, AIso focused on trails plan. Of particular interest is the Hahira Area Traffic Studies which was an analysis of transportation and land use. The applicant did not further explain what makes it unique or succesfful D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 15 pts High level of detail in response Outstanding professional staff with extensive qualifications and organizational depth. Project team Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 103 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments demonstrates excellent experience and capacity. Al Barnes Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 10 pts 13 pts 13 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted key personnel Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Applicant has a pool of planners that perform municipal planning however their plans are primarily transportation focused or comp plans. Subcontractors would be utilized for housing and economics and engagement. E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 104 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 8 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Solid engagement approach utilizing traditional public meetings and stakeholder coordination. Less innovative than several competing proposals. Al Barnes 10 pts High level of detail in response Detail was very good. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. High level of detail in response Applicant centers the use of digital tools including surveys, interactive mapping and join local engagement opportunities. Also includes focus groups. Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 8 pts 7 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 105 of 132 Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 3.25 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 106 of 132 Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 23 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Strong portfolio of downtown revitalization, placemaking, and urban design projects with experience working alongside municipal governments. Slightly fewer large municipal projects than top-ranked firms. Al Barnes 15 pts Mostly complete response Submitted what was required. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Well-supported claim(s) The applicant provided emphasis on small area plans, the creation of toolkits and guidance documents for funding and policies for serval Veronica Green 23 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 107 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments studies in line with the initial project. It all provided opportunities for public works and economic development to use the contract for tasks such the Downtown Development Authority Strategic Plan for Watkinsville witha focus on sthort term strategies. This very much need to push the needle forward in certain areas in need of revitalization .and Garner, NC Economic Development Plan. B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 24 pts Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Demonstrated expertise in neighborhood, downtown, and district planning emphasizing public realm improvements and Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 108 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments placemaking. Portfolio aligns well with City's downtown vision. Al Barnes Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 15 pts 22 pts 23 pts Mostly complete response Has experience developing small areas Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Well-supported claim(s) Documented history of small area plan in ga and fl. Including plan with non-tradtional anchors and considerable housing needs. C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 19 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Exceptional urban design, visualization, and placemaking Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 109 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments expertise. Team demonstrates innovative approaches to creating vibrant public spaces and community identity. Al Barnes Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 10 pts 18 pts 16 pts Mostly complete response Submitted response. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) The combination of Croy engineering with direct experience working the city of Stockbridge and projects that allows the contract to be used across departments D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 110 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 14 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations Experienced leadership team with strong urban design credentials. Smaller organizational depth compared to larger multidisciplinary firms. Al Barnes 5 pts Medium level of detail in response Details were medium/ task orders Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Project team is diverse and has worked on a variety of projects that would be beneficial to the city. Julia Clark is not list in the organization chart but is expected to be available 55% of the time Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 13 pts 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 111 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 10 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations Outstanding community engagement methodology emphasizing interactive workshops, charrettes, tactical urbanism, and public participation. One of the strongest engagement approaches submitted. Al Barnes 5 pts Medium level of detail in response Medium detail Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Medium level of detail in response applicant uses traditional public engagement methods, hybrid meetings, workshops, digital survey and public meeting because the city has lackluster public engagement, we require a more innovative and Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 8 pts 6 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 112 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments comprehensive approach to public engagement F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 3.3 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 113 of 132 Pond & Company - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 23 pts High level of detail in response Strong municipal experience with planning, architecture, engineering, and redevelopment assignments. Good understanding of local government processes. Al Barnes 25 pts Well-supported claim(s) Provided small area planning Uneeda Smith-Sellers 23 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Meets or exceeds my expectations Provided an example of tasks and approach to a small area plan. used savannah as an example with clearly defined deliverables Veronica Green 23 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 114 of 132 B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 22 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Relevant experience with corridor studies and redevelopment planning. Portfolio contains fewer signature downtown master plans than higher-ranked firms. Al Barnes 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was asked Uneeda Smith-Sellers 23 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Veronica Green 21 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) savannah, cumberland cid, tara blvd lci, C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 115 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 18 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Well-rounded multidisciplinary capabilities integrating planning, engineering, architecture, and infrastructure planning. Technical approach is comprehensive but less innovative. Al Barnes 10 pts Medium level of detail in response Submitted what was asked Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. High level of detail in response applicant deconstructed the tasks and approach for small, medium and large plan that allows for the distribution of work and deliverables Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 19 pts 18 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 116 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 14 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Qualified project team with appropriate experience and organizational resources to complete the work. Al Barnes 5 pts Mostly complete response Qualifications were submitted Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) high availability of project manager, less experience than other project managers for this on call Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 14 pts 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 117 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 9 pts Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Well-developed engagement strategy incorporating public meetings and stakeholder outreach. Less emphasis on creative engagement techniques. Al Barnes 5 pts Mostly complete response Proposed community engagement Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. High level of detail in response traditional public engagement to be led by the collaborative firm. site visits,walk audis, pop ups, A Project website and dashboard for the project Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 9 pts 9 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 118 of 132 Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 3.25 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 119 of 132 Spinks Technologies, Inc. - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 12 pts Medium level of detail in response Proposal demonstrates limited experience providing comprehensive municipal planning services comparable to the City's requested scope. Al Barnes 0 pts Incomplete response Incomplete Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Poor level of detail in response While the applicant provides an innovative approach to planning activities, no examples of are identified and the methodology is unproven. Veronica Green 5 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 120 of 132 B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 10 pts Medium level of detail in response Few examples of downtown planning or Small Area Plan experience were provided. Al Barnes 0 pts Incomplete response Incomplete Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Doesn't meet my expectations Applicant provides no examples of previous work experience or success Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 20 pts 5 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 121 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 12 pts Partially fits desired attributes Proposal demonstrates technical capabilities in select areas but lacks the multidisciplinary planning expertise required for this contract. Al Barnes 0 pts Incomplete response Incomplete Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Doesn't meet my expectations applicant has experience in maritime and military initiatives and seeks to test AI in municipal planning. Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 17 pts 5 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 122 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 11 pts High level of detail in response Project team possesses relevant professional qualifications but limited demonstrated experience with comparable municipal planning assignments. Al Barnes 0 pts Incomplete response Incomplete Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Partially meets my expectations While AI led may be able to complete task orders the methodology is largely untried and cannot guarantee accuracy Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 12 pts 5 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 123 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 7 pts High level of detail in response Public engagement methodology meets minimum requirements but lacks detail and innovation compared to competing firms. Al Barnes 0 pts Incomplete response Incomplete Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Meets or exceeds my expectations materials would be developed in AI with the principle facilitating traditional methods of public engagement Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 8 pts 7 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 124 of 132 Reviewer Jeremy Andrews Score 3.75 pts Reason Comments Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 125 of 132 SEAS Community Partners - Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Relevant planning experience with emphasis on community development and stakeholder engagement. Municipal planning portfolio is more limited than higher-ranked firms. Al Barnes 10 pts Partially meets my expectations Submitted what was required Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Partially meets my expectations Applicant did not provide direct examples of municipal planning initiatives such as a CID, LCI or CTP. Veronica Green 13 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 126 of 132 B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 20 pts Well-supported claim(s) Experience includes neighborhood planning and community-based planning initiatives but fewer comprehensive downtown planning projects. Al Barnes 10 pts Partially meets my expectations Submitted medium level response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 22 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Doesn't meet my expectations Applicant failed to provide examples of small area studies, corridor studies. It does include previous experience with the City of Stockbridge in public engagement Veronica Green 8 pts Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 127 of 132 C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 16 pts Well-supported claim(s) Team demonstrates strengths in community planning and engagement but offers less depth in urban design and implementation planning. Al Barnes 5 pts Poor level of detail in response Submitted what was requested Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Veronica Green 7 pts Partially fits desired attributes No examples provided to demonstrate work experience D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 128 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 13 pts Well-supported claim(s) Qualified staff with relevant experience appropriate for smaller planning assignments. Al Barnes 5 pts Medium level of detail in response Response was basic Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Incomplete response No organizational chart or list of project team members and experience included Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 13 pts 0 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 9 pts Well-supported claim(s) Strong emphasis on inclusive public participation and community Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 129 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments outreach throughout the planning process. Al Barnes 0 pts Poor level of detail in response Poor level Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Veronica Green 7 pts Meets or exceeds my expectations traditional public engagement methods. F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments Jeremy Andrews 4.4 pts Other Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 130 of 132 Reviewer Score Reason Comments scores as calculated by Procurement. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 131 of 132 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:42 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 132 of 132 PROPOSAL LETTER We propose to furnish and deliver all the services named in the attached Request for Proposal (RFP). The price or prices offered herein shall apply for the period stated in the RFP. We further agree to strictly abide by all the terms and conditions contained in the City of Stockbridge Procurement Manual as modified by any attached special terms and conditions, all of which are made a part hereof. Any exceptions are noted in writing and included in this proposal. It is understood and agreed that this statement of Proposal and proposal constitutes an offer, which, when accepted in writing by the Procurement Office, City of Stockbridge, and subject to the terms and conditions of such acceptance, will constitute a valid and binding contract between the undersigned and the City of Stockbridge. It is understood and agreed that we have read the City’s specifications shown or referenced in the RFP and that this statement is made in accordance with the provisions of such specifications. By our written signature on this proposal, we guarantee and certify that all items included in this statement meet or exceed all such City specifications. We further agree, if awarded a contract, to deliver goods and services that meet or exceed the specifications. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to reject any or all offers, waive technicalities and informalities, and to make an award in the best interest of the city. It is understood and agreed that this statement of Proposal and proposal shall be valid and held open for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days from the opening date. PROPOSAL SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION (Proposer to sign and return) I certify that this offer is made without prior understanding, agreement, or connection with any corporation, firm, or person submitting a proposal for the same materials, supplies, equipment, or services and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal Law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. I agree to abide by all conditions of the proposal and certify that I am authorized to sign this proposal for the proposer. I further certify that the provisions of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Sections 45-10-20 et. seq. have not been violated and will not be violated in any respect. Authorized Signature Print/Type Name Adam Williamson, Principal Date May 26, 2026 Print/Type Company Name Here TSW Email awilliamson@tsw-design.com 2 STATE OF GEORGIA HENRY COUNTY CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE RESOLUTION NO. __________ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH TSW DESIGN, INC. PURSUANT TO RFP 2026-0009 FOR THE COMPLETION OF SMALL AREA STUDIES, THE ADVANCEMENT OF LONG-RANGE PLANNING INITIATIVES, THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES, AND THE PROVISION OF RELATED PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES; AND FOR OTHER LAWFUL PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Stockbridge desires to facilitate responsible community growth and economic vitality to meet the needs of residents; and WHEREAS, Article IX, Section II, Paragraph IV of the Georgia Constitution empowers the governing authority of each county and of each municipality to adopt plans and exercise the power of zoning; and WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia; and WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge seeks to provide timely and effective professional planning services to support current planning, long-range planning, zoning administration, community development initiatives, small area studies, economic development efforts, housing analyses, urban design projects, and related planning activities; and WHEREAS, the City issued Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 2026-0009 for On-Call Professional Planning Services in accordance with the City's procurement policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, the solicitation was publicly advertised, questions were addressed through an official addendum process, and nine (9) proposals were received by the established deadline; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA AS FOLLOWS, SECTION 1. Approval of Contract. The Mayor and City Council hereby approve the award of RFP 2026-0009 for On-Call Professional Planning Services to TSW Design, Inc., having received the highest evaluation score of 93.95 points. SECTION 2. Authorization to Execute Contract. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an OnCall Professional Planning Services Contract with TSW Design, Inc., together with any related documents necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. SECTION 3. Intention of the Governing Body. It is the intention of the governing body, and it is hereby resolved that the provisions of this Resolution shall be carried out in accordance with the intent expressed herein. SECTION 4. Severability. In the event that any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution is declared invalid, the remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. Approval of Execution. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign all documents necessary to effectuate this Resolution. SECTION 6. Attestation. The City Clerk is authorized to execute, attest to, and seal any documents necessary to effectuate this Resolution. SECTION 7. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. Except as otherwise provided herein, all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are hereby repealed. SECTION 8. Authority to Amend. The City Attorney is granted the authority to amend or correct this Resolution, with the express consent of the City Council, to reflect the intent of the Council and ensure compliance with applicable laws. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. SO RESOLVED this _____ day of ______________, 2026. ____________________________________ Jayden Williams, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ (SEAL) Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________ QUINTON G. WASHINGTON, City Attorney RFP No. 2026-00009 On-Call Professional Planning Services 05/18/2026 4640 N. Henry Boulevard, Levi Conference Room, Stockbridge, Georgia 30281 PROPOSAL DUE DATE: Wednesday, June 17th at 2 PM EST. Proposals shall only be accepted online through the Bonfire Portal at: Bonfire Portal Any proposal submitted in any other format (email, paper, fax, mail, etc.) will not be accepted. Instructions to Offerors: 1. The City of Stockbridge is soliciting proposals from qualified firms to provide professional planning services on an on-call, as-needed basis. This solicitation does not guarantee a minimum amount of work. Services will be authorized on an as-needed, task-order basis at the City’s sole discretion. 2. From issuance of this RFP until award, Offerors shall not contact any City employee, official, or elected representative regarding this solicitation except through the designated procurement contract. For this reason, only clarifying procedural questions are accepted during the Q&A Opportunity as indicated in number two (2) below. 3. All questions or requests for clarification must be sent via Bonfire under Message - Opportunity Q&A: 4. Questions are due no later than Monday, June 8th by 5 PM EST Questions received after this date and time will not be answered. 5. Questions and clarifications will be answered in the form of an addendum. Any addenda, schedule changes, and other important information regarding the solicitation related to this solicitation will be posted on the Bonfire website at the Bonfire Portal and it is the Offeror’s responsibility to check the Bonfire portal for any addenda or other communications related to this solicitation. Proposals shall be submitted electronically through the Bonfire Portal only. Proposals submitted by any other means shall be deemed non-responsive and rejected. 6. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to reject all proposals and to waive technicalities and informalities, and to make award in the best interest of the City of Stockbridge. 7. The City of Stockbridge is not responsible for any technical difficulties. It is highly recommended that all potential contractors submit their proposals prior to the due date of this solicitation. 8. Cost proposal must be submitted in a separate document. Do not include your pricing information in any other section of your RFP submittals. PROPOSAL LETTER We propose to furnish and deliver all the services named in the attached Request for Proposal (RFP). The price or prices offered herein shall apply for the period stated in the RFP. We further agree to strictly abide by all the terms and conditions contained in the City of Stockbridge Procurement Manual as modified by any attached special terms and conditions, all of which are made a part hereof. Any exceptions are noted in writing and included in this proposal. It is understood and agreed that this statement of Proposal and proposal constitutes an offer, which, when accepted in writing by the Procurement Office, City of Stockbridge, and subject to the terms and conditions of such acceptance, will constitute a valid and binding contract between the undersigned and the City of Stockbridge. It is understood and agreed that we have read the City’s specifications shown or referenced in the RFP and that this statement is made in accordance with the provisions of such specifications. By our written signature on this proposal, we guarantee and certify that all items included in this statement meet or exceed all such City specifications. We further agree, if awarded a contract, to deliver goods and services that meet or exceed the specifications. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to reject any or all offers, waive technicalities and informalities, and to make an award in the best interest of the city. It is understood and agreed that this statement of Proposal and proposal shall be valid and held open for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days from the opening date. PROPOSAL SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION (Proposer to sign and return) I certify that this offer is made without prior understanding, agreement, or connection with any corporation, firm, or person submitting a proposal for the same materials, supplies, equipment, or services and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud. I understand collusive bidding is a violation of State and Federal Law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards. I agree to abide by all conditions of the proposal and certify that I am authorized to sign this proposal for the proposer. I further certify that the provisions of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Sections 45-10-20 et. seq. have not been violated and will not be violated in any respect. Authorized Signature Date Print/Type Name Print/Type Company Name Here Email 2 EXHIBIT A General Conditions This CONTRACT made and entered into this ____ day of ____________, 2026 by and between the City of Stockbridge, (Party of the First Part, hereinafter called the “City”), and_________________________. Party of the Second Part, hereinafter called the “Service Provider” or “Contractor”). NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations contained herein and under the conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. TERMS: This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution (the “Effective Date”). The services to be performed under this Contract shall commence upon the date stated in the notice to proceed letter. This Contract shall terminate absolutely and without further obligation on the part of the City on December 31, 2026, and each December 31 of each succeeding and renewed year, as required by O.C.G.A. §36-60-13, as amended, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of this Contract. OPTIONAL RENEWALS: This Contract may be renewed at the sole discretion of the City for four (4) additional twelvemonth terms, upon the same terms and conditions, as provided for in this Contract, unless terminated by the City, by notice to the service provider, or termination and non-renewal by December 31 of the Contract year. Upon each renewal option, the contractor shall provide the City with updated contact information for the designated person responsible for overseeing the work. This information must include their name, telephone number, email address, cell phone number, and contact information for their immediate supervisor. 2. ATTACHMENTS: The following documents are attached and are specifically incorporated herein by reference; and, along with this Contract and the General Conditions attached as Exhibit A, encompass all of the Contract documents: RFP (Instructions + Evaluation) Exhibit A – General Conditions Exhibit B – Scope of Work Exhibit C – SAP Criteria / RFP Documents 3 EXHIBIT A General Conditions Exhibit D- E-Verify Exhibit E- Drug-free Workplace Exhibit F- Purchasing Policy Addition Exhibit G- City Public Benefit Application Exhibit H- References Exhibit I- Cost Proposal 3. PERFORMANCE: Service Provider agrees to furnish all skill and labor of every description necessary to carry out or to perform the services in accordance with the Contract Documents (the “Work”). 4. PRICE: The City agrees to pay the Service Provider following receipt by the City of a detailed invoice reflecting the actual work performed by the Service Provider, provided, however, the Service Provider guarantees that the maximum price for materials, labor, and expenses shall be the amount reflected in Exhibit J. 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS: [See Section 13 of Exhibit A. --- General Conditions] Service Provider further agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the CITY, its council members, officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims or liability for compensation under the Worker’s Compensation Act arising out of injuries sustained by any employee or subcontractor of the Service Provider, as allowed under the law. 6. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City may terminate this Contract for cause upon ten (10) days' prior written notice to the Service Provider of the Service Provider’s default in the performance of any term of this Contract. Such termination shall be without prejudice to any City’s rights or remedies provided by law. 7. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: The City may terminate this Contract for its convenience at any time upon (30) days' written notice to the Service Provider. In the event of the City’s termination of this Contract for convenience, the Service Provider will be paid for those services actually performed. Partially 4 EXHIBIT A General Conditions completed performance of the Contract will be compensated based upon a signed statement of completion to be submitted by the Service Provider, who shall itemize each element of performance. 8. TERMINATION FOR FUND APPROPRIATION: The City may unilaterally terminate this Contract due to lack of funding at any time by written notice to the Service Provider. In the event of the City’s termination of this Contract for fund appropriation, the Service Provider will be paid for those services actually performed. Partially completed performance of the Contract will be compensated based upon a signed statement of completion to be submitted by the Service Provider, which shall itemize each element of performance. 9. CONTRACT NOT TO DISCRIMINATE: During the performance of this Contract, the Service Provider will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability, which does not preclude the applicant or employee from performing the essential functions of the position. The Service Provider will also, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by qualified applicants, consider the same without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability, which does not preclude the applicant from performing the essential functions of the job. The Service Provider will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Contract so that such provision will be binding upon each subservice provider for standard commercial supplies of raw materials. 10. ASSIGNMENT: The Service Provider shall not sublet, assign, transfer, pledge, convey, sell, or otherwise dispose of the whole or any part of this Contract or his right, title, or interest therein to any person, firm, or corporation without the previous consent of the City in writing. 11. WAIVER: A waiver by either party of any breach of any provision, term, covenant, or condition of this Contract shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision, term, covenant, or condition. 12. SEVERABILITY: The parties agree that each of the provisions included in this Contract is separate, distinct, and severable 5 EXHIBIT A General Conditions from the other and remaining provisions of this Contract, and that the invalidity of any Contract provision shall not affect the validity of any other provision or provisions of this Contract. 13. GOVERNING LAW: The parties agree that this Contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. This Contract has been signed in Henry County, Georgia. 14. MERGER CLAUSE: The parties agree that the terms of this Contract include the entire Contract between the parties, and as such, shall exclusively bind the parties. No other representations, either oral or written, may be used to contradict the terms of this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting through their duly authorized agents, have caused this CONTRACT to be signed, sealed, and delivered. Signatures on the following page 6 EXHIBIT A General Conditions STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA By: Jayden Williams Mayor, City of Stockbridge, Georgia ATTEST: Cassandra Lester City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney SERVICE PROVIDER: Signature Date Print Name Print Title ATTEST: Date Signature Print Name Print Title 7 EXHIBIT A General Conditions Instructions to Offerors 1. Proposal Submission Proposals shall be submitted electronically through the City’s designated Bonfire Portal no later than the date and time specified in this Request for Proposals. Proposals submitted by any other means, including email or hard copy, shall be deemed non-responsive and rejected. It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to ensure timely submission. Late proposals will not be accepted under any circumstances. 2. Pre-Proposal Conference A pre-proposal conference may be conducted at the City’s discretion. Attendance is optional unless otherwise stated. Information provided at any pre-proposal conference shall not be binding unless issued by written addendum. 3. Questions and Clarifications All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing through the Bonfire Portal by the deadline established in the procurement schedule. Responses to questions will be issued by written addendum only. Offerors shall not rely on verbal responses or information obtained outside the formal question-and-answer process. 4. Communications Restrictions From the issuance of this RFP until contract award, Offerors shall not contact any City employee, official, or elected representative regarding this solicitation except through the designated procurement contact identified herein. Unauthorized contact may result in disqualification of the Offeror’s proposal. 5. Addenda Any changes to this RFP shall be made by written addendum issued through the Bonfire Portal. It is the responsibility of each Offeror to monitor the portal for addenda and acknowledge receipt as required. 6. Proposal Evaluation and Award Proposals will be evaluated based on the criteria set forth in this RFP. Award will be made to the offeror determined to provide the best overall value to the City, considering qualifications, experience, technical approach, and cost. The City is not obligated to award a contract to the lowest-priced Offeror. 8 EXHIBIT A General Conditions 7. No Guarantee of Work This solicitation is for on-call professional services. The City does not guarantee a minimum amount of work or the issuance of any task orders. Services will be authorized on an asneeded basis at the City’s sole discretion. 8. City’s Reservation of Rights The City reserves the right to: • Reject any or all proposals. • Waive minor irregularities or informalities. • Request clarification or additional information from Offerors. • Cancel this solicitation in whole or in part. • Negotiate with the highest-ranking offeror if deemed in the City’s best interest. 9. Costs of Proposal Preparation All costs incurred by Offerors in the preparation and submission of proposals shall be borne solely by the Offeror. The City shall not be responsible for any such costs. 10. Acceptance of Terms Submission of a proposal constitutes acceptance of the terms, conditions, and procedures contained in this RFP, including the protest procedures set forth herein. 9 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS 1. SCOPE OF WORK The Contract will be to provide services to the City in accordance with the Contract Documents. All work shall be performed in accordance with the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit B 2. REGULATIONS 2.1 The Service Provider shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the performance of the work specified herein. 2.2 The Service Provider shall obtain all permits, licenses, and certificates, or any such approvals of plans or specifications as may be required by Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, for the proper execution of the work specified herein. 2.3 During the performance of this Contract, the Service Provider shall keep current and, if requested by the City, provide copies of any and all licenses, registrations, or permits required by applicable governing agencies. The Service Provider shall keep a copy of any and all licenses, registrations, and permits on the job site while performing the Contract work. 2.4 The Service Provider will comply with the City of Stockbridge’s purchasing policies. 2.5 Service Provider will complete all work in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including but not limited to O.C.G.A. § 50-5-63, as applicable. 3. SERVICE PROVIDER’S PERSONNEL 3.1 The Service Provider will abide by all State and Federal regulations on wages and hours of an employee dealing with the employment relationship between the Service Provider and its subsidiaries or related parties and its employees, including but not limited to the Federal National Labor Relations Act, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3.2 The Service Provider shall require all prospective employees to show proof of citizenship, or proof from the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of valid entry permits and/or work permits for legal aliens, and proof that such legal aliens are eligible to be employed in the United States. This includes any requirement for participation in the DHS E-Verify or SAVE program. 3.3 The Service Provider shall transfer promptly from the City any employee or employees 10 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS that the City advises are not satisfactory and replace such personnel with employees satisfactory to the City; but in no event shall the City be responsible for monitoring or assessing the suitability of any employee or agent of the Service Provider. 3.4 The Service Provider’s employees shall be instructed that no gratuities shall be solicited or accepted for any reason whatsoever from the tenants, customers, or other persons at the City. 3.5 Designation of Supervisor-the Service Provider shall designate an experienced Supervisor (“Supervisor”) acceptable to the City for all purposes related to the work. The initial Supervisor shall be (TBD). 3.5.1 The Supervisor shall be fully responsible for the Service Provider meeting all of its obligations under this Contract. The Supervisor shall provide the City with an appropriate status report on the project's progress. Supervisor and the City, but the final required times will be the City’s discretion. 3.5.2 In the event that the designated Supervisor terminates employment with the Service Provider or is requested by the City to be removed from the role of Supervisor (as provided in Section 3.5), the position shall be assumed by an individual with equivalent qualifications, experience, and knowledge. Such replacement shall require the City’s prior approval. 3.6 The process by which the service provider requests the removal of a team member from the project. If a Service Provider replaces a proposed team member, the Service Provider shall replace that team member with a similarly experienced team member. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any proposed or replacement team member, with or without cause, at any time during the project. 4. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1 The Service Provider shall perform all of its obligations and functions under the Contract in accordance with the Contract specifications and industry standards. The Service Provider shall adjust and coordinate its activities to the needs and requirements of the City and perform its activities so as not to annoy, disturb, endanger, unreasonably interfere with or delay the operations or activities of the City. 4.2 The Service Provider’s personnel shall perform work in compliance with all Federal, State, and City of Stockbridge regulations. 11 4.3 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Any work required beyond that which is specified herein shall be reported in advance to the City. At no time shall work beyond the scope be performed without prior written authorization from the City. 5. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 5.1 In the course of performing the Contract work, the Service Provider may gain access to security-sensitive and other sensitive information of the City. 5.2 The Service Provider agrees to hold all City data and information in confidence and to make such information known only to its employees and subcontracts who have a legitimate need to know such information and only after advising such persons of the Service Provider’s non-disclosure obligations. 5.3 The Service Provider shall seek the City’s prior written consent before using for any purpose other than the fulfillment of the Service Provider’s obligations hereunder, or before releasing, disclosing, or otherwise making such information available to any other person. 5.4 The Service Provider shall employ such practices and take such actions to protect the City’s information from unauthorized use or disclosure as the Service Provider employs and takes to protect its own information, but in no event shall the Service Provider use less than reasonable efforts to protect the City’s information. 5.5 The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of the Contract. 6. COMPENSATION – INVOICE AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES 6.1 The City shall pay the Service Provider, subject to any authorized deductions, the applicable prices set forth for each service authorized by the City, and actually delivered or performed, as the case may be, by the Service Provider to the satisfaction and acceptance, as appropriate, of the City. The timing of such payments shall be as set forth below in the Section. 6.2 The Service Provider shall deliver to the City approval and acceptance, and before eligible for final payment of any amounts due, all documents and material prepared by the Service Provider for the City under this Contract. 6.3 The City shall pay the undisputed amount of the Service Provider’s invoice, as it may be 12 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS reduced to reflect unsubstantiated or unsatisfactory service. Items in dispute shall be paid upon the resolution of the dispute. No verification or payment of any amounts invoiced shall preclude the City from recovering any money paid in excess of that due under the terms of this Contract. 6.4 The Service Provider shall submit all invoices with purchase order number to: City of Stockbridge, GA, Accounts Payable, 4640 N. Henry Blvd Stockbridge, GA. 30281. 6.5 The Service Provider will agree to comply with the City of Stockbridge’s Financial Policies and Purchasing Policy, to the extent applicable. 6.6 The Service Provider agrees that the compensation provided herein shall be full and final settlement of all claims arising against Stockbridge for work done, materials furnished, costs incurred or otherwise arising out of this contract and shall release the City from any and all further claims related to the payment for services and materials furnished in connection with this Agreement. 6.7 The Service Provider shall obtain and keep current all licenses, permits and authorizations, whether municipal, county, state or deferral, required for the performance of its obligations and functions hereunder and shall pay promptly when due all fees therefore. 6.8 The Service Provider shall abide by all applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to wages and hours of an employees; including but not limited to the Service Provider’s compliance with requirements of O.C.G.A. 13-10-91 AND Rule 300-104-1-.02. 7. SERVICE PROVIDER’S LIABILITY The Service Provider shall be responsible for the prompt payment of any fines imposed on the city or the Service Provider by any other federal, state or local governmental agency as a result of the Service Provider’s, or its subcontractor’s (or the officers’ directors’, employees’ or agents’ of either), failure to comply with the requirements of any law or any governmental agency rule, regulation, order or permit. The liability of the Service Provider under this Section 11 is in addition to and in no way a limitation upon any other liabilities and responsibilities which may be imposed by applicable law or by the indemnification provision of Section 12 hereof, and such liability shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Contract. 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 8.1 In addition to indemnification provisions stated above, if the City’s use of any service or 13 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS other items provided by or on behalf of the Service Provider is enjoined due to infringement of another person or entity’s intellectual property rights, the Service Provider shall promptly, at its sole cost and expense, modify the infringing item so that it no longer infringes, procure for the City the legal right to continue using the infringing item, or procure for the City a non-infringing item, or procure for the City a noninfringing replacement item having equal or greater functional capabilities as the infringing item. 8.2 Insurance 8.2.1 General Liability and Automobile Liability. The Service Provider shall purchase and maintain in force during the term of the Contract, at its own cost and expense, to protect the Service Provider, the City, and the members (including, without limitation, all members of the governing City’s Council and the citizens’ advisory committees of each), officers agents, and employees of each, from and against any and all liabilities arising out of or in connection with the Service Provider’s performance of the Contract work: (1) Commercial general liability insurance with coverage of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per occurrence, and with contractual liability coverage for Service Provider’s covenants to and indemnification of the City under the Contract, and (2) Automobile liability insurance with policy limits of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLORS ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per accident or occurrence covering each motor vehicle operated on City property. 8.2.1.1 Self-Insured Retention. Service Provider’s commercial general liability insurance policies shall not be subject to a self-insured retention exceeding $10,000, if the value of the Contract is less than $1,000,000, and not be subject to a self-insured retention exceeding $100,000, if the Contract is $1,000,000 or more, unless approved by the City Manager. Service Provider’s automobile liability insurance policies shall not be subject to a self-insured retention exceeding $10,000, unless approved by the City Manager. 8.2.1.2 Additional Insured Endorsement. Service Provider agrees and shall cause 14 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS the City their member (including, without limitation, members of the City’s Council and members of the citizens’ advisory committees of each), officers, employees, and agents to be named as additional insured under such policy or policies of commercial general and automobile liability insurance. 12.7.1.2 Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability. If Service Provider has any employee working on City property, Service Provider shall procure and maintain in force during the term of the Contract (i) workers’ compensation insurance, and (ii) employer’s liability insurance. The policy limits of the Service Provider’s employer’s liability insurance shall not be less than $100,000 for “each employee.” If the Service Provider is self-insured, the Service Provider shall provide proof of self-insurance and authorization to self-insure as required by applicable state laws and regulations. 12.7.1.3 Professional Liability Insurance. The Service Provider shall purchase and maintain in force during the term of the Contract, Professional Liability insurance which will pay for damages arising out of errors or omissions in the rendering, or failure to render professional services under the Contract in the amount of at least ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per claim. Such insurance must include nose and tail coverage for work performed by the Service Provider from the project’s inception date until the Statute of Limitations has run for the work done on the project. 12.7.4 Health Insurance. Not applicable. 12.7.5 Garage Liability Insurance. Not applicable. 12.7.6 Garage Keeper’s Legal Liability Insurance. Not applicable. 12.7.7 Crime Coverage. Not applicable. 12.7.8 Deductibles. The Service Provider’s policies of insurance required by this Section 12.7may require the Service Provider’s payment of a deductible, provided the Service Provider’s insurer is required to pay claims from the first dollar at 110% of the claim value without any requirement that the Service Provider pay the deductible prior to its insurer’s payment of the claim. 12.7.9 Other Insurance Requirements. All insurance policies required by this Section 12.7 shall provide that they are primary insurance with respect to any other valid insurance the City may possess, and that any other insurance the City does possess shall 15 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS be considered excess insurance only. All such insurance shall be carried with a company or companies which meet the requirements of Section 13.2 of these General Conditions and said policies shall be in a form satisfactory to the City. A properly completed and executed Certificate of Insurance on a form provided or approved by the City (such as a current ACORD certificate of insurance) evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Section shall be furnished to the City upon the Service Provider shall provide the City with at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of any adverse material change in the Service Provider’s required insurance coverage except that ten (10) days’ notice of cancellation for non-payment is required. For purposes of this Section 12.7.10, and “adverse material change” shall mean any reduction in the limits of the insurer’s liability, any reduction, non-renewal or cancellation of any insurance coverage, or any increase in the Service Provider’s self-insured retention. Prior to the expiration of any such policy, the Service Provider shall file with the City a certificate of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed. If the insurance coverage is canceled or reduced, the Service Provider shall, within five (5) days after such cancellation or reduction in coverage, file with the City a certificate showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or provided through another insurance company or companies approved by the City. If the Service Provider fails to obtain or have such insurance reinstated, the City may, if it so elects, and without waiving any other remedy it may have against the Service Provider, immediately terminate this Contract upon written notice to the Service Provider. The City Manager shall have the right to alter the monetary limits or coverage herein specified from time to time during the term of this Contract, and the Service Provider shall comply with all reasonable requests of the City Manager with respect thereto. 9. LIABILITY INSURANCE 9.1 N/A 9.2 Liability Insurance Companies furnishing insurance coverage required by these General Conditions shall (a) be approved to issue insurance policies in the State of Georgia, and (b) must have no less that a “B+” Financial Rating and a Financial Size Category of “Class VI” or higher according to the most current edition of A.M. Best’s Insurance Reports. If the liability insurer is rated by A.M. Best’s Insurance Reports at an “AFinancial Rating and a Financial Size Category of “Class VIII” or higher that the City 16 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Manager may waive the requirement for the insurer to be approved by the State of Georgia. 10. CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS 10.1 Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City reserves the right to modify at any time the nature, method, scope, frequency, or timing of the Service Provider’s obligations under this Contract (Contract Adjustments) in whatever manner it determines to be reasonably necessary for the proper completion of the Service Provider’s work hereunder. Both parties agree that, should any Contract Adjustments be made, the Service Provider’s compensation will be adjusted accordingly, in such amount or amounts as will be mutually agreed to by means of good faith negotiation by the City and Service Provider and, to the extent possible, by reference to any unit costs already established in the Proposal. Without exception, all deletion or additions to the scope of work will be set forth in a written Amendment to this Contract. 10.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract herein should the Service Provider and the City fail to reach agreement on the adjusted compensation within thirty (30) days after the date of the Contract Adjustment. 10.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no upward adjustment of the compensation on account of any Contract Adjustment made necessary or appropriate as a result of the mismanagement, improper act, or other failure of the Service Provider, its employees, agents, or its subcontractors to properly perform its obligations and functions under this Contract. 11. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION 11.1 In the event that: 11.1.1 the Service Provider shall fail to keep, perform or observe any of the promises, covenants or agreements set forth in this Contract (provided that notice of the first failure shall have been given to the Service Provider, but whether or not the Service Provider shall have remedied any such failure); or 11.1.2 the Service Provider shall fail to keep, perform or observe any promise, covenant, or agreement set forth in this Contract, and such failure shall continue for a period of more than five (5) days after delivery to the Service Provider of a written notice of such breach or default; or 11.1.3 the Service Provider shall become insolvent, or shall take the benefit of any 17 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS present or future insolvency statute, or shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditor, or file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or a petition or answer seeking an arrangement for its reorganization, or the readjustment of its indebtedness under the Federal Bankruptcy laws, or under any other law or statute of the United States or any State thereof, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator of all or substantially all of its property; or 11.1.4 the Service Provider shall have a petition under any part of the Federal Bankruptcy laws, or an action under any present or future insolvency laws or statute filed against it, which petition is not dismissed within thirty (30) days after the filing thereof; or 11.1.5 there is any assignment by the Service Provider of this Contract or any of the Service Provider’s rights and obligations hereunder for which the City has not consented in writing; or 11.1.6 the Service Provider shall default on any other agreement entered into by and between Service Provider and the City, then, in its discretion, the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract for default, which termination shall be effective upon delivery of written notice of such termination to the Service Provider. In the event that the City terminates this Contract for default, or the Service Provider abandons or wrongfully terminates the Contract, the Service Provider shall be paid for compensation earned to the date of termination or abandonment (but the City shall have the right to reduce by off-set any amounts owed to the Service Provider hereunder or under any other Contract or obligation by the amount of the City’s damages and any amounts owed by the Service Provider to the City), but the Service Provider shall not be compensated for any profits earned or claimed after the receipt of the City’s notice of termination by default or after abandonment or wrongful termination. The City’s election to terminate or not to terminate this Contract in part or whole for the Service Provider’s default shall in no way be construed to limit the City’s right to pursue and exercise any other right or remedy available to it pursuant to the terms of the Contract or otherwise provided by law or equity. 11.2 Notwithstanding anything else herein contained, the City may terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time for its convenience by giving the Service 18 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Provider thirty (30) days written notice. In that event, the Service Provider shall proceed to complete any part of the work, as directed by the City, and shall settle all its claims and obligations under the Contract, as directed by the City. The Service Provider shall be compensated by the City in accordance with the provisions hereof, including in particular Section 2 of these General Conditions, provided, however, that in no event shall Service Provider be entitled to compensation for work not performed or for anticipatory profits. Service Provider shall justify its claims, as requested by the City, with accurate records and data. 11.3 Bankruptcy and Liquidation – In the event the Service Provider (1) makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or petition or apply to any tribunal for the appointment pf a custodian, receiver, or trustee for all or a substantial part of its assts; (2) commences any proceeding under any bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, readjustment of debt, dissolution, or liquidation law or statute of any jurisdiction whether now or hereafter in effect; (3) has had any such petition or application filed or any such proceeding commenced against it in which an order for relief is entered or an adjudication or appointment is made, and which remains undismissed for a period of sixty(60) days or more; (4) takes any corporate action indicating its consent to, approval of, or acquiescence in any such petition, application, proceeding, or order for relief or the appointment of a custodian, receiver, or trustee for all or substantial part of its assets; or (5) permits any such custodianship, receivership, or trusteeship to continue undischarged for a period of sixty (60) days or more causing the Service Provider or any third party, including, without limitation, a trustee in bankruptcy, to be empowered under state or federal law to reject this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City shall have the following rights: (i) In the event of rejection of this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City may elect to retain its rights under this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto as provided in Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. Upon written request of the City to, as applicable, the Service Provider or the bankruptcy trustee or receiver. The Service Provider or such bankruptcy trustee or receiver shall not interfere with the rights of the City as licensee as provided in 19 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS this Contract or in any agreement supplementary hereto to obtain the Material(s) form the bankruptcy trustee and shall, if requested, cause a copy of such Material (s) to be available to the City. 12. In the event of rejection of this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City may elect to retain its rights under this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto as provided in the Bankruptcy Code without prejudice to any of its rights of setoff with respect to this Contract under the Bankruptcy Code or applicable non-bankruptcy law; or In the event of a rejection of this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City may retain its rights under this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto as provided in the Bankruptcy Code without prejudice to any of its right under the Bankruptcy Code. CITY’S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE During the term of this Contract, the City Manager designee may from time to time designate an individual to serve as the City’s Authorized Representative (CAR) and an Assistant CAR designated to serve in that capacity in the absence of the CAR, who shall have such authority to act on the City’s behalf as the City Manager may from time to time actually delegate to such person, but in no event shall the CAR have authority to modify or terminate this Contract, or make final decisions with respect to amendments, time extensions, assignments, cost or payment adjustments or payment disputes. 13. ASSIGNMENT Neither this Contract nor any of the Service Provider’s rights or obligations hereunder may be assigned by the Service Provider without the City’s prior written consent, which consent may be granted or withheld at the City’s sole discretion. Any transfer of this Contract by merger, consolidation or liquidation (unless the stock of the Service Provider is traded on a national stock exchange or in a generally recognized over the counter securities market) any change in ownership of a power to vote a majority of the outstanding voting stock or ownership interests of the Service Provider shall constitute an assignment of this Contract for purposes of this Section. In the event the Service Provider assigns or subcontracts or attempts to assign or subcontract any right or obligation arising under this Contract without City’s prior written consent, the City shall be entitled to terminate this Contract pursuant to the provisions of Section 17 hereof. 14. NOTICES 14.1 Unless otherwise stated herein, all notices or other writings which the City is required or 20 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS permitted to give to the Service Provider may be hand delivered, mailed via U.S. Certified Mail or sent next-day delivery by a nationally-recognized overnight delivery service to the Service Provider’s address set forth in the Proposal. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been delivered upon actual delivery, or one (1) day following submission to a nationally-recognized overnight delivery service for next day delivery to the Service Provider, or three (3) days following submission to the Service Provider by U.S. Certified Mail. 14.2 Unless otherwise stated herein, all notices or other writings which the Service Provider is required or permitted to give to the City may be hand delivered to the City Manager, mail via U.S. Certified Mail. Or sent next-day delivery by a nationally-recognized overnight delivery service for next day delivery to City, or three (3) days following submission to the City by U.S. Certified Mail. Any such notice shall be sent to: City of Stockbridge, GA ATTN: City Manager 4640 N. Henry Blvd. Stockbridge, GA 30281 Service Provider: 14.3 Either party may change its notice address by written notice to the other given as provided in this section. 15. NONDISCRIMINATION 15.1 During the performance of this Contract, the Service Provider, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest agrees as follows: 15.1.1 Compliance with Regulations. The Service Provider shall comply with the Law and Regulations as they may be amended from time to time (hereafter referred to as the “Regulations”), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract. 15.1.2 Nondiscrimination. The Service Provider, with regard to the work performed by it during the Contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of any subcontractor, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Service Provider shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Regulations. 21 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS 15.1.3 Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations either by competitive proposing or negotiation made by the Service Provider for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Service Provider of the Service Provider’s obligations under this Contract and the Regulation relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color or national origin. 15.1.4 Information and Reports. The Service Provider shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources or information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions, the Service Provider shall so certify to the City , as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 15.1.5 Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the Service Provider’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Contract, the City shall impose such Contract Sanctions as it may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to: 15.1.5.1 Withholding of payments to the Service Provider under the Contract until the Service Provider complies, and/or 15.1.5.2 Cancellation, termination or suspension of the Contract, in whole or in part. 15.1.6 Incorporation of Provisions, The Service Provider shall include the provisions of subsections 20.1.1 through 20.1.5 in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The Service Provider shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event the Service Provider becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Service Provider may request the City to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the City and, in addition, the Service Provider may request the interest of the City and, in addition, the Service Provider may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 15.2 The Service Provider assures the City that it will comply with the pertinent statutes, 22 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Executive Orders and such rules as are promulgated to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin sex, age, marital status, or handicap be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from Federal assistance. This provision shall bind the Service Provider from the period beginning with the initial solicitation through the completion of the Contract. 16. COPYING DOCUMENTS The Service Provider hereby grants the City and its agent’s permission to copy and distribute any and all materials and documents contained in, comprising, or which are otherwise submitted to the City with or in connection with the Service Provider’s Proposal or which are contained in the Contract Documents (the “Submittals”). The permission granted by the Service Provider shall be on behalf of the Service Provider and any and all other parties who claim any rights to any of the materials or documents comprising the Submittals. Such permission specifically authorizes the City and its agents to make and distribute such copies of the Submittals or portions thereof as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the City for its own internal purposes or for responding to requests for copies from any member of the public regardless of whether the request is specifically characterized as a public records request pursuant to Georgia Cod. This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. 17. GENERAL PROVISIONS 17.1 The Contract Documents consist of the Contract, the Proposal Forms, the Instructions to Proposers, Request for Qualifications, all Addendum(s) issued prior to execution of this Contract, these General Conditions and Specifications. Together, these documents comprise the Contract and all the documents are fully a part of the Contract as if attached to the Contract or repeated herein. Precedence of the Contract Documents shall be as follows: (i) addendum(s) to the Contract Documents, (ii) the Contract, (iii) the General Conditions, (iv) the Scope of Work in Exhibit B, (v) the Request for Proposal, and (vii) the Proposal Form. 17.2 This Contract represents the entire agreement between the parties in relation to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between such parties relation to such subject matter, and there are no contemporaneous written or oral agreements, terms or representation made by any party other than those contained herein. No verbal or written representations shall be relied upon outside the Contract 23 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS terms and amendments. Without exception, all deletions or additions to the scope of work will be set forth in a written amendment to this Contract. No amendment, modification, or waiver of this Contract, or any part thereof, shall be valid or effective unless in writing signed by the party or parties sought to be bound or charged therewith; and no waiver of any breach or condition of this Contract shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach or condition, whether of a like or different nature. 17.3 The Service Provider shall, during the term of this Contract, repair any damage caused t real or personal property of the City and/or its tenants, wherever situated, caused by the intentional, reckless, or negligent acts or omissions of the Service Provider’s officers, agents, or employees, and any subcontractors and their officers, agents, or employees, or , at the option of the City, the Service Provider shall reimburse the City for the cost of repairs thereto and replacement thereof accomplished by or on behalf of the City. 17.4 The language of this Contract shall be construed according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either the City or the Service Provider. This Contract shall be deemed to be made, construed and performed according to the laws of the State of Georgia. Any suit or proceeding initiate for the purpose of interpreting or enforcing any provision of this Contract or any matter in connection therewith shall be brought exclusively in a court of competent jurisdiction in Henry County, Georgia, and the Service Provider waives any venue objection, including, but not limited to, any objection that a suit has been brought in an inconvenient forum. The Service Provider agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of the Georgia courts and irrevocably agrees to acknowledge service of process when requested by the City. 17.5 The section headings herein are for the convenience of the City and the Service Provider and are not to be used to construe the intent of this Contract or any part hereof, or to modify, amplify, or aid in the interpretation or construction of any of the provisions hereof. 17.6 The use of any gender herein shall include all genders, and the use of any number shall be construed as the singular or the plural, all as the context may require. 17.7 The delay or failure of the City at any time to insist upon a performance of any of the terms, conditions and covenants herein shall not be deemed a waiver of that breach or any subsequent breach or default in the terms, conditions, or covenants of this Contract. The 24 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Service Provider shall not be relieved of any obligation hereunder on account of its failure to perform by reason of any strike, lockout, or other labor disturbance. 17.8 If the City shall, without any fault, be made a party to any litigation commenced between the Service Provider and a third party arising out of the Service Provider’s operations and activities at the premises, then the Service Provider shall pay all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by or imposed upon the City in connection with such litigation for all trial and appellate proceedings. The City shall give prompt notice to the Service Provider of any claim or suit instituted against it by such third party. The provisions of this Section supplement and are not intended to be in lieu of the indemnification provisions of Section 5 hereof. The provisions of this Section shall survive the acceptance of the services and payment therefore, and the expiration or earlier termination of this Contract. 17.9 The City shall have the right to recover from the Service Provider all of the City’s costs and expenses incurred in enforcing the provisions of this Contract including, but not limited to, (1) the cost of administrative investigation and enforcement ( including, without limitation, audit fees and costs, attorneys’ fees) and (2) the cost of any trial, appellate or bankruptcy proceeding (including, without limitation, investigation costs, audit fees and costs, attorney’s fees, court costs, paralegal fees and expert witness fees). This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. The Service Provider shall not during the term of the Contract knowingly hire or employ (on either a full-time or part-time basis) any employee of the City. 17.10 The Service Provider shall be required, during the term of the Contract at no additional cost to the City, to take such reasonable security precaution with respect to its operations at City Hall as the City in its discretion may from time to time prescribe. The Service Provider shall comply with all regulation, rules and policies of any governmental authority, including the City, relating to security issues. 17.11 The City may, but shall not be obligated to, cure, at any time, upon five (5) days written notice to the Service Provider (provided, however, that in any emergency situation to the City shall be required to give only such notice as is reasonable in light of all the circumstances), any default by the Service Provider under this Contract; whenever the City so cures a default by the Service Provider, all costs and expenses incurred by the 25 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS City in curing the default, including but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, shall be paid by the Service Provider to the City on demand. 17.12 The City shall, in its discretion, be entitled to deduct from the compensation to which the Service Provider is otherwise entitled hereunder, an amount equal to any liabilities of the Service Provider to the City which are then outstanding. In the event that additional work beyond the scope of this Contract is requested by the City Manager and it results in any extra charges to the City, the Service Provider shall so advise the City in writing of the amount of the extra charges. The City is not required to pay any extra charges for additional work unless such work and the charges therefore have been approved in advance and have been confirmed in writing within twenty-four (24) hours by the City Manager, in his or her exclusive discretion. 17.13 The Service Provider is an independent Service Provider, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Service Provider an employee, agent, partner or legal representative of the City for any purpose whatsoever. The Service Provider acknowledges that it does not have any authority to incur any obligations or responsibilities on behalf of the City and agrees not to hold itself out as having any such authority. Nothing contained in this Contract shall be construed to create a joint employer relationship between the City and the Service Provider with respect to any employee of the Service Provider or of its subcontractors. 17.14 The Service Provider and its subcontractors if any, shall maintain complete and accurate books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied, and shall be in a form reasonable acceptable to the City Manager or designee. The Service Provider and its subcontractors shall account for all expenses of any nature related to transactions in connection with the Contract in a manner which segregates in detail those transaction from other transactions of the Service Provider and subcontractors, and which support the amounts reported and /or invoiced to the City. At a minimum, the Service Provider’s and subcontractor’s accounting for such expenses and transactions shall include such records in the form of electronic media compatible with or convertible to a format compatible with computers utilized by the City at its offices; a computer run hard copy; or legible microfilm or microfiche, together with access to the applicable reader. All such books and records and computerized accounting systems shall upon reasonable notice from the City be made available in Henry County, Georgia, 26 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS for inspection, examination, audit and copying by the City through and by its duly authorized representatives at any time for up to four (4) years after the year to which books and records pertain. Such inspection, examination, or audit may include, but is not limited to a review of the general input, processing and output controls of information systems, using read only access, for all computerized applications used to record financial transactions and information. The Service Provider and subcontractor shall freely lend its own assistance in a timely manner in making such inspection, examination, audit, or copying and, if such records are maintained in electronic and other machine-readable format, shall provide the City and/or its representative such assistance as may be required to allow complete access to such records. The City Manager may require the Service Provider and subcontractors to provide other records the City Manager, in his or her sole discretion, deems necessary to enable the City to perform an accurate inspection, examination or audit of expenses incurred in and transactions related to performance of this Contract. Such records shall be provided within thirty (30) days or request thereof. In the event that expenses incurred or reimbursed are found by such inspection, examination, or audit to have been overpaid, the Service Provider and its subcontractors agree that such amounts shall be payable to the City. If, prior to the expiration of the above-state four (4) year record retention period, any audit or investigation is commenced by the City, or any claim is made or litigation commenced relating to this Contract by the City, the Service Provider, or third party, the Service Provider shall continue to maintain all such records, and the City shall continue to have the right to inspect such records in the manner stated above, until the inspection, examination, audit, claim, or litigation is finally resolved (including the determination of any and all appeals or the expiration of time for an appeal). This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Contract. In the event of any conflict between any provision of this Contract and generally accepted accounting principles or generally accepted auditing standards, the provisions of this Contract shall control even where this Contract references such provisions or standards. In particular, without limitation, the Service Provider and subcontractors shall maintain all records required under this Contract to the full extend required hereunder, even if some or all such records would not be required under such generally accepted accounting principles or auditing standards. If as a result of an inspection, examination or audit, it is established that 27 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS amounts are due from the Service Provider to the City, the Service Provider shall forthwith, upon written demand from the City, pay the City such amount, together with interest on the amount due at the rate of twelve (12%) percent per annum, or if less, the maximum rate of interest allowed by law, from the date such additional amounts were overpaid by the City. Further if such inspection, examination or audit establishes that the Service Provider has over billed such amounts for any Contract period by two (2%) percent or more, then the entire expense of such inspection, examination or audit shall be paid by the Service Provider. 17.15 The Service Provider and subcontractors shall prepare and provide the City with all detailed reports as required under the Contract on a timely basis. The City reserves the right to modify the reporting procedures or the form and content of any report as it deems necessary. 17.16 There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Contract, and nothing contained herein shall be construed to create such. 17.17 Consultant shall perform services in accordance with the schedules established in applicable task orders. 17.18 In computing any period of time established under this Contract, except as otherwise specified herein the word “days” when referring to a period of time is ten (10) days or less means business days, and when referring to a period of time that is more than ten (10) days means calendar days. The day of the event, from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. A business day is any day other than Saturday, Sunday, or Federal, State of Georgia or City holidays. 17.19 The Service Provider agrees to perform all acts and execute all supplementary instruments or documents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out or complete the transaction(s) contemplated by this Contract. 17.20 The Service Provider and the City hereby mutually waive any claim against each other and their respective members, officials, officers, agents and employees for damages (including damages for loss of anticipated profits) caused by any suit or proceedings brought by either of them or by any third party directly or indirectly attacking the validity of this Contract or any part thereof, or any addendum or amendment hereto, or the manner in which this Contract was solicited, awarded or negotiated, or arising out of any judgment or award in any suit or proceeding declaring this Contract, or any 28 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS addendum or amendment hereto, null, void or voidable or delaying the same, or any part thereof, from being carried out. 18. GRATUITIES, REBATES, OR KICKBACKS. 18.1 GRATUITIES. It shall be unethical for any person to offer, give or agree to give any employee or official of the City or for any employee or official of the City to solicit, demand, accept from another person, a gratuity, rebate, loan, offer of employment or other services or property of value in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation or preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request including the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing or in any other advisory capacity in any particular matter, pertaining to any program requirement or a Contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal therefore in any manner inconsistent with the State of Georgia’s Department of Administrative Services Gratuity Policy. Rebates normally or routinely offered to customers in the ordinary course of business for the purchase of goods and services are acceptable and are the property of the City. 18.2 KICKBACK AND REBATES. It shall be unethical for any payment, gratuity, or offer of employment to be made by or on behalf of a subcontractor to this Contract to the prime contract or higher tie subcontractor, or any person associated therewith, as an inducement for a subcontractor or order. End of General Conditions. 29 1.1 BACKGROUND: EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS The City of Stockbridge is in the northern part of Henry County, Georgia, which was founded on May 15, 1821. Henry County has an area of approximately 331 square miles, located in the Piedmont Section of northern Georgia and surrounded by the counties of Butts, Clayton, DeKalb, Newton, Rockdale, and Spalding. Stockbridge, Georgia, is just minutes south of Atlanta, a straight drive down Interstate 75-South. The City has approximately 30,000 residents and has a referendum on the November 2022 ballot that could add an additional 6,600 residents. 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK: I. Project Overview: The City of Stockbridge is seeking submissions from qualified agencies and/or firms who can provide: A. Comprehensive Housing, Demographic, and Market Analysis B. Urban Design and Creative Place-Making Studies with renderings C. Revitalization Plans (to include pursuit of Department of Community Affairs Funding Opportunities) A. Economic & Workforce Development Planning B. Greenways & Trails Planning (Connections) C. Streetscape Analysis and Plans Recommendations D. Arts & Culture Planning Task orders may be issued as small, mid, or large projects based on the required level of effort. The City anticipates that most Small Area Studies will not exceed $50,000; however, final task order amounts will be determined based on scope and negotiated fee. The City will specify the scale in each task order. See Exhibit 1, Small Area Plan (SAP) Criteria. II. General: The work to be accomplished is in support of the Comprehensive Plan and Short-Term Work Plan A. 1. Land Use New Development: Focus new development and density in existing activity centers, near transit stations, and high-capacity corridors. 30 2. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Commercial Corridors: Encourage reinvestment or redevelopment of commercial corridors, including the introduction of residential or other new uses to these areas. 3. Single-Family Neighborhoods: Continue to protect existing, stable single-family neighborhoods, while identifying locations for appropriate infill development. 4. Density Transitions: Manage height and density transitions between densely developing areas and surrounding lower intensity residential neighborhoods. 5. Diverse Housing and Development: Encourage more diverse housing and development types to meet the changing needs of residents and communities. 6. Land Use and Economic Policies: Coordinate with the Stockbridge Economic Development Department and the Community Development Department to ensure economic development is informed by land use and development policies and that policies appropriately support economic development efforts. B. Housing 1. Housing Variety and Choice: Focus new development and intensity in existing activity centers, near transit stations, and high-capacity corridors. 2. Workforce Housing: Encourage reinvestment or redevelopment of commercial corridors, including the introduction of residential or other new uses to these areas. 3. Senior and Independent Living: Continue to protect existing, stable single-family neighborhoods, while identifying locations for appropriate infill development. 4. Mixed Use Developments: Manage height and density transitions between densely developing areas and surrounding lower-density residential neighborhoods. 5. Multi-Family Housing: Encourage more diverse housing and development types to meet the changing needs of residents and communities. 6. Housing Strategy: Coordinate with the Community Development Department to ensure economic development is informed by land use and development policies and that policies appropriately support economic development efforts. 7. Fair Housing: During the rezoning process, prevent the occurrence of discrimination in housing on the basis of age, race, religion, gender, or national origin. 8. Code Compliance: Improve the enforcement of building codes and standards to improve housing conditions within aging multi-family housing developments. C. Natural Resources & Sustainability 31 1. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Preservation: Encourage the preservation of the City’s limited remaining open space, farmland, natural, and critical environmental areas. 2. Environmental Sensitivity: Protect environmentally sensitive areas, including wetlands, floodplains, water supply watersheds, and stream corridors. 3. Develop more Neighborhood Parks: Increase the number of parks within neighborhoods that are easily accessible to nearby residents. 4. Acquisition of Open Space: Continue coordination with Recreation, Parks & Cultural Affairs to facilitate open-space acquisition and expansion 5. Sustainable Zoning: Utilize zoning tools and techniques that preserve open space, natural resources and the environment, and address resiliency. 6. Private Partnerships: Partner with non-governmental organizations to acquire and protect land. 7. Sustainable and Conservation Development: Promote development that incorporates sustainable practices and conserves critical environmental areas. 8. Stormwater Management: Encourage techniques to reduce storm water runoff and other drainage issues as part of development activities. 9. Education: Educate the development community and the public on strategies and solutions for addressing water and sewer capacity concerns within the City. 10. Vision: Develop a unified vision and strategy for sustainability related initiatives within City of Stockbridge. D. Economic Development 1. Coordinate Regulatory Processes: Match land use regulations to economic development vision and continue to build a more predictable and consistent review and approval processes. 2. Support Existing Businesses: Engage and support more existing businesses and use incentives to support existing industry clusters and prime locations to create new ones. 3. Foster Business Development: Create a supportive environment to foster start-up businesses. 4. Target Industries: Create specific incentives for target industries and implement a proactive target industry recruitment effort. Increase efforts to develop international business opportunities. 32 5. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Invest in Infrastructure: Continue implementing existing infrastructure strategies 6. Create Development Plans: Formalize economic development concepts for each employment center and clearly define implementation roles for all parties. E. Transportation 1. Provide Transportation Options through Connectivity Across Modes: Improve travel for all users by increasing connections across roadways, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian modes. 2. Promote Equity: Prioritize improvements that increase transportation access to all parts of the City, especially communities where lack of transportation options creates substantial barriers. 3. Improve Safety: Provide safe travel by users across all modes of transportation. 4. Enable Healthy Communities and Improve Quality of Life: Leverage transportation infrastructure to encourage an active lifestyle and overall improved quality of life. 5. Respect/Improve City of Stockbridge’s Character: Implement transportation projects that improve mobility while taking into consideration local community context. 6. Increase Access to Jobs and Education: Prioritize transportation investments that allow workers and students to more easily access these key destinations. 7. Better Accommodate the Movement of Goods: Implement transportation projects that improve freight in the City either by truck or by rail. 8. Improve Maintenance: Ensure the long-term care for existing infrastructure including paving roads and repairing bridges and signal systems. 9. Increase Funding for Improvements: Pursue new local revenue sources that will allow the City to implement additional transportation projects. 10. Encourage Economic Development: Leverage transportation projects that help to encourage revitalization and new development throughout the City. 11. Practice Fiscal Responsibility in Transportation Investments: Prioritize transportation projects that can be implemented in a reasonable timeframe and provide a strong return on investment. F. Equity 1. Aging Population: Support the aging population by creating more opportunities for residents to age-in-place through the addition of senior housing and coordinated services and programs. 33 2. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Immigrant and refugee Community Inclusion: Establish a committee or working group focused on communicating with and including immigrant and refugee communities in planning and decision making in their community. 3. Poverty: Work with community-based organizations and non-profits to address issues around poverty, educational attainment, and other issues facing disadvantaged communities. 4. Low Broadband Coverage Areas: The Georgia Broadband Deployment Initiative has identified low or no coverage areas within the city. The City of Stockbridge will develop partnerships to address these areas. 5. Broadband Service Areas: Identify Unserved Locations within Service Areas and target them through collaboration with governments, educational/institutional entities, and private sector partners. G. Arts, Culture, & Historic Resources 1. Historic Preservation: Preserve and protect the historic character of the City including historically, culturally, or architecturally significant sites. 2. Development: Maintain the character of historic areas while accommodating new residential development. 3. Analysis: Complete a city -wide Historic Resource Survey 4. Historical Sites: Identify additional historically significant sites and institute “formal protection” through the adoption of local historic designation and ordinances. 5. Zoning: Establish new and enforce ordinances to protect historic areas. 6. Open Space and Agricultural Preservation: Encourage the preservation of the few remaining rural areas, forested areas, and agricultural structures or sites within the City. 7. Cultural Events: Establish programs and events that celebrate unique cultures found in Stockbridge. Identify community organizations to partner with on these programs or events. 8. Arts Support: Develop a strategy to better coordinate arts related initiatives and support local artists and arts organizations within Stockbridge. H. Community Health, Wellness, & Safety 1. Food Access: Work with public, private and non-profit partners to address challenges related to access to healthy foods within some areas of Stockbridge. 34 2. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Quality of Life: Improve quality of life by increasing the number of sidewalks and trails that connect homes to regional trail networks, nearby businesses, schools, parks and other community services and amenities. 3. Active Living: Create communities designed to encourage active living and healthy lifestyles. 4. Crime and Safety: Work across departments, with public safety partners and local community organizations to address safety issues including adequate pedestrian facilities and lighting, cut-through and speeding in residential areas, and within area of high crime. 5. Code Enforcement: Enforce existing building codes and other ordinances to address safety issues related to dilapidated or abandoned structures and illegal dumping. I. Coordination & Communication 1. City-County Coordination: Encourage better communication and coordination between County and City staff around issues related to land use, transportation, and other relevant issues. 2. Joint Planning: Consider joint planning initiatives with municipalities to adequately plan for and coordinate land use, development, transportation, and other relevant initiatives. 3. School-City Coordination: Encourage better communication and coordination between Henry County School District and City of Stockbridge staff around issues related to land use and transportation near schools and other HCSD owned land. 4. Education: Identify opportunities or programs to educate City residents and stakeholders on planning and development related priorities and issues and current demographic, market, or development trends on an ongoing basis. 5. Outreach and Involvement: Identify opportunities and events to involve the general public in current planning initiative. III. Area covered: All necessary services provided in this contract will support the Comprehensive Plan and Short-Term Work Program for City of Stockbridge. Some efforts require intergovernmental coordination. IV. Goal: To address specific land use and development issues at a finer level of detail. These plans support the general vision, policies, and goals of the community, but allow for a greater degree of detail in guiding development. They may have their own sets of specific policies 35 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS to shape development, and can include elements such as design guidelines, standards for transitions in development intensities and uses, additional standards for mixed use, investments in infrastructure, connectivity, and greater opportunities for input and control from local residents and businesses. Small Area Plans can take a variety of forms, such as Livable Center Initiatives (LCIs), Master Active Living Plans (MALPs), Corridor Plans, or Transit Oriented Development plans, and are the primary tool by which the City intends to shape development. Work Tasks: The Small Area Plans Program will include an assessment analyzing the existing conditions that impact the specified area within City of Stockbridge. The Plan should include regulatory, policy, and capital investment recommendations designed to achieve stated goals and strategies arrived upon by completing the following tasks: A. Task 1 – Assessment and Analysis Contractor will perform a model-based review of the identified issue(s) and population impacted. This analysis may require the inclusion of the same itemized analysis of city(s) within City of Stockbridge, Georgia for comparison and contrast purposes. B. Task 2 – Community Participation Process 1.Contractor will conduct an outreach process that promotes the involvement of all citizen and stakeholder groups in City of Stockbridge. This can be a mixture of virtual and in-person meetings. C. Task 3 – Recommendations and Action Plan Report 1. Contractor will prepare a Plan document that includes an Assessment, documentation of the Public Involvement Process, and Recommendations Section that includes an Action Plan. Elements shall include: a. Recommendations b. Overall Implementation Strategy c. Five-year Action Plan d. Evaluation Strategy (used to monitor the plan implementation) D. Task 4 – Prepare Project Deliverables (a) Deliverables: a. The plan process and methodology b. Documentation of the community participation process c. Maps, graphics, and relevant illustrations 36 d. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Housing Recommendations e. Overall Implementation Strategy f. Five-year Action Plan g. Evaluation Strategy (b) Format of Deliverables: a. InDesign and PDF files of Final Report and all appendices b. The Five-Year Action Plan Template in Excel format c. All electronic files in their original formats with supporting graphics and GIS Shapefiles. 37 ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS EXHIBIT 1 Small Area Plan (SAP) Criteria SAP Project Scale & Target Elements with Definitions Small Micro – SAP (up to$20k) • SWOT Analysis – Evaluates strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the study area to establish a baseline understanding. • Public Outreach Meetings – Structured sessions (virtual or in-person) where residents and stakeholders provide input and learn about the plan. • Stakeholder Development (Advocacy) – Identification and engagement of key local advocates (businesses, neighborhood leaders, civic groups) to support the plan. • Public Engagement – Broader tools (surveys, pop-ups, online platforms) used to capture feedback from the wider community, especially underrepresented voices. Mid-Micro ($20K-$50K) • SWOT Analysis – Baseline analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to guide plan priorities. • Public Outreach Meetings – Community conversations with residents, business owners, and institutions to shape plan direction. • Stakeholder Development (Advocacy) – Formation of stakeholder or advisory committees to champion the plan and sustain momentum. • Public Engagement – Expanded outreach (focus groups, online mapping, targeted outreach to youth/seniors) for diverse representation. • High-Level Recommendations – Strategic guidance highlighting priority investments, policy shifts, or design concepts without requiring technical detail. • Implementation Plan & Action Matrix (Required) – Outlines specific steps, responsible parties, estimated costs, and timelines for executing recommendations, including identification of potential partnerships. Large Micro-SAP ($50-$75K) • Existing Conditions / Needs Assessment – Comprehensive review of demographics, infrastructure, land use, and market conditions to establish a fact base. 38 • EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Public Engagement – Multi-tiered process (workshops, interviews, open houses, digital platforms) designed to validate findings and refine strategies. • Market Analysis – Study of local economic conditions, real estate demand, development trends, and opportunities for investment. • Transportation Recommendations – Strategies for improving safety, multimodal access, connectivity, and infrastructure upgrades. • Housing Recommendations – Policies and programs to support affordability, housing diversity, density, and alignment with market demand. • Land Use & Zoning Recommendations – Guidance on zoning code amendments, land use patterns, height/density regulations, and design standards needed to achieve plan goals. • Economic Development Recommendations – Approaches to attract investment, revitalize corridors, support local businesses, and align workforce development with growth opportunities. • Implementation Plan & Action Matrix (Required) – A detailed roadmap for execution, including estimated budgets, phasing timelines, funding sources, and public/private partnership opportunities. End of Exhibit B. 39 EXHIBIT C SAP Criteria / RFP Documents REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS The proposal must contain the information outlined below. Please include a title on each page of your proposal and number the pages to ensure proper identification. 1. Cover Letter 2. Executive Summary 3. Evaluation and Selection Criteria 1. Cover/Transmittal Letter Each proposal must include a Cover/Transmittal Letter that briefly summarizes the qualifications and experience relevant to the scope. Please include in the letter the following: i. Company information, including the name of the company (including any dba names); headquarters and parent company locations; and a brief history of the company. ii. Company’s mailing address, contact person, telephone number for the primary contact person, and email address. iii. A principal or officer of the company authorized to execute contracts or other similar documents on the firm’s behalf must sign the letter. 2. Cost Proposal Requirements Offerors shall submit a schedule of fully burdened hourly rates for all proposed personnel classifications anticipated to perform services under this contract. Hourly rates shall include all direct and indirect costs, overhead, administrative expenses, and profit. Hourly rates shall remain firm for the initial contract term. Task orders may be issued on a negotiated lump-sum basis or time-and-materials basis, at the City’s discretion. The City reserves the right to negotiate pricing for each task order based on the defined scope of services. 3. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Offerors shall disclose any current or recent (within the past three years) representation of private developers, property owners, or entities with active or pending development 40 interests within the City of Stockbridge. Offerors shall also disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise during the term of the contract. The City reserves the right to determine whether any disclosed conflict constitutes a material conflict and to require mitigation measures as a condition of contract award 3. Executive Summary Executive Summary: An executive summary letter should include the key elements of the respondents’ RFP and an overview of the team. Indicate the address and telephone number of the respondent’s office located nearest to Stockbridge, Georgia, and the office from which the proposal will be managed. II. RFP EVENT DATES AND SUBMISSION RFP Number: 2026-00009 On-Call Planning Services Questions Due: Monday, June 8th, at 5 PM EST Proposal Due Date: Wednesday, June 17th, by 2 PM EST Proposals shall only be accepted online through the Bonfire Portal Bonfire Portal All submissions are due at the specified location, no later than the date and time herein. The RFP package must include detailed information relative to the Request for Proposal Process and Selection Criteria, as required. The Proposal Letter is included as page two (2) of this RFP and Exhibits C-I must be attached to Bonfire and must be signed by a person authorized to legally bind the company. III. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCESS a. All RFPs received will be reviewed by the Purchasing Manager to ensure that all administrative requirements of the RFP package have been met by the Offerors. Each RFP will be reviewed to ensure that the Offeror submitted all information required in the RFP and that all documents requiring a signature have been signed. Failure to meet these requirements may be cause for rejection. All RFP’s that meet the administrative requirements will then be turned over to the evaluation committee for further evaluation. b. The Evaluation Committee will review all submittals received and rank Offerors 41 based on submittal information required in the Evaluation and Selection Criteria. Discussions may be conducted by the City of Stockbridge with the apparent highestranking offeror who submits an RFP determined to be reasonably susceptible to selection for award, for clarification and to assure full understanding and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and revision of statements, and such revisions may be permitted after submissions and prior to award. In conducting any such discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by competing Offerors. Cost will be considered but will not be the sole determining factor. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to amend the RFP prior to the date of the RFP submission. Addenda will be posted to the Bonfire Portal c. Awards of contract shall be made to one responsible offeror who has successfully submitted an RFP and been ranked by the Evaluation Committee, considering all the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP. No other factors or criteria shall be used in the evaluation. The City of Stockbridge reserves the right to reject all RFP’s submitted in response to this RFP. IV. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCESS 1. Relevant Municipal Planning Experience – 25 Points Demonstrated experience providing professional planning services for municipalities of similar size and complexity, including Comprehensive Plan implementation and small area planning. 2. Experience with Small Area Studies – 25 Points Specific experience developing Small Area Plans, corridor studies, master plans, or similar focused planning efforts, including public engagement and implementation strategies. 3. Technical Expertise in Priority Areas – 20 Points Demonstrated expertise in housing redevelopment, transportation planning, zoning analysis, land use policy, and urban design. 4. Project Team Qualifications & Capacity – 15 Points Qualifications, availability, and experience of key personnel assigned to this contract, 42 including the ability to manage approximately three (3) task orders annually. 5. Public Engagement Approach – 10 Points Proposed methodology for conducting meaningful stakeholder and community engagement. 6. Cost Proposal – 5 Points Reasonableness and competitiveness of the submitted hourly rate schedule and overall pricing structure. The City reserves the right to conduct interviews, request clarifications, or request bestand-final offers if deemed necessary. Award shall be made to the highest-ranked, responsible Offeror whose proposal is determined to be in the best interest of the City V. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS a. Vendors responding to this RFP need to become a registered Vendor to sell products or services to the City of Stockbridge. Please note that the vendor file is a good source for vendor information, but not the only source. Registration does not guarantee that your firm will be solicited for any or all requirements. The vendor file will also be used to support financial transactions with vendors, including invoice payments. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to email: City of Stockbridge Purchasing Office Jandrews@stockbridgega.org b. Prior to the due date, a submitted RFP may be withdrawn by the Offeror by submitting a written request to the Buyer named herein. A person authorized to sign for the Offeror must sign all such requests. The City reserves the right to add provisions to the contract to be consistent with the successful Offeror's offer and to negotiate with the successful Offeror other additions to, deletions from, and/or changes in the language in the Contract, provided that no such addition, deletion or change in Contract language would, in the sole discretion of the City affect the evaluation criteria set forth herein, or give the successful Offeror a competitive advantage. Any exceptions to the agreement must be clearly identified, accompany the Offeror's RFP 43 and be attached to the agreement. Offerors are cautioned that any exception submitted that will give the Offeror a competitive advantage over another Offeror or that will cause a failure to meet a mandatory requirement of the RFP will not be accepted. Prior to award, the apparent winning Offeror(s) may be required to enter discussions with the City to resolve any contractual differences before an award is made. These discussions are to be finalized, and all exceptions resolved within one (1) week of notification; if not, this could lead to rejection of the Offeror's proposal. Offeror will not retype the enclosed contract. This criterion evaluates the proposer’s organizational structure, staffing capacity, and proposed supervisory approach. VI. CERTIFICATION By my signature below, it is certified that my firm can meet all terms of the statement of Proposal and will perform the services specified, and for the privilege of doing so on the City of Stockbridge premises. I understand that, upon proper acceptance of this offer by the City of Stockbridge, a contract will thereby be created. Given under my hand this day of , 20 . Name of Firm Signature Title Business Address End of Exhibit C 44 EXHIBIT D GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ACT AFFIDAVIT Contractor(s) Name: Address: By executing this affidavit, the undersigned person or entity verifies its compliance with O.C.G.A. § 1310-91, stating affirmatively that the individual, firm, or corporation that is registered with, is authorized to participate in, and is participating in the federal work authorization program commonly known as EVerify,* in accordance with the applicable provisions and deadlines established in O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91. The undersigned person or entity further agrees that it will continue to use the federal work authorization program throughout the contract period, and it will contract for the physical performance of services in satisfaction of such contract only with subcontractors who present an affidavit to the undersigned with the information required by O.C.GA. § 13-10-91(b). The undersigned person or entity further agrees to maintain records of such compliance and provide a copy of each such verification to the City of Stockbridge within five (5) business days after any subcontractor(s) is/are retained to perform such service. E Verify TM Company Identification Number Date of Authorization BY: Authorized Officer or Agent Date (Name of Person or Entity) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS THE DAY OF , 20_ [NOTARY SEAL] Notary Public My Commission Expires: * or any subsequent replacement operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security or any equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), P.L. 99-60 45 EXHIBIT D GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE ACT AFFIDAVIT Subcontractor Affidavit under O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91(b)(3) By executing this affidavit, the undersigned subcontractor verifies its compliance with O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91, stating affirmatively that the individual, firm or corporation which is engaged in the physical performance of services under a contract with (name of contractor) on behalf of (name of public employer) has registered with, is authorized to use and uses the federal work authorization program commonly known as E-Verify, or any subsequent replacement program, in accordance with the applicable provisions and deadlines established in O.C.G.A. § 13-10-91. Furthermore, the undersigned subcontractor will continue to use the federal work authorization program throughout the contract period and the undersigned subcontractor will contract for the physical performance of services in satisfaction of such contract only with subsubcontractors who present an affidavit to the subcontractor with the information required by O.C.G.A.§ 13-10-91(b). Additionally, the undersigned subcontractor will forward notice of the receipt of an affidavit from a sub-subcontractor to the contractor within five business days of receipt. If the undersigned subcontractor receives notice that a sub- subcontractor has received an affidavit from any other contracted sub-subcontractor, the undersigned subcontractor must forward, within five business days of receipt, a copy of the notice to the contractor. Subcontractor hereby attests that its federal work authorization user identification number and date of authorization are as follows: Federal Work Authorization User Identification Number Date of Authorization Name of Subcontractor Name of Project Name of Public Employer SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS THE DAY OF , 20_ [NOTARY SEAL] Notary Public My Commission Expires: 46 End of Exhibit D. 47 EXHIBIT E DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE The undersigned certifies that the provisions of Code Sections 50-24-1 through 50-24-6 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the “Drug-free Workplace Act”, have been complied with in full. The undersigned further certifies that: (1) A drug-free workplace will be provided for the Service Provider’s employees during the performance of the Contract; and (2) Each Service Provider who hires a subcontractor to work in a drug-free workplace shall secure from the subcontractor the following written certification: “As part of the subcontracting agreement with (Service Provider), (subcontractor) certifies to the Service Provider that a drug-free workplace will be provided for the subcontractor’s employees during the performance of this Contract pursuant to paragraph (7) of the subsection (b) of Code Section 50-24-03.” Also, the undersigned further certifies that he/she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance or marijuana during the performance of the Contract. Company Name BY: Authorized Officer or Agent Date (Service Provider Signature) Title of Authorized Officer or Agent of Service Provider Printed Name of Authorized Officer or Agent End of Exhibit E. 48 EXHIBIT F PURCHASING POLICY ADDENDUM I, , hereby certify that I have received certify that I have received a copy of the City of Stockbridge, GA, Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy which can be found at https://stockbridgega.org/departments/procurement-division and agree to comply with all requirements of the City of Stockbridge, GA Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy to the extent the policy is applicable to the undersigned. BY: Authorized Officer or Agent Date (Service Provider Signature) Title of Authorized Officer or Agent of Service Provider Printed Name of Authorized Officer or Agent Date End of Exhibit F. 49 EXHIBIT G AFFIDAVIT VERIFYING STATUS FOR CITY PUBLIC BENEFIT APPLICATION By executing this affidavit under oath, as an applicant for a City of Stockbridge, Georgia Business License or Occupation Tax Certificate, Alcohol License, Taxi Permit, execution of contract or other public benefit as referenced in O.C.G.A. § 50-36-1, I am stating the following with respect to my application for a City of Stockbridge license/permit and /or contract for [ Name of natural person applying on behalf of individual, business, corporation, partnership, or other private entity]: 1. I am a United States citizen OR 2. I am a legal permanent resident 18 years of age or older or I am an otherwise qualified alien or non-immigrant under the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act 18 years of age or older and lawfully present in the United States. * In making the above representation under oath, I understand that any person who knowingly and willfully makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in an affidavit shall be guilty of a violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-10-20. Signature of Applicant: Date: Printed Name: * Alien Registration number for non-citizens: ** PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF YOUR PERMANENT RESIDENT CARD, EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION, GREEN CARD, PASSPORT WITH A COPY OF YOUR DRIVER LICENSE, OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION AS ALLOWED UNDER THE LAW IF YOUR ARE A LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENT (#2).** Subscribed and Sworn Before Me, this the day of , 20 Notary Public: My Commission Expires: * Note: O.C.G.A.§ 50-36-1(e)(2) requires that aliens under the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, Title 8 U.S.C., as amended, provide their alien registration number. Because legal permanent residents are included in the Federal definition of “alien”, legal permanent residents must also provide their alien registration number. Qualified aliens that do not have an alien registration number may supply another identifying number below: End of Exhibit G. 50 EXHIBIT H REFERENCE VERIFICATION FORM SOLICITATION NUMBER: RFP 2026-00004 SOLICITATION TITLE: Proposing Firm (List name exactly as provided in the proposal): Date of Verification: Reference Organization: Project Verified (include the Project Name / Title and brief description of the Project: Person Contacted: Title of Contract: Telephone and extension: Email Address: Questions: Yes/No 1. Were you satisfied with the Company/Organization’s overall performance? 2. Did the firm adhere to the scope of work and proposal requirements? 3. Did the firm provide service as agreed upon? 4. Would you contract with this firm again? Additional Comments (if any): Signature and Date: SOLICITATION NUMBER: RFP 2026-00004 SOLICITATION TITLE: 51 EXHIBIT H REFERENCE VERIFICATION FORM Proposing Firm (List name exactly as provided in the proposal): Date of Verification: Reference Organization: Project Verified (include the Project Name / Title and brief description of the Project: Person Contacted: Title of Contract: Telephone and extension: Email Address: Questions: Yes/No 1. Were you satisfied with the Company/Organization’s overall performance? 2. Did the firm adhere to the scope of work and proposal requirements? 3. Did the firm provide service as agreed upon? 4. Would you contract with this firm again? Additional Comments (if any): Signature and Date: SOLICITATION NUMBER: RFP 2026-00004 SOLICITATION TITLE: Proposing Firm (List name exactly as provided in the proposal): Date of Verification: 52 EXHIBIT H REFERENCE VERIFICATION FORM Reference Organization: Project Verified (include the Project Name / Title and brief description of the Project: Person Contacted: Title of Contract: Telephone and extension: Email Address: Questions: Yes/No 1. Were you satisfied with the Company/Organization’s overall performance? 2. Did the company adhere to the scope of work and proposal requirements? 3. Did the company provide service as agreed upon? 4. Would you contract with this company again? Additional Comments (if any): Signature and Date: End of Exhibit I. 53 EXHIBIT I: COST PROPOSAL RFP No. 2026-00009 On-Call Planning Services Cost Proposal Offerors shall submit a Cost Proposal as a separate document that includes the following: A. Hourly Rate Schedule (Required for Evaluation and Negotiation Purposes) Offerors shall provide a schedule of fully burdened hourly rates for all personnel classifications anticipated to perform services under this contract. Hourly rates shall: • • • Include all direct and indirect costs, including labor, overhead, administrative expenses, and profit Remain firm for the initial contract term Be used by the City for comparative evaluation and future task order negotiations B. Task Order Pricing Approach (Primary Compensation Method) The City intends to compensate services under this contract on a lump sum, task-order basis. For each task order: • • • • The City will issue a defined scope of services The selected Consultant shall submit a lump-sum fee proposal based on the scope The fee shall include all labor, materials, and associated costs required to complete the task Each task order will include a not-to-exceed amount, which shall be negotiated and approved by the City prior to issuance C. Pricing Clarifications • • o o o No total contract value shall be proposed, as this is an on-call contract with no guaranteed workload Hourly rates may be used for: Scope refinement Change orders Time-and-materials task orders (if approved by the City) D. Evaluation of Cost Cost will be evaluated based on the reasonableness and competitiveness of the submitted hourly rate schedule and the Offeror’s demonstrated ability to provide cost-effective services on a task-order basis. 54 EXHIBIT I: COST PROPOSAL RFP No. 2026-00009 On-Call Planning Services End of Exhibit I OVERALL TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL IN WORDS Total points awarded for price will be determined by applying the following formula: (Lowest Overall Annual Contract Cost /Proposer’s Price) x ? = Price Score Please note that prices may be negotiated in the best interest of the City after the scoring is completed. End of Exhibit J. 55 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Scoring Summary Active Submissions Total A - Experience Supplier / 100 pts / 25 pts A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience / 25 pts / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts TSW Design 93.95 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL 91.8 24 24 22.75 22.75 Kimley-Horn 84.95 24 24 22.5 22.5 Pond & Company 83.25 23.5 23.5 21.5 21.5 Gresham Smith 82.75 20.5 20.5 20.25 20.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 1 of 123 B - Studies Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. 78.3 20.5 20.5 21 21 The Cratl Firm 64.7 16.25 16.25 14.5 14.5 SEAS Community Partners 60.65 16 16 15 15 Spinks Technologies, Inc. 43 9.5 9.5 8.75 8.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 2 of 123 / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 16.25 16.25 15 15 9.75 9.75 18.75 18.75 13.25 13.25 9.5 9.5 15.75 15.75 11.75 11.75 8 8 16.25 16.25 10.75 10.75 8 8 17.75 17.75 12.75 12.75 8.25 8.25 C - Tech Expertise D - Team E - Engagement Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 3 of 123 15.75 15.75 10.5 10.5 7.25 7.25 13.5 13.5 10 10 6 6 11.5 11.5 7.75 7.75 6 6 8.5 8.5 7 7 5.5 5.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 4 of 123 F - Cost F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts / 5 pts 3.95 3.95 3.55 3.55 2.95 2.95 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 5 of 123 3.3 3.3 4.45 4.45 4.4 4.4 3.75 3.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 6 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services TSW Design Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 94 24 24 Al Barnes 85 25 25 Veronica Green 87 24 24 William Smith 94 25 25 Average: 24.5 ↓ 24.5 Calculated: 90 24.5 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 7 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.95 3.95 3.95 Average: 3.95 ↓ 3.95 Calculated: 3.95 3.95 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 25 Meets or exceeds my expectations Al Barnes 25 Well-supported claim(s) Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 8 of 123 Comments Extensive portfolio of municipal planning projects throughout Georgia with demonstrated expertise in downtown revitalization, redevelopment strategies, comprehensive planning, zoning, and implementation. Experience is directly applicable to the City's objectives. Claims are supported Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 24 24 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) experience working on an on call basis with the city of Stockbridge and other cities of comparable size. Included the City of Augusta Redevelopment Project, Old Fourth Ward in Atlanta, and the Greenwood Master Plan. B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 25 Meets or exceeds my expectations Exceptional experience preparing downtown master plans, corridor plans, redevelopment strategies, and implementation-focused Small Area Plans. Portfolio demonstrates repeated success on projects of similar scale and complexity. Al Barnes 25 Well-supported claim(s) Experience developing small areas 25 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Uneeda Smith-Sellers Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 9 of 123 Veronica Green 23 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) identified for small area plan as well as other areas of expertise useful on later tasks C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 19 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 10 Partially fits desired attributes Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 16 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Comments Excellent multidisciplinary team with strengths in urban design, placemaking, market analysis, economic development, landscape architecture, and implementation. One-point deduction reflects slightly less inhouse engineering capacity than larger multidisciplinary firms. Submitted what was required The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. city of decatur comp plan with a focus on housing and multimodalism D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 10 of 123 Comments William Smith 15 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Highly qualified senior project team with nationally recognized planners, urban designers, and implementation specialists. Demonstrated capacity to manage multiple municipal projects simultaneously. Al Barnes 15 Well-supported claim(s) Claims are supported Uneeda Smith-Sellers 15 Veronica Green 15 The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Principal has experience with on call contracts for cities of comparable size. The Project Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Manager is a specialized small area planner with experience in revitalization and sustainable developmet Meets or exceeds my expectations E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 10 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 11 of 123 Comments Outstanding engagement strategy utilizing stakeholder interviews, design charrettes, visualization techniques, workshops, and collaborative planning methods that exceed minimum RFP requirements. Al Barnes 10 Well-supported claim(s) Uneeda Smith-Sellers 10 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 9 High level of detail in response Submitted claims The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. community center engagement strategy. Target approach to stakeholders. traditional methods, expanded targeted audience and includes social media as an outreach tool that may expand our public engagement reach F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 3.95 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 12 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 25 25 20 20 15 15 25 25 10 10 15 15 23 23 16 16 15 15 25 25 19 19 15 15 Average: 24.5 ↓ 24.5 Average: 16.25 ↓ 16.25 Average: 15 ↓ 15 B - Studies 24.5 C - Tech Expertise 16.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 13 of 123 D - Team 15 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 14 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 15 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 16 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 17 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 18 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 10 Average: 9.75 ↓ 9.75 E - Engagement 9.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 19 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services CPL Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architect and Surveyor, D.P.C. (P.C.) dba CPL Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 93 25 25 Al Barnes 90 25 25 Veronica Green 87 24 24 William Smith 83 22 22 Average: 24 ↓ 24 Calculated: 88.25 24 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 20 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.55 3.55 3.55 Average: 3.55 ↓ 3.55 Calculated: 3.55 3.55 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 22 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 25 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 21 of 123 Comments Good municipal planning experience supporting local governments across multiple planning disciplines. Submitted what was asked and examples to reference. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 25 Meets or exceeds my expectations Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 22 of 123 The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates strong relevant experience providing professional planning services for municipalities of similar size and complexity. The examples cited—including the City of Chamblee, City of Mulberry, City of Covington, and other comparable Georgia municipalities—show direct experience with comprehensive planning, master planning, land use policy, future development guidance, public engagement, and implementation-focused recommendations. This experience is relevant to the City’s needs because it reflects work in communities managing growth, redevelopment, transportation coordination, housing considerations, economic development, and preservation of community character. Veronica Green 24 High level of detail in response Applicant team provided a documentation that it is capable of creating visionary and policy driven planning studies. Particularly with Douglas County Initiative where policy is central to the small area and corridor paln B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 22 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 20 Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was required. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience developing Small Area Plans, corridor studies, master plans, and similar focused planning efforts. The proposal reflects relevant planning expertise, including public engagement activities and implementationoriented strategies designed to guide future decision-making and project execution. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 23 of 123 Comments Relevant experience preparing neighborhood and corridor plans with implementation recommendations. Veronica Green 24 High level of detail in response Applicant specified the Douglas County Lee Rd Study as a small area plan and corridor study. Its strength is that it is policy-based growth. The plan focused on redevelopment and preservation and economic development efforts for the next twenty years. The Saint Rose Playbook is of particular interest because it takes existing infrastructure creates a plan to incorporate housing, workforce training and civic functions. Revitilization and Redevelopment with modern infrastructure is a central desire for the city and with the Covington Urban Redevelopmentt plan the applicant meets this criteria C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 17 Reason Comments Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Competent planning team with appropriate technical capabilities. Proposal demonstrates less emphasis on placemaking and urban design innovation. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 24 of 123 Al Barnes Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 20 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Yes, Submitted examples to reference. 19 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates expertise in what the City of Stockbridge is requesting. High level of detail in response The application notes that CPL has participated in numerous placemaking initiatives in the state of GA. The application does indicate that CPL can provide an large variety of planning activities for projects over the expected time period which may include efforts led by the DDA and Economic Development. The provided example of the suitability assessment for industrial recruitment of and policy building in Bethlehem. It is visionary in the efforts for Grand Etowah reimagining the city center as a village with a variety of housing options as well a economic and civic opportunities. Addtionally the complex planing fo rthe Snellville Town Center master plan which included a mulidisciplinary approach 19 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 25 of 123 D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 14 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 15 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Strong candidates were submitted. Well-supported claim(s) Does the Offeror’s proposal demonstrate the qualifications, availability, and experience of key personnel assigned to this contract, including the ability to manage approximately three (3) task orders annually? Well-supported claim(s) The Principal in Charge has significant experience in the areas in which this contract will initially focus. The Project Manager however, does not have much document experience in this type of planning work. His primary skill set has been in code. It should be noted that in his prior work experience he was the project Manager for the Riverdale LCI and and Marietta. Gillam Sinharoy a Senior Planner has the most experience in the ares of initial interest Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 14 10 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 26 of 123 Comments Experienced staff with sufficient organizational resources to complete assigned work. E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 8 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 10 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Submitted examples to reference. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a strong and comprehensive methodology for conducting meaningful stakeholder and community engagement. The proposed approach meets and exceeds expectations by outlining effective strategies to engage stakeholders and community members throughout the planning process, promote inclusive participation, gather meaningful feedback, and incorporate input into final recommendations and implementation strategies. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 10 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 27 of 123 Comments Adequate public engagement process that satisfies RFP requirements but lacks innovative outreach techniques. Veronica Green 10 High level of detail in response The applicant demonstrated capability of creating public engagement that innovative in and interactives this was highlighted in the Mid City Stroll initiative. The type of activities were inclusive and memorable ensuring continued engagement. Additionally the applicant provided examples of traditional public engagement meeting the primary users where they were. F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 3.55 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 28 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. C.) dba CPL / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 25 25 19 19 14 14 20 20 20 20 15 15 24 24 19 19 10 10 22 22 17 17 14 14 Average: 22.75 ↓ 22.75 Average: 18.75 ↓ 18.75 Average: 13.25 ↓ 13.25 B - Studies 22.75 C - Tech Expertise 18.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 29 of 123 D - Team 13.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 30 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 31 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 32 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 33 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 34 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 35 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 36 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 37 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 8 Average: 9.5 ↓ 9.5 E - Engagement 9.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 38 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Kimley-Horn Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 88 24 24 Al Barnes 65 25 25 Veronica Green 82 23 23 William Smith 93 24 24 Average: 24 ↓ 24 Calculated: 82 24 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 39 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 2.95 2.95 2.95 Average: 2.95 ↓ 2.95 Calculated: 2.95 2.95 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 24 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Extensive municipal planning and engineering experience with numerous redevelopment and downtown planning assignments. Excellent experience across Georgia and nationally. Al Barnes 25 Well-supported claim(s) Submitted well supported claims Uneeda Smith-Sellers 24 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 40 of 123 Veronica Green 23 Well-supported claim(s) Applicant has completed on call planning and small areas studies in comparable communities and has an extensive amount of resources from from the larger corporation. Comp Planning in Chamblee, Small Areas studies in Gwinett and Peachtree corners mirror the city's needs and vision B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 24 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 20 Well-supported claim(s) Small area experience was submitted Uneeda Smith-Sellers 23 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 41 of 123 Comments Strong history of corridor studies, downtown planning, and redevelopment planning. Demonstrated experience with implementation-oriented planning efforts comparable to the City's needs. Veronica Green 23 High level of detail in response Gwinnet Place Mall Revitalization, Peachtree Corners Small Area Plan and the Atlanta Small Area Plans have elements that mirror the city's needs. Also has flexibility for transportation studies and economic development plans C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments Outstanding multidisciplinary capabilities including planning, transportation, engineering, utilities, economic development, GIS, and implementation. Comprehensive technical resources exceed project requirements. William Smith 20 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 10 Medium level of detail in response Detail was limited. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Veronica Green 15 High level of detail in response Applicant provided little emphasis on housing strategies Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 42 of 123 D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 15 Meets or exceeds my expectations Al Barnes 5 Mostly complete response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 14 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 13 High level of detail in response Comments Highly experienced senior staff supported by one of the largest multidisciplinary planning teams in the industry. Excellent organizational depth and project management capacity. Key personnel qualifications were submitted The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Project Manager has extensive experience around the greater Atlanta area, including on call planning, lci, and small area plan as well as transportation planning. Very little focus on housing strategies. Project Director has extensive experience with On-call projects. E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 43 of 123 Comments William Smith 10 High level of detail in response Comprehensive public engagement process utilizing digital engagement tools, stakeholder outreach, workshops, and community meetings designed to build consensus. Al Barnes 5 Medium level of detail in response Proposed community engagement Uneeda Smith-Sellers 9 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 8 Well-supported claim(s) The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Applicant used a data drive approach in conjunction with traditional methodology. Applicant is capable of target public engagement as well as digital platforms. F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 2.95 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 44 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 23 23 18 18 14 14 20 20 10 10 5 5 23 23 15 15 13 13 24 24 20 20 15 15 Average: 22.5 ↓ 22.5 Average: 15.75 ↓ 15.75 Average: 11.75 ↓ 11.75 B - Studies 22.5 C - Tech Expertise 15.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 45 of 123 D - Team 11.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 46 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 47 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 48 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 49 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 50 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 9 9 5 5 8 8 10 10 Average: 8 ↓ 8 E - Engagement 8 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 51 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Pond & Company Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 88 23 23 Al Barnes 65 25 25 Veronica Green 81 23 23 William Smith 86 23 23 Average: 23.5 ↓ 23.5 Calculated: 80 23.5 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 52 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.25 3.25 3.25 Average: 3.25 ↓ 3.25 Calculated: 3.25 3.25 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 23 High level of detail in response Al Barnes 25 Well-supported claim(s) Provided small area planning Uneeda Smith-Sellers 23 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 53 of 123 Comments Strong municipal experience with planning, architecture, engineering, and redevelopment assignments. Good understanding of local government processes. Veronica Green 23 Meets or exceeds my expectations Provided an example of tasks and approach to a small area plan. used savannah as an example with clearly defined deliverables B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 22 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Relevant experience with corridor studies and redevelopment planning. Portfolio contains fewer signature downtown master plans than higher-ranked firms. Al Barnes 20 Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was asked Uneeda Smith-Sellers 23 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Veronica Green 21 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) savannah, cumberland cid, tara blvd lci, C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 54 of 123 Comments William Smith 18 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Well-rounded multidisciplinary capabilities integrating planning, engineering, architecture, and infrastructure planning. Technical approach is comprehensive but less innovative. Al Barnes 10 Medium level of detail in response Submitted what was asked Uneeda Smith-Sellers 19 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 18 High level of detail in response The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. applicant deconstructed the tasks and approach for small, medium and large plan that allows for the distribution of work and deliverables D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 14 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 5 Mostly complete response Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 55 of 123 Comments Qualified project team with appropriate experience and organizational resources to complete the work. Qualifications were submitted Uneeda Smith-Sellers 14 Veronica Green 10 The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. high availability of project manager, less experience than Strongly fits desired attribute(s) other project managers for this on call Meets or exceeds my expectations E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 9 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Well-developed engagement strategy incorporating public meetings and stakeholder outreach. Less emphasis on creative engagement techniques. Al Barnes 5 Mostly complete response Proposed community engagement Uneeda Smith-Sellers 9 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 9 High level of detail in response F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 56 of 123 The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. traditional public engagement to be led by the collaborative firm. site visits,walk audis, pop ups, A Project website and dashboard for the project Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 3.25 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 57 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 23 23 19 19 14 14 20 20 10 10 5 5 21 21 18 18 10 10 22 22 18 18 14 14 Average: 21.5 ↓ 21.5 Average: 16.25 ↓ 16.25 Average: 10.75 ↓ 10.75 B - Studies 21.5 C - Tech Expertise 16.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 58 of 123 D - Team 10.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 59 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 60 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 61 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 62 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 63 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 9 9 5 5 9 9 9 9 Average: 8 ↓ 8 E - Engagement 8 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 64 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Gresham Smith Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 78 20 20 Al Barnes 80 20 20 Veronica Green 75 20 20 William Smith 85 22 22 Average: 20.5 ↓ 20.5 Calculated: 79.5 20.5 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 65 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.25 3.25 3.25 Average: 3.25 ↓ 3.25 Calculated: 3.25 3.25 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 22 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 20 Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was requested Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 66 of 123 Comments Strong planning and transportation portfolio with significant public-sector experience. Proposal demonstrates relevant municipal expertise but less emphasis on transformational downtown planning. Veronica Green 20 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) The applicant provided multiple examples of municipal planning, primarily focusing on transportation planning and comp plans for comparable size cities. Small area studies are primarily LCI and CID B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 21 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 20 Well-supported claim(s) Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 Veronica Green 20 Comments Experience includes corridor planning and urban design; however, fewer examples of implementation-focused downtown master plans similar to the City's vision. Submitted what was requested and examples. The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Applicant primarily focuses on LCI and CID work. The applicant Strongly fits desired attribute(s) does state explicitly layoiut types of policies with vision for the noted studies. Meets or exceeds my expectations C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 67 of 123 Comments William Smith 19 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Highly capable multidisciplinary firm with strengths in planning, landscape architecture, transportation, and design. Excellent technical resources available. Al Barnes 20 Well-supported claim(s) Submitted what was requested Uneeda Smith-Sellers 17 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 15 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Applicant included a funding plan for Brighton TN, AIso focused on trails plan. Of particular interest is the Hahira Area Traffic Studies which was an analysis of transportation and land use. The applicant did not further explain what makes it unique or succesfful D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 15 High level of detail in response Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 68 of 123 Comments Outstanding professional staff with extensive qualifications and organizational depth. Project team demonstrates excellent experience and capacity. Al Barnes 10 Uneeda Smith-Sellers 13 Veronica Green 13 Well-supported claim(s) Submitted key personnel The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Applicant has a pool of planners that perform municipal planning however their plans are primarily transportation focused or comp Strongly fits desired attribute(s) plans. Subcontractors would be utilized for housing and economics and engagement. Meets or exceeds my expectations E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 8 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 10 High level of detail in response Detail was very good. Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 69 of 123 Comments Solid engagement approach utilizing traditional public meetings and stakeholder coordination. Less innovative than several competing proposals. Veronica Green 7 High level of detail in response Applicant centers the use of digital tools including surveys, interactive mapping and join local engagement opportunities. Also includes focus groups. F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 3.25 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 70 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 20 20 17 17 13 13 20 20 20 20 10 10 20 20 15 15 13 13 21 21 19 19 15 15 Average: 20.25 ↓ 20.25 Average: 17.75 ↓ 17.75 Average: 12.75 ↓ 12.75 B - Studies 20.25 C - Tech Expertise 17.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 71 of 123 D - Team 12.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 72 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 73 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 74 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 75 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 76 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 8 8 10 10 7 7 8 8 Average: 8.25 ↓ 8.25 E - Engagement 8.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 77 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Inspire Placemaking Collective, Inc. Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 82 21 21 Al Barnes 50 15 15 Veronica Green 78 23 23 William Smith 90 23 23 Average: 20.5 ↓ 20.5 Calculated: 75 20.5 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 78 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.3 3.3 3.3 Average: 3.3 ↓ 3.3 Calculated: 3.3 3.3 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 23 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 15 Mostly complete response Submitted what was required. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 79 of 123 Comments Strong portfolio of downtown revitalization, placemaking, and urban design projects with experience working alongside municipal governments. Slightly fewer large municipal projects than top-ranked firms. Veronica Green 23 Well-supported claim(s) The applicant provided emphasis on small area plans, the creation of toolkits and guidance documents for funding and policies for serval studies in line with the initial project. It all provided opportunities for public works and economic development to use the contract for tasks such the Downtown Development Authority Strategic Plan for Watkinsville witha focus on sthort term strategies. This very much need to push the needle forward in certain areas in need of revitalization .and Garner, NC Economic Development Plan. B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 24 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 15 Mostly complete response Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 80 of 123 Comments Demonstrated expertise in neighborhood, downtown, and district planning emphasizing public realm improvements and placemaking. Portfolio aligns well with City's downtown vision. Has experience developing small areas Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green 22 23 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Well-supported claim(s) Documented history of small area plan in ga and fl. Including plan with non-tradtional anchors and considerable housing needs. C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 19 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Al Barnes 10 Mostly complete response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 16 Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 81 of 123 Comments Exceptional urban design, visualization, and placemaking expertise. Team demonstrates innovative approaches to creating vibrant public spaces and community identity. Submitted response. The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. The combination of Croy engineering with direct experience working the city of Stockbridge and projects that allows the contract to be used across departments D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 14 Meets or exceeds my expectations Al Barnes 5 Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green Medium level of detail in response Details were medium/ task orders Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Project team is diverse and has worked on a variety of projects that would be beneficial to the city. Julia Clark is not list in the organization chart but is expected to be available 55% of the time 13 10 Comments Experienced leadership team with strong urban design credentials. Smaller organizational depth compared to larger multidisciplinary firms. E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 82 of 123 Comments William Smith 10 Meets or exceeds my expectations Outstanding community engagement methodology emphasizing interactive workshops, charrettes, tactical urbanism, and public participation. One of the strongest engagement approaches submitted. Al Barnes 5 Medium level of detail in response Medium detail Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 Veronica Green 6 The Offeror’s proposal Meets or exceeds my demonstrates a proposed methodology for community expectations engagement. applicant uses traditional public engagement methods, hybrid meetings, workshops, digital survey and public meeting Medium level of detail in response because the city has lackluster public engagement, we require a more innovative and comprehensive approach to public engagement F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 3.3 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 83 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 22 22 18 18 13 13 15 15 10 10 5 5 23 23 16 16 10 10 24 24 19 19 14 14 Average: 21 ↓ 21 Average: 15.75 ↓ 15.75 Average: 10.5 ↓ 10.5 B - Studies 21 C - Tech Expertise 15.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 84 of 123 D - Team 10.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 85 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 86 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 87 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 88 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 89 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 8 8 5 5 6 6 10 10 Average: 7.25 ↓ 7.25 E - Engagement 7.25 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 90 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services The Cratl Firm Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 83 22 22 Al Barnes 35 10 10 Veronica Green 53 15 15 William Smith 70 18 18 Average: 16.25 ↓ 16.25 Calculated: 60.25 16.25 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 91 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 4.45 4.45 4.45 Average: 4.45 ↓ 4.45 Calculated: 4.45 4.45 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 18 Other Al Barnes 10 Partially meets my expectations Basic Response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 22 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Veronica Green 15 Comments Limited municipal planning experience relative to competing firms. applicant provides general planning services but provides not examples of long range or Partially meets my expectations small area planning nor economic development plans Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 92 of 123 B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 17 Other Al Barnes 10 Medium level of detail in response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 10 Mostly complete response Comments Proposal contains relevant planning experience but fewer examples of downtown master planning assignments. Basic response The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Applicant does not provided examples of small area planning or planning activities C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 15 Well-supported claim(s) Al Barnes 5 Doesn't meet my expectations Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 93 of 123 Comments Technical approach satisfies minimum qualifications but lacks the breadth and specialization demonstrated by higher-ranked firms. Response was basic Uneeda Smith-Sellers Veronica Green Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Strongly fits desired attribute(s) Applicant has significant experience in zoning and the ability to assist in strategic planning and policy development. 18 16 D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 12 Well-supported claim(s) Qualified staff with limited organizational depth for multiple concurrent planning assignments. Al Barnes 5 Partially meets my expectations Basic response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 14 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 9 Mostly complete response The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Identifies only two people on the project team. Specializes in operational planning activities E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 94 of 123 Comments William Smith 8 Well-supported claim(s) Standard engagement process meeting minimum RFP expectations. Al Barnes 5 Partially meets my expectations Basic response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 3 Doesn't meet my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Doesn't provide a clear methodology for strategy for public engagement F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 4.45 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 95 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 21 21 18 18 14 14 10 10 5 5 5 5 10 10 16 16 9 9 17 17 15 15 12 12 Average: 14.5 ↓ 14.5 Average: 13.5 ↓ 13.5 Average: 10 ↓ 10 B - Studies 14.5 C - Tech Expertise 13.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 96 of 123 D - Team 10 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 97 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 98 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 99 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 100 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 8 8 5 5 3 3 8 8 Average: 6 ↓ 6 E - Engagement 6 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 101 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services SEAS Community Partners Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 82 21 21 Al Barnes 30 10 10 Veronica Green 35 13 13 William Smith 78 20 20 Average: 16 ↓ 16 Calculated: 56.25 16 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 102 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 4.4 4.4 4.4 Average: 4.4 ↓ 4.4 Calculated: 4.4 4.4 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 20 Well-supported claim(s) Al Barnes 10 Partially meets my expectations Submitted what was required Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 103 of 123 Comments Relevant planning experience with emphasis on community development and stakeholder engagement. Municipal planning portfolio is more limited than higher-ranked firms. Veronica Green 13 Partially meets my expectations Applicant did not provide direct examples of municipal planning initiatives such as a CID, LCI or CTP. B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 20 Well-supported claim(s) Al Barnes 10 Uneeda Smith-Sellers 22 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 8 Doesn't meet my expectations Comments Experience includes neighborhood planning and community-based planning initiatives but fewer comprehensive downtown planning projects. Partially meets my expectations Submitted medium level response The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Applicant failed to provide examples of small area studies, corridor studies. It does include previous experience with the City of Stockbridge in public engagement C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 104 of 123 Comments William Smith 16 Well-supported claim(s) Team demonstrates strengths in community planning and engagement but offers less depth in urban design and implementation planning. Al Barnes 5 Poor level of detail in response Submitted what was requested Uneeda Smith-Sellers 18 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. Veronica Green 7 Partially fits desired attributes No examples provided to demonstrate work experience D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 13 Well-supported claim(s) Al Barnes 5 Medium level of detail in response Response was basic 13 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Uneeda Smith-Sellers Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 105 of 123 Comments Qualified staff with relevant experience appropriate for smaller planning assignments. Veronica Green 0 Incomplete response No organizational chart or list of project team members and experience included E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments Strong emphasis on inclusive public participation and community outreach throughout the planning process. William Smith 9 Well-supported claim(s) Al Barnes 0 Poor level of detail in response Poor level Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. Veronica Green 7 Meets or exceeds my expectations traditional public engagement methods. Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 4.4 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 106 of 123 / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 22 22 18 18 13 13 10 10 5 5 5 5 8 8 7 7 0 0 20 20 16 16 13 13 Average: 15 ↓ 15 Average: 11.5 ↓ 11.5 Average: 7.75 ↓ 7.75 B - Studies 15 C - Tech Expertise 11.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 107 of 123 D - Team 7.75 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 108 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 109 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 110 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 111 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 8 8 0 0 7 7 9 9 Average: 6 ↓ 6 E - Engagement 6 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 112 of 123 2026-0009 On-Call Planning Services - On-Call Planning Services Spinks Technologies, Inc. Scoring Summary Evaluation Group 1 - Main Evaluation Total A - Experience A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience Reviewer / 95 pts / 25 pts / 25 pts Uneeda Smith-Sellers 78 21 21 Al Barnes 0 0 0 Veronica Green 27 5 5 William Smith 52 12 12 Average: 9.5 ↓ 9.5 Calculated: 39.25 9.5 Evaluation Group 2 - Cost Evalutators Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 113 of 123 Reviewer Total / 5 pts F - Cost / 5 pts F-1 - Cost Proposal / 5 pts Jeremy Andrews 3.75 3.75 3.75 Average: 3.75 ↓ 3.75 Calculated: 3.75 3.75 Scoring Comments A-1 - Relevant Municipal Planning Experience - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments Proposal demonstrates limited experience providing comprehensive municipal Medium level of detail in response planning services comparable to the City's requested scope. William Smith 12 Al Barnes 0 Incomplete response Incomplete Uneeda Smith-Sellers 21 Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror's proposal demonstrates experience. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 114 of 123 Veronica Green 5 Poor level of detail in response While the applicant provides an innovative approach to planning activities, no examples of are identified and the methodology is unproven. B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 10 Medium level of detail in response Al Barnes 0 Incomplete response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 20 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 5 Doesn't meet my expectations Comments Few examples of downtown planning or Small Area Plan experience were provided. Incomplete The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience of developing small areas. Applicant provides no examples of previous work experience or success C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas - Reviewer Scores Reviewer William Smith Score 12 Reason Comments Partially fits desired attributes Proposal demonstrates technical capabilities in select areas but lacks the multidisciplinary planning expertise required for this contract. Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 115 of 123 Al Barnes 0 Incomplete response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 17 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 5 Doesn't meet my expectations Incomplete The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates experience in housing redevelopment with transportation planning and using urban design. applicant has experience in maritime and military initiatives and seeks to test AI in municipal planning. D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Comments William Smith 11 High level of detail in response Project team possesses relevant professional qualifications but limited demonstrated experience with comparable municipal planning assignments. Al Barnes 0 Incomplete response Incomplete Meets or exceeds my expectations The Offeror’s proposal shows qualifications for the team with the ability to manage approximately 3 tasks orders. Uneeda Smith-Sellers 12 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 116 of 123 Veronica Green 5 Partially meets my expectations While AI led may be able to complete task orders the methodology is largely untried and cannot guarantee accuracy E-1 - Public Engagement Approach - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason William Smith 7 High level of detail in response Al Barnes 0 Incomplete response Uneeda Smith-Sellers 8 Meets or exceeds my expectations Veronica Green 7 Meets or exceeds my expectations Comments Public engagement methodology meets minimum requirements but lacks detail and innovation compared to competing firms. Incomplete The Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a proposed methodology for community engagement. materials would be developed in AI with the principle facilitating traditional methods of public engagement F-1 - Cost Proposal - Reviewer Scores Reviewer Score Reason Jeremy Andrews 3.75 Other Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 117 of 123 Comments Cost score represents the average of the individual evaluator cost scores as calculated by Procurement. / 25 pts B-1 - Experience with Small Area Studies / 25 pts / 20 pts C-1 - Technical Expertise in Priority Areas / 20 pts / 15 pts D-1 - Project Team Qualifications & Capacity / 15 pts 20 20 17 17 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 12 12 11 11 Average: 8.75 ↓ 8.75 Average: 8.5 ↓ 8.5 Average: 7 ↓ 7 B - Studies 8.75 C - Tech Expertise 8.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 118 of 123 D - Team 7 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 119 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 120 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 121 of 123 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 122 of 123 / 10 pts E-1 - Public Engagement Approach / 10 pts 8 8 0 0 7 7 7 7 Average: 5.5 ↓ 5.5 E - Engagement 5.5 Generated on Jul 17, 2026 1:44 PM EDT - Jeremy Andrews Page 123 of 123 City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 ADDENDUM NO. 1 Questions & Answers Solicitation No.: RFP 2026-0009 Solicitation Title: On-Call Planning Services ATTENTION ALL POTENTIAL BIDDERS: x MUST ADDENDUM. READ CAREFULLY AND FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS. This addendum forms a part of the contract documents, modifies the original bidding documents and shall be as binding as if contained therein. Return Addendum with Bid Submittal. Failure to do so may subject the Bidder to disqualification. Return Completed Revised Bid Pricing Sheets with Bid Submittal. 1. ADDITIONS / CLARIFICATIONS / QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Q1. Exhibit C has two Section Threes (3. Conflict of Interest - bottom of page 40, and 3. Executive Summary - top of page 41). Can the City confirm if the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure is meant to be its own section or included with 2. Cost Proposal Requirements? A1. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure is intended to be a separate section of the proposal and is not part of the Cost Proposal Requirements section. Due to a numbering error in Exhibit C, both the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure and Executive Summary were inadvertently labeled as Section 3. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure should be included within the Technical Proposal submission and not within the Cost Proposal. Q2. Previous RFPs have included a Cost Proposal form. Is there a specific format that the City would like followed, or is the inclusion of rates at the discretion of the bidder? A2. No. Offerors may submit their own cost proposal format at their discretion, provided they comply with the requirements set forth in the Cost Proposal Requirements section. Q3. Is the expectation that proposing firms return completed forms, or is this intended for use by the City of Stockbridge only? For example, should proposing firms ask client references to complete the Reference Verification Form and include it with their proposal, or should proposing firms only fill out the reference organization name and project title on the form, allowing your team to contact the references directly? A3. The reference forms should simply be completed by the Offeror. It is only for internal use. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 Q4. On pages 40-41 of the RFP, there appears to be two separate items labeled as number 3: one is the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure, and the other is the Executive Summary. However, at the top of page 40, the conflict-of-interest form is not listed under the requested materials. Are proposing firms expected to provide both a Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure and an Executive Summary? If yes, please advise where you would like us to include the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure within our proposal. A4. Yes. Offerors are expected to provide both a Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure and an Executive Summary. The duplicate numbering in Exhibit C is a clerical error. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure should be treated as a separate proposal section and included within the Technical Proposal submission. It is not part of the Cost Proposal Requirements section and should not be included with the separate Cost Proposal submission. For organizational purposes, Offerors may include the Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure immediately following the Executive Summary or as a separately labeled section within their Technical Proposal. Q5. Can the City please modify Exhibit H (Reference Verification Form) so that each reference begins on a separate page? This would allow us to send individual pages to each client for signature and return, without disclosing other clients’ reference information. A5. No. The City will not modify Exhibit H. Offerors are not required to obtain signatures or completed responses from their references. Exhibit H is intended to be completed and submitted by the Offeror as part of the proposal package for the City's internal evaluation process. Therefore, separate reference pages are not necessary. Q6. The Bonfire portal lists separate required upload fields for the Proposal Letter and Exhibits A–I. Could the City please clarify where Offerors should upload the full Technical Proposal response, including the Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria response, team qualifications, project experience, and public engagement approach? A6. Yes, these should be loaded separately into the appropriate fields. Q7. Exhibit C includes the Request for Proposal Process and outlines the required proposal content, including Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria, Cost Proposal Requirements, Conflict of Interest Disclosure, and certification. Should Offerors upload the full Technical Proposal response under Exhibit C – SAP and RFP Docs, or should it be uploaded under a different Bonfire field? A7. The full Technical Proposal should be uploaded under the Exhibit C – SAP and RFP Documents upload field. This submission should include the Cover Letter, Executive Summary, Evaluation and Selection Criteria responses, project experience, team qualifications, public engagement approach, and Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Cost information should not be included in this submission and must be uploaded separately under Exhibit I – Cost Proposal. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 Q8. The Bonfire portal shows Exhibit B – Scope of Work as a required PDF upload. Since Exhibit B appears to be the Scope of Work and Specifications and does not appear to include a proposer signature page, should Offerors upload an acknowledgment of Exhibit B, a signed copy of Exhibit B, or include the Technical Proposal response in this upload field? A8. Offerors are not required to sign Exhibit B. To satisfy the Bonfire upload requirement, Offerors may upload a copy of Exhibit B as provided in the solicitation documents. The Technical Proposal should be uploaded under Exhibit C and should not be uploaded in lieu of Exhibit B. Q9. The Bonfire portal shows Exhibit A – General Conditions as a required PDF upload. Should Offerors sign and upload the contract/general conditions pages at proposal submission, or is Exhibit A intended to be acknowledged and completed only by the awarded Service Provider? A9. Offerors are not required to execute the contract signature pages contained within Exhibit A at the proposal stage. Submission of a proposal constitutes acknowledgment and acceptance of the General Conditions. Formal execution of the contract documents will occur following award. Q10. Page 1 states that the Cost Proposal must be submitted as a separate document and that pricing information should not be included in any other section of the RFP submittal. Exhibit C also includes “Cost Proposal Requirements” within the proposal process section. Could the City please confirm that all pricing information should be included only in the separate Exhibit I – Cost Proposal upload and excluded from the Technical Proposal/Exhibit C response? A10. Yes, that is correct. Pricing should only be included in the Cost Proposal Exhibit and nowhere else in the responses. Q11. Exhibit H includes Reference Verification Forms with questions and signature lines. Should Offerors obtain completed and signed forms from references and upload them with the proposal, or should Offerors provide reference contact information for the City to verify directly? A11. Offerors should simply fill out the reference forms and submit them, as they are for internal evaluation process only. Q12. Exhibit H lists the solicitation number as RFP 2026-00004, while the solicitation is identified elsewhere as RFP 2026-00009 On-Call Professional Planning Services. Should Offerors revise the form to reference RFP 2026-00009, or submit the form exactly as provided? A12. The reference to RFP No. 2026-00004 is a clerical error. The correct solicitation number is RFP No. 2026-00009. Offerors should reference RFP No. 2026-00009 in all proposal documents and forms. Q13. Exhibit C requires disclosure of current or recent representation of private developers, property owners, or entities with active or pending development interests within the City of Stockbridge. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 Should this disclosure be included in the Technical Proposal/Exhibit C response, submitted as a separate upload, or included with the required forms? A13. The Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure should be included within the Offeror's Technical Proposal response under Exhibit C. A separate upload is not required unless otherwise specifically requested by the City. Offerors should clearly identify the disclosure as a separate section within their proposal. Q14. Exhibit E states that the Service Provider must secure a written drug-free workplace certification from any subcontractor. Could the City please confirm whether subconsultants are required to complete and sign Exhibit E — Drug-Free Workplace and submit it with the proposal, or whether Exhibit E is required only from the prime contractor at proposal submission, with subcontractor certifications provided after award if applicable? A14. This is only for the prime at this stage. If needed further certifications for subs can be gathered at a later time. Q15. Exhibit I states that this is an on-call contract with no guaranteed workload and that no total contract value should be proposed. Could the City please confirm that the Cost Proposal should include only the required fully burdened hourly rate schedule and task-order pricing approach, and that any total price field should be marked “Not Applicable”? A15. Yes, that is correct. Q16. Can you please provide a copy of the City of Stockbridge, GA, Financial Management Policies Purchasing Policy mentioned in form Exhibit F - Purchasing Policy Addendum. A16. A copy of the City's Purchasing Policy is available on the City of Stockbridge website. The applicable link is provided in Exhibit F – Purchasing Policy Addendum. Q17. Have any of the Exhibit letters shifted from the previous RFP? Also, Exhibit H form (References), has the previous RFP number 2026-20004 instead of 2026-00009. Are there any other changes to the forms? I want to use our forms from the previous RFP and want to make sure the letters or content didn't change. Thanks! A17. Other than the correction of the solicitation number from RFP No. 2026-00004 to RFP No. 2026-00009, the City is not aware of any substantive changes to the referenced forms. Offerors should use the forms included with this solicitation and reference RFP No. 2026-00009 throughout their submission. Q18. Page 55 includes the formula “Lowest Overall Annual Contract Cost / Proposer’s Price x? = Price Score,” but the Evaluation Criteria list Cost Proposal as 5 points. Could the City please confirm the intended multiplier and how cost will be evaluated given that the contract is on-call with no guaranteed annual contract value? City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 A18. The formula referenced on Page 55 is intended only to illustrate the City's general approach to evaluating pricing. Because this is an on-call contract with no guaranteed annual contract value, Offerors are not required to submit an overall annual contract cost.Cost will be evaluated based on the reasonableness and competitiveness of the fully burdened hourly rate schedule submitted in Exhibit I. As stated in the Evaluation Criteria, the Cost Proposal is worth a maximum of five (5) points. The City reserves the right to consider the overall pricing structure, consistency of rates, and anticipated value to the City when assigning cost scores. Q19. For revitalization plans and DCA funding opportunities, is the City seeking grant identification and application support in addition to planning and implementation strategies? A19. Yes. The City anticipates that on-call services may include assistance with identifying potential funding opportunities, evaluating grant eligibility, and providing grant application support when requested. However, the specific scope of services for each task order will be defined by the City at the time of issuance. Q20. Does the City anticipate selecting a single consultant team or establishing a pool of qualified firms for on-call services? A20. The City currently anticipates awarding the contract to a single consultant team. The final award decision will be based on the evaluation of proposals and the City's determination of the firm that provides the best overall value and qualifications to meet the City's needs. Q21. Are we to submit hourly rates pertaining to page 54, Exhibit I, section A? Or, per section B, are we to submit a plan for by-task-order hourly rates? A21. Offerors should submit the hourly rates requested in Exhibit I, Section A. Pursuant to Exhibit I, Section B, the City anticipates negotiating and issuing individual task orders based upon the specific scope, staffing requirements, and level of effort associated with each assignment. Q22. Is there a budget for the overall on-call? A22. No specific funding amount has been established for the on-call contract. Services will be utilized on an as-needed basis and task orders will be issued subject to available funding, project needs, and City approval requirements. Q23. Could the City please define "housing redevelopment" as listed on page 42, section IV, item 3? A23. For purposes of this solicitation, "housing redevelopment" generally refers to planning, policy development, redevelopment strategies, market analysis, housing needs assessments, corridor and neighborhood revitalization initiatives, affordable and workforce housing strategies, redevelopment opportunity identification, and related implementation activities intended to support the City's housing and community development goals. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 In the event of any inconsistency between Bonfire upload field descriptions and the solicitation documents, the solicitation documents and any issued addenda shall govern. City of Stockbridge Purchasing Division__________________________________________________ City of Stockbridge City Hall 4640 North Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Ga 30281 ADDENDUM NO. 2- Evaluation Period Extension Solicitation No.: RFP 2026-0009 Solicitation Title: On-Call Planning Services ATTENTION ALL POTENTIAL BIDDERS: The deadline for evaluators to complete their review and evaluation of proposals has been extended to Wednesday, July 8, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time to accommodate the Independence Day holiday. All other terms, conditions, and requirements of the solicitation remain unchanged and in full force and effect. EXHIBIT A General Conditions This CONTRACT made and entered into this ____ ____________, 2026 by and 26 day of May between the City of Stockbridge, (Party of the First Part, hereinafter called the “City”), and_________________________. Party of the Second Part, hereinafter called the “Service TSW Provider” or “Contractor”). NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations contained herein and under the conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. TERMS: This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution (the “Effective Date”). The services to be performed under this Contract shall commence upon the date stated in the notice to proceed letter. This Contract shall terminate absolutely and without further obligation on the part of the City on December 31, 2026, and each December 31 of each succeeding and renewed year, as required by O.C.G.A. §36-60-13, as amended, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of this Contract. OPTIONAL RENEWALS: This Contract may be renewed at the sole discretion of the City for four (4) additional twelvemonth terms, upon the same terms and conditions, as provided for in this Contract, unless terminated by the City, by notice to the service provider, or termination and non-renewal by December 31 of the Contract year. Upon each renewal option, the contractor shall provide the City with updated contact information for the designated person responsible for overseeing the work. This information must include their name, telephone number, email address, cell phone number, and contact information for their immediate supervisor. 2. ATTACHMENTS: The following documents are attached and are specifically incorporated herein by reference; and, along with this Contract and the General Conditions attached as Exhibit A, encompass all of the Contract documents: RFP (Instructions + Evaluation) Exhibit A – General Conditions Exhibit B – Scope of Work Exhibit C – SAP Criteria / RFP Documents 3 EXHIBIT A General Conditions Exhibit D- E-Verify Exhibit E- Drug-free Workplace Exhibit F- Purchasing Policy Addition Exhibit G- City Public Benefit Application Exhibit H- References Exhibit I- Cost Proposal 3. PERFORMANCE: Service Provider agrees to furnish all skill and labor of every description necessary to carry out or to perform the services in accordance with the Contract Documents (the “Work”). 4. PRICE: The City agrees to pay the Service Provider following receipt by the City of a detailed invoice reflecting the actual work performed by the Service Provider, provided, however, the Service Provider guarantees that the maximum price for materials, labor, and expenses shall be the amount reflected in Exhibit J. 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS: [See Section 13 of Exhibit A. --- General Conditions] Service Provider further agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the CITY, its council members, officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims or liability for compensation under the Worker’s Compensation Act arising out of injuries sustained by any employee or subcontractor of the Service Provider, as allowed under the law. 6. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City may terminate this Contract for cause upon ten (10) days' prior written notice to the Service Provider of the Service Provider’s default in the performance of any term of this Contract. Such termination shall be without prejudice to any City’s rights or remedies provided by law. 7. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: The City may terminate this Contract for its convenience at any time upon (30) days' written notice to the Service Provider. In the event of the City’s termination of this Contract for convenience, the Service Provider will be paid for those services actually performed. Partially 4 EXHIBIT A General Conditions completed performance of the Contract will be compensated based upon a signed statement of completion to be submitted by the Service Provider, who shall itemize each element of performance. 8. TERMINATION FOR FUND APPROPRIATION: The City may unilaterally terminate this Contract due to lack of funding at any time by written notice to the Service Provider. In the event of the City’s termination of this Contract for fund appropriation, the Service Provider will be paid for those services actually performed. Partially completed performance of the Contract will be compensated based upon a signed statement of completion to be submitted by the Service Provider, which shall itemize each element of performance. 9. CONTRACT NOT TO DISCRIMINATE: During the performance of this Contract, the Service Provider will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability, which does not preclude the applicant or employee from performing the essential functions of the position. The Service Provider will also, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by qualified applicants, consider the same without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability, which does not preclude the applicant from performing the essential functions of the job. The Service Provider will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Contract so that such provision will be binding upon each subservice provider for standard commercial supplies of raw materials. 10. ASSIGNMENT: The Service Provider shall not sublet, assign, transfer, pledge, convey, sell, or otherwise dispose of the whole or any part of this Contract or his right, title, or interest therein to any person, firm, or corporation without the previous consent of the City in writing. 11. WAIVER: A waiver by either party of any breach of any provision, term, covenant, or condition of this Contract shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision, term, covenant, or condition. 12. SEVERABILITY: The parties agree that each of the provisions included in this Contract is separate, distinct, and severable 5 EXHIBIT A General Conditions from the other and remaining provisions of this Contract, and that the invalidity of any Contract provision shall not affect the validity of any other provision or provisions of this Contract. 13. GOVERNING LAW: The parties agree that this Contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. This Contract has been signed in Henry County, Georgia. 14. MERGER CLAUSE: The parties agree that the terms of this Contract include the entire Contract between the parties, and as such, shall exclusively bind the parties. No other representations, either oral or written, may be used to contradict the terms of this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting through their duly authorized agents, have caused this CONTRACT to be signed, sealed, and delivered. Signatures on the following page 6 EXHIBIT A General Conditions STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA By: Jayden Williams Mayor, City of Stockbridge, Georgia ATTEST: Cassandra Lester City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney SERVICE PROVIDER: Signature Date May 26, 2026 Print Name Adam Williamson Print Title Principal ATTEST: Date May 26, 2026 Signature Print Name Jerrico Roland Print Title Marketing Manager 7 EXHIBIT A General Conditions Instructions to Offerors 1. Proposal Submission Proposals shall be submitted electronically through the City’s designated Bonfire Portal no later than the date and time specified in this Request for Proposals. Proposals submitted by any other means, including email or hard copy, shall be deemed non-responsive and rejected. It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to ensure timely submission. Late proposals will not be accepted under any circumstances. 2. Pre-Proposal Conference A pre-proposal conference may be conducted at the City’s discretion. Attendance is optional unless otherwise stated. Information provided at any pre-proposal conference shall not be binding unless issued by written addendum. 3. Questions and Clarifications All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing through the Bonfire Portal by the deadline established in the procurement schedule. Responses to questions will be issued by written addendum only. Offerors shall not rely on verbal responses or information obtained outside the formal question-and-answer process. 4. Communications Restrictions From the issuance of this RFP until contract award, Offerors shall not contact any City employee, official, or elected representative regarding this solicitation except through the designated procurement contact identified herein. Unauthorized contact may result in disqualification of the Offeror’s proposal. 5. Addenda Any changes to this RFP shall be made by written addendum issued through the Bonfire Portal. It is the responsibility of each Offeror to monitor the portal for addenda and acknowledge receipt as required. 6. Proposal Evaluation and Award Proposals will be evaluated based on the criteria set forth in this RFP. Award will be made to the offeror determined to provide the best overall value to the City, considering qualifications, experience, technical approach, and cost. The City is not obligated to award a contract to the lowest-priced Offeror. 8 EXHIBIT A General Conditions 7. No Guarantee of Work This solicitation is for on-call professional services. The City does not guarantee a minimum amount of work or the issuance of any task orders. Services will be authorized on an asneeded basis at the City’s sole discretion. 8. City’s Reservation of Rights The City reserves the right to: • Reject any or all proposals. • Waive minor irregularities or informalities. • Request clarification or additional information from Offerors. • Cancel this solicitation in whole or in part. • Negotiate with the highest-ranking offeror if deemed in the City’s best interest. 9. Costs of Proposal Preparation All costs incurred by Offerors in the preparation and submission of proposals shall be borne solely by the Offeror. The City shall not be responsible for any such costs. 10. Acceptance of Terms Submission of a proposal constitutes acceptance of the terms, conditions, and procedures contained in this RFP, including the protest procedures set forth herein. 9 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS 1. SCOPE OF WORK The Contract will be to provide services to the City in accordance with the Contract Documents. All work shall be performed in accordance with the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit B 2. REGULATIONS 2.1 The Service Provider shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the performance of the work specified herein. 2.2 The Service Provider shall obtain all permits, licenses, and certificates, or any such approvals of plans or specifications as may be required by Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, for the proper execution of the work specified herein. 2.3 During the performance of this Contract, the Service Provider shall keep current and, if requested by the City, provide copies of any and all licenses, registrations, or permits required by applicable governing agencies. The Service Provider shall keep a copy of any and all licenses, registrations, and permits on the job site while performing the Contract work. 2.4 The Service Provider will comply with the City of Stockbridge’s purchasing policies. 2.5 Service Provider will complete all work in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including but not limited to O.C.G.A. § 50-5-63, as applicable. 3. SERVICE PROVIDER’S PERSONNEL 3.1 The Service Provider will abide by all State and Federal regulations on wages and hours of an employee dealing with the employment relationship between the Service Provider and its subsidiaries or related parties and its employees, including but not limited to the Federal National Labor Relations Act, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3.2 The Service Provider shall require all prospective employees to show proof of citizenship, or proof from the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of valid entry permits and/or work permits for legal aliens, and proof that such legal aliens are eligible to be employed in the United States. This includes any requirement for participation in the DHS E-Verify or SAVE program. 3.3 The Service Provider shall transfer promptly from the City any employee or employees 10 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS that the City advises are not satisfactory and replace such personnel with employees satisfactory to the City; but in no event shall the City be responsible for monitoring or assessing the suitability of any employee or agent of the Service Provider. 3.4 The Service Provider’s employees shall be instructed that no gratuities shall be solicited or accepted for any reason whatsoever from the tenants, customers, or other persons at the City. 3.5 Designation of Supervisor-the Service Provider shall designate an experienced Supervisor (“Supervisor”) acceptable to the City for all purposes related to the work. The initial Supervisor shall be (TBD). 3.5.1 The Supervisor shall be fully responsible for the Service Provider meeting all of its obligations under this Contract. The Supervisor shall provide the City with an appropriate status report on the project's progress. Supervisor and the City, but the final required times will be the City’s discretion. 3.5.2 In the event that the designated Supervisor terminates employment with the Service Provider or is requested by the City to be removed from the role of Supervisor (as provided in Section 3.5), the position shall be assumed by an individual with equivalent qualifications, experience, and knowledge. Such replacement shall require the City’s prior approval. 3.6 The process by which the service provider requests the removal of a team member from the project. If a Service Provider replaces a proposed team member, the Service Provider shall replace that team member with a similarly experienced team member. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any proposed or replacement team member, with or without cause, at any time during the project. 4. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1 The Service Provider shall perform all of its obligations and functions under the Contract in accordance with the Contract specifications and industry standards. The Service Provider shall adjust and coordinate its activities to the needs and requirements of the City and perform its activities so as not to annoy, disturb, endanger, unreasonably interfere with or delay the operations or activities of the City. 4.2 The Service Provider’s personnel shall perform work in compliance with all Federal, State, and City of Stockbridge regulations. 11 4.3 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Any work required beyond that which is specified herein shall be reported in advance to the City. At no time shall work beyond the scope be performed without prior written authorization from the City. 5. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 5.1 In the course of performing the Contract work, the Service Provider may gain access to security-sensitive and other sensitive information of the City. 5.2 The Service Provider agrees to hold all City data and information in confidence and to make such information known only to its employees and subcontracts who have a legitimate need to know such information and only after advising such persons of the Service Provider’s non-disclosure obligations. 5.3 The Service Provider shall seek the City’s prior written consent before using for any purpose other than the fulfillment of the Service Provider’s obligations hereunder, or before releasing, disclosing, or otherwise making such information available to any other person. 5.4 The Service Provider shall employ such practices and take such actions to protect the City’s information from unauthorized use or disclosure as the Service Provider employs and takes to protect its own information, but in no event shall the Service Provider use less than reasonable efforts to protect the City’s information. 5.5 The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of the Contract. 6. COMPENSATION – INVOICE AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES 6.1 The City shall pay the Service Provider, subject to any authorized deductions, the applicable prices set forth for each service authorized by the City, and actually delivered or performed, as the case may be, by the Service Provider to the satisfaction and acceptance, as appropriate, of the City. The timing of such payments shall be as set forth below in the Section. 6.2 The Service Provider shall deliver to the City approval and acceptance, and before eligible for final payment of any amounts due, all documents and material prepared by the Service Provider for the City under this Contract. 6.3 The City shall pay the undisputed amount of the Service Provider’s invoice, as it may be 12 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS reduced to reflect unsubstantiated or unsatisfactory service. Items in dispute shall be paid upon the resolution of the dispute. No verification or payment of any amounts invoiced shall preclude the City from recovering any money paid in excess of that due under the terms of this Contract. 6.4 The Service Provider shall submit all invoices with purchase order number to: City of Stockbridge, GA, Accounts Payable, 4640 N. Henry Blvd Stockbridge, GA. 30281. 6.5 The Service Provider will agree to comply with the City of Stockbridge’s Financial Policies and Purchasing Policy, to the extent applicable. 6.6 The Service Provider agrees that the compensation provided herein shall be full and final settlement of all claims arising against Stockbridge for work done, materials furnished, costs incurred or otherwise arising out of this contract and shall release the City from any and all further claims related to the payment for services and materials furnished in connection with this Agreement. 6.7 The Service Provider shall obtain and keep current all licenses, permits and authorizations, whether municipal, county, state or deferral, required for the performance of its obligations and functions hereunder and shall pay promptly when due all fees therefore. 6.8 The Service Provider shall abide by all applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to wages and hours of an employees; including but not limited to the Service Provider’s compliance with requirements of O.C.G.A. 13-10-91 AND Rule 300-104-1-.02. 7. SERVICE PROVIDER’S LIABILITY The Service Provider shall be responsible for the prompt payment of any fines imposed on the city or the Service Provider by any other federal, state or local governmental agency as a result of the Service Provider’s, or its subcontractor’s (or the officers’ directors’, employees’ or agents’ of either), failure to comply with the requirements of any law or any governmental agency rule, regulation, order or permit. The liability of the Service Provider under this Section 11 is in addition to and in no way a limitation upon any other liabilities and responsibilities which may be imposed by applicable law or by the indemnification provision of Section 12 hereof, and such liability shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Contract. 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 8.1 In addition to indemnification provisions stated above, if the City’s use of any service or 13 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS other items provided by or on behalf of the Service Provider is enjoined due to infringement of another person or entity’s intellectual property rights, the Service Provider shall promptly, at its sole cost and expense, modify the infringing item so that it no longer infringes, procure for the City the legal right to continue using the infringing item, or procure for the City a non-infringing item, or procure for the City a noninfringing replacement item having equal or greater functional capabilities as the infringing item. 8.2 Insurance 8.2.1 General Liability and Automobile Liability. The Service Provider shall purchase and maintain in force during the term of the Contract, at its own cost and expense, to protect the Service Provider, the City, and the members (including, without limitation, all members of the governing City’s Council and the citizens’ advisory committees of each), officers agents, and employees of each, from and against any and all liabilities arising out of or in connection with the Service Provider’s performance of the Contract work: (1) Commercial general liability insurance with coverage of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per occurrence, and with contractual liability coverage for Service Provider’s covenants to and indemnification of the City under the Contract, and (2) Automobile liability insurance with policy limits of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLORS ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit per accident or occurrence covering each motor vehicle operated on City property. 8.2.1.1 Self-Insured Retention. Service Provider’s commercial general liability insurance policies shall not be subject to a self-insured retention exceeding $10,000, if the value of the Contract is less than $1,000,000, and not be subject to a self-insured retention exceeding $100,000, if the Contract is $1,000,000 or more, unless approved by the City Manager. Service Provider’s automobile liability insurance policies shall not be subject to a self-insured retention exceeding $10,000, unless approved by the City Manager. 8.2.1.2 Additional Insured Endorsement. Service Provider agrees and shall cause 14 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS the City their member (including, without limitation, members of the City’s Council and members of the citizens’ advisory committees of each), officers, employees, and agents to be named as additional insured under such policy or policies of commercial general and automobile liability insurance. 12.7.1.2 Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability. If Service Provider has any employee working on City property, Service Provider shall procure and maintain in force during the term of the Contract (i) workers’ compensation insurance, and (ii) employer’s liability insurance. The policy limits of the Service Provider’s employer’s liability insurance shall not be less than $100,000 for “each employee.” If the Service Provider is self-insured, the Service Provider shall provide proof of self-insurance and authorization to self-insure as required by applicable state laws and regulations. 12.7.1.3 Professional Liability Insurance. The Service Provider shall purchase and maintain in force during the term of the Contract, Professional Liability insurance which will pay for damages arising out of errors or omissions in the rendering, or failure to render professional services under the Contract in the amount of at least ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per claim. Such insurance must include nose and tail coverage for work performed by the Service Provider from the project’s inception date until the Statute of Limitations has run for the work done on the project. 12.7.4 Health Insurance. Not applicable. 12.7.5 Garage Liability Insurance. Not applicable. 12.7.6 Garage Keeper’s Legal Liability Insurance. Not applicable. 12.7.7 Crime Coverage. Not applicable. 12.7.8 Deductibles. The Service Provider’s policies of insurance required by this Section 12.7may require the Service Provider’s payment of a deductible, provided the Service Provider’s insurer is required to pay claims from the first dollar at 110% of the claim value without any requirement that the Service Provider pay the deductible prior to its insurer’s payment of the claim. 12.7.9 Other Insurance Requirements. All insurance policies required by this Section 12.7 shall provide that they are primary insurance with respect to any other valid insurance the City may possess, and that any other insurance the City does possess shall 15 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS be considered excess insurance only. All such insurance shall be carried with a company or companies which meet the requirements of Section 13.2 of these General Conditions and said policies shall be in a form satisfactory to the City. A properly completed and executed Certificate of Insurance on a form provided or approved by the City (such as a current ACORD certificate of insurance) evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Section shall be furnished to the City upon the Service Provider shall provide the City with at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of any adverse material change in the Service Provider’s required insurance coverage except that ten (10) days’ notice of cancellation for non-payment is required. For purposes of this Section 12.7.10, and “adverse material change” shall mean any reduction in the limits of the insurer’s liability, any reduction, non-renewal or cancellation of any insurance coverage, or any increase in the Service Provider’s self-insured retention. Prior to the expiration of any such policy, the Service Provider shall file with the City a certificate of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed. If the insurance coverage is canceled or reduced, the Service Provider shall, within five (5) days after such cancellation or reduction in coverage, file with the City a certificate showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or provided through another insurance company or companies approved by the City. If the Service Provider fails to obtain or have such insurance reinstated, the City may, if it so elects, and without waiving any other remedy it may have against the Service Provider, immediately terminate this Contract upon written notice to the Service Provider. The City Manager shall have the right to alter the monetary limits or coverage herein specified from time to time during the term of this Contract, and the Service Provider shall comply with all reasonable requests of the City Manager with respect thereto. 9. LIABILITY INSURANCE 9.1 N/A 9.2 Liability Insurance Companies furnishing insurance coverage required by these General Conditions shall (a) be approved to issue insurance policies in the State of Georgia, and (b) must have no less that a “B+” Financial Rating and a Financial Size Category of “Class VI” or higher according to the most current edition of A.M. Best’s Insurance Reports. If the liability insurer is rated by A.M. Best’s Insurance Reports at an “AFinancial Rating and a Financial Size Category of “Class VIII” or higher that the City 16 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Manager may waive the requirement for the insurer to be approved by the State of Georgia. 10. CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS 10.1 Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City reserves the right to modify at any time the nature, method, scope, frequency, or timing of the Service Provider’s obligations under this Contract (Contract Adjustments) in whatever manner it determines to be reasonably necessary for the proper completion of the Service Provider’s work hereunder. Both parties agree that, should any Contract Adjustments be made, the Service Provider’s compensation will be adjusted accordingly, in such amount or amounts as will be mutually agreed to by means of good faith negotiation by the City and Service Provider and, to the extent possible, by reference to any unit costs already established in the Proposal. Without exception, all deletion or additions to the scope of work will be set forth in a written Amendment to this Contract. 10.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract herein should the Service Provider and the City fail to reach agreement on the adjusted compensation within thirty (30) days after the date of the Contract Adjustment. 10.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no upward adjustment of the compensation on account of any Contract Adjustment made necessary or appropriate as a result of the mismanagement, improper act, or other failure of the Service Provider, its employees, agents, or its subcontractors to properly perform its obligations and functions under this Contract. 11. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION 11.1 In the event that: 11.1.1 the Service Provider shall fail to keep, perform or observe any of the promises, covenants or agreements set forth in this Contract (provided that notice of the first failure shall have been given to the Service Provider, but whether or not the Service Provider shall have remedied any such failure); or 11.1.2 the Service Provider shall fail to keep, perform or observe any promise, covenant, or agreement set forth in this Contract, and such failure shall continue for a period of more than five (5) days after delivery to the Service Provider of a written notice of such breach or default; or 11.1.3 the Service Provider shall become insolvent, or shall take the benefit of any 17 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS present or future insolvency statute, or shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditor, or file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or a petition or answer seeking an arrangement for its reorganization, or the readjustment of its indebtedness under the Federal Bankruptcy laws, or under any other law or statute of the United States or any State thereof, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator of all or substantially all of its property; or 11.1.4 the Service Provider shall have a petition under any part of the Federal Bankruptcy laws, or an action under any present or future insolvency laws or statute filed against it, which petition is not dismissed within thirty (30) days after the filing thereof; or 11.1.5 there is any assignment by the Service Provider of this Contract or any of the Service Provider’s rights and obligations hereunder for which the City has not consented in writing; or 11.1.6 the Service Provider shall default on any other agreement entered into by and between Service Provider and the City, then, in its discretion, the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract for default, which termination shall be effective upon delivery of written notice of such termination to the Service Provider. In the event that the City terminates this Contract for default, or the Service Provider abandons or wrongfully terminates the Contract, the Service Provider shall be paid for compensation earned to the date of termination or abandonment (but the City shall have the right to reduce by off-set any amounts owed to the Service Provider hereunder or under any other Contract or obligation by the amount of the City’s damages and any amounts owed by the Service Provider to the City), but the Service Provider shall not be compensated for any profits earned or claimed after the receipt of the City’s notice of termination by default or after abandonment or wrongful termination. The City’s election to terminate or not to terminate this Contract in part or whole for the Service Provider’s default shall in no way be construed to limit the City’s right to pursue and exercise any other right or remedy available to it pursuant to the terms of the Contract or otherwise provided by law or equity. 11.2 Notwithstanding anything else herein contained, the City may terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time for its convenience by giving the Service 18 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Provider thirty (30) days written notice. In that event, the Service Provider shall proceed to complete any part of the work, as directed by the City, and shall settle all its claims and obligations under the Contract, as directed by the City. The Service Provider shall be compensated by the City in accordance with the provisions hereof, including in particular Section 2 of these General Conditions, provided, however, that in no event shall Service Provider be entitled to compensation for work not performed or for anticipatory profits. Service Provider shall justify its claims, as requested by the City, with accurate records and data. 11.3 Bankruptcy and Liquidation – In the event the Service Provider (1) makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or petition or apply to any tribunal for the appointment pf a custodian, receiver, or trustee for all or a substantial part of its assts; (2) commences any proceeding under any bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, readjustment of debt, dissolution, or liquidation law or statute of any jurisdiction whether now or hereafter in effect; (3) has had any such petition or application filed or any such proceeding commenced against it in which an order for relief is entered or an adjudication or appointment is made, and which remains undismissed for a period of sixty(60) days or more; (4) takes any corporate action indicating its consent to, approval of, or acquiescence in any such petition, application, proceeding, or order for relief or the appointment of a custodian, receiver, or trustee for all or substantial part of its assets; or (5) permits any such custodianship, receivership, or trusteeship to continue undischarged for a period of sixty (60) days or more causing the Service Provider or any third party, including, without limitation, a trustee in bankruptcy, to be empowered under state or federal law to reject this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City shall have the following rights: (i) In the event of rejection of this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City may elect to retain its rights under this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto as provided in Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. Upon written request of the City to, as applicable, the Service Provider or the bankruptcy trustee or receiver. The Service Provider or such bankruptcy trustee or receiver shall not interfere with the rights of the City as licensee as provided in 19 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS this Contract or in any agreement supplementary hereto to obtain the Material(s) form the bankruptcy trustee and shall, if requested, cause a copy of such Material (s) to be available to the City. 12. In the event of rejection of this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City may elect to retain its rights under this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto as provided in the Bankruptcy Code without prejudice to any of its rights of setoff with respect to this Contract under the Bankruptcy Code or applicable non-bankruptcy law; or In the event of a rejection of this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto, the City may retain its rights under this Contract or any agreement supplementary hereto as provided in the Bankruptcy Code without prejudice to any of its right under the Bankruptcy Code. CITY’S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE During the term of this Contract, the City Manager designee may from time to time designate an individual to serve as the City’s Authorized Representative (CAR) and an Assistant CAR designated to serve in that capacity in the absence of the CAR, who shall have such authority to act on the City’s behalf as the City Manager may from time to time actually delegate to such person, but in no event shall the CAR have authority to modify or terminate this Contract, or make final decisions with respect to amendments, time extensions, assignments, cost or payment adjustments or payment disputes. 13. ASSIGNMENT Neither this Contract nor any of the Service Provider’s rights or obligations hereunder may be assigned by the Service Provider without the City’s prior written consent, which consent may be granted or withheld at the City’s sole discretion. Any transfer of this Contract by merger, consolidation or liquidation (unless the stock of the Service Provider is traded on a national stock exchange or in a generally recognized over the counter securities market) any change in ownership of a power to vote a majority of the outstanding voting stock or ownership interests of the Service Provider shall constitute an assignment of this Contract for purposes of this Section. In the event the Service Provider assigns or subcontracts or attempts to assign or subcontract any right or obligation arising under this Contract without City’s prior written consent, the City shall be entitled to terminate this Contract pursuant to the provisions of Section 17 hereof. 14. NOTICES 14.1 Unless otherwise stated herein, all notices or other writings which the City is required or 20 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS permitted to give to the Service Provider may be hand delivered, mailed via U.S. Certified Mail or sent next-day delivery by a nationally-recognized overnight delivery service to the Service Provider’s address set forth in the Proposal. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been delivered upon actual delivery, or one (1) day following submission to a nationally-recognized overnight delivery service for next day delivery to the Service Provider, or three (3) days following submission to the Service Provider by U.S. Certified Mail. 14.2 Unless otherwise stated herein, all notices or other writings which the Service Provider is required or permitted to give to the City may be hand delivered to the City Manager, mail via U.S. Certified Mail. Or sent next-day delivery by a nationally-recognized overnight delivery service for next day delivery to City, or three (3) days following submission to the City by U.S. Certified Mail. Any such notice shall be sent to: City of Stockbridge, GA ATTN: City Manager 4640 N. Henry Blvd. Stockbridge, GA 30281 Service Provider: TSW 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 850 Atlanta, GA 30309 14.3 Either party may change its notice address by written notice to the other given as provided in this section. 15. NONDISCRIMINATION 15.1 During the performance of this Contract, the Service Provider, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest agrees as follows: 15.1.1 Compliance with Regulations. The Service Provider shall comply with the Law and Regulations as they may be amended from time to time (hereafter referred to as the “Regulations”), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Contract. 15.1.2 Nondiscrimination. The Service Provider, with regard to the work performed by it during the Contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of any subcontractor, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Service Provider shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Regulations. 21 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS 15.1.3 Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations either by competitive proposing or negotiation made by the Service Provider for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Service Provider of the Service Provider’s obligations under this Contract and the Regulation relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color or national origin. 15.1.4 Information and Reports. The Service Provider shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources or information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions, the Service Provider shall so certify to the City , as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 15.1.5 Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the Service Provider’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Contract, the City shall impose such Contract Sanctions as it may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to: 15.1.5.1 Withholding of payments to the Service Provider under the Contract until the Service Provider complies, and/or 15.1.5.2 Cancellation, termination or suspension of the Contract, in whole or in part. 15.1.6 Incorporation of Provisions, The Service Provider shall include the provisions of subsections 20.1.1 through 20.1.5 in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The Service Provider shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event the Service Provider becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Service Provider may request the City to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the City and, in addition, the Service Provider may request the interest of the City and, in addition, the Service Provider may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 15.2 The Service Provider assures the City that it will comply with the pertinent statutes, 22 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Executive Orders and such rules as are promulgated to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin sex, age, marital status, or handicap be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from Federal assistance. This provision shall bind the Service Provider from the period beginning with the initial solicitation through the completion of the Contract. 16. COPYING DOCUMENTS The Service Provider hereby grants the City and its agent’s permission to copy and distribute any and all materials and documents contained in, comprising, or which are otherwise submitted to the City with or in connection with the Service Provider’s Proposal or which are contained in the Contract Documents (the “Submittals”). The permission granted by the Service Provider shall be on behalf of the Service Provider and any and all other parties who claim any rights to any of the materials or documents comprising the Submittals. Such permission specifically authorizes the City and its agents to make and distribute such copies of the Submittals or portions thereof as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the City for its own internal purposes or for responding to requests for copies from any member of the public regardless of whether the request is specifically characterized as a public records request pursuant to Georgia Cod. This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. 17. GENERAL PROVISIONS 17.1 The Contract Documents consist of the Contract, the Proposal Forms, the Instructions to Proposers, Request for Qualifications, all Addendum(s) issued prior to execution of this Contract, these General Conditions and Specifications. Together, these documents comprise the Contract and all the documents are fully a part of the Contract as if attached to the Contract or repeated herein. Precedence of the Contract Documents shall be as follows: (i) addendum(s) to the Contract Documents, (ii) the Contract, (iii) the General Conditions, (iv) the Scope of Work in Exhibit B, (v) the Request for Proposal, and (vii) the Proposal Form. 17.2 This Contract represents the entire agreement between the parties in relation to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between such parties relation to such subject matter, and there are no contemporaneous written or oral agreements, terms or representation made by any party other than those contained herein. No verbal or written representations shall be relied upon outside the Contract 23 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS terms and amendments. Without exception, all deletions or additions to the scope of work will be set forth in a written amendment to this Contract. No amendment, modification, or waiver of this Contract, or any part thereof, shall be valid or effective unless in writing signed by the party or parties sought to be bound or charged therewith; and no waiver of any breach or condition of this Contract shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach or condition, whether of a like or different nature. 17.3 The Service Provider shall, during the term of this Contract, repair any damage caused t real or personal property of the City and/or its tenants, wherever situated, caused by the intentional, reckless, or negligent acts or omissions of the Service Provider’s officers, agents, or employees, and any subcontractors and their officers, agents, or employees, or , at the option of the City, the Service Provider shall reimburse the City for the cost of repairs thereto and replacement thereof accomplished by or on behalf of the City. 17.4 The language of this Contract shall be construed according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either the City or the Service Provider. This Contract shall be deemed to be made, construed and performed according to the laws of the State of Georgia. Any suit or proceeding initiate for the purpose of interpreting or enforcing any provision of this Contract or any matter in connection therewith shall be brought exclusively in a court of competent jurisdiction in Henry County, Georgia, and the Service Provider waives any venue objection, including, but not limited to, any objection that a suit has been brought in an inconvenient forum. The Service Provider agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of the Georgia courts and irrevocably agrees to acknowledge service of process when requested by the City. 17.5 The section headings herein are for the convenience of the City and the Service Provider and are not to be used to construe the intent of this Contract or any part hereof, or to modify, amplify, or aid in the interpretation or construction of any of the provisions hereof. 17.6 The use of any gender herein shall include all genders, and the use of any number shall be construed as the singular or the plural, all as the context may require. 17.7 The delay or failure of the City at any time to insist upon a performance of any of the terms, conditions and covenants herein shall not be deemed a waiver of that breach or any subsequent breach or default in the terms, conditions, or covenants of this Contract. The 24 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Service Provider shall not be relieved of any obligation hereunder on account of its failure to perform by reason of any strike, lockout, or other labor disturbance. 17.8 If the City shall, without any fault, be made a party to any litigation commenced between the Service Provider and a third party arising out of the Service Provider’s operations and activities at the premises, then the Service Provider shall pay all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by or imposed upon the City in connection with such litigation for all trial and appellate proceedings. The City shall give prompt notice to the Service Provider of any claim or suit instituted against it by such third party. The provisions of this Section supplement and are not intended to be in lieu of the indemnification provisions of Section 5 hereof. The provisions of this Section shall survive the acceptance of the services and payment therefore, and the expiration or earlier termination of this Contract. 17.9 The City shall have the right to recover from the Service Provider all of the City’s costs and expenses incurred in enforcing the provisions of this Contract including, but not limited to, (1) the cost of administrative investigation and enforcement ( including, without limitation, audit fees and costs, attorneys’ fees) and (2) the cost of any trial, appellate or bankruptcy proceeding (including, without limitation, investigation costs, audit fees and costs, attorney’s fees, court costs, paralegal fees and expert witness fees). This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. The Service Provider shall not during the term of the Contract knowingly hire or employ (on either a full-time or part-time basis) any employee of the City. 17.10 The Service Provider shall be required, during the term of the Contract at no additional cost to the City, to take such reasonable security precaution with respect to its operations at City Hall as the City in its discretion may from time to time prescribe. The Service Provider shall comply with all regulation, rules and policies of any governmental authority, including the City, relating to security issues. 17.11 The City may, but shall not be obligated to, cure, at any time, upon five (5) days written notice to the Service Provider (provided, however, that in any emergency situation to the City shall be required to give only such notice as is reasonable in light of all the circumstances), any default by the Service Provider under this Contract; whenever the City so cures a default by the Service Provider, all costs and expenses incurred by the 25 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS City in curing the default, including but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees, shall be paid by the Service Provider to the City on demand. 17.12 The City shall, in its discretion, be entitled to deduct from the compensation to which the Service Provider is otherwise entitled hereunder, an amount equal to any liabilities of the Service Provider to the City which are then outstanding. In the event that additional work beyond the scope of this Contract is requested by the City Manager and it results in any extra charges to the City, the Service Provider shall so advise the City in writing of the amount of the extra charges. The City is not required to pay any extra charges for additional work unless such work and the charges therefore have been approved in advance and have been confirmed in writing within twenty-four (24) hours by the City Manager, in his or her exclusive discretion. 17.13 The Service Provider is an independent Service Provider, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Service Provider an employee, agent, partner or legal representative of the City for any purpose whatsoever. The Service Provider acknowledges that it does not have any authority to incur any obligations or responsibilities on behalf of the City and agrees not to hold itself out as having any such authority. Nothing contained in this Contract shall be construed to create a joint employer relationship between the City and the Service Provider with respect to any employee of the Service Provider or of its subcontractors. 17.14 The Service Provider and its subcontractors if any, shall maintain complete and accurate books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied, and shall be in a form reasonable acceptable to the City Manager or designee. The Service Provider and its subcontractors shall account for all expenses of any nature related to transactions in connection with the Contract in a manner which segregates in detail those transaction from other transactions of the Service Provider and subcontractors, and which support the amounts reported and /or invoiced to the City. At a minimum, the Service Provider’s and subcontractor’s accounting for such expenses and transactions shall include such records in the form of electronic media compatible with or convertible to a format compatible with computers utilized by the City at its offices; a computer run hard copy; or legible microfilm or microfiche, together with access to the applicable reader. All such books and records and computerized accounting systems shall upon reasonable notice from the City be made available in Henry County, Georgia, 26 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS for inspection, examination, audit and copying by the City through and by its duly authorized representatives at any time for up to four (4) years after the year to which books and records pertain. Such inspection, examination, or audit may include, but is not limited to a review of the general input, processing and output controls of information systems, using read only access, for all computerized applications used to record financial transactions and information. The Service Provider and subcontractor shall freely lend its own assistance in a timely manner in making such inspection, examination, audit, or copying and, if such records are maintained in electronic and other machine-readable format, shall provide the City and/or its representative such assistance as may be required to allow complete access to such records. The City Manager may require the Service Provider and subcontractors to provide other records the City Manager, in his or her sole discretion, deems necessary to enable the City to perform an accurate inspection, examination or audit of expenses incurred in and transactions related to performance of this Contract. Such records shall be provided within thirty (30) days or request thereof. In the event that expenses incurred or reimbursed are found by such inspection, examination, or audit to have been overpaid, the Service Provider and its subcontractors agree that such amounts shall be payable to the City. If, prior to the expiration of the above-state four (4) year record retention period, any audit or investigation is commenced by the City, or any claim is made or litigation commenced relating to this Contract by the City, the Service Provider, or third party, the Service Provider shall continue to maintain all such records, and the City shall continue to have the right to inspect such records in the manner stated above, until the inspection, examination, audit, claim, or litigation is finally resolved (including the determination of any and all appeals or the expiration of time for an appeal). This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Contract. In the event of any conflict between any provision of this Contract and generally accepted accounting principles or generally accepted auditing standards, the provisions of this Contract shall control even where this Contract references such provisions or standards. In particular, without limitation, the Service Provider and subcontractors shall maintain all records required under this Contract to the full extend required hereunder, even if some or all such records would not be required under such generally accepted accounting principles or auditing standards. If as a result of an inspection, examination or audit, it is established that 27 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS amounts are due from the Service Provider to the City, the Service Provider shall forthwith, upon written demand from the City, pay the City such amount, together with interest on the amount due at the rate of twelve (12%) percent per annum, or if less, the maximum rate of interest allowed by law, from the date such additional amounts were overpaid by the City. Further if such inspection, examination or audit establishes that the Service Provider has over billed such amounts for any Contract period by two (2%) percent or more, then the entire expense of such inspection, examination or audit shall be paid by the Service Provider. 17.15 The Service Provider and subcontractors shall prepare and provide the City with all detailed reports as required under the Contract on a timely basis. The City reserves the right to modify the reporting procedures or the form and content of any report as it deems necessary. 17.16 There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Contract, and nothing contained herein shall be construed to create such. 17.17 Consultant shall perform services in accordance with the schedules established in applicable task orders. 17.18 In computing any period of time established under this Contract, except as otherwise specified herein the word “days” when referring to a period of time is ten (10) days or less means business days, and when referring to a period of time that is more than ten (10) days means calendar days. The day of the event, from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. A business day is any day other than Saturday, Sunday, or Federal, State of Georgia or City holidays. 17.19 The Service Provider agrees to perform all acts and execute all supplementary instruments or documents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out or complete the transaction(s) contemplated by this Contract. 17.20 The Service Provider and the City hereby mutually waive any claim against each other and their respective members, officials, officers, agents and employees for damages (including damages for loss of anticipated profits) caused by any suit or proceedings brought by either of them or by any third party directly or indirectly attacking the validity of this Contract or any part thereof, or any addendum or amendment hereto, or the manner in which this Contract was solicited, awarded or negotiated, or arising out of any judgment or award in any suit or proceeding declaring this Contract, or any 28 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS addendum or amendment hereto, null, void or voidable or delaying the same, or any part thereof, from being carried out. 18. GRATUITIES, REBATES, OR KICKBACKS. 18.1 GRATUITIES. It shall be unethical for any person to offer, give or agree to give any employee or official of the City or for any employee or official of the City to solicit, demand, accept from another person, a gratuity, rebate, loan, offer of employment or other services or property of value in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation or preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request including the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing or in any other advisory capacity in any particular matter, pertaining to any program requirement or a Contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal therefore in any manner inconsistent with the State of Georgia’s Department of Administrative Services Gratuity Policy. Rebates normally or routinely offered to customers in the ordinary course of business for the purchase of goods and services are acceptable and are the property of the City. 18.2 KICKBACK AND REBATES. It shall be unethical for any payment, gratuity, or offer of employment to be made by or on behalf of a subcontractor to this Contract to the prime contract or higher tie subcontractor, or any person associated therewith, as an inducement for a subcontractor or order. End of General Conditions. 29 1.1 BACKGROUND: EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS The City of Stockbridge is in the northern part of Henry County, Georgia, which was founded on May 15, 1821. Henry County has an area of approximately 331 square miles, located in the Piedmont Section of northern Georgia and surrounded by the counties of Butts, Clayton, DeKalb, Newton, Rockdale, and Spalding. Stockbridge, Georgia, is just minutes south of Atlanta, a straight drive down Interstate 75-South. The City has approximately 30,000 residents and has a referendum on the November 2022 ballot that could add an additional 6,600 residents. 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK: I. Project Overview: The City of Stockbridge is seeking submissions from qualified agencies and/or firms who can provide: A. Comprehensive Housing, Demographic, and Market Analysis B. Urban Design and Creative Place-Making Studies with renderings C. Revitalization Plans (to include pursuit of Department of Community Affairs Funding Opportunities) A. Economic & Workforce Development Planning B. Greenways & Trails Planning (Connections) C. Streetscape Analysis and Plans Recommendations D. Arts & Culture Planning Task orders may be issued as small, mid, or large projects based on the required level of effort. The City anticipates that most Small Area Studies will not exceed $50,000; however, final task order amounts will be determined based on scope and negotiated fee. The City will specify the scale in each task order. See Exhibit 1, Small Area Plan (SAP) Criteria. II. General: The work to be accomplished is in support of the Comprehensive Plan and Short-Term Work Plan A. 1. Land Use New Development: Focus new development and density in existing activity centers, near transit stations, and high-capacity corridors. 30 2. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Commercial Corridors: Encourage reinvestment or redevelopment of commercial corridors, including the introduction of residential or other new uses to these areas. 3. Single-Family Neighborhoods: Continue to protect existing, stable single-family neighborhoods, while identifying locations for appropriate infill development. 4. Density Transitions: Manage height and density transitions between densely developing areas and surrounding lower intensity residential neighborhoods. 5. Diverse Housing and Development: Encourage more diverse housing and development types to meet the changing needs of residents and communities. 6. Land Use and Economic Policies: Coordinate with the Stockbridge Economic Development Department and the Community Development Department to ensure economic development is informed by land use and development policies and that policies appropriately support economic development efforts. B. Housing 1. Housing Variety and Choice: Focus new development and intensity in existing activity centers, near transit stations, and high-capacity corridors. 2. Workforce Housing: Encourage reinvestment or redevelopment of commercial corridors, including the introduction of residential or other new uses to these areas. 3. Senior and Independent Living: Continue to protect existing, stable single-family neighborhoods, while identifying locations for appropriate infill development. 4. Mixed Use Developments: Manage height and density transitions between densely developing areas and surrounding lower-density residential neighborhoods. 5. Multi-Family Housing: Encourage more diverse housing and development types to meet the changing needs of residents and communities. 6. Housing Strategy: Coordinate with the Community Development Department to ensure economic development is informed by land use and development policies and that policies appropriately support economic development efforts. 7. Fair Housing: During the rezoning process, prevent the occurrence of discrimination in housing on the basis of age, race, religion, gender, or national origin. 8. Code Compliance: Improve the enforcement of building codes and standards to improve housing conditions within aging multi-family housing developments. C. Natural Resources & Sustainability 31 1. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Preservation: Encourage the preservation of the City’s limited remaining open space, farmland, natural, and critical environmental areas. 2. Environmental Sensitivity: Protect environmentally sensitive areas, including wetlands, floodplains, water supply watersheds, and stream corridors. 3. Develop more Neighborhood Parks: Increase the number of parks within neighborhoods that are easily accessible to nearby residents. 4. Acquisition of Open Space: Continue coordination with Recreation, Parks & Cultural Affairs to facilitate open-space acquisition and expansion 5. Sustainable Zoning: Utilize zoning tools and techniques that preserve open space, natural resources and the environment, and address resiliency. 6. Private Partnerships: Partner with non-governmental organizations to acquire and protect land. 7. Sustainable and Conservation Development: Promote development that incorporates sustainable practices and conserves critical environmental areas. 8. Stormwater Management: Encourage techniques to reduce storm water runoff and other drainage issues as part of development activities. 9. Education: Educate the development community and the public on strategies and solutions for addressing water and sewer capacity concerns within the City. 10. Vision: Develop a unified vision and strategy for sustainability related initiatives within City of Stockbridge. D. Economic Development 1. Coordinate Regulatory Processes: Match land use regulations to economic development vision and continue to build a more predictable and consistent review and approval processes. 2. Support Existing Businesses: Engage and support more existing businesses and use incentives to support existing industry clusters and prime locations to create new ones. 3. Foster Business Development: Create a supportive environment to foster start-up businesses. 4. Target Industries: Create specific incentives for target industries and implement a proactive target industry recruitment effort. Increase efforts to develop international business opportunities. 32 5. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Invest in Infrastructure: Continue implementing existing infrastructure strategies 6. Create Development Plans: Formalize economic development concepts for each employment center and clearly define implementation roles for all parties. E. Transportation 1. Provide Transportation Options through Connectivity Across Modes: Improve travel for all users by increasing connections across roadways, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian modes. 2. Promote Equity: Prioritize improvements that increase transportation access to all parts of the City, especially communities where lack of transportation options creates substantial barriers. 3. Improve Safety: Provide safe travel by users across all modes of transportation. 4. Enable Healthy Communities and Improve Quality of Life: Leverage transportation infrastructure to encourage an active lifestyle and overall improved quality of life. 5. Respect/Improve City of Stockbridge’s Character: Implement transportation projects that improve mobility while taking into consideration local community context. 6. Increase Access to Jobs and Education: Prioritize transportation investments that allow workers and students to more easily access these key destinations. 7. Better Accommodate the Movement of Goods: Implement transportation projects that improve freight in the City either by truck or by rail. 8. Improve Maintenance: Ensure the long-term care for existing infrastructure including paving roads and repairing bridges and signal systems. 9. Increase Funding for Improvements: Pursue new local revenue sources that will allow the City to implement additional transportation projects. 10. Encourage Economic Development: Leverage transportation projects that help to encourage revitalization and new development throughout the City. 11. Practice Fiscal Responsibility in Transportation Investments: Prioritize transportation projects that can be implemented in a reasonable timeframe and provide a strong return on investment. F. Equity 1. Aging Population: Support the aging population by creating more opportunities for residents to age-in-place through the addition of senior housing and coordinated services and programs. 33 2. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Immigrant and refugee Community Inclusion: Establish a committee or working group focused on communicating with and including immigrant and refugee communities in planning and decision making in their community. 3. Poverty: Work with community-based organizations and non-profits to address issues around poverty, educational attainment, and other issues facing disadvantaged communities. 4. Low Broadband Coverage Areas: The Georgia Broadband Deployment Initiative has identified low or no coverage areas within the city. The City of Stockbridge will develop partnerships to address these areas. 5. Broadband Service Areas: Identify Unserved Locations within Service Areas and target them through collaboration with governments, educational/institutional entities, and private sector partners. G. Arts, Culture, & Historic Resources 1. Historic Preservation: Preserve and protect the historic character of the City including historically, culturally, or architecturally significant sites. 2. Development: Maintain the character of historic areas while accommodating new residential development. 3. Analysis: Complete a city -wide Historic Resource Survey 4. Historical Sites: Identify additional historically significant sites and institute “formal protection” through the adoption of local historic designation and ordinances. 5. Zoning: Establish new and enforce ordinances to protect historic areas. 6. Open Space and Agricultural Preservation: Encourage the preservation of the few remaining rural areas, forested areas, and agricultural structures or sites within the City. 7. Cultural Events: Establish programs and events that celebrate unique cultures found in Stockbridge. Identify community organizations to partner with on these programs or events. 8. Arts Support: Develop a strategy to better coordinate arts related initiatives and support local artists and arts organizations within Stockbridge. H. Community Health, Wellness, & Safety 1. Food Access: Work with public, private and non-profit partners to address challenges related to access to healthy foods within some areas of Stockbridge. 34 2. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Quality of Life: Improve quality of life by increasing the number of sidewalks and trails that connect homes to regional trail networks, nearby businesses, schools, parks and other community services and amenities. 3. Active Living: Create communities designed to encourage active living and healthy lifestyles. 4. Crime and Safety: Work across departments, with public safety partners and local community organizations to address safety issues including adequate pedestrian facilities and lighting, cut-through and speeding in residential areas, and within area of high crime. 5. Code Enforcement: Enforce existing building codes and other ordinances to address safety issues related to dilapidated or abandoned structures and illegal dumping. I. Coordination & Communication 1. City-County Coordination: Encourage better communication and coordination between County and City staff around issues related to land use, transportation, and other relevant issues. 2. Joint Planning: Consider joint planning initiatives with municipalities to adequately plan for and coordinate land use, development, transportation, and other relevant initiatives. 3. School-City Coordination: Encourage better communication and coordination between Henry County School District and City of Stockbridge staff around issues related to land use and transportation near schools and other HCSD owned land. 4. Education: Identify opportunities or programs to educate City residents and stakeholders on planning and development related priorities and issues and current demographic, market, or development trends on an ongoing basis. 5. Outreach and Involvement: Identify opportunities and events to involve the general public in current planning initiative. III. Area covered: All necessary services provided in this contract will support the Comprehensive Plan and Short-Term Work Program for City of Stockbridge. Some efforts require intergovernmental coordination. IV. Goal: To address specific land use and development issues at a finer level of detail. These plans support the general vision, policies, and goals of the community, but allow for a greater degree of detail in guiding development. They may have their own sets of specific policies 35 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS to shape development, and can include elements such as design guidelines, standards for transitions in development intensities and uses, additional standards for mixed use, investments in infrastructure, connectivity, and greater opportunities for input and control from local residents and businesses. Small Area Plans can take a variety of forms, such as Livable Center Initiatives (LCIs), Master Active Living Plans (MALPs), Corridor Plans, or Transit Oriented Development plans, and are the primary tool by which the City intends to shape development. Work Tasks: The Small Area Plans Program will include an assessment analyzing the existing conditions that impact the specified area within City of Stockbridge. The Plan should include regulatory, policy, and capital investment recommendations designed to achieve stated goals and strategies arrived upon by completing the following tasks: A. Task 1 – Assessment and Analysis Contractor will perform a model-based review of the identified issue(s) and population impacted. This analysis may require the inclusion of the same itemized analysis of city(s) within City of Stockbridge, Georgia for comparison and contrast purposes. B. Task 2 – Community Participation Process 1.Contractor will conduct an outreach process that promotes the involvement of all citizen and stakeholder groups in City of Stockbridge. This can be a mixture of virtual and in-person meetings. C. Task 3 – Recommendations and Action Plan Report 1. Contractor will prepare a Plan document that includes an Assessment, documentation of the Public Involvement Process, and Recommendations Section that includes an Action Plan. Elements shall include: a. Recommendations b. Overall Implementation Strategy c. Five-year Action Plan d. Evaluation Strategy (used to monitor the plan implementation) D. Task 4 – Prepare Project Deliverables (a) Deliverables: a. The plan process and methodology b. Documentation of the community participation process c. Maps, graphics, and relevant illustrations 36 d. EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Housing Recommendations e. Overall Implementation Strategy f. Five-year Action Plan g. Evaluation Strategy (b) Format of Deliverables: a. InDesign and PDF files of Final Report and all appendices b. The Five-Year Action Plan Template in Excel format c. All electronic files in their original formats with supporting graphics and GIS Shapefiles. 37 ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS EXHIBIT 1 Small Area Plan (SAP) Criteria SAP Project Scale & Target Elements with Definitions Small Micro – SAP (up to$20k) • SWOT Analysis – Evaluates strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the study area to establish a baseline understanding. • Public Outreach Meetings – Structured sessions (virtual or in-person) where residents and stakeholders provide input and learn about the plan. • Stakeholder Development (Advocacy) – Identification and engagement of key local advocates (businesses, neighborhood leaders, civic groups) to support the plan. • Public Engagement – Broader tools (surveys, pop-ups, online platforms) used to capture feedback from the wider community, especially underrepresented voices. Mid-Micro ($20K-$50K) • SWOT Analysis – Baseline analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to guide plan priorities. • Public Outreach Meetings – Community conversations with residents, business owners, and institutions to shape plan direction. • Stakeholder Development (Advocacy) – Formation of stakeholder or advisory committees to champion the plan and sustain momentum. • Public Engagement – Expanded outreach (focus groups, online mapping, targeted outreach to youth/seniors) for diverse representation. • High-Level Recommendations – Strategic guidance highlighting priority investments, policy shifts, or design concepts without requiring technical detail. • Implementation Plan & Action Matrix (Required) – Outlines specific steps, responsible parties, estimated costs, and timelines for executing recommendations, including identification of potential partnerships. Large Micro-SAP ($50-$75K) • Existing Conditions / Needs Assessment – Comprehensive review of demographics, infrastructure, land use, and market conditions to establish a fact base. 38 • EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS Public Engagement – Multi-tiered process (workshops, interviews, open houses, digital platforms) designed to validate findings and refine strategies. • Market Analysis – Study of local economic conditions, real estate demand, development trends, and opportunities for investment. • Transportation Recommendations – Strategies for improving safety, multimodal access, connectivity, and infrastructure upgrades. • Housing Recommendations – Policies and programs to support affordability, housing diversity, density, and alignment with market demand. • Land Use & Zoning Recommendations – Guidance on zoning code amendments, land use patterns, height/density regulations, and design standards needed to achieve plan goals. • Economic Development Recommendations – Approaches to attract investment, revitalize corridors, support local businesses, and align workforce development with growth opportunities. • Implementation Plan & Action Matrix (Required) – A detailed roadmap for execution, including estimated budgets, phasing timelines, funding sources, and public/private partnership opportunities. End of Exhibit B. 39 REDACTED PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72(a)(25) REDACTED PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72(a)(25) BUSINESS CONTINUITY (DISASTER RECOVERY) • Protects critical city data and systems • Data backed up in secure, mirrored locations • Rapid recovery from disasters or cyberattacks • Minimizes downtime, productivity loss, and citizen disruption .J·· ,;;.JI .;-_· _/� '.,j.: �z•··,./j'; •· a / • - lt,11·'IJii.:• · i[il ..: � 1 .a.1..-.�•�\ ••·: •• ---•ii1� • \.!f ,_,...,.,,� I 1 1-iiil • -\- '\ _ -'"pl_ A '. •'• ��--·--..·X: �.,#:-....• \.

STOCKBRIDGE CITY COUNCIL Mayor Jayden L. Williams At-Large Council Meeting Agenda July 13, 2026 6:00 PM Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander Council District 5 Councilmember LaKeisha Gantt Council District 1 Councilmember Antwan Cloud Council District 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. Council District 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber Council District 4 CITY MANAGER STOCKBRIDGE CITY HALL Shawn Edmondson 4640 NORTH HENRY BLVD. INTERIM CITY CLERK Cassandra Lester CITY TREASURER Frank Milazi CITY ATTORNEY Quinton G. Washington Megan McCulloch STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Website: www.stockbridgega.org Phone: 770-389-7900 Fax: 770-389-7912 Translation and Interpretation Services are available with (7) days prior notice. Please contact the City’s HR Manager at 770-389-7908 for assistance. AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE MONDAY, JULY 13, 2026 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 1 Adopt the June 2, 2026 Henry County BOC Called Joint Meeting w Cities re TSPLOST2 2 Adopt the June 8th City Council Summary Minutes PUBLIC COMMENTS - All persons wishing to speak for public comment must sign in with the City Clerk prior to the beginning of the meeting. You must sign your name, address, and phone number. You will be able to address the Mayor and Council for three (3) minutes. Speakers must respect all members of the elected body, officials, and staff. Defamation, unruliness and/or swearing will not be tolerated while meetings are in session. CONSENT AGENDA 3 Council Consideration to appoint a member to the Planning Commission - Term to be assigned accordingly. OLD BUSINESS 4 SECOND READ of an ordinance establishing the City of Stockbridge Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive program for Blighted Properties pursuant to Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Georgia Constitution and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12, et. seq. - Presented by: Megan McCulloch NEW BUSINESS Page | 3 5 Scope Of Services Under Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 With Whitley Engineering, Inc - Presented by: Ryan Anderson MAYOR'S COMMENTS (Mayor Jayden L. Williams) EXECUTIVE SESSION (Exemptions to the Georgia Open Meetings Acts) ANNOUNCEMENTS OF UPCOMING MEETINGS & EVENTS City Council Meetings are held on the second Monday of each month, and Work Sessions are held the last Tuesday of the month at the Stockbridge City Hall - City Council Chamber. Meeting times and dates may change. Please visit www.stockbridgega.org for updates. The City of Stockbridge adheres to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you need auxiliary services to participate in the meetings, please contact City Hall at 770-389-7900 in advance. ADJOURNMENT July 13, 2026 6:00 PM 4640 N. Henry Stockbridge, GA 30281 Phone: (770) 389-7900 , 2026 Page 1 of 3 STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY OF HENRY The Henry County Board of Commissioners held a Called Joint Public Meeting with the Cities (Hampton, Locust Grove, McDonough, and Stockbridge) regarding T-SPLOST 2 on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 10:30 a.m. at the Henry County Administration Building (Community Room), 140 Henry Parkway, McDonough GA. HenryTV also streamed this live online on its website, as well as Charter/Spectrum Channel 180 and Facebook Live. Carlotta Harrell, Chair Johnny Wilson, District 1 Commissioner Neat Robinson, District 2 Commissioner Dee Anglyn, III, Vice Chair/District 3 Commissioner Michael T. Price, District 4 Commissioner Kevin J. Lewis, District 5 Commissioner Staff Present: Kevin Johnson, Interim County Manager; Rachel Mack, County Attorney; Stephaine Braun, County Clerk; and Jasmin Head, Deputy County Clerk Municipalities Present: City of Stockbridge: Mayor Jayden L. Williams; Councilmembers Elton Alexander, Antwan Cloud and Yolanda Barber; City Manager Shawn Edmondson; and Interim City Clerk Cassandra Lester City of Hampton: Mayor Ann Tarpley; Councilmembers Marty Meeks, Pam Duchesne and Kesha White-Williams; and City Manager Jeff Baker City of Locust Grove: Mayor Carlos Greer and City Administrator Tim Young City of McDonough: Mayor Kamila “Kam” Varner; Councilmembers Darryl Payton, Vanessa Thomas and Xavier Johnson ; City Administrator, Keith Dickerson; and Deputy City Administrator Sylvia Smith Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge was recited. Call to Order Chair Harrell and each Mayor from the Cities of McDonough, Stockbridge, Locust Grove and Hampton called their respective meetings to order. The purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed renewal of Henry County’s Transportation SPLOST program, receive updates from county staff and municipal representatives, discuss potential transportation projects, and outline the process for an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) and a potential November 2026 referendum. , 2026 Page 2 of 3 County Presentation: T-SPLOST II Overview County staff presented an overview of T-SPLOST II, noting that voters approved the first T-SPLOST in November 2021. A six-year renewal is projected to generate approximately $340 million in transportation revenues. Staff reviewed eligible project categories, including road widening, resurfacing, intersection improvements, sidewalks, trails, and bridge work. Finance Director Joy Robinson reviewed estimated collections and population-based distribution projections. Staff highlighted accomplishments under T-SPLOST I, including the McDonough Parkway Extension, Rock Quarry Road Widening, Mill Road Widening, State Route 81 Widening, Jonesboro Road Widening, Bill Gardner Parkway Widening, and Fairview Road Widening. Public Outreach and Recommended County Projects Staff reported conducting seven public open houses and receiving more than 900 survey responses. Residents identified traffic congestion, intersection delays, road conditions, and road widening as top priorities. Recommended county projects included: Jonesboro Road Phase II, Fairview Road Phases II/IIIA, SR 81 Phase II (right of way grant match), Mill Road Phase II (design and right of way grant match), SR 42 improvements (design grant match), major intersection upgrades throughout the county, road resurfacing projects, trail investments, safety improvements, grant matching funds, and program management. Staff also identified Tier II projects that could advance if revenues exceed projections. Municipal Presentations Stockbridge representatives emphasized a data-driven project prioritization framework centered on public safety, asset preservation, congestion relief, connectivity, economic impact, and project readiness. The city highlighted the Patrick Henry Parkway widening project, signal modernization, stormwater improvements, resurfacing, trails, sidewalks, and grant matching opportunities. Hampton representatives expressed support for regional transportation planning, infrastructure investments that keep pace with growth, and continued collaboration on trail connectivity, including the Flint River Greenway. Locust Grove presented proposed investments in road resurfacing, strategic roadway connections, downtown grid streets, multiuse trails, and projects designed to improve mobility and economic development. City officials stressed the importance of maintaining existing infrastructure while expanding connectivity. McDonough representatives identified preliminary priorities including Industrial Boulevard, Avalon Parkway, Highway 155 North, Turner Church Road, Zack Hinton Parkway, King Mill Road, sidewalk connections, and multiuse trail projects. , 2026 Page 3 of 3 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) County Attorney Rachel Mack reviewed the Intergovernmental Agreement requirements. The IGA must be approved by the Board of Commissioners and participating municipalities before the referendum can proceed. Staff advised that municipal approval is requested by July 15, 2026, with Board consideration anticipated on July 21, 2026. Discussion included population figures used for revenue distribution. Chair Harrell stated the county’s willingness to utilize 2024 population figures to support collaboration and fairness among all jurisdictions. Comments Commissioners, mayors, council members, and staff expressed support for regional cooperation, transportation investment, trail connectivity, congestion relief, infrastructure preservation, and continued partnership among Henry County and its municipalities. Speakers emphasized the importance of public support for T-SPLOST II and the need to address future transportation demands. Upcoming Meetings and Events A. June 16, 2026 is a Regular BOC Meeting at 6:30 p.m. B. July 7, 2026 is a Regular BOC Meeting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting was adjourned at 11:39 a.m. Carlotta Harrell, Chair Henry County Board of Commissioners Stephanie Braun County Clerk Henry County SPLOST Department T-SPLOST 2 Public Outreach and Feedback Report June 2, 2026 To the Henry County Board of Commissioners, The SPLOST Department has held a series of events this spring to gather the community’s feedback ahead of the T-SPLOST 2 referendum in November 2026. Our public outreach efforts included the following: • • • The Department hosted seven public open houses held at county facilities throughout Henry County. During these events, an estimated 40-50 residents stopped by to learn more about the program and share their feedback. The online public survey had 907 respondents hearing directly from residents about the potential projects on the T-SPLOST 2 project list. Many of the most highly requested projects have been incorporated into the recommended projects list. The Department held three online training sessions and two in-person meetings with the T-SPLOST 2 Ambassadors Group, comprised of community members appointed by the Board, to discuss current and future transportation projects. The ambassadors offered valuable insights and feedback when finalizing the recommended project list. The SPLOST Department is pleased to present the T-SPLOST 2 Recommended Projects List, as recommended by county staff and the T-SPLOST 2 Ambassadors’ Group, and the T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report. This report summarizes the public feedback received during our public outreach events and survey. An appendix which includes the written comments will be provided digitally as part of today’s meeting records. Following the Board’s adoption of a final project list in July, the department will update our outreach materials to include the final projects and to share the latest information with our community. We appreciate the community’s and Board’s continued interest in advancing Henry County SPLOST projects and enhancing our local infrastructure. Henry County T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report - Countywide Number of Respondents: 907 What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) Traffic congestion 781 Intersection delays 327 Safety concerns Road widening Intersection improvements 74 248 51 Expanded public transit 26 0 75 Bridge improvements 80 Other 196 Bicycle or trails 36 Limited transit options 463 Sidewalk projects 125 School zone traffic 537 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes Lack of sidewalks 716 141 Other 200 400 600 800 0 200 400 600 800 Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects (Select up to 5) East Atlanta Road Intersection improvement projects (Select up to 5) Airline at Kelleytown 115 East Lake Road 240 Hampton-Locust Grove Road 479 219 129 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 127 North Ola at Snapping Shoals 131 Old Jackson at Leguin Mill 257 State Route 81, ph. II 122 Old Jackson at South Ola 300 145 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 300 200 107 McCullough at Pates Creek 350 100 129 McCullough at Mitchell McDonough Parkway (west) 0 280 East Atlanta at Thurman 312 Patrick Henry Pkwy 221 Chambers at Mt. Olive 427 Mill Road, ph. II 154 Chambers at McCullough Jodeco Road (west of I-75) Oak Grove Road 169 Airline at Turner Church 305 Jonesboro Road, ph. II 194 Airline at Lake Dow 400 154 State Route 155 at Crumbley 500 243 State Route 20 at Kelleytown How do you interact with Henry County transportation? Travel through here 2% Live and work here 43.1% 269 Other 73 0 In which commission district do you reside? Live here 47% Work here 7.9% 177 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel Not Sure / Don't live here 11.4% District 5 10.5% District 1 23.7% District 2 12% District 4 18.3% District 3 24.1% 50 100 150 200 250 300 Henry County T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report - District 1 Number of Respondents: 215 What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) Traffic congestion 196 Intersection delays Road widening 85 Safety concerns Intersection improvements 10 54 Lack of sidewalks 3 21 Other 110 Sidewalk projects 24 Limited transit options 130 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes School zone traffic 181 35 Bicycle or trails 15 Bridge improvements 12 Expanded public transit 9 40 Other 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects (Select up to 5) East Atlanta Road Intersection improvement projects (Select up to 5) Airline at Kelleytown 4 East Lake Road 36 Hampton-Locust Grove Road 139 Jodeco Road (west of I-75) 52 McDonough Parkway (west) 134 Mill Road, ph. II 50 East Atlanta at Thurman 11 McCullough at Mitchell 11 McCullough at Pates Creek 11 21 43 76 Old Jackson at South Ola State Route 81, ph. II 40 60 80 100 73 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 90 20 31 Old Jackson at Leguin Mill 28 0 Chambers at McCullough North Ola at Snapping Shoals 49 Patrick Henry Pkwy 30 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 102 Oak Grove Road 37 Airline at Turner Church Chambers at Mt. Olive 69 Jonesboro Road, ph. II 36 Airline at Lake Dow 120 140 95 State Route 155 at Crumbley 38 State Route 20 at Kelleytown 26 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel 68 Other 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Henry County T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report - District 2 Number of Respondents: 109 What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Traffic congestion Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) 84 Intersection delays Road widening 34 Safety concerns Intersection improvements 7 42 27 Bicycle or trails School zone traffic 7 Bridge improvements Limited transit options 7 Expanded public transit 4 0 62 Sidewalk projects 17 Other 69 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes Lack of sidewalks 76 9 11 14 Other 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects (Select up to 5) Intersection improvement projects (Select up to 5) East Atlanta Road Airline at Kelleytown 58 East Lake Road 14 Hampton-Locust Grove Road 13 Airline at Turner Church Jonesboro Road, ph. II McDonough Parkway (west) 45 65 McCullough at Mitchell 34 Mill Road, ph. II 41 East Atlanta at Thurman 37 22 McCullough at Pates Creek 30 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 27 25 North Ola at Snapping Shoals 18 Patrick Henry Pkwy 50 5 Old Jackson at Leguin Mill 1 Old Jackson at South Ola 1 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 9 0 6 Chambers at Mt. Olive 72 State Route 81, ph. II 8 Chambers at McCullough Jodeco Road (west of I-75) Oak Grove Road 19 Airline at Lake Dow 20 40 60 80 4 State Route 155 at Crumbley 29 State Route 20 at Kelleytown 8 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel 21 Other 9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Henry County T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report - District 3 Number of Respondents: 219 What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) Traffic congestion 178 Intersection delays Road widening 76 Safety concerns Intersection improvements 29 65 7 Limited transit options 19 Other 40 Bicycle or trails 13 Bridge improvements 15 Expanded public transit 9 0 116 Sidewalk projects 27 School zone traffic 137 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes Lack of sidewalks 175 21 Other 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects (Select up to 5) East Atlanta Road Intersection improvement projects (Select up to 5) Airline at Kelleytown 16 East Lake Road 129 Hampton-Locust Grove Road 36 108 59 9 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 11 57 19 Old Jackson at South Ola State Route 81, ph. II 60 80 100 120 38 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 113 40 McCullough at Pates Creek Old Jackson at Leguin Mill 45 20 5 North Ola at Snapping Shoals 38 0 29 12 McCullough at Mitchell McDonough Parkway (west) Mill Road, ph. II 15 East Atlanta at Thurman 52 Patrick Henry Pkwy 78 Chambers at Mt. Olive 76 Oak Grove Road 85 Airline at Turner Church Chambers at McCullough Jodeco Road (west of I-75) Jonesboro Road, ph. II 82 Airline at Lake Dow 140 23 State Route 155 at Crumbley 93 State Route 20 at Kelleytown 82 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel 38 Other 7 0 20 40 60 80 100 Henry County T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report - District 4 Number of Respondents: 166 What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) Traffic congestion 140 Intersection delays 54 Safety concerns 40 51 Bicycle or trails 7 24 Bridge improvements 19 Other 70 Sidewalk projects 33 Limited transit options 79 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes School zone traffic 119 Intersection improvements 15 Lack of sidewalks Road widening 7 Expanded public transit 2 36 Other 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects (Select up to 5) East Atlanta Road Intersection improvement projects (Select up to 5) Airline at Kelleytown 27 East Lake Road 35 Hampton-Locust Grove Road 32 Jonesboro Road, ph. II 91 26 30 North Ola at Snapping Shoals 14 Old Jackson at Leguin Mill 74 10 Old Jackson at South Ola 14 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 33 40 16 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 64 Patrick Henry Pkwy 64 25 McCullough at Pates Creek 56 Oak Grove Road 46 McCullough at Mitchell McDonough Parkway (west) 20 25 East Atlanta at Thurman 63 0 Airline at Turner Church Chambers at Mt. Olive 101 State Route 81, ph. II 24 Chambers at McCullough Jodeco Road (west of I-75) Mill Road, ph. II 34 Airline at Lake Dow 60 80 100 120 10 State Route 155 at Crumbley 42 State Route 20 at Kelleytown 29 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel 54 Other 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Henry County T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report - District 5 Number of Respondents: 95 What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) Traffic congestion 86 Intersection delays Road widening 39 Safety concerns 75 Intersection improvements 3 56 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes 22 Sidewalk projects Lack of sidewalks 20 Bicycle or trails School zone traffic 6 Bridge improvements Limited transit options 7 Expanded public transit Other 48 26 9 2 16 Other 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects (Select up to 5) East Atlanta Road Intersection improvement projects (Select up to 5) Airline at Kelleytown 2 East Lake Road 5 2 Airline at Turner Church Hampton-Locust Grove Road 43 Jodeco Road (west of I-75) 58 Jonesboro Road, ph. II McDonough Parkway (west) 61 Chambers at Mt. Olive 60 35 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 22 North Ola at Snapping Shoals Oak Grove Road 29 Patrick Henry Pkwy 29 Old Jackson at South Ola 30 State Route 155 at Crumbley 3 Old Jackson at Leguin Mill 3 1 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 13 10 36 McCullough at Pates Creek 59 State Route 81, ph. II 3 McCullough at Mitchell 54 Mill Road, ph. II 4 Chambers at McCullough East Atlanta at Thurman 63 0 5 Airline at Lake Dow 20 40 50 60 70 6 19 State Route 20 at Kelleytown 8 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel 46 Other 11 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? Other Responses 26 Big trucks driving on roads that are not made for them! Government over spending highway/road needs to be widen I can’t afgord to be on the road because of your stupid taxes Influenced drivers, "unruly" drivers (speed, exhaust, music) ... need more "traffic" dedicated officers. Interstate build up Lack of double lane/two lane road throughout the County Road (Ex. Highways 20, 42, 55, 81, & 138) Also over heads at some the railroad crossing lack of intersection control at Noah's Ark, Pates Creek & McCUllough Lack of traffic law enforcement Literally all of these options are major concerns No more building of warehouses Over development leading to too much traffic. Overpopulation and overdevelopment people blocking the box at red lights preventing cross traffic movements People that don’t follow the rules of the road. Policeable traffic infractions (speed, impared, irrational action) Quarry (dump truck) traffic off Hwy 42 Repave Hwy 3 can't see in heavy rain Roundabouts School buses providing door to door service is ridiculous. THE TRAIN CONSTANTLY BEING STOPPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Too few lanes, can’t pass Too many construction projects in several locations at the same time! Tractor Trailers on roads they aren't supposed to be on, like Hampton Locust Grove Road. The bridge before Rocky Creek isn't strong enough to keep supporting these! Henry County needs to enforce the road signs that say no thru trucks! Traffic light does not hold long enough at Willow Drive to cross over to Industrial Pkwy trucks parked and lined up on both sides of the road leaving a small area in between to drive through. One direction only. P a g e | 1 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience: Intersections Other Responses 73 155 and Kings Mill 155 from Bill Gardener to I75 20 & Simpson Mill Rd / Oakland Ave, Willow Ln (near Walmart) from 20 to Roundabout, Road in front of Rufus Stewart Park needs sidewalk to Macon street, 81 at Florence McGarity A light, and intersection improvements, or a roundabout is needed at Mt. Carmel and 81. Traffic has been backing up to the cemetery on Mt. Carmel at the nearby church due to current traffic patterns. Additionally, it’s currently a safety hazard for the cars turning East onto 81 due to cars going above highway speeds. This has been a need for the area for many years. ADD ROUNDABOUTS AT HWY 155/INDUSTRIAL BLVD AND BUILD A BRIDGE OVER THE TRAIN TRACKS !!!!!!!!!!!! All the above Anywhere in Locust Grove Bandy Pkwy at Bill Gardner Pkwy Bill Gardner at Lester Mill Bill Gardner at Lester Mill Road and Hwy 155 at I75 Bill Gardner Parkway at Lester Mill Bill Gardner Parkway at Lester Mill Rd Bill Gardner Pkwy @ Lester Mill Rd Bill Gardner pkwy at Lester Mill Bill Gardner Road at Lester Mill Road Brannan Rd. @ State Hwy 42 Bridges road from willow to mt carmel East Atlanta Road and Orchard Road East Atlanta Road at Flat Rock Road Every intersection on GA. S.R. 81 East Fairview and 138 need widing. Fix the light at Racetrack and 42 and stop building warehouses and rental dwellings. Flippen at Hudson Bridge Rd and Flippen at Jodeco Rd Greenwood Industrial to I-75 Highway 20 at Lawrenceville Street/Turner Church Road HIGHWAY 42 FROM THE TRIANGLE TO LOCUST GROVE Holloway and Patrick Henry HWY 155 at Bill Gardner pkwy Hwy 155 at Valley Rd Hwy 155 Intersection by summit racing is nightmare 24/7 Hwy 20 at Oakland Road and Simpsons Mill Road Hwy 81 at Bethany Industrial Blvd & Hwy 155 Industrial Blvd/Kings Mill Rd at State Route 155 Jedeco Rd where it intersects both hudson bridge and flippen road.. always a backed up slow moving nightmare Jodeco & Meadowbrook P a g e | 2 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Jodeco Rd and Chambers Rd Jodeco Rd and Dailey Mill Road Jodeco Rd near the Dollar General. Jonesboro near roundabout by the tracks Jonesboro rd and Willow lane Jonesboro rd at McCullough rd King Mill and HWY 155 King Mill Rd @155 Kings Mill Rd at 155 Kings Mill Road and Highway 155 McCullough Road at Jonesboro Road Mcdonough Parkway and Hwy 155 McDonough Pkwy at Bridges Rd Millers Mill and Hwy 138 Mitchell Rd at Jonesboro Rd More traffic circles they keep traffic moving which causes less congestion. Mt. Carmel Rd at South Mt. Carmel Rd. N ola at the schools need a light to exit Orleans place subdivision on HWY 81 WW Noah's Ark at Jodeco Rd None of the above North Bethany at 81 turn signal needed Oak Grove Road — Jonesboro Road to Jodeco Road Patrick Henry at Country Club Drive Problem is neighborhoods are not connected to main roads to ease conjestion Racetrack Road at Macon Street Railroad section at Peeksville/42 Reopen the Hwy 42/Old Atlanta Rf intersection near Davis Rd/Hwy 42 to exit the Wildwood Estates subdivision that was closed for unnecessary storage facility building Rex Rd & East Atlanta Simpsons Mill/Oakland at Hwy 20, Chambers at Hwy 81 State Route 155 (exit216) State Route 155 at Avalon Parkway State Route 155 at Hemphill Rd Stop with spending money on foolish projects Ward Rd at 155 Willow lane and Jonesboro td P a g e | 3 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Are there any remaining comments or feedback you would like to share with the Henry County SPLOST Department? Responses 371 155 from 42 to75. King Mill Rd repaved from 155 to Sowell Rd. ASAP!!!! 20 year old roads are worn out and crumbling damaging cars, harming infrastructure and damaging home values 2026 ....There should be a railway to going and from the City of Atlanta and ATL Airport for people living in Henry County....You can only travel by car or Uber....not everyone have a car or know how to use Uber. The City needs to plan for all the new housing and warehouses being build...traffic will be a nightmare. The region is known for too much traffic...Folks might reconsider moving to Henry County and working in all these new warehouses.. 75 THROUGH HENRY COUNTY IS WELL KNOWN THRU/OUT THE US. ANYONE WHO COMES THROUGH HERE FROM ANYWHERE ALL HAVE THE SAME COMPLAINT, 75 IS CONGESTED EVERYDAY AT SOME TIME THROUGH THE DAY. WHY DO WE NOT OPEN UP THE PAY LANES AND MAKE THEM ALL USABLE AS PART OF HIGHWAY 75 TO RELIEVE CONGESTION ON THE HIGHWAY? a light is needed at Postmaster Drive and Highway 81. I was in a wreck there from a driver trying to play chicken to get across the road. I have also seen several accidents almost happen there while driving to and from McDonough Square. A lot of the problem with traffic congestion has to do with people driving very slow on major roads like Hwy 155 north and south, Hwy 42, and Hwy 20 going toward Conyers. If these roads can't be widened quickly, at least consider putting in passing lanes so people can go around slow drivers. A right turn lane is needed at the intersection of Campground Road and Hwy 155 (turning south onto Hwy 155 from Campground). A train system would alleviate a lot of congestion. Add or increase the library systems budget Add roundabouts to help traffic move faster. Add turn signals to Hwy 138 and 155. Stop the building of mega subdivisions. Tell the roads catch up. Stripping all the land of full grown trees doesn’t help our air pollution. Case in point. Flat rock Kelly town. Round abouts don’t help either. Adjust the property tax rate on the warehouses to equal what the homeowners are paying. The county is losing over $72,000,000.00 per year because of the CHEAP, CHEAP RATEs. Plus, make some of the projects in question to satr asap instead of 3 to 6 years from now. Almost all these proposals have had studies, reports, and reviews, and still the county delays them due to a lack of funds. Get some BONDS funding and stop procrastinating. These issues are not going away. All I can say is stop building in HC All of Henry county needs street lights. Although widening the roads will appease most people, it hasn’t worked. There needs to be alternative modes of transportation and bike lanes and trails around south henry county. Any improvements are appreciated Any road widening projects should consider multi modal transportation lanes as well. Having some sort of public transportation would be great. It takes me over 30 mins to travel from where i live in henry county to mcdonough where more food options are outside of chain restaurants and I ultimately decide to drive the 30mins to Atlanta where I can park and be more connected to options. At some point, a resurfacing of Laney between South Ola and New Hope would benefit the buses and other through traffic traversing every day. Before beginning detours and making them active, you need to take into account how the traffic lights at major intersections like the one at Hwy 155 and Industrial Blvd/Kings Mill Rd will effect the flow of traffic. The traffic lights need to be able to give all the opportunity to get through the light. Example: turning left from industrial onto Hwy 155. We have to wait for traffic to clear from kings mill to Industrial to go through and sometimes only a couple cars P a g e | 4 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) get through creating heavy traffic congestion, long line of cars past the Chevrolet dealership and impatience on the drivers who are sitting there for 10-15 minutes or more. Better signage to protect pedestrians. Cars are not paying enough attention. Better zoning, less apartments more single family homes. Bike/walking trails similar to belt line to decrease traffic and parking during leisure and entertainment is an idea Bill Gardner @ I-75 needs a long term plan. Bill Gardner traffic between I-75 & 42 needs to be re evaluated. Use eminent domain to get the traffic to flow. Bill Gardner at I75 is a real mess. Also the roundabout on Mill Road did nothing for the traffic congestion. Bill Gardner from 155 to 42 needs additional lanes, it also needs someone to use "Eminent domain" to properly get traffic moving thru the Tanger blvd/ wendy's & walmart entrances & exits. This state wants to control every aspect of traffic movement, use the right way. Who's idea was it to have the ingress & egress to the new Delta Community Credit union & clinic next door? It would work great if I'm entering from Tanger Blvd, or from the NORTH on hwy 42. There IS NO SIGNAGE directing traffic how to enter either place. PLEASE install some street lights in some of the intersections, it appears no one travels at night to see how bad the lighting is. Blacksville community needs more sidewalks, sidewalk connectivity, and paved streets where gravel exists. Some of these fixes can also be tied to improving 30 year old drainage issues in the community. Bridges Road has a terrible alignment. It is all over the place and inconsistent and poorly designed. It needs to connect through from 20 to jonesboro rd. It needs to be realigned at 20 in order for the 4 lane project on 20 which should tie into bridges at a roundabout at the intersection of 20/bridges, and then bridges should be reprofiled and realigned, 4laned, create an agreement with city to share work fundings and this way it will connect 20 to jonesboro road effectively and smoothly. Build a bridge over the train tracks in the king mill industrial park. It is stopped half the time the train rides through. Build DOT only lanes all over the county since we seem to permit every warehouse to be built within Henry County the doesn't seem to benefit the citizens whatsoever. They just hinder the citizens who are trying to get out of the county after multiple decades of living here. Buses! Where are the buses??? Can’t wait for the new intersection by Work Camp Road to finally be done! :) Cones on Kelly town go out and then come down and back up again but still no work seems like a waste of money so far Consideration for public transportation should be train, not more bus traffic which will need hundreds of thousands of dollars every three years for resurfacing the roads in which buses travel. Why can't the peach pass lane be expanded go both ways at the same time that will alleviate some of the hwy traffic. PLEASE change the bridge at exit 218 from that X shape which alleviates no traffic to widening such as the one at Hudson Bridge. Deal with the TRAFFIC Definitely prioritize intersections.. so many do not utilize traffic flow well and create additional congestion Delays because of railroad testing on both sides of King Mill Rd in McDonough (Hwy 155 & Hwy 42) - constantly causing delays with people commuting to work along King Mill Rd. Could use a light designating for left turns at Hwy 155 - King Mill Rd. as it is hard to turn at times because of traffic congestion on Hwy 155. Do not use anymore of SPLOST money on the aquatic center. Do something about 155. You constantly are allowing new housing and warehouses but have done NOTHING about the traffic congestion. Do you not look at consequences of these choices? Who is your urban planner? Do you have one? Do better for your people!! Don’t have simultaneous major projects in progress at same time messing up ALL routes in an area making things even worse than before. When reducing lanes, think about which ones are going to back up most & keep straight lanes free. The choice at Willow Drive & 20/81 with the left lane & straight lane sharing while right turn has its own is so dangerous. So many whip around into right lane to go straight making that intersection dangerous for straight traffic in the properly defined straight lane. P a g e | 5 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Dual the state routes in Henry county and make sidewalks mandatory for upcoming divisions near major roads. Dumb idea wasting money on water park Dwelling growth is outpacing the roads. Henry needs a moratorium. Ellistown is the worse road in the county. Please get this road paved. It is use everyday as a cut through so there is a lot of traffic on it. Ellistown Road is horrible. It needs to be repaired. Extend Marta along 75 north and south for easy commute into the city. Fairview Road Project when will it begin? Finish one project before starting another. These work crews are the slowest I've ever seen Finish one road project before you begin another. But first and foremost, STOP ALL THE BUILDING OF UNNECESSARY HOMES AND APARTMENTS WHICH IS PUTTING TO MUCH PRESSURE ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE!!!!! Finish what you start before it is obsolete. Stop letting filming affect emergency vehicles and their response; communicate. Fix original roads before building new subdivisions/apartments. No to splost! Fix the pot holes Fix the potholes. Fix the roads Flippen Rd needs widening badly!! Flippen road needs to be on this list, from N Henry to Hudson Bridge and any parts in between. Widening, sidewalks,etc. Focus on Eagles Landing and Jonesboro Rd/Mill Rd athe traffic is beyond ridiculous Focus on North South roads to take pressure off i75 Get I-75 both North and South non-toll lanes added from I-675 to Locust Grove. I know it's an interstate, but it needed more than toll lanes. Get I-75 thru Henry County Widened from Eagles Landing Thru Locust Grove Widened to stop years of traffic back ups and surface street traffic will decrease some. Give attention to making intersections flow better.. sync lights to help flow of traffic instead of stop and go because they are not synced appropriately.. this only adds to traffic build up I see this constantly in Locust grove Bill Gardner at 75 and the diamond lanes on 20 Hampton mentioned needs of new pedestrian traffic bridge at the Feb 10 meeting would TSplost dollars be used for pedestrian safety? Hampton-Locust Grove road is an area that backs up badly because of one light that doesn't have a turn lane. This two lane section before the strong rock christian school is an immensely important connection between the two towns that thousands rely on daily and this section needs to be widened or have the intersections improved with turn lanes. Have a professional paving company fix Upchurch Rd near Turner Rd. I think they have tried 5 times and still is not smooth or fixed it keeps washing out. Henry County should live within their means and stop adding additional taxes when every commissioner campaigned on “NO NEW TAXES” and the fact that we already pay over inflated property taxes. STOP THE BUILDING!!!!! Hold meetings in the evenings where normal people are out of work and available to attend. Use constant contact to update those who have allowed for email, text, or other communication paths to keep updated on those meetings. How about reallocating funds generated from the high property taxes which is spent on lavish county spending. how many unfinished T-SPLOST projects are not started or finished. I am 43 years old, born and raised here. There are way too many roads around here, not to include state routes, that are the same as they were in the late 80's/early 90's. I'm aware state DOT is in charge of the State Routes however, it's ridiculous there has been minimal road IMPROVEMENT in this county. Lot of road work, not many improvements I am concerned about how emergency vehicles cannot get through the diverging diamond on 20 and 75. It’s bumper to bumper and they cannot get through at all. P a g e | 6 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) I am incredibly concerned with the number of motorists that run red lights. I am NOT voting for another Splost. Find the money elsewhere. You get enough of my mo ey I am voting NO I believe the N-S parallel connectors will significantly lessen congestion on I-75. Also a permanent two-direction toll lane, although I know this is GDOT responsibility. I believe widening the main roads in Henry County from County line to County line would greatly help. Also stop building so many town home in these subdivisions. houses should be on 1/2 to 3/4 of an acres. I can't view who my commissioner is, fix your website! :). I don't have any additional comments but do have a question. When will road widening on Bill Gardner Pkwy begin? Will Jonesboro Road from I-75 to Chambers Rd. ever be widened? The congestion is really bad and there are major concerns about that being exacerbated if the housing community proposed in Jonesboro Road is approved. I don't see anything about the traffic congestion in the Henry Town Center area. What can be done to improve this? I don't want another T-SPLOST. If the County cannot manage the millions it is currently taking in from the tax payers why would I approve millions more for them to mismanage. I dread driving anywhere in Henry county. Always worried the excessive reckless driving by most people will cause an accident and I'll be stuck somewhere for hours. Plus I'm fearful every morning walking my dog. Will the drivers driving 20 miles over the speed limit veer slightly and hit us? There are no sidewalks and even though I move off the road it's still dangerous. I feel that the diverging diamond at exit 218 was a completely missed opportunity, with its total utilitarian appearance. It looks unfinished and crude. I don’t understand why the same level of engineering and architectural design was not given to its overall design. The bridges and diverging diamonds on the Northside of Atlanta are beautiful, with light elements and attractive pedestrian walkways. Our’s looks like a truck stop. Aesthetics do matter! I have little to no faith in Henry County caring about the commuinity. I have lived at 125 Cotton Indian Trail for over 40 years. Many of my neighbors and I have called Henry County DOT concerning the condition of our street. Holes have been patched several times only to reopen shortly after. The condition of our street is listed as very poor on DOT List. Can we please get some needed support and asphalt replacement? Can we be placed on the needed replacement list? I learned about this survey from the I Love McDonough FB page even though I follow all the county pages. I wish it was easier for citizens to know what is going on/be informed. I live and work in Henry Co and it takes me 40 minutes one way. Crazy congestion and folks never do speed limit. I live in Lake Dow Estates and the traffic on 81 is the worst. Upchurch Rd and 81 needs a traffic light or the road needs widening. I lived in Henry for 17 years. We moved out because the traffic is horrible. We still work in Henry county & it takes less amount of time for us to get to where we work from another county than it did from where we lived in Henry County, and it’s double the miles!! I love round abouts I oppose SPLOST initiatives. I believe that our taxes should be spent more wisely so there would be no need for additional taxation. I really like having Roundabouts and Diverging Diamonds I see no improvements I could get home faster before y'all added all these other roads .... This is sad to see, I now have to sit in traffic now WHEN before it's was smooth and no traffic It's unbelievable really I thank you for you all's efforts in these matters. I think a transportation system (buses) would be wasted money. Put the money on road improvements. Also, why can't every red light have a censor that lets traffic continue to flow if no cars are coming from the opposite direction? Why sit at a red light without another car coming from the opposite direction? P a g e | 7 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) I think more operational improvements to traffic signals and lane management would provide more bang for your buck in increasing capacity and through put. If additional lanes are added but the operational issues are not addressed the travel times will not be significantly decreased I was told that I-75 was adding 2 lanes but these lanes are express lanes not free lanes. I think this might be a GADT issue but I-75 is what makes Henry County Special but when it is constantly backed up it puts the entire county to shame. Please ask for more "free" lanes ASAP and begin working on this before the local items in Henry County. Thanks for listening. I will be voting no on the SPLOST as this county has proven to be a poor steward of tax payer money. We are all over taxed and yet you want to tax us more. I will vote no on SPLOST. Most of these improvements should be funded by taxes already being collected especially from the major distribution centers and developers that have created the major need for these. I would like for the leaders to actually forecast what projects they plan on approving and to work on the roads before approving the project. I would like to see more affordable recreations options for lower to mid income families I would like to see more roundabout projects to improve the safety and efficiency at our intersections. I would like to see Willow Lane from Bridges Road to Highway 20 winding out I would really like to see Marta brought into Henry County. I’d like to see more pedestrian friendly streets I’d love for the country to focus heavily on side walks and trails I’m a huge fan of public infrastructure improvement, more active communication would be great. I'd really love more bike paths and sidewalks in Locust Grove. Thank you. Improve infrastructure (roads) before allowing more housing improve the speed it takes to get things done! Improving congestion and intersection. I drive from Stockbridge t McDonough to Hampton daily. McDonough is one of the most congested areas especially through Jonesboro rd area. Everyone is always driving crazy due to having wait so long. Multiple drivers do not understand to yield on a flashing yellow which almost causes wrecks daily! Increase roads ... increase patrols. High speeds... Loud exhaust... Loud music... DUI checkpoints... Start a "dashcam unit" ... use dash camera footage to prosecute vehicle owner ... don't care who's driving ... but they will. Increase sound barriers from I-75 Interchange SR81 at Bethany Roud needs turn arrows to allow transfer from Bethany to SR81 for both directions. Most of the time people run the yellow/red to get onto SR81 caused by the constant traffic traversing north and south on Bethany through the interchange It is vital that roadways in Henry County be improved to be safer/more accommodating for pedestrians. It takes forever to complete an actual project. It’s been over a year of infrequent work on Keys Ferry. Cones or pylons have been on that road forever. They don’t even widen the road at all. So many people bike and walk this roadway and it’s just not safe. It takes way too long to get anything done. We are not informed well enough when projects are happening. Projects you deem important are usually not that important. It would be great if we could begin being proactive rather than reactive while actively including needed projects that were not done to begin with. P a g e | 8 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) It would be nice if all traffic lights were sequenced so you would not stop at each intersection especially when going down Jonesboro Rd It’s plain awful trying to get anywhere around Henry County. I've stated before, the timing of the traffic signals needs improvement. What causes a lot of traffic at intersections is the timing of the lights only allows 3-5 vehicles though at certain intersections. Changing the timing to allow more vehicles to get through the intersection would greatly help with intersection congestion. Jonesboro road going West toward I-75 is horrible traffic. Jonesboro Road going East into the square and down Hwy 81 east is horrible. Too much traffic! Too much building! It needs to STOP!! Keep up the great work, without your team, we would be decades behind - oh wait...we are! But not because of SPLOST, there's only so much a penny can do! Kings Mill and International are in desperate need of repaving and have been for years. When will these streets/roads be paved? Lake Dow road and airline intersection four-way stop is very dangerous also McGarity and airline Lane widening i 75 from eaglesla ding through locust grove Lane widening will not solve the congestion issue. There needs to be other modes of transportation. Large problem is people blocking intersections. Look at 155& king mill/industrial. If you’re headed south on industrial trying to cross 155, the traffic turning left from king mill block it and you can’t go. Sit through 3-5 lights. Ridiculous. Leguin Mill Rd needs resurfacing from Peeksville to about Harris Less SpLost ... your building a special program for improper budgeting Less stop signs and roundabouts (nobody knows how to use either for some reason), and more traffic lights! On busier intersections, it takes forever to advance when there is no traffic light. For example, the Oak Grove/Jodeco Road traffic light addition has been a game changer. Also more streetlights for visibility at night would be incredibly beneficial. Let's get going on Jonrsboro Rd widening Mt Olive to N Mt Carmel!!! Lighting at 20/81 & Avalon Pky. Synchronization of traffic signals 20/81 from Nail road to Willow, and 155 from Greenwood Ind to King Rd. Just common sense. Offer more suggestions for T-splost South of I-75 Locust Grove Hwy 42, especially at Grove Rd Lose the planes for round about intersections. More and more people. Stop for no reason. Stop lights with turn signals and lanes or stop signs. Loss the round-about planes. Lower the speed limit coming into McDonough on Highway 20 East from Conyers. Tractor trailers are going too fast at Hwy 20 east and McGarity Rd-Lawrenceville Street-Fairview Dr. Maintain the current roads. No mass transit. Bike/walking trails for recreation. Make E. Atlanta Rd a parkway. Or atleast have turning lanes for each community. East Atlanta should look like Fairview rd. Install roundabout at Rex Rd and East Atlanta Rd. More roundabouts less traffic lights. PUT A SENSOR ON OLD CONYERS RD AND FLATROCK. The wait time is absolutely ridiculous especially when more times than not no one is coming. Need a turning light at and more turning lanes on SR 138 & 155 intersection, too much unnecessary traffic Making sure roadways are properly striped. There are many outlining roads where the centerline is not visible. Many of the items on this survey are not true problem areas. While a lot of our 'headache' areas are around state routes (specifically Highway 155 @ Industrial Blvd toward McDonough and I75) more effort should be put into getting the state to help with the road issues on this state highway P a g e | 9 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) McDonough Pkwy at Bridges Rd has had multiple very serious collisions, as I am sure has been documented. It gets very backed up and it's hard for pedestrians to cross safely as well. McDonough where 20 meets 75 is always soo traficky!! - i would like to see this improved and more trail and pedestrian improvements and public transportation so we can reduce cars rather than just aident roads. I’d also like to see more money put into remote workers who contribute to the community but do not contribute to traffic. Mill Rd\Mt Carmel roundabout was not an improvement. Bill Gardner/Lester Mill Rd traffic light was not an improvement. more bigger projects like Rock Quarry Rd and BillGardener More public transit options are needed in Henry County and the metro Atlanta area. More Roundabouts More round-a-bouts will help reduce traffic congestion throughout the county. Also, the use of traffic cameras to issue citations for violators who block intersections. More sidewalks along Austin Road and Hearn Road connecting to the rec center. Too many adolescents are walking close to the road towards the rec center without adequate spacing, especially along the lake. Honestly, sidewalks should be installed two miles in each direction from all rec centers to ensure safety for walkers. More sidewalks and walking accessibility. More streetlights for visibility, more traffic lights and less roundabouts(accidents), fix potholes More traffic circles More transit and more help for the homeless Need a stoplight BADLY at the intersection of Hwy 81 and Florence McGarity. Need additional options OVER RR tracks. Need developers to fund acel/decel. Fix intersection at Jonesboro Road and Starbucks near Olive Garden. Does not line up with Target exit, raised median sticks out too far, Starbucks traffic goes out into the road. need redlight at 155 and Crumbly road Need to improve the way traffic lights operate.. I am frequently in heavy traffic sitting at an intersection with zero traffic on the other road yet the light stays green for no traffic but holds the congested side. Or changes on a dime for the side with very little traffic causing more congestion. Need traffic lights at Brannan Road and Highway 42. Brannan Road intersect at Hwy 42. Nighttime lighting at exit 218 specifically 20/81/Avalon Pky. Very busy and darkest intersection in the county. Heavy heavy delays from Hampton to I75 on 20/81 and 155 are sad and disturbing. Very detrimental to lifestyle and safety for residents in District 1 and 5. Lack of management, overgrowth without thought of consequences. No Jack Braking signs on 75 North between Jodeco & Eagles Landing. New senior living center is very noisy whenever traffic starts backing up, which is around the clock. No more SPLoST No new taxes!!!!!! No Splost, stop building start repairing Noah's Ark Road needs repaving all the way to the Clayton County line and it needs the sign replaced to stop the Tractor Trailers from ruining the pavement. None at this kind North Henry is always left out of any improvements to our county. Yet we pay the same amount of taxes. I’ve lived in this county for 27 years. My husband has lived here for over 50. Our roads are primarily the same. Not sure how this is handled. But, prioritizing road improvements in the aging communities would help to increase visibilty on how SPLOT funds are used. People tend to connect better with initiatives that directly impact them. Oak grove rd widening would be detriment to the long standing residents/families along Oak grove. Already a speed danger and adding lanes would only make that more unsafe. Getting mail from boxes is a dangerous daily routine due to the speed of vehicles already. P a g e | 10 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Old Hwy 3 needs to be resurfaced as well. Patrick Henry and Country Club is extremely dangerous every weekday afternoon. Road construction is making it much worse and even more congested. Is there anyway to change the times of lane closures? And add some type of intersection. Pave King Mill Rd.!!! Pavement markings along Hudson Bridge, Eagles landing, and East Lake need to be completed. I cannot understand how we are several months after the paving was completed and there are still missing crosswalks, balk lines and other traffic markings. Peeksville Rd and Hwy 42 have been much improved with the additional lane of travel starting at Bill Gardner but semi-trucks somehow still end up on Peeksville trying to turn back on 42. Please add Fairoaks subdivision Fairoaks circle for resurfacing. Please add lights on all these dark roads!! Please add some public transportation. I beg. Please consider the Lester Mill Rd and Bill Gardner intersection. There is traffic here do to the lack of a turning lane. Please develop roads before allowing new housing developments to begin or stop developments all together. Its too crowded in Henry County now. Please do more to promote cycling and walking, etc. Expanded trails, connectors, sidewalks that are wide and safe and not interrupted. Please do something to connect all of the unfinished sidewalks all over the county. It's very difficult to walk or bike anywhere due to all of the sidewalks that end in drainage ditches or un-walkable areas with dangerous traffic. Please evaluate and adjust the TIMING of lights at intersections so traffic is not sitting unnecessarily. #1 example: Hampton-Locust Grove Rd at Hwy 20. We have to sit at that light so long when no traffic is coming and we could have turned left from a stop sign so much easier and faster! Timing of lights would help a LOT of intersections in our county. Please fix the Carriage circle, east Atlanta, Thurman, old lantern drive area. It’s so dangerous. please fix traffic problems and resurface road / pave them Please focus on car alternatives instead of turning Henry county into large sprawling highways like Tara blvd. Spend the money on public transit options and encouraging other forms of transportation. Subsidize options instead of creating induced demand through yet more road widening, which never lasts. Please. Please for the sake of our AIR QUALITY have trees alongside the roads and shrubs at least in round about! Please get this traffic issue under control. These issues should have been planned & addressed years ago before allowing this unchecked growth. Please have better erosion and sediment controls on ALL road projects! Protect our Natural Waters! Please just finish one project before starting another- finish jonesboro road to clayton county line instead of starting another project PLEASE just finish the Jonesboro road widening. Why do half the project (phase 1) and leave it half done and move onto something else?? Just do phase 2 and yall can have the project completely done. Also the dutchtown school district and the majority of the subdivisions are in the phase 2 portion. The sidewalks are LONG overdue and at least 2 more subdivisions are being built on this end. Please look at the area in front of the McDonough library and senior center. There have been issues there for years and it’s so hard (and dangerous) turning left onto 81. Please no public transportation. Please pave and improve E Knight Rd! PLEASE pave Butlers Bridge rd. It has become dangerous Please pave Moss Drive!!! You spend more time and money patching it every few weeks than it would cost to really pave it! P a g e | 11 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Please please help with the traffic congestion problems in Henry county and the horrible condition of our roads. We have potholes the size of planets!! Please please please fix Crumbly and 155, it is a nightmare to try and turn left out there!!! Please prioritize infrastructure building first and then growth. Please put a do not block the box/intersection sign on Jonesboro Rd at the I-75S exit ramp! Please put a traffic light at the intersection of Hwy 81 East and Florence McGarity Blvd, the entrance to the McDonough Library and Heritage Senior Center. Please put a traffic signal at Davis Road and Highway 42! Also, Bill Garnder needs to be widened going towards Hwy. 155. Please put roundabout at leguin mill and old Jackson because the bus has trouble turning left off leguin mill onto old Jackson northbound and as well other directions. Needed NOW for safety. Bus runs off roadway now. Please repave Jodeco Rd Please repave KING MILL and keep the railroad from stopping on the tracks and blocking the intersections. It happens frequently. Please resurface Snapping Shoals Road! Please resurface the entire street at Medline Place, McDonough Please stop asking me to tax myself with yet another iteration of these agendas. Manage and be good stewards of We The People money and all should work. Stop with the kickbacks and for once think about the constituents. Pretty please with sugar on top. Please STOP building apartments that only brings more congestion in a smaller space! Henry County has grown so big that it's no longer easy to get anywhere. We have family that live in Marietta and they HATE driving to see us, not because of ATL traffic but because of the traffic on 75 that is ALWAYS congested between 675 and Hwy 20. The switching lanes that we have to PAY to travel are rarely flowing in the right direction. Please stop building warehouses and housing developments. Reduce taxes for senior citizens/retirees. We can't afford to stay in our homes because you have taxed every last cent we have. Please take a look at the traffic at the intersection of Mitchell and Jonesboro Rd and McCullough Road and Jonesboro Road, these two intersections are very dangerous not to mention that the traffic is extremely heavy in those areas during school hours. People are still making left hand turns at McCullough and Jonesboro. The signs are NOT helping, please create a round about there or some kind of barrier that will prevent them from making a left. In addition, the residents of The Gates at Pates Creek are having a hard time making a left out of their neighborhood! Please widen the roads. It should not take 45mins to go 11 miles. I actually hate driving to and from work. The traffic is a nightmare. Potholes the size of your car. CRAZY Projects are taking longer than promised and crews aren’t working half the time in passing. Public transportation -electric buses rts on major thoroughfares and edges of communities would be great and SIDEWALKS SHOULD BE EVERYWHERE Public Works and Public Safety must be top concerns. We are focused so much on parks and rec. This needs to be at the bottom. If you don't feel safe and can't drive safely to the parks, they are useless. Purchase right of way for projected growth based on census data, DOT data, and ARC data. When bridges are replaced, ensure new bridges are wide enough to accommodate future growth, along with sidewalks on new bridges. Amend building codes and land zoning so that structures are further away from roadways and utilities to reduce costs associated with future road widenings. Enact a moratorium on new construction, increase impact fees QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RESIDENTS Quit approving developments until the roads can catch up. Quit putting the cart before the horse. Quit sending money on stupid stuff. Quit wasting my money on water parks and fountains! Fix the existing roads! Potholes and faded lines are NOT a feature. P a g e | 12 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Rail service from ATL airport/downtown the GA/FL line. Repair, resurface,and make our smaller roads safer. You cannot fix the over build and its' affect on the infrastructure. Not everyone lives on a major road, but every day they are affected by them. Greed always ends in disaster! Repave Noah's Ark Road and put a stop to the tractor trailers on this road. Repave the roads that in dire need. The spot patching does not always suffice. Many times with a month it is needed again. Restore the buildings in Heritage Park as promised! resurface whole sections of roads instead of patch/fill holes in roads Rex Rd & East Atlanta Rd needs a roundabout Road work at night, not during the busy hours of the day or weekend Roads and other transportation issues need to be completed before continuing to approve housing and commercial building projects. Henry County citizens need a break from new construction congestion. Roundabout at McGarry and airline and Lake Dow road and airline Roundabouts ARE NOT the answer. Until the public is educated on how to function through them. Stop making them. Roundabouts aren’t the answer because the entitled and uneducated drivers do not know how to navigate a roundabouts. Roundabouts not lights keep us moving Safety and congestion relief should be the focus. There are several dangerous intersection that are extremely challenging to safely navigate with traffic. Safety over congestion. Extensive accident reviews should be completed with priority given to severity over number. For instance, congestion at Kelleytown and Airline is bad but I would bet the severity of accidents at Kelleytown and Hwy 20 are worse. Shared used paths improve efficiency and development- with Atlanta BeltLine leading an example of how much impact non-road development can have on an area. Nobody ever moved to any area because they have wide roads it’s because they have multiple ways they can get to places. Sidewalks are needed on Jonesboro Rd beginning from Crown Park Dr to McCullogh Rd to allow residents to safely commute to and from school, work, and home either by the use of walking, bicycles, scooters, etc. Also, a traffic light at the intersection of Jonesboro Rd and Town Centre Village Dr is needed to alleviate traffic congestion and to reduce the number of motor accidents. Sidewalks need to be put on the part of Flippen that is inside the Jodeco Heights subdivision. More wide bike lanes, wide enough for adult trikes, would add value to the area and keep some cars off the road. Slow down all the new “multi family” locations being built until AFTER the roads can be updated to handle at least the current traffic issues rather than adding even more traffic with no relief. Snapping Road has been on the books for widening really several years. I have been ran off this road 4 different times by large trucks etc. the road is too narrow and now 2 large rental subdivisions are emptying into it. A disaster waiting to happen. Snapping Shoals road is too narrow and is in dire need of resurfacing and repair- especially since adding huge build to rent subdivisions on that road. Snapping shoals road needs to be widened with all the extra homes that were approved to be built it is a dangerous road. Also lines need to be repainted on all the secondary roads. Snapping shoals road of north Ola is due for urgent resurfacing. Not only “fixing” potholes that just keep getting bigger after it rains. Something needs to be done on Kings Mill Toad from Highway 42 to SR155. The congestion caused by the 18 wheelers combined with the train tracks is too much. The reckless truck drivers (not all) make driving through there dangerous. Something needs to be done with snapping shoals Rd. It is about to be one big pot hole. Spend it where it needs to be spent. And quickly! Spend money on roads only! No parks, no pools! P a g e | 13 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Start a new project after having current project 80 percent finished. Traffic circles or round about are great, but the one at hwy138 and moseley is ridiculous. This intersection should have a red light triggered only after someone is leaving moseley. Start using our taxes as intended. We are sick of all the building with outdated infrastructure. Traffic is already horrendous no matter where you go in this county! It shouldn't take an hour to go anywhere within the county when it's less than 30 miles! State Hwy 155 turn signal at Industrial Blvd in McDonough State road 155 needs widening now, it’s nearly impossible to use on week days. Stop all the overdevelopment. You are destroying what brought most people to the community. You will fix most of the traffic issues when you stop building warehouses and rental dwellings. Stop all this growth. Stop approving more housing until improvements are made Stop building Stop building all the homes adding more traffic than Henry County can handle. Stop building new homes/townhomes/apartments. We do not need more residents in the county. Stop building new residences until the roadway is able to handle additional traffic. Would be great to have an access road that would run parallel to the interstate from Locust Grove to Stockbridge. Stop building rent a homes and pave snapping shoals road. It is never in any plans I see. Potholes galore. Stop building roundabout they don’t help. And build a bridge over the train tracks on Jonesboro rd to avoid traffic congestion! Stop building shit. Too many people. STOP BUILDING STUFF = LESS TRAFFIC :) Stop building until the roads are widen. Also get the timing right for traffic lights. At each traffic light you get stoped Stop letting big trucks come downtown!! Make them go around Stop letting tractor trailers on roadways they don't belong on, The weight of their loads are damaging our roads. I drove a tractor trailer for 33 years in the city Start fining these drivers $600. Stop using our money for what they are destroying. stop over building!! Stop the warehouses. It is ruining our way of life Street lights are needed throughout the county Street lights are needed which are the basic safety hazards on the roads at night. Especially on hwy 20 going west Subdivisions are being severely neglected. Don't waste another dime on triple surface treatment. Thank you for paving the circle we live on Thank you for the improvements you are currently working on Thank you for your hard work! It's nice that we can share our input on the potential transportation projects before they begin. Several roads across the county need to be improved and we have to keep in mind that projects can take a while to complete. It would be great if you all could consider more intersection improvement projects to help alleviate some of the congestion while the major road work is under construction. I have noticed a significant difference after roundabouts were added to several intersections countywide. I appreciate all that you do! Thank you TEAM Henry SPLOST - You all are doing amazing work!! I know its challenging at times, but you continue to push through everyday!! Super Proud of the work that's being done. DPW Thanks for the good work. Progress is visible throughout the county The bicycle paths started over four years ago and we not see anything come to fruition. Where are we on this project? The biggest issue with the intersection congestion is the timing on the traffic signals. Only 4-5 vehicles are able to get through some of these heavily congested intersections because the traffic lights change way too quickly. Extending P a g e | 14 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) the time will allow more vehicles to get through, thus relieving some of the backup being caused at these traffic signals. The company you hired to do the roads (ersnell) are not doing a good job.The roads are uneven. No lines to tell the difference between the straight lane and turn lane. It’s causing confusion and people are using it like a passing lane. The consistent growth here in Henry County has increased traffic congestion. Growth is good and necessary, we need multiple forms of transportation to meet needs of our residents The county appears to do a good job with SPLOST. Is there a list of projects or a program tied to SPLOST? What are the projects life cycle? What is the 5 and 10 year projection for SPLOST projects? The County did an excellent job with engaging the community and keeping us informed on both completed and potential projects. The county is out building it's infrastructure. No matter how quickly you repair and expand the roads, the number of apartments here out pace the improvements. The county is so far behind with infrastructure improvements that I will be long gone before things get better. So much money wasted on unnecessary things. The county needs to remove stop the school zone camera ticketing until the timing and flashing lights are corrected. Revenue generation in this manner is unethical. The department needs to do better at communicating to people what work you are doing and when you are starting how long it will be going on for etc. There was NO Warning to residents about the digging up of E Atlanta Rd - no forward notice - nothing and no indication on what day work will be and how long it will be - also you need to detour people using Thurman and other roads except for locals. And consider other things like this. We live on E Atlanta rd and were stuck the other day for 20 min just trying to get back in our driveway. I have lived all over the world - and never ONCE has an area failed to notify me of roadwork affecting my road - and don’t say - oh attend meetings- first some people travel for work or work odd hours - not everyone can make a meeting - create a facebook page or a working website that provides useful information - the current website is not helpful at all - it is so high level it tells you nothing The intersection at Simpsons Mill/Oakland at Hwy 20 needs to be a light or roundabout (like on Jonesboro Road). The U-turn required is becoming more dangerous and the u-turn lane traffic backs up into Hwy 20 at peak times causing safety issues. The intersection of Industrial @ SR155 needs to be improved and traffic citations given to those who block the intersection and continually run the red light, impeding the flow of traffic. The intersection of SR 155 and Crumbley needs addressing and Crumbley Rd from SR 155 to Kellytown needs some speed control help The Knight Drive SPLOST project seems to be delayed. When will this work be completed. The light at Hwy 42 and Racetrack Road needs SERIOUS help. Between 6:30am and 7:15am, the light takes forever to change to green on Racetrack road then lets 2-3 cars through (no exaggeration) before it turns red again. Snapping Shoals needs to be widened and totally repaved due to the MASIVE rental community that is being built. The major issue for Henry County is our transportation woes....we have too much traffic and not enough roads to accommodate that amount of traffic The OLA area needs Keys Ferry Rd at 81 extended around to Eastlake or further north around to Eagles Landing to keep us from going into McDonough to access I75.. The phase 1 of Jonesboro road ends at North Mt Carmel road. Doesnt it make sense to do phase 2 now which will help traffic for the Dutchtown school district and surrounding subdivisions? The road conditions are terrible. The roads need resurfacing The roads need to be top priority. We, as an entire county, needed upgrades to infrastructure 20 years ago. There’s a joke, in true Henry county fashion everything is 15-20 years behind where it needs to be. Let’s stop the building of residential until we can bring our roads up to date. P a g e | 15 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) The roads that are already there and need paving and taking care of put money back into the infrastructure that is already there first and then focus on the ones that need improving and expanding. The round about on Mill Rd & Mt Carmel is not productive to Jonesboro road. Aggressive drivers not following the rules of each one get in concept. speeding through 5-6 cars at a time. These are the drivers who were running the stops signs before roundabout got here. frustrating. Try something else. The SR81 in McDonough need a light by the Library and entrance to Heritage Senior Center. In the past years many accidents occurred and some have been fatal. The traffic around highway 155, highway 20 close by HW 20 and HW75 - both ways is very bad. The traffic light relatively recently installed at the intersection of East Lake road and Elliot road is inefficient by only allowing one direction of travel at a time even at late hours at night when there are no other vehicles at the intersection. Ideally, there should be room for left turning lanes to allow for more than one direction of travel to flow at a time, but there should be at least some sort of other system in place than what it is now. The whole county need help from traffic congestion. Stop the growth until you can take care of the issues we already have. The widening of the streets should be a priority to reduce congestion on the main roads. The worst traffic issue that I am involved in almost daily I did not see listed. Where King Mill rd tries to merge onto 155 at the industrial blvd intersection with all the trucks is horrible. Please help!!! Thank you!!! There needs to be improved public transportation that connects people to a MARTA stop in neighboring Clayton County. Or just expand MARTA to Henry County There needs to be some improvements and safety issues done on Flippen Road. There should be sidewalks that connect the subdivision that are near parks. There's no amount of road widening that will solve congestion problems. There needs to be alternative modes of transportation, bike lines, public transportation. This county needs pedestrian friendly areas. It is unacceptable to be rapidly expanding and leaving out those that do not own cars in these expansions. With that being said, public transportation should go beyond the Henry shuttles. Widen these roads, add sidewalks and bike lanes and expand the public transportation system. It is not safe for pedestrians at all. Through most of the day it is extremely difficult to exit Nestle Court onto King's Mill Road. Once on you sit through multiple lights to turn left on Hwy 155. Hwy 155 backed up to Luxottica. Heavy congestion. Continued growth of Dist. Centers adding more trucks and traffic congestion. Too much outside traffic going through the Newberry 55+ Community Ryan Homes for senior citizens in Henry County! Too much tractor trailer traffic cutting through on Hwy 20 . It’s destroying the hwy, too many pot holes , constantly dodging, and it’s like driving down the road on a horse and buggy. Using the state hwy for interstate traffic rather than going around properly on the interstate is unacceptable . Night and day. Noisy . Causing numerous wrecks as county insists on building more subdivisions (another story) , always see visible long black skid marks where trucks avoid hitting someone. Moved here over 20 years ago and it was so peaceful. Now??? Too much traffic .. county is having a hard time keeping up with the growth. Not happy about all the growth.... Traffic is a huge problem in Henry County. Stop building !! Traffic light at Highway 81 and the library. Getting out of there to turn left not good. Also an arrow to turn left going to Walgreens and marathon gas station. Traffic lights seem to be poorly timed, with many intersections not having left turn arrows. Also, there seems to be never-ending construction, especially in McDonough traffic on 155 has tripled and getting worse. one lane each way which is not substantiable with all the new building and new housing development projects. who is responsible for approving these permits and new development projects making congestion a nightmare. Case in point new Kroger and car wash on 155 in overly congested area. person rubber stamping these projects without consideration of traffic infrastructure should be P a g e | 16 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) replaced . IJS Traffic signals in McDonough square need reviewed to lengthen the amount of time for traffic on Griffin and Macon street. Can take upwards of 5-10 minutes to proceed through the intersection during peak times. Need to increase police presence along 155 and enforce driving laws. Entirely too many speeders and people passing in non-passing zones (center lanes) through intersections and blind turns, people cutting off traffic and not abiding by laws and regulations. Traffic violations are rampant. Not sure if SPLOST money can be used to increase police presence but something needs to be done about the absolute disregard for the safety of others by a large number of drivers on our roads Turning lane lights should have longer timing, especially turning into Walmart on 20. There should be a red light leaving McDonough Walmart onto Willow Lane. Uneducated, aggressive and distracted drivers create many of our traffic issues. Drivers on their phones leaving excessive gaps in traffic, allows fewer cars through green lights. Aggressive drivers and tailgaters cause too many accidents, which creates more traffic. Unbelievable how many people still don’t know how to navigate a round-about. People who block intersections to try and get through a red light, create unnecessary backups. These are just a few examples of driver behavior that can’t be fixed with SPLOST dollars. Update the traffic light patterns. Use the property taxes on the road repairs.... As high as they are, there's really no reason to be asking for more money for ANY reason.... Vote no for t splost Way too many trucks and distribution centers in areas where the roads can’t support the trucks We can widen roads forever. With the growth we are having, we need reall mass transportation. We desparately need a roundabout at Noah's Ark, Crown Oaks and Pates Creek. There is entirely too much fast moving heavy traffic (including semi's which aren't even supposed to be on the road). It's blind hill and trying to turn onto Noah's Ark is very dangerous. We also need turn lanes at signals at Pates & Mccullough as it is impossible during school to get out. Also any time there is a problem on I75 it makes matters even worse for us. I live on Noah'sArk and sometimes it takes me 10 minutes just to get out of my driveway. We desperately need a dedicated left turn lane on Bill Gardner Pkwy at the Lester Mill intersection. Please consider this. We do need more sidewalks . We don’t need anymore buses or other forms of “public” transportation. Any form of Henry County Bussing/shuttle transit is unsafe for citizens due to the black crime in Henry County. Stop building warehouses and fix our roads! We don't need more chicken shacks or burger joints- we need roads. The roundabouts are great! We have lived here since 1981 and the traffic on 155 is always heavy now with no improvements to the road We have WAY too much traffic in locust grove on Bill Gardener, 42 and Peeksville. These should be widened We must stay in front of the growth. We need a new road from the intersection of Keys Kerry and Highway 81 over to Rt 155 to then turn onto Eagles Landing to get to I75 so the Ola community does not have to constantly go East-West into McDonough. This would easily reduce the pressure on Highway 81. The widening of Highway 81 will not improve traffic to I75, period. We need a red light at the intersection of Crumbley Road and Hwy 155. Traffic back up in all directions making it difficult to get out unless some kind soul lets you in. We need a roundabout on Noah's Ark, Crown Oaks & Pates Creek. It is a very dangerous sight limited intersection and heavily travelled. We also need more monitoring of speed on this road. We also need turn lanes to keep things moving at Pates & McCullough. McCUllough and Chambers is another very dangerous intersection and heavily traveled. We need alternate roads to two help us save time P a g e | 17 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) We need good leadership in this area. Make the hard decisions instead of the good ol boy network. We need Marta and bus transportation We need sidewalks and bike lanes, along with a limit on new construction before adequate infrastructure is in place. We need to focus on widening our current roads. We are decades behind in some areas. I know growth is going to continue, but so should adequate traffic improvements. We need to be building strong relationships with state and federal leaders, so we can secure the funding that we deserve. When a project is done by SPLOST, please ensure stop signs are placed appropriately and the correct distance from the roadway. Also please ensure appropriate signage is placed in the area (e.g., stop ahead, etc.). It’s crazy how many people don’t see and don’t stop for the newly placed stop signs for the McDonough Pkwy extension to Turner Church at White Mountain Pass. It’s been called in to SPLOST and DOT but no one does anything about it to address the signage and lack thereof. when are you going to widen jonesboro rd it took 45 minutes to go to homedepo i live on jodeco rd When will Snapping Shoals Road be resurfaced? Wherever you have road improvements, make sure there is proper lighting also. Why are approve TSPLOST approve and either zeroed out or not started. No new projects until you finished approved project. Airline connection to Old Jackson Why are we so far behind the growth improving / winding roads? Why does the County have a $13 million deficit? Where has the money gone. I want a forensic audit before agreeing to any additional taxes. Why is Henry county witholding splost funds from the HC cities. (recently filed lawsuit-HC cities vs HC) Why is Stockbridge allowed to use Tsplost for trails, not ROADS? Potholes everywhere in COS Widen 20/81 off of exit 218, and widen hwy 42 off of exit 216. It take 30-45 mins sometimes to get on the interstate when leaving work. It’s a 2 min drive with no traffic Widen Highway 155 from I-75 past the Publix at Hampton Locust Grove Road. Traffic on Highway 155 is a nightmare. For the love of God and all that his holy, please get whomever to fix I-75 through Henry County so it isn't a daily parking lot both ways. Whoever voted to do the changing "express" lanes needs to be fired. Every last one of them! I swear that made traffic through Henry County worse. Make tax payers pay for the nonsense and also make them pay to use it. Obvious money grab and all it accomplishes was make everyone mad and frustrated daily. Traffic and high property taxes are the biggest problem in Henry County. Fix it! Doubt anyone will, but sure would be nice. Widen roads faster and stop building homes until roads are set up first. Widen roads to deal with the volume of traffic that has been allowed to enter into Henry County. The road should have come first a long time ago so it is past due for them to be done to deal with all the amount of traffic. We now have in Henry County. Widening Flippen rd for overflow traffic from 75 south Widening of SR 155 in both directions from I-75. Nightmare with all the tractor trailers. The main reason I plan to sell my house and move. I have family that has already moved due to traffic and know several more people for the same reason. SR155 is always backed up. Absolutely no quality of life because you spend your time in traffic. Will Henry County consider a partnership with MARTA? Will the morons that run Henry county please stop adding more and more apartment complexes and subdivisions that squeeze too many houses on smaller and smaller lots? Will the senior center have a pool. We really need one Willow lane between bridges and 20. Bridges between willow and mt Carmel. Willow Lane from 20 to Bridges needs 4 laned ASAP before it becomes a bottleneck. Bridges Rd needs to connect from Willow to Mt Carmel. Old Jackson needs to continue and connect from 81 to Rodgers. A MAJOR issue that is GDOT, City, & County (maybe) is the intersection of 155 @ industrial. Traffic turning left off king mill onto 155 blocks the intersection and traffic going straight across from industrial cannot go and sits for 3 light cycles at times. Major issue. P a g e | 18 of 19 T-SPLOST 2 Public Feedback Report Appendix A (Comments) Also traffic on 155 going through the intersection block it at times as well. Another issue is Phillips Drive needs to be a roundabout because once the new road and roundabout at 20/mcdonough ppkwy lets loose you'll see a major bottle neck at phillips, and phillips traffic will not be able to move at all. It will also back traffic up to the new roundabout likely because the terminus of the 4 lane is not logical. It needs to have a roundabout at phillips and taper from 4 to 2 lane just past alpha auto. Worst idea ever. Our insurance and property value are not inline with what’s it really worth Would like sidewalk down Clark Dr in district 2, new subdivision, mobile homes down the road. Many kids are walking in the street becoming a dangerous situation. wow! No mention of Ga Hwy 138 and Ga Hwy 155 intersection signal improvements and widening. No mention of Ga Hwy 138 intersection with Old Conyers Road( How many wrecks make it justifiable). No mention of the HORRENDOUS ROUNDABOUT AT N Moseley Rd and Ga Hwy 138. Seems to be biased toward every where but Commission District 2. Poor communications about meetings. Y’all are YEARS behind. Good luck to you. Make friends with the GDOT. We don’t get our fair share of transportation dollars to help out like other counties because of previous assholes. Maybe you can do better if you’re nice. Yes Brown Ave. people use as cut thru from Hampton St to Griffin St. It has one speed bump but needs another closer up Brown. Ave to Griffin St. Drivers speed down Brown Ave one the go over first speed bump. Yes construction workers need to fix the entire road instead of patching spots. Construction workers should work at night when traffic isn’t as busy . Yes do not take these survey questions to dictate or allow the lack of responses from conservative side of the county to allow the future construction of sidewalks in this county they are not needed at all. Yes, put a signal light at Simpson Mill and Oakland Rds. You cant see with the turning lanes so there are to many accidents there! It is DANGEROUS!!! Should have been done a long time ago instead of what is there now! Yes....somehwre wishing the next decade you need to complete the Old Jackson to Airline Road connection. It is one of the original TSPLOST You need to implement turn lanes as part of adding any traffic lights to intersections that were previously 4-way stops. Using timed turning signals with no separate lanes doesn’t provide sufficient relief, it must be a package deal. Even just a 4-5 car deep temporary turn lane until a full road widening would provide far greater immediate improvement than just throwing in a light only. You people don’t have a clue! What have you been doing for the past 20 years? These road project should have been done a long time ago, quit taxing the Seniors that don’t drive on your stupid road system! You’re already 20 years behind. Get moving. P a g e | 19 of 19 How Projects Move Forward Project Categories Stockbridge WHERE COMMUNITY CONNECTS TSPLOST II candidate projects are screened through a practical, transparent prioritization approach designed to align public input, safety, infrastructure condition, congestion relief, and project readiness. Public input and safety needs Infrastructure condition and maintenance Congestion and operational efficiency Regional connectivity and funding leverage Project readiness within the 5-year window Patrick Henry Pkwy Widening joint county project. City share: Approx. 41% TSPLOST II Traffic Signal Upgrades Modernize intersections for safety, flow, and reliability. Stormwater Projects Drainage improvements to reduce risk and protect assets. Transportation Investments That Move Stockbridge Forward Focused on safety, preservation, congestion relief, connectivity, and responsible delivery. Street Resurfacing Preserve roadways through resurfacing or reconstruction. Priority Framework Trails and Sidewalks Install and maintain connections for pedestrians. 35 30 20 15 City of Stockbridge ARC Matching Funds Connects neighborhoods, improves safety, and strengthens mobility. Local match capacity to leverage outside funding. Community Brochure | City of Stockbridge, Georgia TSPLOST II Project Prioritization Stockbridge WHERE COMMUNITY CONNECTS Why TSPLOST II Matters Weighted Scoring Model Transportation infrastructure is one of the most visible and essential public services in a growing city. TSPLOST II provides a structured opportunity to invest in projects that improve safety, preserve assets, reduce congestion, and strengthen access across Stockbridge. Each eligible project category is reviewed against a 100-point framework. The weighting emphasizes public safety and infrastructure preservation while also accounting for connectivity, economic impact, strategic alignment, and leverage opportunities. Safety & Public Risk Responsible Delivery Focus Public Input Reflect community feedback, recent town halls, and observed transportation needs. Safety First Reduce collision risk, pedestrian exposure, flooding impacts, and emergency response constraints. Maintain What We Own 35 pts Leverage Funding Safety Signals, sidewalks, and risk reduction. Use street assessment data to guide preservation before minor issues become major failures. Asset Management & Preservation 30 pts Strengthen eligibility for GDOT, ARC, or federal matching funds to improve return on local investment. Execute Within the Window Engineer, permit, and deliver recommended projects within the TSPLOST II collection period. Reliability Connectivity & Economic Impact 20 pts Strategic Alignment & Leverage 15 pts Resurfacing and preservation. Connectivity Trails, sidewalks, and access. 100 TOTAL POINTS Bottom Line Fund needed, ready, defensible projects aligned with Stockbridge transportation priorities. Transportation Infrastructure: T-SPLOST II Road Resurfacing | Multiuse Trails | New Roads T-SPLOST 2: Building Better Communities Through Infrastructure What We Will Cover T-SPLOST 2 Road Resurfacing – Primary to Our T-SPLOST Methods, materials, and the case for maintaining our existing roads Listing of proposed roads within the City New Road Construction – Strategic Links to Benefit System Planning, building, and the economic ripple effects of new roadways Multiuse Trails – Important Emphasis of Mayor & Council Designing shared-use paths that boost health, connectivity, and local economies Funding & Future Outlook T-SPLOST 2, the infrastructure gap, and what comes next The State of U.S. Roads 2025 ASCE Report Card for America's Infrastructure D+ Roads Grade Up from D in 2021 39% of major roads in poor or mediocre condition $1,400 annual cost per driver from deterioration and congestion $3.7T infrastructure investment gap to reach good repair The 2025 Report Card marks the highest grade point average ASCE has ever awarded. Yet 9 of 18 categories still earned a D range grade. What Is Road Resurfacing? Road resurfacing is a maintenance process that adds a new top layer of asphalt or concrete over an existing road surface. It restores smoothness and safety without rebuilding the entire road structure from the base up. Key Indicators That Resurfacing Is Needed Visible potholes and cracks posing safety risks Rough surface textures suggesting underlying deterioration Poor drainage causing water pooling on the road Faded road markings impairing driver visibility Increased road noise indicating surface irregularities Resurfacing Methods Overlay Mill & Fill Micro-Surfacing Fresh 1.5–3" asphalt layer over existing surface. Best when the base is strong. Extends life 8–12 years. Removes damaged surface then replaces it. Structural fix lasting 11–17 years for heavily worn roads. Thin polymer-modified cold mix applied quickly. Roads reopen within 1 hour. 50% lower lifecycle cost. $1.50–$3.50/sq ft ~$15/sq yd ~$2–$4/sq yd The Resurfacing List $2.8 - $3 million 1. Lakeview Drive – Skyland Dr. West to Skyland Dam 2. Skyland Dr. East from 107 to Lakeview. 3. Highland Drive 4. Rockwood Lane 5. Wolf Creek 6. Roberts Trail (remainder) 7. Laughlin Drive 8. Elma Marie Court 9. Nadia Court 10. Happy Trail 11. Jubilee Blvd 12. McArthur Drive 13. Montefeltro Court 14. Invector Court 15. Citori Court 16. Werre Way 17. Lear Drive from Dunniston Dr. to Big Poplar Way 18. Elmstead Place 19. Brickfield Place 20. Tanger Boulevard (Grace Baptist to St. Augustine Parkway) 21. LG – Griffin from Shoal Creek to St. Augustine Parkway 22. Hosannah Road improvements (rough patching, other) Tanger/MLK Skyland Club Drive Commons New Road Construction Planning, Building, and Growing Communities Through New Roadways T-SPLOST 2: Building Better Communities Through Infrastructure Planning New Roads 1 Needs Assessment Traffic studies, growth projections, and community input identify where new connectivity is required. 2 Design & Engineering Route alignment, lane widths, drainage systems, and intersection design are finalized. 3 Right-of-Way Acquisition 4 Construction & QA Land is purchased or easements are secured. Public hearings ensure transparent engagement. Contractors build in phases. Inspectors verify materials and compaction meet specifications. Most new roads are built by developers. City seeks to link certain segments and to create new grid-streets downtown as part of the Heart of Locust Grove Plan. Economic Impact of New Roads 13,000+ jobs supported per $1B in highway investment The Multiplier Effect a $100M project flows 15–20% ofdirectly to local wages 7–12% 15–30% business productivity increase within 5 years of completion commercial property value appreciation near new exits value generated 30–40% additional through secondary spending 5–10% residential property value increase from new access The Road Segment List $3 million Grid Streets Heart of LG 1. Heart of LG network, Phase I (Smith/Carter/Ridge/Cleveland) 2. Palmetto Street to Indian Creek 3. Colvin Drive Extension (continuation of SPLOST VI) Palmetto Extension Colvin Drive Extension Multiuse Trails Shared-Use Paths for Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Communities T-SPLOST 2: Building Better Communities Through Infrastructure What Are Multiuse Trails? Dedicated off-road pathways serving pedestrians, cyclists, wheelchair users, joggers, skaters, and other non-motorized travelers. Also known as shared-use paths or greenways. Design Standards 10 ft 12–14 ft 8 ft Recommended High Traffic Minimum Standard width — adequate for moderate to heavy use Heavy use with high concentrations of multiple user types Minimum allowed — only for low traffic or short lengths Community Benefits of Trails Health & Wellness Environmental Economic Every $1 invested returns ~$3 in medical cost savings Reduces car trips, lowering greenhouse gas emissions Trails attract tourism and boost local business revenue 25–30% of adults are physically inactive — trails change that Protects natural habitats along trail corridors Increases property values in adjacent neighborhoods 2 hours outside per week improves mental health Prevents soil erosion and stormwater pollution Provides transportation savings for commuters Trail Impact by the Numbers $3 200+ #1 10 ft return per $1 studies amenity standard invested in trails (medical savings) documenting trail economic benefits trails are most desired community feature recommended path width for most use Multiuse Trail List $3 .4 million Hwy 42 S Connector 1. 2. 3. 4. Peeksville Connection (Design) $250,000 Palmetto Connector - $471,000 Price Road Ext - $715,000 Highway 42 South – Publix to Downtown - $2 million Palmetto, MLK And Indian Creek Connectors Price Road Extension The Funding Challenge Revenue Under Pressure Emerging Solutions Federal gas tax stuck at 18.4¢/gallon since 1993 Public-private partnerships (P3s) EV adoption eroding fuel tax revenue State infrastructure banks with low-interest loans State/local governments now fund 76% of roadway spending EV registration fees in 30+ states $118B General Fund transfer needed to sustain Highway Trust Fund Value capture from property appreciation Construction cost inflation reducing purchasing power BUILD America 250 Act — $580B proposed Looking Ahead T-SPLOST II Development Partners Continuation of the Penny Tax keeps local property taxes lower to go towards maintenance and new roads. Council seeks concessions from developers for additional rights-of-way as well as construction of segments wherever feasible. Complete Streets BUILD America 250 Road designs that integrate trails, bike lanes, and transit to serve all users — not just cars. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY! The proposed $580B successor to IIJA would fund highways, bridges, transit, and rail through 2031. Key Takeaways Road resurfacing extends pavement life 8–12 years at 30–60% less than full reconstruction — the most cost-effective maintenance strategy available. Multiuse trails deliver a 3:1 return on health savings alone, while boosting property values, reducing emissions, and connecting communities. New roads generate 13,000+ jobs per $1 billion invested and increase regional business productivity by 7–12% within five years. A $3.7 trillion infrastructure gap demands creative funding — from P3s and state loan programs to the proposed $580B BUILD America 250 Act. Thank You! T-SPLOST 2: Investing in Roads, Trails, and Communities Questions & Discussion T-SPLOST 2 Ambassador Recommended Projects June 2, 2026 The T-SPLOST 2 ambassadors have adopted the following recommended projects for T-SPLOST 2. We want to thank the Henry County community whose input and feedback helped to shape this proposed project list. Major Road Widening (ROW + Construction Costs) Cost (Millions) Jonesboro Road widening phase II (North Mt. Carmel Road to Moore's Church) $ 48.0 million Fairview Road widening phases II / IIIA (Home Depot to Hearn; Hearn to Austin Rd) $ 24.0 million State Route 81 phase II (ROW-Local Match) (Bethany Road to Keys Ferry Road) $ 2.0 million Mill Road phase II (PE in full + ROW-Local Match) (Flea Market to State Route 81) $ 2.75 million State Route 42 (PE-Local Match) (SR 155 to Locust Grove) (joint 61% county / 39% LG) $ 1.5 million Jodeco Road Major Intersections (Hudson Bridge-Flippen; Chambers Road) $ 18.0 million Oak Grove Road Major Intersections (Campground-Old Jodeco; Foster Drive) $ 14.0 million McDonough Parkway at Jonesboro Road / Bridges Rd (joint 50/50 project with McDonough) $ 8.0 million Airline Road at Kelleytown Road (re-alignment) $ 4.0 million East Lake Road at Elliott Road (multilane roundabout) $ 6.0 million Chambers Road at McCullough Road / Chambers Road at Mt. Olive Road (roundabouts) $ 8.0 million Panola Road at Flakes Mill Road (re-alignment) $ 6.0 million State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel Road (roundabout) $ 5.0 million Major Road Widening (Local Match for PE & ROW Costs) Major Intersections Intersection Improvements Other Categories (Lump Sum) Road Resurfacing $ 16.535 million County Arterials / Collectors Resurfacing (PCI <50)* (see reverse) $ 6.000 million Resurfacing Funds to be Divided by District $ 10.535 million Roadway Signs / Safety Improvements (e.g. signs and striping, rumble strips, guardrails, etc.) $ 6.0 million Trails (e.g. Camp Creek Greenway Trail, Flint River Greenway Trail, etc.) $ 4.0 million Federal / State Grant Matching Funds $ 11.0 million Program Management $ 11.0 million Contingency (15%) $ 33.7 million Total $ 229.485 million Revenue Projection (County Share) $ 224.9 million McDonough Contribution (joint project) $ 4.0 million Locust Grove Contribution (joint project) $ 0.585 million $ 229.485 million Total *Estimated cost for major county road resurfacing. Tier 2 Projects (if sales tax collections exceed 100%) on reverse. www.HenryTSPLOST.com Tier 2 Projects (if sales tax collections exceed 100%) Cost (Millions) Jodeco Road widening phase II (ROW) (Chambers to Pates Creek Elementary) $ 5.0 million East Lake Road widening (ROW) (SR 155 to Airline Road) $ 5.0 million Willow Ln / Industrial Blvd improvements (ROW) (Bridges Road to Old Industrial Blvd) $ 5.0 million State Route 42 widening (ROW-Local Match) (joint 61% county / 39% LG) $ 5.0 million Road Resurfacing (split by District) $ 20.55 million Program Management $ 2.0 million Contingency (10%) $ 4.5 million $ 47.05 million Revenue Projection (County Share) (Tier 2 - 100-120%) $ 45.0 million Locust Grove Contribution (joint project) $ 2.05 million Total County Arterials / Collectors Resurfacing (PCI <50)* Length (miles) District PCI Wynn Drive (Hampton City Limits to Dorsey Road) 0.8 5 27.20 Bond Drive (Fairview Rd to DeKalb County line) 0.7 2 35.00 Floyd Road (Old Griffin Rd to Hampton City Limits / Thompson Creek) 0.97 1 36.50 Rocky Creek Road (Hampton-Locust Grove Road to SR 20) 2.02 1 42.91 Snapping Shoals Road (River Road to SR 81) 2.34 3 45.07 King Mill Road (SR 155 to SR 42) 1.4 1/5 47.62 Gardner Road (Patillo Rd to Flat Shoals Church Rd) 1.73 2 48.91 *The above roads are classified as an arterial or collector according to Georgia DOT and they have a pavement condition score below 50. Staff is recommending these roads to be resurfaced in FY 2028 (beginning summer 2027). The remaining resurfacing funds would be divided by District. www.HenryTSPLOST.com June 2, 2026 HenryTSPLOST.com What is T-SPLOST 2? Henry County voters approved the county’s first Transportation SPLOST (T-SPLOST) in November 2021. The program began collections in April 2022 continuing through April 2027. The county is planning to ask voters in November to renew the T-SPLOST program for an additional six years. A 6-yr program can collect an estimated $340 million for transportation projects. Henry County and each city would then receive a portion for projects. What can T-SPLOST pay for? The Transportation SPLOST program can pay for a variety of transportation projects. Some types of projects include the following: road widening projects, road resurfacing, intersection improvements, new sidewalks and trails, and bridge repairs and replacements. *A T-SPLOST program can span six years with an approved Intergovernmental Agreement. This has been a change in state law since Henry County passed its first T-SPLOST in 2021. Estimated Collections Estimated Collections Economic Stability A 1% Local Sales Tax will collect an estimated $340 Million over 6 years Population-Based Distribution Population 2020 Percent Share of Collections Henry County (unincorporated) 158,638* 65.904% $224.9 M Hampton 8,381 3.482% $11.9 M Locust Grove 8,949 3.718% $12.7 M McDonough 29,058 12.072% $41.2 M Stockbridge 35,686** 14.825% $50.6 M *Unincorporated population only **Adjusted for 2022 legislative annexation Where We Are T-SPLOST 1 Approved in November 2021 Seven Major Projects: McDonough Parkway Extension — Construction in progress Rock Quarry Road Widening — Construction in progress Mill Road Widening — Construction in progress State Route 81 Widening — Construction awarded; work beginning this summer Jonesboro Road Widening — Construction awarded; work beginning this summer Bill Gardner Parkway Widening — Right of way acquisition in progress Fairview Road Widening — Right of way acquisition in progress McDonough Parkway Extension Estimated Completion Late 2026 Rock Quarry Road Widening Estimated Completion Early 2029 Where We Are 40+ Current & Upcoming Road Projects valued at over $6.6 Billion Twelve (12) Georgia DOT projects including the I-75 Commercial Vehicle Lanes, I-75 Express Lanes Expansion, I-75 at Bethlehem Road Interchange, the Western Parallel Connector and state highway widening projects Twenty-six (26) current County SPLOST projects including 12 new road / road widening projects, 9 intersection improvements and 4 dirt road improvements Fifteen (15) future County projects either in design or scheduled to start design this year Five (5) current resurfacing projects in progress repairing over 200 county roads Where We Are Sidewalks Transit 35 New Miles of Sidewalks / Shared Use Paths programmed as part of Major Projects 18 miles by Henry County & 17 miles by GDOT New Local Bus Route launching this summer between McDonough & Stockbridge Where We Are Going T-SPLOST 2 provides an opportunity to program the next group of transportation improvements in Henry County, building upon the existing projects planned by Georgia DOT and Henry County. What We Heard 77 Public Open Houses 40-50 Approx. Attendees 40-50 900+ Online Survey Responses 900+ What We Heard What transportation issue affects your daily travel the most? (Select up to 2) Traffic congestion 781 Intersection delays 327 Safety concerns 248 196 75 Bridge improvements 80 51 Expanded public transit 26 0 463 Bicycle or trails 36 Other 537 Sidewalk projects 125 Limited transit options 716 Road resurfacing Road conditions/potholes School zone traffic Road widening Intersection improvements 74 Lack of sidewalks Which transportation improvements should Henry County prioritize? (Select up to 3) 141 Other 200 400 600 800 0 200 400 600 800 What We Heard Please select the projects that would most improve your travel experience. Road widening projects East Atlanta Road 1. McDonough Parkway (west) 2. Jodeco Road (west of I-75) 3. Mill Road, phase II 4. Jonesboro Road, phase II 5. Hampton-Locust Grove Road 6. State Route 81, phase II 115 East Lake Road 240 Hampton-Locust Grove Road 305 Jodeco Road (west of I-75) 427 Jonesboro Road, ph. II 312 McDonough Parkway (west) 479 Mill Road, ph. II 350 Oak Grove Road 219 Patrick Henry Pkwy 257 State Route 81, ph. II 300 0 100 200 300 400 500 What We Heard Intersections Airline at Kelleytown 194 Airline at Lake Dow 169 Airline at Turner Church 154 Chambers at McCullough 221 Chambers at Mt. Olive 280 East Atlanta at Thurman 129 McCullough at Mitchell 107 McCullough at Pates Creek 129 Noah's Ark at Pates Creek 127 North Ola at Snapping Shoals 131 Old Jackson at Leguin Mill *Georgia DOT and Henry County SPLOST are collaborating to install a traffic signal at SR 155 and Crumbley. 122 Old Jackson at South Ola 145 Peeksville at Leguin Mill 154 State Route 155 at Crumbley 243 State Route 20 at Kelleytown 177 State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel 269 Other 73 0 50 100 150 1. Chambers at Mt. Olive Road 2. SR 81 at Mt. Carmel Road 3. SR 155 at Crumbley Road* 4. Chambers at McCullough Road 5. Airline at Kelleytown Road 6. SR 20 at Kelleytown Road 200 250 300 Recommended Projects Major Road Widening Projects N -> Jonesboro Road Fairview Road Phase II Phases II / IIIA Widen Jonesboro Road between North Mt. Carmel Road and Moore’s Church in preparation for upcoming subdivisions and to improve existing intersections Widen Fairview Road between Panola Road and Austin Road to improve connectivity and complete a trail connection between Fairview and Panola Mountain Federal Funds SR 81 Mill Road SR 42 Phase II Phase II SR 155 to Locust Grove (joint with Locust Grove) These projects have received federal funds to begin design work. The federal government covers 80% of costs with a 20% local match. The county can ask for federal funds in the future on these projects, using T-SPLOST 2 as the local match, to assist with full engineering and right of way costs. We expect the next federal funding application window to be in 2028. Major Intersections T-SPLOST 1 had a major focus on roadway widening projects. These projects are costing about $21 million per mile. Considering the long schedule to complete widening projects, high project costs and extensive network of already-planned road widening projects, staff looked instead at focusing on major intersection projects in T-SPLOST 2. Intersections are often a “pinch point” causing traffic congestion and high crash rates. By improving the major intersections, the county can provide meaningful benefit at a lower cost at more locations throughout the county. These projects will also be constructed so that future road widening projects can build upon them without reconstructing the intersections. What does that look like? SR 42 at Eagles Landing Pkwy State Route 42 is currently four lanes in the vicinity of Eagles Landing Parkway. When Georgia DOT widens SR 42 in the future, the project will connect into the existing intersection without the need for any major reconstruction. Major Intersections Jodeco Road Hudson Bridge, Flippen & Chambers Oak Grove Road Campground, Jodeco & Foster Drive McDonough Pkwy Jonesboro Rd & Bridges Rd (joint with McDonough) Other Intersections Airline Road at Kelleytown Road East Lake Road at Elliott Road Chambers at McCullough / Mt. Olive (dual roundabouts) Other Intersections <- N Panola Road at Flakes Mill Road State Route 81 at Mt. Carmel Rd Road Resurfacing Major Roads (to be bid out in 2027) County Arterials / Collectors scored below 50 on Pavement Condition Wynn Drive (Hampton City Limits to Dorsey Road) Bond Drive (Fairview Road to DeKalb County line) Floyd Road (Old Griffin Road to Hampton City Limits) Rocky Creek Road* (Hampton-Locust Grove Road to SR 20) Snapping Shoals Road* (River Road to SR 81) King Mill Road* (SR 155 to SR 42) Gardner Road (Patillo Rd to Flat Shoals Church Rd) Total: 10.16 miles at an estimated cost of $6 million Major Roads District Resurfacing $6 million $10.535 million Total $16.535 million All remaining funding after completing the major roads group would be allocated to repaving roads in each District. The roads selected for resurfacing would be based on the latest most current pavement condition scores at the time. *The county submitted several roads as part of grant applications in 2026 for federal funds. Schedule may shift based on possible award of federal funds. Other Categories Signs / Safety Improvements $6 Million Invest $1 million per year in the DOT Sign Shop to accelerate installation of low-cost safety enhancements such as flashing stop signs, rumble strips, guardrails, and lighting Trails $4 Million Advance trail projects in partnership with federal funding such as the Camp Creek Greenway Trail in McDonough and Flint River Greenway Trail in Hampton Grant Matching Funds $11 Million Provide the requisite local match when federal and state grant opportunities arise for transportation projects Program Management $11 Million Staff & office expenses to oversee project delivery Contingency (15%) $33.7 Million provide flexibility for unforeseen project needs or field conditions that may arise during right of way and construction Tier 2 Projects (if collections exceed estimate) Right of Way Acquisition $20 Million Advance right of way acquisition for future road widening projects: Jodeco Road widening (Pates Creek Elementary to Chambers) East Lake Road widening (SR 155 to Airline Road) Willow Ln / Industrial Blvd (Bridges Road to Old Industrial Blvd) State Route 42 widening (Local Match) (joint with Locust Grove) Road Resurfacing $20.55 Million Resurface roads based on the pavement condition index (funding divided by District) Program Management $2 Million Staff & office expenses to oversee project delivery Contingency (10%) $4.5 Million provide flexibility for unforeseen project needs or field conditions that may arise during right of way and construction Recommended Projects Major Road Projects $78.25 million Intersection Improvements $65 million Road Resurfacing $16.5 million Other Categories $21 million Program Management $11 million Contingency (15%) $33.7 million Henry County Total $224.9 million Intergovernmental Agreement The Intergovernmental Agreement must be approved by the Board of Commissioners and a majority of local City Councils representing at least 50% of the municipal population. The county’s goal is to have the participation of every city. Benefits of the IGA: The IGA allows the T-SPLOST program to operate for the full six-year period. The T-SPLOST program would remain in place for the full duration, providing greater certainty for the county and cities when planning projects, even if revenues reach projected levels earlier than expected due to strong economic activity. Every city receives a portion of collections to complete projects within their community. Next Steps Finalize the Intergovernmental Agreement with the BOC and City Councils Finalize the county project list and each city’s project list The county requests the city councils approve the IGA by July 15. The BOC plans to consider adopting the IGA and calling the referendum at the July 21 meeting. Election Day on November 3, 2026 HenryTSPLOST.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MONDAY JUNE 8, 2026 6:00 P.M. Mayor & City Council Mayor Jayden L. Willams At-Large Mayor Pro Tem Elton Alexander – Council District 5 Councilmember LaKeisha Gantt – Council District 1 Councilmember Antwan Cloud – Council District 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. – Council District 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber – Council District 4 Administration Shawn Edmondson – City Manager Frank Milazi – City Treasurer Cassandra Lester – Interim City Clerk Quinton Washington – City Attorney Megan McCullough – Associate Attorney Mission: To provide visionary leadership and superior municipal services that enhance the quality of life for citizens while creating a welcoming business atmosphere focused on sustainability and expansion of tourism and cultural events. CALL TO ORDER The City Council Meeting was called to order at 6:06 PM INVOCATION The invocation and The Pledge of Allegiance were led by Mayor Jayden L. Williams. ROLL CALL Roll was called and quorum was established. Councilmember Berry arrived at 6:15 pm. Councilmember Gantt arrived at 6:24 pm. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Motion to amend the agenda to add the approval of the renewals for Continued Participation In The Henry County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program For Fiscal Years 2027-2029; to add Council consideration to approve a Resolution Encouraging Congressional Action On The 21st Century Road To Housing Act; and to adopt the agenda with the changes, was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 3–0. 1|Page ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES Motion to approve the May 11, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes and the May 26, 2026 Work Session Minutes made by Councilmember Cloud and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander. The motion passed 3-0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Three people presented Public Comments: Valerie Lambert of 7920 Christian Court; Charlene Woodruff of 7914 Christian Court; and Kathy Walker of 200 Hunting Court. All spoke regarding their concerns about the Tranquil Trail residential development adjacent to the Spivey Cove and Spivey Ridge subdivisions in Clayton County. CEREMONIAL REVIEW Mayor Jayden Williams provided a recap of the proclamations issued for the month of June, which included: - Municipal Court Clerk Week: June 8–12, 2026 - World Blood Donor Day: Sunday, June 14, 2026 - Juneteenth: Friday, June 19, 2026 - Father’s Day: Sunday, June 21, 2026 - Proclamation for the Steve and Marjorie Harvey Foundation - Caribbean American Heritage Month - Homeowners Month - Pride Month Mayor Williams also welcomed Stockbridge Municipal Court Judge Wanda Dallas, who took her oath of office prior to the council meeting. OLD BUSINESS Amphitheater Hours of Operation: Council consideration of an ordinance establishing an inclement weather policy at the VyStar Amphitheater. Any such ordinance would be limited in scope to allow a concert to continue, if delayed due to inclement weather, until midnight. Such ordinance will require an amendment to the City Noise Ordinance (Code of Ordinances § 11.26, et seq.) Motion to approve made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 4-1-0. Councilmember Barber opposed Amphitheater Rental Policy: Council consideration to approve the 2026 Amphitheater Rental Policy. Motion to approve made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Gantt. The motion passed 5-0. Variance Case #VR-2026-01. (Council District 2) Consideration of a variance application for two setback variances on Parcel #S20-03003000 on Wilson Avenue to allow for the construction of a new single-family detached dwelling. Applicant: Jerry Robinson of BAC Construction. Zoned: SR. Property size: 0.613 +/- acres. 2|Page Variance Request #1--Reduce the front yard setback from the required 50 feet to 25 feet. Variance Request #2--Reduce the rear yard setback from the required 40 feet to 20 feet. Conditional motion to approve made by Councilmember Cloud; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander. The motion passed 4-1-0. Councilmember Barber opposed. The conditional approval is based on the property owner’s approval of the future easement for installment of 5ft sidewalks during the neighborhood project currently under planning by Falcon Design. Appeal Case #AP-2026-01. (Council District 4) Consideration of an appeal of the completed Zoning Verification Letter (ZVL) for two parcels at the southwest corner of East Atlanta Road and Stagecoach Road, including Parcel #04701016001 with 2.64 acres and Parcel #028-02021005 with 10.88 acres. Applicant / Property Owner: Samir Patel. Agent: Newton Galloway, Attorney. The ZVL was completed on March 27, 2026, and the applicant filed the appeal on April 19, 2026. Motion to approve staff and legal recommendation of denial made by Councilmember Berry; Seconded by Councilmember Gantt. The motion passed 3-02. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and Councilmember Cloud abstained. NEW BUSINESS City Of Stockbridge Bus Stop Location Map: Henry County Transit Department is introducing public transit service along a fixed route from McDonough to Stockbridge with defined stops for passengers to load and unload and requires an executed Memorandum of Understanding. Motion to approve made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Councilmember Barber. The motion passed 5-0. Path Foundation Master Service Agreement with City of Stockbridge: Council consideration to approve the Master Services Agreement (MSA) for coordination between PATH and the City of Stockbridge. Motion to approve made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander. The motion passed 5-0. New Project Manager Classification: Council consideration approving a new Project Manager classification within the City Manager’s Office. Motion to table for executive session due to personnel matters made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Councilmember Barber. The motion passed 50. Receipt of Fiscal Year 2026 Grant Awards: Council consideration to officially accept all grants awarded to the city in the 2026 fiscal year in order to be compliant with grant requirements. 3|Page Motion to approve made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 5-0. Council Consideration to Approve the Renewal for Continued Participation in the Henry County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Fiscal Years 2027-2029 Motion to approve made by Councilmember Gantt; Seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 5-0. Council Consideration to Approve a Resolution Encouraging Congressional Action on the 21st Century Road to Housing Act: Motion to approve made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander; Seconded by Councilmember Cloud. The motion passed 5-0. EXECUTIVE SESSION (Exemptions to the Georgia Open Meetings Act) Motion to adjourn to executive session for the purposes of litigation, personnel, real estate, and cybersecurity was made by Councilmember Gantt and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander. The motion passed 5–0. The council returned from executive session at approximately 10:03 PM. Motion to end the executive session and return to regular session was made by Councilmember Cloud; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 5–0. Upon returning from executive session, a motion to approve the new Project Manager classification was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Gantt. The motion passed 4-1-0. Councilmember Barber opposed ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn made by Councilmember Cloud; Seconded by councilmember Gantt The motion passed 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: ______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk ______________________________ Jayden L. Williams, Mayor 4|Page STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY OF HENRY CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE ORDINANCE NO. ______________________ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE (“CITY”) CODE OF ORDINANCES BY CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 3.10, ENTITLED " COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAM"; TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR BLIGHTED PROPERTIES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IX, SECTION II, PARAGRAPH VII(D) OF THE GEORGIA CONSTITUTION AND O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 ET SEQ.; TO PROVIDE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BLIGHTED PROPERTY; TO IMPOSE AN INCREASED MUNICIPAL AD VALOREM TAX ON CERTAIN BLIGHTED PROPERTY; TO PROVIDE FOR NOTICE, HEARINGS, APPEALS, REMEDIATION, REMOVAL OF DESIGNATION, REDUCED TAXATION FOLLOWING REDEVELOPMENT, COORDINATION WITH HENRY COUNTY TAX OFFICIALS; ESTABLISHMENT OF A BLIGHTED PROPERTY REGISTRY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia is charged with providing public services to residents located within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 et seq. authorize municipalities to establish community redevelopment tax incentive programs to encourage the remediation and redevelopment of blighted property; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that abandoned, neglected, unsafe, and blighted properties create substantial burdens on public safety, code enforcement, public infrastructure, neighborhood stability, and economic development; and WHEREAS, blighted properties discourage private investment, hinder economic development, impede neighborhood revitalization, reduce the City's tax base, and interfere with the orderly implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code, Capital Improvements Program, Urban Redevelopment Plans, corridor studies, and other adopted planning and economic development initiatives; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council further find that the timely rehabilitation, redevelopment, stabilization, adaptive reuse, or removal of blighted properties serves a substantial public purpose by protecting property values, improving neighborhood character, encouraging private investment, expanding economic opportunity, eliminating unsafe conditions, and enhancing the overall quality of life within the City of Stockbridge; and Page 1 of 20 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council desire to establish objective standards and fair administrative procedures for identifying blighted property, protecting the due process rights of property owners, encouraging voluntary compliance, promoting responsible property maintenance, and facilitating the productive reuse and long-term revitalization of underutilized properties throughout the City of Stockbridge. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION 5.16.070. Having considered the proposed amendment to the City of Stockbridge Code of Ordinances, the Mayor and Council hereby amend the Code by creating a new Chapter 3.10, which shall read as the attached and incorporated Exhibit A. SECTION 2. CODIFICATION. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be codified as Chapter 3.10 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Stockbridge. SECTION 3. ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLEMENTATION. The City Manager, or their designee, is hereby authorized and directed to develop administrative procedures, coordinate public notice, and enforcement protocols, and to take all necessary steps to ensure consistent implementation and operation of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 5. CITY ATTORNEY’S AUTHORITY. Pursuant to the City's charter and with explicit consent of the City Council, the City Attorney is duly authorized to make requisite amendments to all contracts, ordinances, resolutions, and documents, as may be necessary, in order to secure conformity with the express intent of the City Council and to ensure adherence to all pertinent laws and ordinances of the City. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. Should any section or provision of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Page 2 of 20 SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. SO ORDAINED THIS ___________ DAY OF __________, 2026. ______________________ Jayden Williams, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk _______________________ Quinton G. Washington, City Attorney Page 3 of 20 EXHIBIT A FULL TEXT OF PROPOSED CHAPTER 3.10 CHAPTER 3.10: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAM 3.10.010 Purpose and Authority. A. This Chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority granted by Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia, O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 et seq., the City's Charter, and all other applicable provisions of Georgia law. B. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive Program designed to encourage the rehabilitation, redevelopment, productive reuse, and long-term maintenance of blighted property located within the corporate limits of the City. C. The City recognizes that rehabilitation of blighted property decreases demands upon governmental services, improves neighborhood stability, encourages private investment, protects property values, and promotes economic development. D. This Chapter establishes administrative procedures for identifying qualifying blighted property, providing notice and an opportunity to cure, conducting hearings, imposing increased municipal ad valorem taxation where authorized by law, encouraging voluntary remediation, and providing reduced municipal taxation following successful redevelopment. E. This Chapter shall be administered in a manner consistent with the City of Stockbridge Unified Development Code, the City's Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvements Program, adopted Urban Redevelopment Plans, Tax Allocation Districts, corridor studies, small area plans, and all other applicable planning, redevelopment, and economic development policies adopted by the Mayor and Council. F. Nothing contained in this Chapter shall limit or impair any authority otherwise possessed by the City under its Charter, Georgia law, or other provisions of this Code to enforce nuisance, zoning, building, housing, fire, life-safety, or property maintenance regulations. 3.10.020 Legislative Findings. The Mayor and Council specifically find and declare that: A. Blighted properties create conditions that are detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. B. Such properties increase demands upon police protection, fire protection, emergency response, code enforcement, sanitation, and other governmental services. C. Such properties discourage private investment, hinder economic development, impede neighborhood revitalization, reduce the City's tax base, and interfere with the orderly implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code, Capital Improvements Program, Urban Redevelopment Plans, corridor studies, and other adopted planning and economic development initiatives. Page 4 of 20 D. The timely rehabilitation, redevelopment, stabilization, adaptive reuse, or removal of blighted properties serves a substantial public purpose by protecting property values, improving neighborhood character, encouraging private investment, expanding economic opportunity, eliminating unsafe conditions, and enhancing the overall quality of life within the City of Stockbridge. E. The public benefits resulting from rehabilitation and redevelopment substantially outweigh the temporary increased municipal tax burden imposed upon qualifying blighted properties. F. Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia authorizes municipalities to establish community redevelopment tax incentive programs and to levy an increased municipal ad valorem tax upon qualifying blighted property in order to encourage rehabilitation and redevelopment. G. Voluntary remediation should be encouraged whenever reasonably possible. H. Property owners should be afforded meaningful notice, an opportunity to correct violations, administrative review, and judicial review before any increased municipal taxation becomes effective. I. The procedures established by this Chapter are intended to be objective, transparent, uniformly administered, and consistent with constitutional principles of due process. J. This Chapter is enacted for the public purpose of eliminating blight, promoting redevelopment, encouraging investment, reducing governmental expenditures, and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City. 3.10.030 Definitions. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed below. A. Blighted Property means developed or urbanized real property meeting the definition established by Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 et seq., and satisfying the eligibility requirements established by this Chapter. Property shall not be deemed blighted solely because of aesthetic conditions. Examples of blighted property include, but is not limited to the following: 1. An uninhabitable, unsafe, vacant, deteriorated, or abandoned building or structure; 2. Inadequate provisions for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, utilities, fire safety, or safe occupancy; 3. An imminent harm to life, safety, or other property caused by fire, flood, tornado, storm, structural failure, natural disaster, environmental hazard, or other dangerous condition, provided that the City or other appropriate public agency has given written notice to the property owner regarding the specific harm caused by the property and the owner has failed to take reasonable measures to remedy such harm; 4. A site identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, or other regulatory agency as a contaminated site or as requiring environmental remediation; Page 5 of 20 5. Repeated illegal or criminal activity occurring on the property of which the property owner knew or reasonably should have known; 6. Maintenance of the property below applicable state, county, or municipal codes for at least three (3) months after written notice of the violation has been provided to the owner; 7. Conditions conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infestation, fire hazard, crime, nuisance activity, or danger to persons or property in the immediate vicinity; 8. Property that is subject to frequent property maintenance, building, fire, zoning, environmental, sanitation, stormwater, or other code citations; or 9. Vacant property last occupied by a commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or mixed-use activity where no visible lawful commercial, industrial, occupancy, redevelopment, construction, or maintenance activity has occurred for more than three (3) consecutive months. 10. Blighted property may also include property constituting an unsafe structure, dangerous building, nuisance property, dilapidated structure, or structure unfit for occupancy as defined elsewhere in the City Code. B. Building Inspector means the City's Chief Building Official, Building Inspector, Code Enforcement Officer, Fire Marshal, or any qualified inspector designated by the Public Officer. C. City means the City of Stockbridge, Georgia. D. Code Enforcement Division means the department responsible for enforcement of the City's nuisance, property maintenance, zoning, housing, and related ordinances. E. Community Redevelopment means any lawful activity undertaken to rehabilitate, repair, renovate, stabilize, restore, demolish, reconstruct, redevelop, improve, or otherwise return property to productive use consistent with applicable law. F. Final Determination means the written determination issued by the Public Officer following expiration of the applicable cure period or completion of all administrative proceedings. G. Owner means the individual or legal entity reflected upon the most recent Henry County tax digest or otherwise determined to hold legal title to the property. H. Person means any individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, estate, association, governmental entity, or other legal entity responsible for payment of municipal ad valorem taxes. I. Preliminary Determination means the initial written determination issued by the Public Officer identifying property believed to qualify for designation as Blighted Property. J. Public Officer means the Community Development Director, or their designee, or such officer or employee designated by the City Manager to administer this Chapter. K. Remediation Agreement means a written agreement entered into between the City and a property owner establishing a schedule and requirements for correction of blighted conditions. Page 6 of 20 3.10.040 Construction and Intent. A. This Chapter shall be liberally construed to accomplish the public purposes authorized by Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 et seq. B. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to diminish any constitutional or statutory rights afforded to property owners. C. This Chapter establishes minimum administrative procedures and shall not preclude the City from pursuing any additional remedies authorized by law. D. The increased municipal ad valorem taxation authorized by this Chapter is intended to function as a component of a Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive Program and shall not be construed as a criminal penalty, civil fine, special assessment, or code enforcement citation. E. In the event of any conflict between this Chapter and state law, state law shall control. F. This Chapter shall supplement and not replace the Unified Development Code, Property Maintenance Code, Building Code, Fire Code, Business Regulations, Stormwater Regulations, nuisance ordinances, unsafe structure regulations, environmental regulations, or any other applicable ordinance of the City of Stockbridge. G. Compliance with this Chapter shall not relieve any person from complying with any other applicable federal, state, or local law. H. Where provisions of this Chapter conflict with another ordinance of the City, the more restrictive provision shall apply unless otherwise prohibited by law. 3.10.050 Administration. A. Public Officer. The Community Development Director, or their designee, or such officer or employee designated by the City Manager shall serve as the Public Officer responsible for administration and enforcement of this Chapter. B. Delegation. The Public Officer may delegate inspection, investigation, and administrative functions to qualified City personnel but shall retain responsibility for issuance of all Preliminary Determinations and Final Determinations. C. Interdepartmental Cooperation. The Community Development Department, Code Enforcement Division, Fire Department, Police Department, Finance Department, and all other City departments shall cooperate with the Public Officer in administration of this Chapter. D. Administrative Rules. The Public Officer may develop administrative forms, inspection procedures, remediation agreement templates, internal operating procedures, and other documents necessary to administer this Chapter, provided such rules are consistent with this Chapter and applicable law. E. Administrative Record. The Public Officer shall maintain an administrative record for each property considered under this Chapter, including inspection reports, photographs, Page 7 of 20 notices, correspondence, code enforcement history, remediation agreements, hearing records, and final determinations. F. Coordination with Henry County. The City Manager is authorized to coordinate with the Henry County Tax Commissioner, Henry County Tax Assessor, and other appropriate county officials regarding implementation of this Chapter and may execute administrative memoranda of understanding or similar agreements, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, as necessary to facilitate administration of the Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive Program. 3.10.060 Qualification of Blighted Property. A. No property shall be eligible for designation as Blighted Property unless the Public Officer determines that: 1. The property satisfies the definition of "Blighted Property" established by Article IX, Section II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 et seq.; 2. The property has remained in violation of applicable federal, state, or local law for a period of not less than twelve (12) consecutive months following written notice of such violation; 3. The owner has been afforded a reasonable opportunity to correct the identified conditions; 4. The conditions continue to exist at the time of inspection; and 5. The property is not exempt from designation pursuant to this Chapter. B. In addition to subsection (A), the property shall satisfy at least one (1) of the following: 1. Three (3) or more unresolved code enforcement violations issued during the preceding twenty-four (24) months; 2. A final determination that a structure is unsafe pursuant to applicable City ordinance; 3. Repeated nuisance abatement actions by the City; 4. Abandonment or vacancy for a period exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months; 5. Identification by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, or other regulatory agency as a contaminated site or as requiring environmental remediation; 6. Inadequate provisions for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, utilities, fire safety, or safe occupancy; 7. Conditions conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infestation, fire hazard, crime, nuisance activity, or danger to persons or property in the immediate vicinity; 8. Repeated criminal activity occurring upon the property of which the owner knew or reasonably should have known; 9. Subject to frequent property maintenance, building, fire, zoning, environmental, sanitation, stormwater, or other code citations; Page 8 of 20 10. Vacant property last occupied by a commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or mixed-use activity where no visible lawful commercial, industrial, occupancy, redevelopment, construction, or maintenance activity has occurred for more than three (3) consecutive months; 11. Any other objective evidence demonstrating that the property has become a continuing burden upon municipal resources. C. Property shall not be designated solely because: 1. The structure is aged; 2. Cosmetic deficiencies exist; 3. Landscaping is inadequate; 4. Market conditions have reduced property values; or 5. The property is vacant but otherwise maintained in compliance with applicable law. D. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit simultaneous enforcement of nuisance, zoning, building, housing, fire, life-safety, property maintenance, or other applicable regulations. 3.10.070 Exempt Property. The following property shall not be eligible for designation under this Chapter: A. Property receiving a valid homestead exemption and occupied as the owner's primary residence. B. Property actively undergoing construction pursuant to a valid building permit and demonstrating substantial progress. C. Property subject to an approved remediation agreement and remaining in compliance therewith. D. Property owned by the United States, the State of Georgia, Henry County, the City, or any governmental entity to the extent prohibited by law. E. Property temporarily damaged by fire, storm, flood, or other casualty, provided the owner is actively pursuing repairs in good faith. F. Property subject to an active bankruptcy stay to the extent prohibited by federal law. G. Notwithstanding the foregoing, real property upon which there is situated a dwelling occupied as the primary residence of one (1) or more persons shall not be eligible for designation as blighted property under this chapter and shall not be subject to the increased municipal ad valorem tax authorized herein. 3.10.080 Initiation of Proceedings. Proceedings under this Chapter may be initiated by: A. the Public Officer; B. the Community Development Department; C. the Code Enforcement Division; D. the Fire Marshal; E. the Police Department; F. Resolution of the Mayor and Council; Page 9 of 20 G. a community redevelopment study, neighborhood survey, corridor study, housing conditions survey, planning study, or other assessment conducted or adopted by the City; H. a proactive inspection initiated by the Public Officer based upon existing surveys, redevelopment studies, code enforcement records, housing condition assessments, or other official records prepared within the preceding five (5) years; I. a petition signed by at least five (5) residents of the City, not of the same household, identifying the property and alleged blighting conditions. A petition submitted by residents shall not require the Public Officer to designate property as blighted but shall require the Public Officer to conduct an investigation within a reasonable time. 3.10.090 Investigation and Inspection. A. Upon initiation of proceedings, the Public Officer shall cause the property to be inspected. B. Inspections may include review of: 1. prior code enforcement history; 2. police incident reports; 3. fire reports; 4. building permit history; 5. tax records; 6. ownership history; 7. utility service history where lawfully available; 8. photographs; 9. aerial imagery; 10. videos, inspection notes, reports, or other supporting documentation where reasonably available; 11. any other reliable evidence. C. The Public Officer may request assistance from any City department. D. When appropriate, inspections shall be conducted by certified personnel possessing qualifications relevant to the conditions under investigation. E. Entry upon private property shall occur only as authorized by law. F. Fire Safety Review. Where the Public Officer determines that a property presents a potential fire or life-safety hazard, the Fire Marshal or the Fire Marshal's designee shall review the property and may inspect the premises. The Fire Marshal's findings shall become part of the official Inspection Report and may be considered during any administrative or judicial proceeding conducted pursuant to this Chapter. The Fire Marshal may provide written findings regarding: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Fire hazards; Hazardous materials; Structural conditions affecting life safety; Violations of the Fire Code; Unsafe occupancy conditions; and Recommended corrective actions. Page 10 of 20 G. Code Enforcement Review. The Public Officer may request a review by the Code Enforcement Division to determine whether the property has a documented history of repeated violations of the Property Maintenance Code, Unified Development Code, nuisance regulations, unsafe structure provisions, or any other applicable City ordinance. The Code Enforcement Division shall provide records of previous violations, notices, citations, administrative actions, or abatement efforts that may assist in determining whether the property is maintained in a blighted condition. H. Business Compliance Review. When the property contains or is associated with a commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or mixed-use business, the Public Officer may request a review by the Business Compliance Officer. The Business Compliance Officer may evaluate: 1. Business license compliance; 2. Occupancy status; 3. Operational compliance; 4. Vacant commercial or industrial buildings; 5. Prior business-related enforcement actions; and 6. Other matters relevant to determining whether the property is maintained in a blighted condition. 3.10.100 Inspection Report. A. Following inspection, the Public Officer shall prepare or cause to be prepared a written Inspection Report containing, at minimum: 1. parcel identification number; 2. property address; 3. ownership information; 4. existing zoning classification and current land use; 5. inspection dates; 6. photographs, videos, inspection notes, reports, or other supporting documentation where reasonably available; 7. applicable violations of the City Code, Unified Development Code, Property Maintenance Code, Building Code, Fire Code, Business Regulations, or other applicable federal, state, or local laws; 8. description of observed conditions; 9. history of prior enforcement actions; 10. determination whether constitutional and statutory blight criteria are satisfied; 11. recommendation concerning designation; 12. recommendations for corrective action; and 13. any additional information the Public Officer determines necessary. B. The Inspection Report shall become part of the administrative record. 3.10.110 Blighted Property Review Committee. A. There is hereby established a Blighted Property Review Committee. B. The Committee shall consist of: Page 11 of 20 1. Community Development Director (Chair); 2. Chief Building Official; 3. Code Enforcement Manager; 4. Fire Marshal; 5. Finance Director or designee; 6. The City Manager may appoint alternate members when necessary. C. The Committee shall review the Inspection Report and all supporting documentation. D. The Committee may request additional inspections or information. E. Within thirty (30) days following receipt of the Inspection Report, the Committee shall issue a written recommendation to: 1. proceed with designation; 2. defer pending additional investigation; 3. recommend voluntary remediation; or 4. close the matter. F. The Committee’s written determination shall identify the applicable provisions of this Chapter and other relevant City ordinances and specify the required corrective actions. G. The Committee's recommendation shall become part of the administrative record. H. The recommendation shall be advisory only and shall not constitute final agency action. 3.10.120 Preliminary Determination. A. Following receipt of the Committee's recommendation, the Public Officer shall determine whether sufficient evidence exists to support a Preliminary Determination. If the Public Officer issues a Preliminary Determination, the determination shall include: 1. findings of fact; 2. applicable code violations; 3. statutory basis for designation; 4. photographs or supporting documentation; 5. proposed corrective actions; 6. notice of the owner's rights under this Chapter; 7. a statement advising the owner of the right to request a hearing before the Municipal Court within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice; 8. notice that failure to timely request a hearing shall constitute a waiver of the owner's right to contest the designation administratively. B. The Preliminary Determination shall not constitute a final designation. 3.10.130 Notice of Preliminary Determination. A. Within ten (10) business days after issuance of a Preliminary Determination, the Public Officer shall provide written notice to the owner. 1. However, where through the existence of reasonable diligence it becomes known to the public officer that real property has been sold or conveyed since publication Page 12 of 20 of the most recent tax digest, written notice shall be given to the person(s) known or reasonably believed to then own the property or be chargeable with the payment of ad valorem taxes thereon, at the best address available. Service in the manner set forth at O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12 shall constitute sufficient notice to the subject property owner or person chargeable with the payment of ad valorem taxes for purpose of this section, except that posting of the notice on the property will not be required. B. Notice shall be served by: 1. certified mail; 2. statutory overnight delivery; or 3. personal service as contemplated by O.C.G.A. § 9-11-4. C. Notice shall include: 1. a copy of the Preliminary Determination; 2. the Inspection Report; 3. photographs relied upon; 4. applicable code violations; 5. available administrative remedies; 6. procedures for voluntary remediation; 7. identification of outstanding municipal taxes, liens, demolition costs, code enforcement liens, court costs, administrative fees, and other municipal obligations; 8. right to inspect and copy the administrative record; 9. right to request an informal meeting with the Public Officer; and 10. right to appeal any Final Determination. D. The owner shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt of the notice to: 1. correct the violations; 2. submit a remediation plan; or 3. request an informal conference with the Public Officer. 3.10.140 Voluntary Remediation Agreement. A. Purpose. The purpose of a Voluntary Remediation Agreement is to encourage the prompt rehabilitation and productive reuse of property through cooperative compliance without the necessity of imposing the increased municipal ad valorem tax authorized by this Chapter. B. Submission. At any time prior to issuance of a Final Determination, the Owner may submit a written request to enter into a Voluntary Remediation Agreement. C. Contents. The proposed agreement shall include, at a minimum: 1. Description of existing conditions; 2. A detailed description of all corrective work to be completed; 3. A detailed scope of work and schedule for completion of each phase of work; 4. Estimated completion dates; 5. Proof of the Owner's legal authority to perform the work; Page 13 of 20 6. Copies of any required permits or applications, if available; 7. Evidence demonstrating the financial ability to complete the proposed remediation; 8. Identification of and payment due date for all outstanding municipal taxes, liens, demolition costs, code enforcement liens, court costs, administrative fees, and other municipal obligations be satisfied before eligibility for redevelopment incentives; 9. Such additional information as the Public Officer reasonably determines necessary. D. Approval. The Public Officer may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Voluntary Remediation Agreement after considering the recommendation of the Blighted Property Review Committee. E. Effect of Agreement. Upon approval, all proceedings under this Chapter shall be stayed for the duration of the agreement, provided the Owner remains in substantial compliance. F. Inspections. The Public Officer may conduct periodic inspections to verify compliance. G. Extensions. The Public Officer may grant one or more extensions for good cause shown, provided the Owner demonstrates substantial progress toward completion. H. Default. The Owner shall be deemed in default upon: 1. Failure to substantially perform the agreement; 2. Failure to obtain required permits; 3. Failure to maintain the property in a safe condition; 4. Failure to remit payment of outstanding municipal taxes, liens, demolition costs, code enforcement liens, court costs, administrative fees, and other municipal obligations be satisfied before eligibility for redevelopment incentives; 5. Submission of materially false information; or 6. Failure to permit reasonable inspections authorized by law. I. Effect of Default. Upon written notice of default, the stay shall automatically terminate and proceedings under this Chapter may resume from the point at which they were suspended. 3.10.150 Final Determination. A. Following expiration of the cure period established in Section 3.10.130, or upon default of a Voluntary Remediation Agreement, the Public Officer shall determine whether the property should be designated as Blighted Property. B. A Final Determination shall include: 1. Findings of fact; 2. Conclusions supporting designation under this Chapter; 3. Identification of the statutory authority; 4. Identification of required corrective actions completed or remaining; 5. Identification of all outstanding municipal taxes, liens, demolition costs, code enforcement liens, court costs, administrative fees, and other municipal obligations be satisfied before eligibility for redevelopment incentives; 6. The effective date of designation; Page 14 of 20 7. Notice that failure to timely request a hearing shall constitute a waiver of the owner's right to contest the designation administratively. 8. Notice of appeal rights. C. The Final Determination shall be served upon the Owner in the same manner as the Preliminary Determination. D. A copy of the Final Determination shall become part of the permanent administrative record. 3.10.160 Appeal to Municipal Court. A. Any Owner aggrieved by a Final Determination may appeal by filing a written Notice of Appeal with the Public Officer within thirty (30) calendar days following service of the Final Determination. B. Upon receipt of a timely Notice of Appeal, the Public Officer shall transmit the administrative record to the Municipal Court. C. The Municipal Court shall schedule the appeal for hearing not later than forty-five (45) days following receipt of the administrative record unless continued for good cause. D. Written notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing shall be provided to all parties not less than ten (10) business days before the hearing. E. Notice of the hearing shall also be published in the City's designated legal organ not fewer than five (5) days before the scheduled hearing. F. The hearing shall be conducted de novo. G. The Public Officer shall bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the property qualifies for designation under this Chapter and applicable Georgia law. H. The Owner shall have the right to: 1. Appear personally or through legal counsel; 2. Present witnesses; 3. Present documentary evidence; 4. Cross-examine witnesses; 5. Present rebuttal evidence. I. The Georgia Rules of Evidence shall apply except as otherwise permitted by law for administrative proceedings. J. The Municipal Court shall issue written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the hearing. 1. The Municipal Court may: 2. Affirm the Final Determination; 3. Reverse the Final Determination; 4. Modify the Final Determination; 5. Remand the matter to the Public Officer for additional proceedings. K. The decision of the Municipal Court shall constitute the City's final administrative action. Page 15 of 20 L. If the designation is affirmed, the Public Officer shall transmit a certified copy of the Court's decision to the Henry County Tax Commissioner for implementation of the increased municipal ad valorem tax in accordance with this Chapter. 3.10.170 Judicial Review. Any person aggrieved by the final administrative decision of the Municipal Court may seek judicial review in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. 3.10.180 Stay Pending Appeal. No increased municipal ad valorem tax authorized by this Chapter shall become due or payable during the pendency of any timely administrative or judicial appeal. If the designation is ultimately affirmed after exhaustion of all appeals, the increased municipal ad valorem tax shall become due in accordance with applicable law. 3.10.190 Community Redevelopment Tax Assessment. A. Property receiving a final designation as Blighted Property shall be subject to an increased municipal ad valorem tax calculated by applying a factor of twenty-five (25) to the City's annual operating millage rate. B. The increased tax authorized by this Chapter applies solely to the City's municipal operating millage and shall not affect county, school district, state, or other taxing authority millage rates. C. The increased tax shall become effective on January 1 of the calendar year following the date the designation becomes final, unless otherwise provided by Georgia law. D. If the designation is removed before January 1 of the applicable tax year, no increased municipal tax shall be imposed. E. Revenues generated pursuant to this Chapter shall be deposited into the City's General Fund and may be appropriated for code enforcement, demolition of unsafe structures, redevelopment initiatives, neighborhood revitalization, affordable housing initiatives, public safety, and other lawful municipal purposes. 3.10.200 Removal of Designation. A. The Owner may petition the Public Officer at any time for removal of a Blighted Property designation upon demonstrating compliance with one (1) or more of the following: 1. Completion of a Remedial Action Plan or Redevelopment Plan approved by the Public Officer that addresses all conditions of blight identified by the City and provides for compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including the City's Unified Development Code, Property Maintenance Code, Building Code, Fire Code, Business Regulations, and all other applicable ordinances; or 2. Completion of all work required by a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction, including proceedings brought pursuant to the City's nuisance, unsafe structures, or property maintenance ordinances. Page 16 of 20 B. Upon receipt of the petition, the Public Officer shall cause the property to be reinspected, pursuant to the procedures established in 3.10.090. C. If the Public Officer determines that all qualifying blighted conditions have been corrected and the property complies with applicable law, the Public Officer shall issue a written Removal of Designation. D. The Removal of Designation shall include a written Verification Report shall certify that: 1. All required corrective work has been completed in a good and workmanlike manner; 2. The property complies with all applicable codes and ordinances; 3. All unsafe conditions, nuisance conditions, and blight conditions have been eliminated; 4. Any redevelopment or remedial action has been completed substantially in accordance with the approved plan; 5. Any outstanding municipal taxes, liens, demolition costs, code enforcement liens, court costs, administrative fees, and other municipal obligations have been satisfied; and 6. Any required permits have received final approval; 7. Any required Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion has been issued, where applicable. E. Copies of the Removal of Designation shall be provided to: 1. Property owner of record; 2. Any person responsible for payment of ad valorem taxes; 3. The Henry County Tax Commissioner and Henry County Tax Assessor; and 4. Any other governmental agency deemed appropriate by the Public Officer. F. Removal shall become effective immediately upon issuance and the property shall become eligible for the reduced municipal ad valorem tax incentive established. G. The Public Officer shall notify the Henry County Tax Commissioner and Henry County Tax Assessor of the Removal of Designation within thirty (30) calendar days of the Removal of Designation. 3.10.210 Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive. A. Property for which a Blighted Property designation has been removed pursuant to Section 3.10.200 shall be eligible for a reduced City municipal operating millage equal to fifty percent (50%) of the City's operating millage. B. The reduced municipal operating millage shall remain in effect for two (2) consecutive tax years beginning January 1 following removal of the designation. C. To qualify, the Owner shall submit a notarized application with documentation demonstrating: 1. All conditions resulting in the property's designation as blighted have been fully corrected; Page 17 of 20 2. All required inspections have been successfully completed; 3. All applicable building permits, certificates of occupancy, and other development approvals have been obtained, where required; 4. The property complies with all applicable provisions of the City of Stockbridge Unified Development Code, Property Maintenance Code, Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations; 5. Any approved redevelopment plan or remedial action plan has been fully completed; 6. Receipts, invoices, contracts, cancelled checks, or other documentation establishing the actual cost of remediation or redevelopment; 7. Copies of all applicable permits, inspection approvals, and certificates of completion or occupancy, where applicable 8. All outstanding City ad valorem taxes, fees, assessments, fines, liens, and other municipal obligations related to the property have been satisfied or otherwise resolved in accordance with applicable law; and 9. Any additional information reasonably required by the Public Officer to verify eligibility. B. Upon receipt of a completed application, the Public Officer shall review the documentation and may conduct such additional inspections as deemed necessary to verify compliance with this Chapter. 1. If the Public Officer determines that the applicant has satisfied all requirements, the Public Officer shall issue a written determination approving the reduced municipal ad valorem tax rate and specifying the number of tax years for which the reduction shall apply. 2. If the Public Officer determines that the applicant has failed to satisfy the requirements of this Chapter, the application shall be denied in writing, stating the reasons for denial. C. If, during the period in which a reduced municipal ad valorem tax rate is in effect, the property is subsequently determined to have again become maintained in a blighted condition, or if the owner is found to have submitted materially false or misleading information in support of the application, the Public Officer may revoke the tax reduction following notice and an opportunity to be heard. Upon revocation, the property shall again be subject to the municipal ad valorem tax rate otherwise applicable under this Chapter. D. Upon approval or revocation of a reduced municipal ad valorem tax rate, the Public Officer shall provide written notice to the Henry County Tax Commissioner identifying the property by parcel number, street address, owner of record, and the applicable tax years for which the reduced municipal ad valorem tax rate shall apply. 3.10.220Blighted Property Registry. A. Establishment of Registry. The Community Development Department shall establish and maintain a Blighted Property Registry identifying all real property that has been officially designated as maintained in a blighted condition pursuant to this Chapter. B. Registration Required. Upon final designation as a blighted property, the owner of record shall register the property with the Community Development Department on forms prescribed by the Public Officer. Registration shall remain in effect until the Public Officer Page 18 of 20 issues a written determination removing the property's blight designation pursuant to Section 3.10.200 of this Chapter. C. Annual Regulatory Fee. To offset the City's costs associated with inspections, monitoring, code enforcement, hearings, recordkeeping, administration, and implementation of the Blighted Property Tax Incentive Program, each property listed on the Blighted Property Registry shall be assessed an annual regulatory fee of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00). i. The annual regulatory fee shall be due on January 31 of each calendar year, or within thirty (30) days following designation if the property is added to the Registry after January 1. ii. The annual regulatory fee shall remain payable until the property is removed from the Blighted Property Registry. D. Failure to Register or Pay Fee. Failure to register a designated property or to timely pay the annual regulatory fee shall constitute a violation of this Chapter and may result in enforcement action authorized by this Chapter or other applicable provisions of the City Code. E. Removal from Registry. Upon issuance of a written determination by the Public Officer removing the property's blight designation pursuant to Section 3.10.200 of this Chapter, the property shall be removed from the Blighted Property Registry, and no additional annual regulatory fee shall accrue after the effective date of removal. 3.10.230 Coordination with Henry County. A. Following any Final Determination or Removal of Designation, the Public Officer shall certify the action to the Henry County Tax Commissioner and Henry County Tax Assessor. B. The certification shall include: 1. Parcel identification number; 2. Property address; 3. Owner of record; 4. Effective date; 5. Applicable municipal ad valorem tax rate to be applied pursuant to this Chapter; and 6. Applicable tax year; and 7. Any additional information reasonably required by the Henry County Tax Commissioner to ensure proper administration of the City's municipal ad valorem tax program. B. The written notice provided pursuant to this section shall serve as the official authorization for the Henry County Tax Commissioner to implement the applicable municipal ad valorem tax rate in accordance with this Chapter and the Constitution of the State of Georgia. C. The City Manager may enter into administrative memoranda of understanding with Henry County necessary to facilitate implementation of this Chapter, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. Page 19 of 20 D. The Community Development Department shall maintain a permanent record of all notices transmitted pursuant to this section and shall retain copies of all correspondence, determinations, inspection reports, and related documentation in accordance with the City's records retention policies and applicable state law. 3.10.230 Annual Report. A. No later than March 31 of each calendar year, the Public Officer shall submit to the Mayor and Council an annual report summarizing administration of this Chapter during the preceding calendar year. B. The report shall include, at a minimum: 1. Number of properties investigated; 2. Number of Preliminary Determinations; 3. Number of Final Determinations; 4. Number of Voluntary Remediation Agreements executed; 5. Number of successful redevelopments; 6. Amount of additional municipal tax generated; 7. Number of pending appeals; 8. Annual accounting of revenues collected and expenditures made for redevelopment purposes; 9. Recommendations for improving administration of this Chapter. 3.10.240 Administrative Rules. The Public Officer may adopt written administrative policies, procedures, forms, and guidance documents necessary to administer this Chapter, provided such policies are consistent with this Chapter, the City Charter, and applicable law. Page 20 of 20 07/13/26 ✔ Megan McCulloch Legal SECOND READ of an ordiance establishing the City of Stockbridge Community Redevelopment Tax Inentive program for Blighted Properties pursuant to Article IX, SEction II, Paragraph VII(d) of the Georgia Constitution and O.C.G.A. § 41-2-12, et. seq. See second page of agenda sheet due to space constrictions. ✔ cannot be determined in advance Georgia law authorizes municipalities to establish a Community Redevelopment Tax Incentive Program to encourage the rehabilitation and redevelopment of qualifying blighted properties. The proposed ordinance establishes objective criteria and due process procedures for identifying qualifying properties, provides notice and appeal rights to affected property owners, and authorizes the imposition of an increased City ad valorem tax on properties that remain in a blighted condition. The ordinance also establishes procedures for removal of the designation upon remediation and provides a temporary reduced tax rate following successful redevelopment. Administration of the program would be coordinated with the Henry County Tax Commissioner and Tax Assessor. Approval. 07/13/2026 ✔ ✔ Ryan Anderson Community Development Consideration of a Request approval of an amendment to the Scope of Services under Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 with Whitley Engineering, Inc. to include review of Home Land Development Permit (HLDP) applications and associated engineering documents. The amendment authorizes payment of $100 from each HLDP review fee to Whitley Engineering for technical review services, with total annual compensation for HLDP reviews not to exceed $25,000 paid from GL100-72000-521203 The City entered into Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 with Whitley Engineering, Inc. in July 2024 to provide professional civil engineering services, plan reviews, consultation, and related engineering support for the Community Development Department. The contract has been successfully renewed, and the proposed amendment expands the existing scope of services to support implementation of the City's HLDP review process while providing qualified engineering review of permit applications ✔ 25000 ✔ Consideration of a Request approval of an amendment to the Scope of Services under Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 with Whitley Engineering, Inc. to include review of Home Land Development Permit (HLDP) applications and associated engineering documents. The amendment authorizes payment of $100 from each HLDP review fee to Whitley Engineering for technical review services, with total annual compensation for HLDP reviews not to exceed $25,000 paid from GL100-72000-521203 Approval COUNCIL MEETING ACTION MINUTES MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2025 6:00 P.M. Mayor & City Council Mayor Anthony S. Ford Mayor Pro Tem LaKeisha Gantt Dist. 1 Councilmember Alphonso Thomas Dist. 2 Councilmember Kyle D. Berry, Sr. Dist. 3 Councilmember Yolanda Barber Dist. 4 Councilmember Elton Alexander Dist. 5 Administration Shawn Edmondson, City Manager Frank Milazi, City Treasurer/CFO Vanessa Holiday, City Clerk Quinton Washington, City Attorney Megan McCulloch, Associate Attorney Mission: Is to provide visionary leadership and superior municipal services that enhance the quality of life for citizens while creating a welcoming business atmosphere focused on sustainability and expansion of tourism and cultural events. Call to Order – Mayor Ford called the meeting to order at 6:12 p.m. Invocation – Mr. Charles Marshall Pledge of Allegiance – Recited by all in attendance. Roll Call – All members were present except Councilmember Thomas. AMENDMENT OF THE AGENDA Motion to amend the Agenda to remove Item #7; Defer Item#10, 11 and 12 to the February 9, 2026 Council meeting; Add Item #24-Health Insurance Renewal; Add Item #25-Wayfinding Contract Renewal; and add a Soccer Field Resolution in place of Item #7 was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Motion to adopt the Agenda was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. CEREMONIAL REVIEW Mayor Ford reviewed the proclamations for Psi Alpha Omega’s 20th Year Anniversary. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Charles Marshall spoke in support of the soccer fields to be developed in the new Eagles Landing park. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 1. Approval of the November 10, 2025 Council Meeting Minutes Approval of the November 18, 2025 Council Work Session Meeting Minutes Approval of the November 24, 2025 Hometown Connection Meeting Minutes Motion to approve the Minutes was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Barber. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 1|Page PRESENTATION 2. Tree Give Away Event - Grant ReLeaf Presented by: Rep. Regina Lewis-Ward Representative Lewis-Ward referenced Arbor Day on February 20, 2026, and referenced the site Arbor Day Event Brite.com where you can check to see if you are eligible for a free tree; and introduced Sustainability Scientist, Ms. Charlotte King, Ms. King gave an overview of the value of trees and noted that this initiative is important to Stockbridge noting the city is growing, and that growth brings increased stormwater runoff, infrastructure costs, energy costs, and public health impacts. Ms. King noted Urban trees are one of the highest returns, lowest-cost climate, and public health investments a city can make. CONSENT AGENDA 3. A. 2026 Event Calendars 2026 City Events 2026 Main Street Events 2026 Mayor/Council Initiatives B. Renewal of Board/Committee Appointments Main Street Advisory Board: Willie Hopkins, Anika Potts, Crystal Park, Camille Mason, and Vanessa Gibson Term Ends: December 31, 2027 Downtown Development Authority: Kenya Cook, Jerry Mays, and Toseika Thomas Term Ends: December 31, 2029 Youth Council Advisory Council: Dr. Alfreda Gourdine, Denita Minnis, Candis Jones, and Sharika Zellars Term Ends: December 31, 2029 Ethics Board: Mary Scott and Angela Jenkins Term Ends: December 31, 2029 Citizens Police Advisory Council District 1 - Carmen Reese District 2 - Thomas Smith District 3 - William Daniels District 4 - Paige Jones III District 5 - Raymond Martin At-Large (Mayor) - Pastor Lavell Sanders Bishop LaRay Tillman – Faith Based Community Representative Reggie Sylvain – Business Community Representative Neat Robinson, Zone 1 Nathan Banks, Zone 2 Judy Neal, Zone 4 Term Expires December 31, 2027 2|Page Councilmember Alexander requested Item A of the Consent Agenda be moved to New Business Item #27 on the Agenda. Motion to approve Item B of the Consent Agenda and to provide information for the city to share on its social media platforms was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. (Mayor Pro Tem Gantt was not present on the dais for the vote). OLD BUSINESS 4. Council Consideration to approve Revised Copy of the SSD (Special Services District) Map. Presented by: Shawn Edmondson Motion to approve was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Councilmember Berry. (Councilmember Barber Abstained, citing she had not been included in discussions). The motion failed. Item Revisited - Councilmember Alexander motioned to approve the Revised Copy of the SSD (Special Services District) Map; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 3-1 (Barber Opposed). 5. SECOND READING - Council Consideration to approve FY2025 Budget Amendment Ordinance in the amount of $8,852,935.00. Presented by: Frank Milazi Motion to approve the FY2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $8,842,935.00 was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed 3-1 (Barber Opposed citing the Council approved Amphitheater Operations during an Executive Session and noted those discussions should occur in a public meeting). Councilmember Alexander stated there is no voting in Executive Session, which is convened for privileged information, and that every municipality must have a balanced budget; and stated that without a public vote, the city would be in violation. 6. SECOND READING - Council Consideration to approve an ordinance to amend Title 3 of the Stockbridge Code of Ordinances regarding "Finance"; to amend Chapter 3.20 thereof entitled "Credit Card Payments"; to provide for Convenience Fees for certain transactions citywide effective January 1, 2026. Presented by: Frank Milazi Attorney McCulloch noted the item should be approved as a Resolution to reinstate credit card fees instead of an Ordinance. Motion to approve a Resolution to reinstate credit card fees was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. Councilmember Berry noted the fees would only pertain to credit card transactions, and not the other forms of payment. 3|Page EXECUTIVE SESSION Attorney McCulloch noted Legal requested the Executive Session at this point on the Agenda relating to the Agenda Item #7 which has since been removed from the Agenda. By consensus, the Council agreed to convene Executive Session after Item #27. PUBLIC HEARING 7. APPEAL CASE #AP-2025-02. (Council District 4). Council Consideration of an appeal of the denial of an application for an alcohol license by Reynell Hay, per City of Stockbridge letter dated September 5, 2025. The applicant proposed locating a package store at 110 Rock Quarry Road (Parcel #S33-01011002). Applicant: Reynell Hay. Agent: Law Firm of Smith, Welch, Webb & White. This item was removed from the Agenda. Council Consideration to approve a Resolution of Support and partner with the Southern Crescent Soccer Foundation for Soccer Fields at the new Eagles Landing Park with $200,000 provided by the Southern Crescent Soccer Foundation. Presented by Shawn Edmondson, City Manager and Eric Morrison, President of the Southern Crescent Soccer Foundation. Motion to authorize a commitment to support the soccer fields, and approve funding up to $400,000 when construction begins, utilizing SPLOST VI funds toward the project, and to present a Plan, Schedule, and Timeline to implement the approved upgrades to Clark Park, Gardner Park and Memorial Park was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed 3-0. (Mayor Pro Tem Gantt was not present on the dais). 8. SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE #SP-2025-04. (Council District 4.) Council Consideration of a request for a special use permit for a portion of the property at 4498 North Henry Boulevard to allow the development and operation of a quick-serve restaurant with drive-through windows and / or lanes. Property Owner: City of Stockbridge. Applicant: Royal TH, LLC. Agent: Battle Law, PC. Proposed Business: Tim Wharton’s, a coffee restaurant. Zoning District: C-2 (General Commercial). The property is located in Land Lot 61 of District 12 within the Stockbridge City Limits, and it contains 1.32 +/- acres. The applicant intends to develop only a 0.8-acre portion of the property. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson gave an overview of the request and presented Staff Recommended Conditions. Additional Conditions were made to include a minimum of 75% brick, decorative lighting and 8 – 10ft. sidewalks where feasible. Attorney Mahoney presented on behalf ot he Applicant who stated that because the site plan may need to be configured, he would need to confer with the Applicant regarding the Conditions presented. Public Hearing Opened. There were no comments. Public Hearing Closed. 4|Page Motion to approve Special Use Permit Case #SP-2025-04 with Staff Recommended Conditions; Additional Conditions were made to include a minimum of 75% brick, decorative lighting and 8 – 10ft. sidewalks where feasible and to address the safety concerns was made by Councilmember Barber; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 9. ZONING MODIFICATION CASE #ZM-2025-03. (Council District 4.) Council Consideration of a request for a zoning modification to Rezoning Case #RZ-2023-02 for property at 258 and 264 Valley Hill Road, plus Parcel #S0801020000, for the purposes of 1) increasing the number of subdivisions lots from 16 to 28, and 2) changing the location and types of amenities to be included within the subdivision. Zoning District: SR (Suburban Residential). Property Owners: Claudia Perez Granados (for 258 Valley Hill Road) and Alejandro Granados Encinales (for 264 Valley Hill Road and Parcel #S08-01020000). Applicants: Claudia Perez Granados and Alejandro Granados Encinales. Agent: Jacqueline Funicello. The property is located in Land Lot 92 of District 12 within the Stockbridge City Limits, and it contains 17.062 +/- total acres within three parcels, as is described below. ~258 Valley Hill Road Parcel #S09-06010000)--Contains 2.2492 +/- acres. ~264 Valley Hill Road Parcel #S08-01010000)--Contains 6.5254 +/- acres. ~Unaddressed Parcel No. #S08-01020000)--Contains 8.2874 +/- acres. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson gave an overview of the request and presented Staff Recommended Conditions and a Condition was added whereas 25% of the homes would be larger homes with a minimum of 3,000 sq. feet and allow for shared amenities with the adjacent subdivision and fencing. Public Hearing Opened. No Speakers in Favor. Ms. Susan Grosvenor and Judy spoke in Opposition. Public Hearing Closed. Motion to approve Zoning Modification Case #ZM-2025-03 with Staff Conditions and Additional Conditions of 25% of homes at 3,000 sq. feet, allow for shared amenities with the adjacent subdivision and fencing was made by Councilmember Alexanders; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed 3-1 (Barber Opposed citing health and safety concerns and proper drainage issues). 10. ANNEXATION CASE #AX-2025-02. (Council District 5.) Council Consideration of a request for the annexation, using the 100 % Annexation Method of the property at 2220 Jodeco Road (off Feucht Drive), plus the adjacent Parcel #052-01020001, from unincorporated Henry County into the Stockbridge City Limits. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a multifamily (apartment) development. 5|Page Property Owner: Kenneth J. Butcher as representative for Glenn D. Cook, Carol J. Cook, Julia A. Cook, Bryan Cook, and Debra C. Butcher. Applicant: Emory Equity, LLC. Agent: Dennis J. Webb, Attorney with the law firm of Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP. The property is located in Land Lot 51 of District 6, and it contains two parcels, as are listed below, with 24.995 + / - total acres. ~ 2220 Jodeco Road -- Contains 21.494 +/- acres. ~ Parcel #052-01020001 – Contains 3.501 +/- acres. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director This item was deferred to the February 9, 2026 City Council meeting. 11. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CASE #CP-2025-03.(Council District 5.) Council Consideration of a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for property at 2220 Jodeco Road (off Feucht Drive), plus the adjacent Parcel #05201020001, if and after the property is annexed into the Stockbridge City Limits. The property currently has the Henry County future land use designation of “High-Density Mixed-Use,” and the applicant requests that it be assigned the City of Stockbridge’s future land use designation of “High-Density Residential.” Purpose: To allow for the construction of a multifamily (apartment) development. Property Owner: Kenneth J. Butcher as representative for Glenn D. Cook, Carol J. Cook, Julia A. Cook, Bryan Cook, and Debra C. Butcher. Applicant: Emory Equity, LLC. Agent: Dennis J. Webb, Attorney with the law firm of Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP. The property is located in Land Lot 51 of District 6, and it contains two parcels, as are listed below, with 24.995 + / - total acres. ~ 2220 Jodeco Road -- Contains 21.494 +/- acres. ~ Parcel #052-01020001 – Contains 3.501 +/- acres. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director This item was deferred to the February 9, 2026 City Council meeting. 12. REZONING CASE #RZ-2025-04. (Council District 5.) Council Consideration of a request for the rezoning of the property at 2220 Jodeco Road (off Feucht Drive), plus the adjacent Parcel #052-01020001, if and after the property is annexed into the Stockbridge City Limits. The property’s current Henry County zoning district is ‘C-3’ (Heavy Commercial), and the applicant requests that the property be assigned the City of Stockbridge’s zoning district of ‘MFR’ (“Multiple Family Residential”). Purpose: To allow for the construction of a multifamily (apartment) development. Property Owner: Kenneth J. Butcher as representative for Glenn D. Cook, Carol J. Cook, Julia A. Cook, Bryan Cook, and Debra C. Butcher. Applicant: Emory Equity, LLC. Agent: Dennis J. Webb, Attorney with the law firm of Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP. The property is located in Land Lot 51 of District 6, and it contains two parcels, as are listed below, with 24.995 + / - total acres. ~ 2220 Jodeco Road -- Contains 21.494 +/- acres. ~ Parcel #052-01020001 – Contains 3.501 +/- acres. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director This item was deferred to the February 9, 2026 City Council meeting. 6|Page 13. FINAL READING & ADOPTION - FY2026 Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Plan. Presented by: Shawn Edmondson, City Manager and Frank Milazi, City Treasurer/CFO Mr. Edmondson refenced Section 2.21(5) of the Charter and read the required Budget Memo referencing the Proposed FY2026 Budget; noted the overall budget is $74.1 million dollars, noted a change of the proposed COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) to 4%; recommended approval and thanked staff for their hard work and efforts during the budget process. Mr. Milazi noted this is the 3rd and final presentation, with the scheduled adoption of the FY2026 Budget going into effect January 1, 2026reviewed a 2026 Proposed Budget Summary Budget noting the Revenues and Expenditures are all estimates, with a proposed General Fund Operating Budget of $34,768,690, and increase of $5,529,379 or 19% over the 2025 approved budget of $29,239,311; and noted the total Proposed Balanced Budget (Revenues and Expenditures) for all Funds including General Fund is $73,302,280 for Fiscal Year 2026; noted the budget is a roadmap or fiscal plan for the City to continue providing various services across the city for the upcoming year; and noted some capital projects will take more than one year, however, the funding is approved annually. Mr. Milazi noted amendments to the budget cannot be made without revenues; noted Wayfinding was paid with ARPA funds, and that there were not obligated expenses in 2026; noted credit card fees are currently being absorbed by the city, and that an ordinance would be coming forward for Council approval to remove the waiver for credit card fees; noted the duties of the Governing Body and that the vision is executed through the City Manager. Mr. Milazi referenced the 2026 Budget Priorities as approved by the Governing Body: Community Center, T-SPLOST Projects, Downtown Development, Wayfinding, and City Municipal Buildings. Mr. Milazi referenced 2026 Budget Highlights: Road and Sidewalk Improvements to continue – LMIG/SPLOST VI Public Safety Enhancement No increase in Property Tax Millage Rate 3.77 mills since 2023 Community Development fee proposal to be submitted. 4% COLA for all City Employees Public Works new facility under construction Water receivables write off higher due to meters malfunction. Cemetery improvements Credit Card payment fees to be reimplemented. Pay off GEFA Loan 7|Page Mr. Milazi referenced Department Overviews, noting that approximately $4 million dollars is being transferred from the General Fund to fund the city’s CDA and DDA with the Downtown Development Authority to receive with $336,000, and the Citywide Development Authority to receive $68,000; and noted the balance for the Amphitheater; and noted there was an adjustment made in the Public Works Department budgets where funding was coming from Reserves, and was corrected. Mr. Milazi noted the budget is balanced and recommends approval of the proposed General Fund FY2026 Operating Budget in the $34,768,690. Councilmember Berry noted his concern of $3 million dollars for the Amphitheater considering $8.1 million was spent in 2024, and $4 million to date for 2025. Councilmember Alexander called Ms. Webster forward to state the number of paid concerts at the Amphitheater in 2025. Ms. Webster’s response was 10 concerts. Councilmember Alexander stated that it would be best to get ahead of the game and bring in the vendors, receive the reports two weeks after each show, noting the vendors will be vetted, stating the halo affect around the Amphitheater; noted ticket sales will be low in this economy, sales will be less; noted there needs to be an RFP put out; and recommended a minimum $4.5 million dollar budget set for the Amphitheater, noting the previous 3-year approach was not sustainable; noted the ticket vendor will change from FreshTix to Ticketmaster with tier ticketing, and that 40% of the ticket sales will cover costs, and the city will be intentional about the list of artists, and marketing efforts. Mr. Edmondson noted the intent is to bring in mor partnership and sponsorship; and referenced the breakdown of the 3,600 seats, opening up 250 additional seats by removing the blocked view area. Mayor Ford asked if the city needed to bring in HJ Russell, the Amphitheater’s Architects. Mr. Edmondson stated he didn’t believe that would be necessary, noting most of the equipment used is rented. Councilmember Alexander noted there needs to be an RFP for Sponsors, as sponsorships are currently not happening, and perhaps an IGA with Henry County similar to the IGA for marketing between the City of Jonesboro and Clayton County. Mr. Milazi stated the $3 million dollars for the Amphitheater is a combination of $2.1 million from Amphitheater revenues from ticket sales of $1.6 million, concession sales of $60,000, sponsorship (VyStar) of $300,000 and the shortfall of $840,000 will be transferred from the City’s General Fund; and recommended the Council approve the budget as is without an increase, and the revenue that comes in would offset the expenses; noting the Budget that has been presented 8|Page is balanced, and requesting a change to the Amphitheater budget up to $4.5 million would cause the Budget to be unbalanced, noting there are no additional projected revenues, and if the Council is insisting on $4.5 million dollars for the Amphitheater, there would need to be decreases throughout the current budget, or projects would need to be delayed. Councilmember Alexander noted there is money that will come in from Hotel/Motel tax. Mr. Milazi noted there is projected revenue of $900,000 and noted Hotel/Motel tax has restrictions of use; and stated the Finance Department will present a minimum of two budget amendments per year. Councilmember Barber stated that she could not wrap her head around the conversation to fund the Amphitheater up to $4.5 million dollars, when the priority should have been around the funding of the Soccer Fields where it was suggested that the city bond money for the soccer fields and other capital improvements; noting $4.5 million dollars should go toward park improvements, not the Amphitheater; noted she brought a major naming rights sponsor to the city in 2021 who agreed to pay all expenses including the artists fees, production and lighting costs, etc., and that not one dime would have come from the city, and not use taxpayer dollars, noting the city is not a nightclub, and that tax dollars should go toward the Master Trail Plan and infrastructure projects, and that the city has instead wasted millions of dollars on free events and the operations of the Amphitheater which is a gross mismanagement. Councilmember Barber noted her comments would all be for the record as follows, and noted she would send a copy of the letter to the governing body, City Manager, City Treasurer, City Attorney and City Clerk: I want to be clear about how I see my fiduciary responsibilities as an elected official and a member of the Governing Body. While I cannot and will not speak for the other members of Council, what I will say is that I take the budget adoption and adhering to the city’s approved Operating Budget very seriously. Equally, I take the City’s Charter seriously as well. Residents of our City are not looking for handouts. They’re looking for an equitable return on the investment of their tax dollars. The arrogance and the lack of care and concern that has been exhibited, as the Governing Body has made decisions that have benefited the very few, rather than the collective, is something that we all will have to answer for. That’s why I have been asking questions since I was sworn in and six years later, I have not stopped. I understand the weight of the responsibilities that my position carries. I understand that my role is to save money and to cut costs, NOT WASTE MONEY. As elected officials, we each took an oath to act in the best interest of our city, and to provide oversight of each and every taxpayer dollar that comes in and goes out. The Governing Body approved a Finance Policy and agreed to follow the processes and procedures in that policy, and we unanimously agreed to a 2 to 3 Year plan to 9|Page follow the recommendations by the City Treasurer and the City’s Financial Advisor to re-build the City’s Fund Balance (Savings Account). I hope that the Governing Body will fulfil its obligation and to not use the city’s Fund Balance and Contingency Fund except and only in case of an emergency. On October 28th of this year, the City Manager made a request to add new positions and reclassify current positions with new titles and pay grades. The City’s Charter Section 3.04.060 REQUIRES that when a new position is created, the Ordinance shall include the Job Description, a new Pay and Classification, and a new Organization Chart including the new and reclassified positions. On October 28th none of those documents were included and presented to the Governing Body as required. I opposed the vote to approve the new and reclassified positions. Not because I disagreed with the positions, but my opposition referenced the Charter which requires those documents and they had not been included. Members of the Governing Body should also question why the documents were not attached. Members of the Governing Body should also question why the city’s legal counsel did not advise on the requirement for those specific. This is not the first instance of when new positions or reclassified positions have been created, so there is history of adhering to the process and the Charter by doing this the right way. On November 10th, the City Manager presented the First Reading of the FY2026 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan. The Mayor opened the Public Hearing portion of the meeting and members of the Council gave their input and responses to the budget that was presented. I read a statement into the record where I made it known that I had gone through every single line item of the proposed budget. What was missing from the First Reading of the Proposed Budget was funding for the Amphitheater, the Required Job Descriptions, Pay and Classification and a City Organizational Chart for the new and reclassified positions, making the budget (as presented) incomplete. I questioned several budget line items and various departmental budget amounts. I also recommended that the Council adopt an Ordinance regarding the use of Contingency Funds, which are only to be used in the event of an emergency such as a natural disaster. The Mayor and members of Council did not support moving forward with the approval of a Contingency Fund Ordinance that night and said that our City’s Legal Counsel needs to review and bring back an Ordinance. I forwarded my email to all members of the Governing Body, the City’s Legal Counsel, the City Manager, City Treasurer, and the City Clerk. To date, the city’s legal counsel has not prepared an Ordinance for Contingency Funds, nor have I received a response following their review. On November 17, 2025, City Staff submitted some, but not ALL, of the documents that I requested during the November 10th meeting. City Staff submitted some, but not ALL of the job descriptions for the newly created and the reclassified positions. City Staff submitted an incomplete Pay & Classification and responded to some, but not all of the questions and concerns that I raised regarding the FY2026 budget. 10 | P a g e During the Second Reading of the Proposed FY2026 on November 18, 2025 again, I requested that ALL Job Descriptions, the Pay & Classification and Organizational Chart to be attached to the Budget as REQUIRED by the Charter Section 3.04.60. I requested the Amphitheater Marketing Plan, the Sponsorship Plan to understand the necessary steps to offset costs associated with concerts and FREE City events as was discussed during the Retreat. I also requested the Building Maintenance Plan for the MMCC to understand the necessary steps to increase revenues (as discussed during the Budget Retreat). I asked for an update to the Assistant Public Works Director position as it relates to the Engineering Services as discussed during the Retreat, along with other documents and questions relating to the Proposed FY2026 Budget. I specifically asked during the November 18th meeting if the documents were attached as requested, and it was confirmed that they were included in the Governing Body’s Agenda Books/Agenda Binders. However, all of the requested documents and responses were not included and had not been submitted. When I stated that the information was not there, I was attacked by Councilmember Alexander for asking the City Manager to respond to the budget questions raised. And I was attacked by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt who insisted that the information had been submitted by staff and was included in the Agenda Books. Mayor Pro Tem Gantt accused me of not reading the information prior to the meetings. She also accused me of ‘gaslighting’ for asking questions of staff and she again violated the city’s Code of Conduct when she called me “crazy”, which can be clearly heard on mic during our public meeting. What is interesting is, whenever I bring up questions regarding the Amphitheater, funding of the Amphitheater, putting the Amphitheater services out for bid, or turning the Amphitheater over to a 3rd Party Management Company, these two councilmembers become argumentative and want to shut me down for simply asking questions. During the Budget Retreat in Macon, GA, Mayor Pro Tem Gantt also violated the City’s Code of Conduct when she called me a Bitch during the public meeting. Of course, the conversation was about Amphitheater funding…. During the Budget Retreat in September of this year, Mayor Pro Tem Gantt once again violated the Code of Conduct when the conversation centered around the Amphitheater funding and the operations, she called me a Bitch for the 2nd time during a public meeting. There were no consequences for any of these Code of Conduct violations. Attorney Washington, I am requesting an investigation of all three of these incidents where Mayor Pro Tem Gantt violated the Code of Conduct with name calling in a public meeting, with action to be taken by the Governing Body. The next day, after the last meeting of the Governing Body, on November 19, 2025, the Mayor & Council received a series of emails from City staff that included attachments and documents that two members of Council and the City Manager had just said the night before that the documents were in the Council Agenda Books/Binders. There were no explanations or apologies for their false accusations towards me during the last meeting of the Council. 11 | P a g e Following the 2nd Reading of the proposed budget, I asked for clarification on additional budget line items, and again requested ALL job descriptions, the Pay and Classification and the Organizational Chart as required. I sent an email to the entire Governing Body, City’s Legal Counsel, City Manager, City Treasurer and City Clerk. On Friday, December 5, 2025 at 10:48 P.M., some but not ALL of the information was emailed to the Governing Body with the final reading and adoption on Monday. This is exactly why I make my comments and requests publicly. Coincidentally, or not, the job description for the ‘new Events Director position was not submitted. Why is that? I have been publicly requesting monthly, quarterly, and semi-annual financials since 2022 because I knew the math wasn’t mathing. Two members of the Council and a former Councilmember directed the former City Manager (at the time)- via email NOT to release the financial information to me. It’s on record. I had to use my own personal monies to retain an attorney as a way to obtain information from our City, and I had to file a complaint with the Secretary of State for a violation of the Open Records Act when documents were not given to me as requested, as an elected official. The Operations of the Amphitheater went millions of dollars over budget in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. I was sounding the alarm each of those years, and I’m sounding the alarm now. Our city spent nearly a million dollars on free events last year and is proposing the same in the 2026 budget. Again, I am sounding the alarm. There is no municipality that allows their city to repeatedly, year after year, go millions of dollars over budget, let alone overspend on FREE events and an Amphitheater. It is wasteful spending and irresponsible. The Governing Body approved a City tax, and the residents were told that the City tax would be used to cover expenses associated with Public Safety and Public Works to cover the additional areas as a result of the 2023 annexation of approximately 6,700 residents and businesses. However, we have been continuously spending millions of dollars OVER BUDGET on FREE CITY EVENTS AND THE AMPHITHEATER every year since 2022. Not thousands, but millions. I have pleaded with the Governing Body and the City Managers to outsource the Operations of the Amphitheater to a 3rd party Venue Management company who would bear all of the costs to run the shows, including booking the artists, etc. and the City would receive a portion of the profits for each show. My repeated recommendation has fallen on deaf ears with the Governing Body, who insist on having control of the Amphitheater by spending millions of taxpayer dollars to fund the Operations, even though we have in our face, four solid years of overspending and losses. In 2021 I brought a potential Naming Rights Sponsor to the table, but the Council did not want to proceed with the negotiations. During a separate public meeting, I made a motion to give a directive to staff to do the research on what Sponsorships would mean for our City. My motion failed, as the majority of the Council did not support the motion. 12 | P a g e In 2024, we exceeded the approved budget by $32.9 million dollars. City Staff decided that although there was an overall approved budget of $43 million dollars, a total of $76 million dollars was spent. City Staff didn’t come before the Governing Body to request an additional $32 million dollars (AS REQUIRED) during a public meeting where the full Governing Body would have been present, and a vote of approval was required. They just spent it. UNAUTHORIZED and UNAPPROVED. Without the proper oversight from the Governing Body. Nobody was listening to me on the bull horn as I was continuously sounding the alarm that something was not right with the finances. That $32.9 million dollars should still be available in the different accounts that it was pulled from and spent. But it’s no longer there. And that is why there was a $32.9 million budget amendment presented for 2024 expenses. I am trying to prevent that from happening to our city ever again. I had hoped that there would be a lesson learned and the members of the governing body, the leadership and the decision makers of our city will wake up and pay attention. There needs to be full oversight immediately. If not, we will be in the same dilemma with another budget amendment, and another, and another, until the well runs dry. There are those who said they didn’t know the city’s funds were being spent without their knowledge, even though I was sounding the alarm and asking for financial reporting too many times to count, and it has been suggested that I ask my questions and address my concerns behind the scenes. Well, the behind-thescenes conversations have cost us millions. The city has overspent over the approved budget for 4 consecutive years. This makes no sense! All discussions of funding sources such as SPLOST, TSPLOST, General Fund and other revenue streams should be discussed publicly, not behind closed doors in Executive Session and/or via text message or emails. When I continued to raise concerns and ask questions publicly, I was censored. I was admonished because I was raising red flags, asking for budget documents, contracts, and other financial records during the public meetings and emails. No one listened, I was ignored. And talked over with numerous attempts to drown me out so that you couldn’t hear what was really happening. The truth has since unfolded and been brought to the forefront, finally. However, the truth has not been accompanied by an apology and further review/discussions by the Governing Body. This is public money, and whenever we talk about city funds, those conversations need to take place in the open, for public knowledge. The Governing Body is fully aware of what happened as it relates to the 2024 $32.9 budget amendment, and the previous years of millions of dollars of overspending. Our city went over budget in 2022, 2023, 2024 and now in 2025. Our City’s Ethics Board recommended that an independent firm review the claims for dereliction of duties. Has the governing body acted on any of the Ethics Board recommendations? No. 13 | P a g e Tonight, this Council is being asked to approve the 2026 budget for $34 million dollars. City Staff asked the Council to approve the budget at this same time last year for $29 million – and tonight we have a 2025 budget amendment for $8.8 million dollars (so far). Staff has not provided ALL of the job descriptions and pay grades, or a complete city Organizational Chart. There have been three meetings in which I have asked for all of the job descriptions for new and reclassified positions including the and pay of the new position of Events Director, who will be responsible for overseeing the contractor who will manage all aspects of the Operations of the Amphitheater. It has not been submitted prior to this meeting tonight. Why is it been withheld? Members of Council should be asking that question too. My requests tonight are not complicated: • There needs to be proper reporting of spending, and oversight by the Governing Body frequently. • Turn the Amphitheater over to a 3rd Party Venue Management Company who has the capital to cover the costs of operations of the venue at 100% without relying on taxpayer dollars to subsidize the operations. • Reduce the budget for FREE City events. • Ensure sufficient funds are available to complete the Downtown Utility Relocation Project • Allocate adequate funding to the Rock Quarry Rd. Extension project. • Ensure sufficient funds are available to complete the Wayfinding project. • Ensure adequate funding is available to execute the Master Trail Plan. • Ensure adequate funding is available to execute the Parks Master Plan. Currently, the priorities of our city are not adequately reflected in the budget. Also, the Governing Body should pass an ordinance for the city’s Contingency Fund assuring those funds will only be used in an emergency as I mentioned on November 10th. The Governing Body should provide proper oversight and must fulfil our fiduciary responsibilities as we swore to when we took the oath of office. When the budget is approved and adopted, that amount is what staff should adhere to. Of course, there may need to be adjustments that happen, but never again should overspending be in excess of millions of dollars. Not on my watch. I will continue to do my due diligence. I will continue to ask questions. I will continue to ask for documents, as it is my right, and my responsibility. Members of the Governing Body must allow staff to do their jobs without interference, and without fear of losing their jobs simply because they are choosing to do what is right. And staff needs to do the job they have been hired to do. Our City will be better for it. Based on my GMA training, if the Council does not approve and adopt the budget tonight, it’s not a big deal. Our City operations would just continue using the 2025 budget until a new budget is adopted. 14 | P a g e I will support approving the FY2026 Balanced Budget in the amount of $34,768,690 dollars when all of the required documents are provided per the city’s Charter when adopting the budget. If there are any changes made to this budget, it should not exceed $34,768,690 dollars The bottom line is…the General Fund should remain at $34,768,690. All of the added positions requested by Mr. Edmondson are not included in this already balanced $34,768,690 budget. Are these are newly added positions after the budget has been balanced with no additional projected revenues? Soccer Field Project (new Park) I support the soccer field project; however, the City Council approved a Parks Master Plan. I think it’s a great idea considering the World Cup is coming to Atlanta. My only concern is, we made a financial commitment and entered into a contract to make upgrades to our current/existing park system (Clark, Gardiner and Memorial parks). The mismanagement of $32.9 in 2024 has set us back on completing various Capital Improvement projects. The overspending on the Amphitheater Operations and FREE City events in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 are examples of misguided priorities and how Capital projects are delayed due to wasteful spending. The Parks Master Plan has been delayed, just as the roll-out of our Trail network. ➢ Mr. Aaron, I believe the execution of the Parks Master Plan as was approved is outlined in phases and was approved during the Council Retreat in March of this year. What’s the status? What phase are we in? ➢ Attorney Washington, what happens to our obligations under that contract agreement if we don’t move forward with those upgrades because there is no funding? ➢ Mr. Aaron, what is the status of the execution of the Master Trail Plan? Capital Improvement Projects List/LCI (Livable Cities Initiatives) • Updates are needed to dates, projects and amounts. Purchase of Vehicles The City Council agreed to purchase four vehicles which will replace the older vehicles (two Ford Explorers) and adding a Passenger Van and a large SUV to the Governing Body’s Fleet. It was said that we would transfer the vehicles that are being replaced to other departments, one being Main Street. I support moving the other vehicle to Events, but I don’t support purchasing another $60,000 vehicle when we already have a vehicle that can be transferred once the new vehicles are received. ➢ The Ford Explorer that the City Manager drives still doesn’t have city decals at all. Can it be transferred to Main Street and/or Events Department? 15 | P a g e Budget for Unhoused ➢ Mr. Edmondson, during the Hometown Connection meeting, you confirmed that there was funding in the budget to partner with agencies in support of the unhoused population in our city. What is that account number?____________________________________ DDA Budget Funding for the DDA Budget has increased in the FY2026 Budget from $45,000 to over $336,000. The full Governing Body is unaware of why the budget has increased to this amount. DDA Rep did not present their 2025 YTD expenditures during the Budget Retreat. I still have unanswered questions regarding several expenses and what appear to be discrepancies that were listed on the quarterly report that was provided over the summer. Job Descriptions/Pay and Classification and Org. Chart ➢ Did you have an opportunity to cross-check the job descriptions/pay and classification and Org. Chart? There are some positions on the Org Chart, but not on the Pay and Classification and vice versa. ➢ Mr. Edmondson can someone from the HR Department do a cross-check and provide make sure ALL the job descriptions are attached to the budget as required with a corrected Pay and Classification and Organizational Chart? ➢ Mr. Edmondson, the city advertised for a HR Manager to fill a vacancy; however, I see on the Organizational Chart a HR Director. Was a position of an HR Director advertised? Director positions are appointed by the City Manager and are confirmed by the City Council. Please send the applications and resumes of all Directors that you wish to appoint so the Council can review and consider confirmation in accordance with the Charter. Should the City Council approve this budget tonight without including all of the required documentation or a funding source of revenue for additional positions, this time, the governing body won’t be able to say they didn’t know. This time, just as been done in years past, you would have ignored all the tenants of Good Governance, and approving this budget without meeting the Charter requirements would be a violation and a dereliction of your duties. As part of the Amphitheater Plan to increase revenues, the Governing Body needs to adopt/approve a Rental Policy. Currently, there is no approved cost structure to determine projected revenues based on rentals. As I mentioned during our Budget Retreat in September 2025. What criteria has staff been using? During Councilmember Barber’s comments, there was a Motion to end comments being made by Councilmember Barber was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion failed. 16 | P a g e Point of Order was called by Councilmember Alexander, noting the length of the comments and that the comments were off-subject. Mayor Ford stated the comments and questions were budget related. Point of Order was made by Councilmember Alexander regarding comments made by Councilmember Barber with derogatory language. Councilmember Barber apologized, noting she was repeating the comments made toward her by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. Councilmember Alexander called for a Point of Order for the length of time of Councilmember Barber’s comments. Councilmember Gantt called for a Point of Order for the length of time for Councilmember Barber’s comments. A Motion to end comments being made by Councilmember Barber was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed 3-1 (Barber Opposed, citing she remained quiet as other members of the governing body asked questions and had comments throughout the meeting, and is being shut down as she raises questions and makes comments that are budget related). Mayor Ford noted the motion was approved by members of the Council to end Councilmember Barber’s comments and questions relating to the budget. Motion to approve the FY2026 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan and to seek additional funding for the operations of the Amphitheater as described by staff was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed 3-1 (Barber Opposed) Councilmember Alexander motioned to adjourn the meeting; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. Mayor Ford noted there were several items remaining on the Agenda that have not been voted on; and noted the Public Hearing for the Budget has not taken place. Public Hearing Opened – No Comments in Favor Comments to Oppose: Ms. Alicia Moore stated residents are concerned about the operations and costs associated with the Amphitheater, and it seems to be personal perks for members of the governing body; stated the Amphitheater should be bid out for a Management Company to operate; stated it was inappropriate to shut down a member of the Governing Body who was asking questions and addressing concerns about the budget; and stated that she found the fact of the City Council being deadest on keeping the Amphitheater under its reign is very suspicious. Public Hearing Closed. 17 | P a g e 14. SECOND READING - TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2025-04 FOR FAÇADE BUILDING MATERIALS. (Citywide) Council Consideration of an ordinance to revise Section 4.4.4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) to establish updated requirements for building façade materials for non-residential and multi-family structures. The proposed ordinance outlines material standards to promote architectural consistency, durability, and neighborhood compatibility. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson noted there were no changes from the First Reading. Motion to approve TX-2025-04 was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 15. SECOND READING - TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2025-05 FOR TWO-CAR GARAGES. (Citywide) Council Consideration of an ordinance to amend Section 4.4.2(F)(2) of the Unified Development Code (UDC) to require two-car garages for all single-family homes, townhomes, and each unit within duplexes. This amendment updates the architectural standards to promote adequate off-street parking and consistent residential design. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson noted there were no changes from the First Reading. Motion to approve TX-2025-05 was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 16. SECOND READING - TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2025-06 FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. (Council Districts 4 and 5) Council Consideration of an ordinance to adopt Title 9, Chapter 200 of the Municipal Code of Ordinance for the City of Stockbridge to establish regulations for Entertainment Districts within the City. The ordinance outlines operational standards, alcohol permitting, smoking establishment requirements, and enforcement provisions to support safe and vibrant public spaces. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson noted there were no changes from the First Reading. Councilmember Alexander asked if the additional areas of Patrick Henry Pkwy., Eagles Landing Pkwy., or Rock Quarry Rd. were included. Mr. Anderson noted the research is still in progress. Motion to approve TX-2025-06 was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 18 | P a g e 17. SECOND READING - TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2025-07 FOR OUTDOOR FESTIVALS. (Citywide) Council Consideration of an ordinance to revise Title 9, Chapter 28, Section 040 of the Municipal Code of Ordinances for the City of Stockbridge to establish updated permitting requirements for outdoor festivals and temporary special events within the City. The proposed ordinance outlines application procedures, public safety measures, and fee structures to ensure responsible event management. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson noted there were no changes from the First Reading Motion to approve TX-2025-07 was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 18. SECOND READING - TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2025-08 FOR TEMPORARY ALCOHOL LICENSES. (Citywide) Council Consideration of an amendment to Chapter 9.04, Section 595.1 of the Municipal Code of Ordinances for the City of Stockbridge to establish a permitting process for temporary alcohol sales at outdoor events and special events within the City. The ordinance outlines application procedures, fee structures, and eligibility criteria for both nonprofit and commercial applicants. Presented by: Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Mr. Anderson noted recommendations from the First Reading have been included in the ordinance, reducing the fee to $300 per event in the downtown district, and $500 per event outside of the downtown district, and allowing a OneYear Pass in the amount of $1,000.00 Citywide. Motion to approve TX-2025-08 was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 19. SECOND READING - TEXT AMENDMENT CASE #TX-2025-10 FOR CONTAINER-BASED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. (District 4) Council Consideration of an ordinance to amend Sections 2.5.3(E) and 2.5.3(H) of the Stockbridge Unified Development Code (UDC) to allow container-based commercial buildings as a type of “Special Use” within the Downtown Village Overlay District. Mr. Anderson noted there were no changes from the First Reading. Motion to approve TX-2025-10 was made by Councilmember Barber; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. NEW BUSINESS 20. Council Consideration to approve the Public Works Maintenance Shop – Phase 2 interior build-out with Prime Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $2,241,455.00. Funding source is from SPLOST VI. Presented by: Decius Aaron, Public Works Director 19 | P a g e Motion to approve Phase 2 of the Public Works Maintenance Shop was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 21. Council Consideration to approve Change Order No. 2 for the 2025 LMIG Paving Project with Blount Construction Company in the amount of $109,689.20. Funding Source: TSPLOST. Presented by: Decius Aaron, Public Works Director Motion to approve Change Order No. 2 for the 2025 LMIG Paving Project was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 22. Council Consideration to approve Change Order No. 3 for the Walter Way, Pine View and Memorial Park Lift Station and Force Main Rehabilitation Project with Sol Construction, LLC in the amount of $256,216.00. Funding Source is from SPLOST VI. Presented by: Decius Aaron, Public Works Director Motion to approve Change Order No. 3 for the Walter Way, Pine View and Memorial Park Lift Station and Force Main Rehabilitation Project was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. Councilmember Alexander requested a listing of all funding expenses and balances for SPLOST, TSPLOST, ARPA and Contingency funds from 2025 to current. 23. Council Consideration to approve the award of the Governor's Office of Highway Safety H.E.A.T. Grant in the amount of $268,928.00. The effective date of the grant is December 1, 2025, through September 30, 2026. Allowed costs incurred within this period are reimbursable at a rate of 100% of the approved federal funds allocated above. Presented by: Asst. Chief Godfrey Motion to approve acceptance of the Governor’s Office of Highway Safety H.E.A.T. Grant in the amount of $268,928,00 was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Berry. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 24. Council Consideration to approve the renewal of the City’s Health Insurance Policy with Cigna the amount of $3,400,531. Funding Source: General Fund. Presented by: Frank Milazi, City Treasurer/CFO Motion to approve the City’s Health Insurance renewal with Cigna Insurance in the amount of $3,400,531 was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 20 | P a g e 25. Council Consideration to approve Phase II & Phase III of the Wayfinding Contract for DeNyse Company in the amount of $1.4 million dollars. Funding Source: ARPA Presented by: Shawn Edmondson, City Manager Motion to approve the DeNyse Co. contract renewal for Phase II of the Wayfinding Project was made by Councilmember Alexander; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. 26. Council Consideration to approve the 2026 Event Calendars for Main Street, City Events and Council Initiatives. Motion to approve the 2026 Event Calendars for 2026 transferring the African American History Program, the Women’s History Month Program, and the Fall Festival Event to a City Event with staff determining the funding source for each event and revising the City’s Events and Mayor & Council Initiatives Calendar and Budget was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. UPCOMING MEETINGS & ANNOUNCEMENTS: Council meetings will be held in the City Council Chamber. Meeting dates, locations, and times are subject to change or contact City Hall offices at 770-389-7900 or visit the website www.stockbridgega.org for updates. • • • • • • Citywide Development Authority Meeting, Second Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. — City Hall Levi Meeting Room (Dec 9) Community Zoning and Information Meeting (CZIM) Wednesday, December 10th CANCELLED. Main Street Advisory Board Meeting, Second Friday of each Month, at 9:00 a.m. at the Downtown Connection Center 130 M L King Sr. Heritage Trail (Dec 12) Downtown Development Authority Board Meeting, Third Tuesday of each month, at 6:00 p.m. at the Downtown Connection Center, 130 M L King Sr. Heritage Trail (Dec 16) Planning Commission Meeting, Third Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. (Dec 18) CANCELLED Youth Council Advisory Committee Meeting, Third Thursday of each month, at 6:30 p.m. — City Hall Levi Meeting Room (Dec 18) UPCOMING CITY EVENTS / INITIATIVES • • Join the City of Stockbridge for the Swearing-In Ceremony for Mayor Jayden L. Williams, Councilwoman LaKeisha Gantt and Councilman Antwan Cloud on Friday, January 2, 2026, at 3pm at Home2 Suites 400 Speer Rd. Stockbridge, GA, This event is open to the public w/Free Shuttle Service from Kohls from 26pm. Join Councilman Alexander for a District 5 Town Hall Meeting on Thursday, December 11, 2025 at 7pm at the Winding Creek Community 254 Warbler Way, McDonough. 21 | P a g e • The Economic Development Department hosts a FREE Business Health Clinic on the 2nd Thursday of every month from 9am – 12pm at the Stockbridge Connection Center, 130 M L King Sr. Heritage Trail. Please contact Rosalynd Rawls to schedule an appointment for Meet the Mayor and for more information on Council Initiatives at 678-833-3348 or via email: rrawls@stockbridgega.org Mayor Ford wished everyone Happy Holidays, and encouraged everyone to get flu shots, and COVID boosters; noted it has been a wonderful twelve years serving the city of Stockbridge, where there has never been a dull moment; encouraged the governing body to continue moving things and doing great things, noting the public is watching; noted he is not moving, and will continue to be engaged, and he will help out where he can; noted he looks forward to a bright future for him, his family, and everyone. Stockbridge Where Community Connects. EXECUTIVE SESSION Motion to convene Executive Session for Real Estate, Personnel, Litigation and Cybersecurity matters was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 4-0. Councilmember Barber exited the meeting following Executive Session. Motion to adjourn Executive Session and sign an Affidavit was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. Motion to reconvene the meeting was made by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt; seconded by Councilmember Alexander. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. Motion to approve a Conditional Settlement with GRP LLC litigation to place on the Agenda for January 12, 2026 was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. Motion to authorize the City Treasurer to open an account with Fund One, State of Georgia Fund was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. Motion to adjourn the meeting at 12:12 a.m. was made by Councilmember Berry; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Gantt. The motion The motion passed unanimously 3-0. 22 | P a g e APPROVAL OF SCOPE CHANGE FOR WHITLEY ENGINEERING CONTRACT – HLDP REVIEWS Ryan Anderson, MPPA, CPM — 7/13/2026 Purpose and Scope Change Strategic Implications Primary Purpose of the Scope Change Request Summary: This is a request to change the scope of the Whitley Engineering contract to include additional revenue generated from the House Land Disturbance Permit fee adopted in the FY2026 fee schedule for Community Development. The permit fee is $300, of which Whitley Engineering will receive $100, for an amount not to exceed $25,000. Primary Purpose: To formalize and integrate technical engineering review for residential projects into the city’s standard permitting workflow. This ensures that house land disturbance is overseen by professional civil engineers to mitigate potential long-term impacts on city infrastructure. 2 Implications for the City of Stockbridge Enhanced Technical Standards: Provides the Community Development Department with dedicated engineering expertise specifically for residential land disturbance, ensuring compliance with environmental and city codes Fiscal Sustainability: Implements a selfsustaining fee model where the technical review cost ($100) is covered by the applicant’s permit fee($300), reducing the reliance on the General Fund for these specific professional services. Budgetary Safeguards: Includes a strict annual compensation cap of $25,000 for this scope of work, providing the City Council with clear oversight and predictability regarding departmental expenditures. Strategic Alignment: Directly fulfills the objectives of the 2026 Community Development fee proposal to modernize the city’s fee structures to better reflect the professional expertise required for modern municipal growth Background and Context Council Action Original Agreement: The City established a formal partnership for professional services for Civil Engineering Services Contract with RFP 2024-0001 Service Provider: The contract was awarded to Whitley Engineering, Inc. to support the operations and technical needs of the Community Development Department Official Codification: This agreement was formally adopted and codified by the Stockbridge City Council via Resolution No. R25-1831 Regulatory Context: This resolution serves as the legal and administrative basis for the current partnership, ensuring all engineering services are performed according to city standards and approved fee structures 3 R25-1831 Background and Context Original Whitley Engineering Contract Initial Authorization: The original civil engineering contract (RFP 2024-0001) with Whitley Engineering, Inc. was formally codified and authorized by the Stockbridge City Council through Resolution No. R25-1831 Purpose: This agreement was established to provide professional civil engineering services specifically for the Community Development Department Performance-Based Renewal: As part of the City's standard oversight, the contract is subject to formal performance reviews to ensure high-quality service and adherence to city standards Second Renewal Option: In August 2025, the City Council reviewed and approved the 2nd Renewal Option for Whitley Engineering, Inc., ensuring the ongoing availability of technical expertise for departmental projects Executed Evaluation: A formal Contract Renewal Evaluation Form was completed and executed, documenting the firm's successful performance and authorizing the extension of the partnership Current Standing: The proposed amendment regarding the land disturbance permit fee builds upon this established and successfully renewed contractual foundation. 4 RFP 2024-001 Proposed Scope Change Home Land Disturbance Permit Fee Modification to Scope: Update the existing professional services agreement (RFP 2024-0001) to formally include the review and processing requirements for House Land Disturbance Permits. Defined Fee Allocation: 1 Total Permit Fee: $300.00 per application. 2 Contractor Compensation: Whitley Engineering, Inc. shall receive $100.00 of the total fee for their technical portion of the work. 5 Annual Fiscal Cap: To ensure budgetary oversight and fiscal responsibility, the amendment stipulates that Whitley Engineering will not receive more than $25,000 annually for these specific permitrelated services. Strategic Alignment: This amendment directly supports the 2026 Community Development fee schedule presented during the budget process, aimed at ensuring the city's fee structures reflect the professional expertise required for current growth and development. Request for Council Approval A Clearly Defined, Necessary Amendment​ We ask the Council to approve amending the Whitley Engineering agreement to add HLDP engineering review services under clear, defined compensation terms.​ No New Cost to the City​ This amendment adds no burden to the city's budget; it is fully funded by existing permit fees and aligns with established fee schedules.​ Approval Protects Public Trust​ Approving this amendment reinforces transparency, accountability, and the consistent application of procurement and fiscal policy.​ Stronger, Faster Development Review​ Your approval streamlines permit reviews, protects public infrastructure, and guarantees evaluations by qualified engineers. 6 Ryan Anderson, MPPA, CPM Randerson@stockbridgega.org Thank YOu STATE OF GEORGIA HENRY COUNTY CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE RESOLUTION NO. R26-_____ A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SCOPE OF SERVICES UNDER CONTRACT NO. RFP 2024-0001 WITH WHITLEY ENGINEERING, INC. TO PROVIDE HOME LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (HLDP) REVIEW SERVICES; AUTHORIZING ASSOCIATED FEES; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge ("City") is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia and is charged with being fiscally responsible concerning the use and expenditure of all public funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Stockbridge entered into Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 with Whitley Engineering, Inc. for professional civil engineering services, plan reviews, consultation, and related engineering support services; WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved the renewal of Contract No. RFP 20240001 for continued civil engineering services provided by Whitley Engineering, Inc.; WHEREAS, the City has established the Home Land Development Permit (HLDP) process, and the Mayor and City Council have approved the fiscal year 2026 fee schedule for the Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development desires to amend the Scope of Services under the Whitley Engineering Inc, contract to include review of Home Land Development Permit (HLDP) application submittals; and WHEREAS, the addition of HLDP review services will provide applicants with a streamlined review process and ensure professional engineering review of development proposals requiring HLDP approval; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department desires to allocate One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of each HLDP review fee to Whitley Engineering, Inc. as compensation for engineering review services, with the remaining portion of the fee retained by the City; and WHEREAS, expenditures associated with HLDP review services performed by Whitley Engineering, Inc. shall not exceed Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) annually under this amendment unless otherwise approved by the Mayor and City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF SCOPE AMENDMENT. The Mayor and City Council hereby approve an amendment to the Scope of Services under Contract No. RFP 2024-0001 with Whitley Engineering, Inc. to include the review of Home Land Development Permit (HLDP) applications, supporting plans, drainage studies, trafficrelated submittals, and associated engineering documents as requested by the City. SECTION 2. HLDP REVIEW FEE ALLOCATION. Consistent with the fiscal year 2026 fee schedule approved for the Department of Community Development, the total HLDP permit fee shall be Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00), of which One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) shall be paid to Whitley Engineering, Inc. for performance of HLDP review services, with the remaining Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) retained by the City. SECTION 3. ANNUAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT. Compensation paid to Whitley Engineering, Inc. for HLDP review services authorized by this amendment shall not exceed Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) annually. SECTION 4. AUTHORIZATION. The Mayor is authorized to execute any amendment or addendum necessary to implement this Resolution. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Resolution is determined invalid, such determination shall not affect the remaining portions. SECTION 6. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. All conflicting resolutions or provisions are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. SO RESOLVED this ____ day of __________, 2026. CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA ______________________________ Jayden L. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Cassandra Lester, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Quinton Washington, City Attorney

STOCKBRIDGE COMMUNITY ZONING INFORMATION MEETING ADMINISTRATION Community Zoning Information Meeting Agenda July 8, 2026 6:00 PM Ryan Anderson Community Development Director Veronica Green Chief Planner Linda Logan Senior Planner Secretary Gordon Linton Senior Planner STOCKBRIDGE CITY HALL 4640 NORTH HENRY BLVD. STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Website: www.stockbridgega.org Phone: 770-389-7900 Fax: 770-389-7912 AGENDA COMMUNITY ZONING INFORMATION MEETING CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026 6:00 PM I. Welcome II. Overview Of The Zoning Process Item # 1 - Overview of the Zoning Process: PowerPoint Presentation Presented by: Linda Logan III. Discussion Of Zoning Cases Item # 1 - REZONING CASE #RZ-2026-01. (Council District 4.) Consideration of a rezoning application for the property at 112 Old Conyers Road to rezone the property from the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) District to the RR (Rural Residential) District to better align the zoning of the property with the existing bed-and-breakfast operations, and to access residential resources. There are no plans to change the current operations or property footprint of the bed-and-breakfast inn that was established in 2018. Applicant: Anita Johnson. Property Owner: Marvin Johnson. Property Location: District 12, Land Lot 68, within the Stockbridge City Limits. Property Size: 3.734 +/- acres. Presented by: Linda Logan Item # 2 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE #SP-2026-01. (Council District 4.) Consideration of a special use permit application for the property at 112 Old Conyers Road to allow a special use permit for a bed-and-breakfast inn within the RR (Rural Residential) District. There are no plans to change the current operations or property footprint of the bed-and-breakfast inn that was established in 2018. Applicant: Anita Johnson. Property Owner: Marvin Johnson. Property Location: District 12, Land Lot 68, within the Stockbridge City Limits. Property Size: 3.734 +/- acres. Presented by: Linda Logan Item # 3 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CASE #CP-2026-01. (Council District 4.) Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan amendment application to change the future land use designation of the property at 4231 North Henry Boulevard from Low-Density Mixed-Use to Heavy Industrial to allow for the further development of natural resources that are associated with the existing surrounding rock quarry, pursuant to Section 3.2.25 of the Stockbridge Unified Development Code (UDC). Applicant: Vulcan Lands, Inc., c/o Vulcan Materials Company. Agent: Jack Nichols of James, Bates, Brannan, Groover, LLP. Property Owner: Ekstedt Properties, LLC. Property Location: District 12, Land Lot 62. Property Size: 1.377 Page | 3 +/- acres. Presented by: Linda Logan Item # 4 - REZONING CASE #RZ-2026-02. (Council District 4.) Consideration of a rezoning application to rezone the property at 4231 North Henry Boulevard from the C-2 (General Commercial) District to the HI (Heavy Industrial) District to allow for the further development of natural resources that are associated with the existing surrounding rock quarry, pursuant to Section 3.2.25 of the Stockbridge Unified Development Code (UDC). Applicant: Vulcan Lands, Inc., c/o Vulcan Materials Company. Agent: Jack Nichols of James, Bates, Brannan, Groover, LLP. Property Owner: Ekstedt Properties, LLC. Property Location: District 12, Land Lot 62. Property Size: 1.377 +/- acres. Presented by: Linda Logan Item # 5 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASE #SP-2026-02. (Council District 4.) Consideration of a special use permit application for the property at 4231 North Henry Boulevard to allow for the development of natural resources, including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery, within the HI (Heavy Industrial) District. Applicant: Vulcan Lands, Inc., c/o Vulcan Materials Company. Agent: Jack Nichols of James, Bates, Brannan, Groover, LLP. Property Owner: Ekstedt Properties, LLC. Property Location: District 12, Land Lot 62. Property Size: 1.377 +/- acres. Presented by: Linda Logan IV. Other Business V. Upcoming Meetings VI. Adjournment July 8, 2026 6:00 PM 4640 N. Henry Stockbridge, GA 30281 Phone: (770) 389-7900 OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE Community Development Department OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS—SLIDE #1 I. INITIAL ACTIONS BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OR DEVELOPER: A. Purchases a property or enters into a contract with the owner to purchase the property, pending zoning approval by the City of Stockbridge. B. Prepares a site plan for the proposed development project. C. Contacts the Planning & Zoning Staff to request a pre-application meeting, which is required before submitting zoning applications. The developer’s proposal is discussed. D. Submits zoning applications to the City (after a pre-application meeting is held) to request various zoning actions to allow the proposed development. ~ Applications include the application request, the survey of the property, the proposed site plan, various legal documents, a letter of intent, and a water/sewer availability letter. ~ The applicant is usually the property owner or the developer. ~ The applicant often hires an agent to handle the application process. ~ An attorney often acts as the applicant or agent to represent the owner or developer. OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS—SLIDE #2 TYPES OF ZONING APPLICATIONS / CASES: ANNEXATION – Allows a property in unincorporated Henry County to be brought into the Stockbridge City Limits. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT – Changes the “future land use designation” of the property from what the Future Land Use Map shows within the City’s Comprehensive Plan, to another future land use designation which 1) allows for the proposed types of use; 2) allows the requested zoning; and 3) allows the proposed residential density. REZONING – Changes the base zoning of the property to allow for the proposed types of uses, and to disallow the uses under the existing zoning. Any overlay zoning district would not change. VARIANCE – Allows the applicant to deviate from a required site design standard, such as a building setback requirement, or to be exempt from meeting a certain requirement. SPECIAL USE PERMIT – Is required for special types of uses that are identified as being possibly allowed in a zoning district. Examples: churches, liquor stores, personal care homes, and gas stations. ZONING MODIFICATION – Is required when a developer wants to deviate from what City Council approved for a rezoning case. Examples: building according to a completely different site plan (major modification) or seeking relief from a required zoning condition (minor zoning modification). OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS—SLIDE #3 II. ACTIONS BY THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE’S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: A. Conducts a pre-application meeting with the owner/applicant. ~ Includes the Planning & Zoning Staff, City Engineer, City Fire Marshall, and the City Building Official. ~ Purpose of meeting is to assess the merits of the proposed development and its compliance with applicable zoning and other regulations. B. Processes incoming zoning applications by assessing their completeness and assigning case numbers. C. Takes various actions to meet the legal advertising requirements. ~ Sends legal ads to the newspaper. ~ Lists zoning cases on agendas for upcoming public meetings. ~ Prepares a draft letter for applicants to mail to owners of neighboring properties within 500 feet. ~ For annexation cases, sends copies of all of the applications to Henry County officials for review. ~ Posts zoning signs on the property. OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS—SLIDE #4 D. Prepares a Staff Report: ~ Assesses the merits of each zoning case. ~ Assesses the compliance with the Comprehensive Development Plan and Unified Development Code (UDC). ~ Makes recommendations, including zoning conditions of approval. E. Prepares a PowerPoint presentation for use in presenting each zoning case at public meetings. F. Prepares a Decision Letter to document the City Council’s action, and sends it to the applicant. G. Sends the Final Ordinances, which have been prepared by the City Clerk, to the applicant. OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS—SLIDE #5 III. PUBLIC MEETINGS (All held in the Council Chamber at City Hall): A. C.Z.I.M. Meeting (Community Zoning and Information Meeting)—This is an informal meeting to allow the public a chance to hear an overview of proposed zoning cases and to ask questions of the applicant/developer. No actions are taken at this meeting. B. Planning Commission Meeting: ~ This is a public hearing that is conducted by the Stockbridge Planning Commission Board members. ~ Board members hear the staff’s presentation of cases, allow the applicant to speak, hold a public hearing for citizens to speak, ask questions of the staff and developer, have a discussion, and vote to approve, approve with conditions, deny, or defer each case to another meeting. ~ Board members’ votes become recommendations to City Council. C. City Council Meeting: ~ Follows a similar format as Planning Commission meetings. ~ Council members’ votes become final, and they become law. OVERVIEW OF THE ZONING PROCESS—SLIDE #6 IV. PERMITTING REVIEWS: A. Developer submits land disturbance and building permit applications to the Permitting Staff. B. Permit applications are reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Staff (and others) to ensure that all zoning requirements and all zoning conditions (if any) from approved zoning cases are met. C. When all requirements are met, permits are issued: ~ Land Disturbance Permit—Allows the developer to clear the land, install streets and sidewalks, install utilities, and build amenities. ~ Building Permit—Allows the developer to build each residential unit and each other type of building on the property. Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 294 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S24-01002000 112 OLD CONYERS RD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 3.73 Address JOHNSON MARVIN 112 OLD CONYERS RD STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Land Value: Building Value: Misc Value: Total Value: $167,800 $387,000 Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual $11,500 4/17/2015 $225,000 FM Q 9/1/1985 $0 U U $566,300 Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/3/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/3/2026 3:11:41 AM Developed by Project/Case # REZ-2026.05.1127 Address: Parcel Number(s): 112 OLD CONYERS RD, STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 S24-01002000 City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Division, Community Development Department Rezoning Request Application Zoning Case Num Ordinance Num First: Last: Name of Applicant Anita Johnson Applicants Address: 112 Old Conyers Rd City State: Zip: Email: Georgia 30281 Stockbridgelakesbb@gmail.com Phone: Stockbridge (404) 376-4336 First Last Name of Owner: Marvin Johnson Phone: Owner's Address City: Stockbridge 112 Old Conyers Rd 4043763830 State: Zip: Email: Georgia 30281 Mdjohnson226@gmail.com First Last Name of Second Owner: Second Property Owner's Phone: Address: City: State: Zip: Email: First Last Name of Third Owner: Third Property Owner's Phone: Address: City: State: Zip: Email: First Last Name of Agent: Anita Johnson Agent's Address: 112 Old Conyers Rd City: State: Zip: Email: Stockbridge Georgia 30281 Stockbridgelakesbb@gmail.com Phone: 4043764336 THE APPLICANT NAMED ABOVE AFFIRMS THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER OR AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND REQUESTS Request from C-3 (Heavy Commercial District) to The property will be POSTED with a City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Sign. The sign must remain on the s fifteen days prior to either Planning Commission or City Council meeting(s). The applicant or property owner sh reason. (Current Zoning) RR (Rural Residential District) (Requested Zoning District) For the Purpose of: To better align zoning with the existing B&B operations and access residential resources. (Type of Development) Case Name: Stockbridge Lakes Bed & Breakfast Is Development of Regional Impact (DRI)? Size of Tract: 4 Yes Nearest intersection to the property: East Atlanta Rd No acres Land Lot Number(s): District: District 4 Please refer to the Note: Will verify on site inspection HENRY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED PLANS bcochran 09/28/2017 Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 294 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S24-01002000 112 OLD CONYERS RD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 3.73 Address JOHNSON MARVIN 112 OLD CONYERS RD STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Land Value: Building Value: Misc Value: Total Value: $167,800 $387,000 Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual $11,500 4/17/2015 $225,000 FM Q 9/1/1985 $0 U U $566,300 Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/3/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/3/2026 3:11:41 AM Developed by Project/Case # REZ-2026.05.1127 Address: Parcel Number(s): 112 OLD CONYERS RD, STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 S24-01002000 City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Division, Community Development Department Rezoning Request Application Zoning Case Num Ordinance Num First: Last: Name of Applicant Anita Johnson Applicants Address: 112 Old Conyers Rd City State: Zip: Email: Georgia 30281 Stockbridgelakesbb@gmail.com Phone: Stockbridge (404) 376-4336 First Last Name of Owner: Marvin Johnson Phone: Owner's Address City: Stockbridge 112 Old Conyers Rd 4043763830 State: Zip: Email: Georgia 30281 Mdjohnson226@gmail.com First Last Name of Second Owner: Second Property Owner's Phone: Address: City: State: Zip: Email: First Last Name of Third Owner: Third Property Owner's Phone: Address: City: State: Zip: Email: First Last Name of Agent: Anita Johnson Agent's Address: 112 Old Conyers Rd City: State: Zip: Email: Stockbridge Georgia 30281 Stockbridgelakesbb@gmail.com Phone: 4043764336 THE APPLICANT NAMED ABOVE AFFIRMS THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER OR AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND REQUESTS Request from C-3 (Heavy Commercial District) to The property will be POSTED with a City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Sign. The sign must remain on the s fifteen days prior to either Planning Commission or City Council meeting(s). The applicant or property owner sh reason. (Current Zoning) RR (Rural Residential District) (Requested Zoning District) For the Purpose of: To better align zoning with the existing B&B operations and access residential resources. (Type of Development) Case Name: Stockbridge Lakes Bed & Breakfast Is Development of Regional Impact (DRI)? Size of Tract: 4 Yes Nearest intersection to the property: East Atlanta Rd No acres Land Lot Number(s): District: District 4 Please refer to the Note: Will verify on site inspection HENRY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED PLANS bcochran 09/28/2017 Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 147 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S33-01052000 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 1.4 Address EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC 508 GUINEVERE CT MCDONOUGH, GA 30252 Land $167,700 Value: Building $473,400 Value: Misc $11,440 Value: Total $652,540 Value: Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/29/2005 $502,000 FM Q 9/26/2002 $0 U U Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/29/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/29/2026 1:13:22 AM Developed by Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 294 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S33-01052000 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 1.4 Address EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC 508 GUINEVERE CT MCDONOUGH, GA 30252 Land $167,700 Value: Building $473,400 Value: Misc $11,440 Value: Total $652,540 Value: Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/29/2005 $502,000 FM Q 9/26/2002 $0 U U Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/29/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/29/2026 1:13:22 AM Developed by Applicant Campaign Disclosure Form (Must be completed by the applicant, the property owner, and the agent. Use as many forms as needed.) Has the applicant made, within two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of this application for a conditional use permit, campaign contributions aggregating $250 or more, or made gifts having in the aggregate a value of $250 or more to a member of the City of Stockbridge Planning Commission or Stockbridge City Council who will consider the application? Yes No If Yes, the applicant and the attorney representing the applicant must file the following information with the City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Division within ten (10) days after this application is first filed: Planning Commissioner and/or City Council Member Name Dollar Amount of / Campaign Contribution We certify that the foregoing information is true and correct, this I Description of Gift $250 or greater, which was given to Board Member day of~ — Applicant’s Name - Printed Signature of Applicant/Property Owner/Agent Applicant’s Attorney, if applicable - Printed Sign0(ire of Applicant’s Attorney, if applicable Sworn to and subscribed before me this J IA iN 'day of _________ _________________ lotary Public NOTARY PUBLIC GEORGIA MARSHA L. GILLESPIE MONROE COUNTY * Applicant means any individual or business entity (corporation, partnership, limited partnership, firm enterprise, franchise, association, or trust) applying for a variance. Citv of Stockbridoe Community Develooment Deoartment-4602 North Henry Blvd : Sfockbridoe. GA 302S1 770-389-7900 COMP-2026.06.1145 Address: 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD, STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Web Form City of Stockbridge Planning a Community Development Dep Application for an Amendment to the Comprehensiv Name of Applicant: First Vulcan Lands, Inc. Applicant's Address: 1200 Urban Center Drive City: Birmingham State: Alabama Name of Agent: First Jack Agent's Address: 231 Riverside Drive City: Macon Last c/o Vulcan Materials C Last Nichols State: Georgia THE APPLICANT NAMED ABOVE AFFIRMS THAT HE OR SHE IS THE OWNER, OR AGENT OF THE OWNER, OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW, AND REQUESTS THAT THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE GRANTED: From: Low Density Mixed Use To: Heavy Industrial Project Name: 4231 North Henry Boulevard Purpose of ProjectFurther development of natural resources associated with the existing quarry pursuant to S Industrial rather than Low Density Mixed Use. Nearest intersection to the property: North Henry Boulevard and Pinehurst Drive Size of Tract: 1.4 acres Landlot/ District62 / 12 Applicant Signature: Vulcan Lands, Inc. Property Owner Authorization Form please click here TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN LAND LOT 62 OF THE 12th DISTRICT OF HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, IN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, CONTAINING 1.40 ACRES AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY FOR JUDY B. MILLER PREPARED BY MATHIS-MILLIGAN SURVEYORS, INC. CERTIFIED BY DONALD R. MILLIGAN, GEORGIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 2472 DATED MAR. 17, 1997, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TO FIND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 (WHICH IS GEORGIA HIGHWAY 42 AND HAVING A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY) A DISTANCE OF 1,375.6 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF LAMBERT DRIVE (30 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.38 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING THUS ESTABLISHED, THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH HAS A RADIUS OF 1,829.86 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 139.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET [SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 139.62 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A BEARING OF SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST]; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 493.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 130.11 FEET TO A FLAT IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 422.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 231 Riverside Drive Suite 100 Macon, Georgia 31201 0 478.742.4280 BRANNAN GROOVER F 478.742.8720 Jack Nichols Direct Line: (478)749-9982 Email: jnichols@jamesbatesllp.com - Please Reply to the Macon Office - June 1,2026 Ryan Anderson Community Development Director Stockbridge, Georgia randerson@stockbridgega.org Veronia Green Chief Planner Stockbridge, Georgia vgreen @st ockb ridgega. or g Re: Letter of Intent for 4231 North Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, GA 30281 Parcel No. S33-01052000 (the “Subject Parcel”) Dear Mr. Anderson and Ms. Green: I represent Vulcan Lands, Inc. c/o Vulcan Materials Company (“Applicant” or “Vulcan”), and I am submitting this letter of intent along with Vulcan’s Application to the City of Stockbridge (the “City”) relating to three zoning related requests for the above-referenced Subject Parcel. The three requests are for: 1. Rezoning of the Subject Parcel from C2 (general commercial district) to HI (heavy industrial district); 2. Special Use Permit for the Subject Parcel to allow the development of natural resources including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery; and 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Subject Parcel’s designation on the City’s Future Land Use Map from Low Density Mixed-Use to Heavy Industrial. The Subject Parcel is 1.4 acres currently zoned C2 that is owned by Ekstedt Properties, LLC (“Ekstedt”). There is one building on the property that is used in Ekstedt’s business. Ekstedt is fully aware of the Applicant’s requests to the City and supports the Applicant’s requests for the Subject Parcel. The Subject Parcel has approximately 140 feet of frontage along North Henry Boulevard. All remaining sides of the Subject Parcel are surrounded by property owned by the Applicant and currently used in the Applicant’s Stockbridge Quarry. The Subject Parcel juts into the Applicant’s property (parcel no. S33-01053000), creating a rectangular incision into the 30+ ATLANTA ATHENS MACON jamesbatesllp.com Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Veronica Green, Chief Planner June 1,2026 acres of property owned by the Applicant that surrounds the Subject Parcel. All the Applicant’s property surrounding the Subject Parcel is already zoned HI and used as part of Applicant’s quarry. In total the Applicant owns over 787 acres of property associated with the Stockbridge Quarry. The Applicant requests that the Subject Parcel be rezoned to HI in order to allow the Applicant to utilize the 1.4 acres as part of its quarry operations. If rezoning is approved, the large majority of the Subject Parcel would be utilized as a berm with a small portion of the 1.4 acres being used as an edge of the Applicant’s mining pit as shown on the Site Plan submitted with this Application. Pursuant to the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) at § 3.2.25, mines and quarries are allowed in the HI zoning district. That section states, “The development of natural resources, including removal of minerals and other natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery, is allowed in the HI zoning district. . . .” Section 3.1 of the UDC states that mines and quarries are Permitted Uses in the HI district, but it also says that the “[d]evelopment of natural resources, including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery” requires a Special Use in the HI district. Thus, to try and fully satisfy any discrepancies in the UDC, the Applicant is also requesting that it be granted a Special Use Permit pursuant to § 3.1 of the UDC to allow the Applicant to build a berm and conduct mining operations on the Subject Parcel. Finally, the Applicant is also asking that the City’s Comprehensive Plan be amended to the extent that the Subject Parcel is currently designated as Low Density Mixed-Use on the Future Land Use Map. The Applicant asks that the Subject Parcel’s designation on the Future Land Use Map be changed to Heavy Industrial to conform to what the Subject Parcel would actually be used for if rezoning is approved. This change would also make sense so as to correspond to what all the property surrounding the Subject Parcel is currently used as, which is the Applicant’s Stockbridge Quarry. If you have any questions about the above requests, or if any other information is needed in support of the requests, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, Jack Nichols cc: Vulcan Materials Company 51748.0012 Page 2 of 2 Parcel S33-01052000 (City of Stockbridge) Legend Stockbridge Quarry Boundary Quarry 100 ft Buffer Berm Ultimate Pit Boundary Parcel To Be Rezoned ± Stockbridge Quarry Pre-Application Meeting Notes: 1. Feature Representation: All features shown are conditional and for representation purposes only. 2. Latest Revision: December 10, 2025. Microsoft, Vantor 0 140 280 Feet A B D C E F H G I K J L M N P O Q ZONING REFERENCES: SURVEYORS COMMENTS ON B-II TITLE EXCEPTIONS AS SHOWN IN THAT COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, SAID COMMITMENT HAVING A COMMITMENT NUMBER: NCS-1274709-ORL AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 25, 2025, SAID COMMITMENT BEING ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES. OHE LVD DR S IT E SC OT TB PIN EH U RS T NEAL AVE ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, (COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 13151C0086D, DATED OCTOBER 06, 2016), ALL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X, DEFINED AS "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN." OH OH E C/L DITC X DRIVE CONST WAY .E D.B. 1 115, PSMT. X G. 196 GAT E OHE DENIE (DB 1 D ACCESS 115 P G 196 ) IPS THE FIELD DATA UPON WHICH THIS PLAT IS BASED WAS GATHERED USING BASE AND ROVER USING MULTIPLE SETUPS AND DUPLICATE OBSERVATIONS ON CORNERS. THE PROCESSED DATA HAS A HORIZONTAL POSITION OF LESS THAN 0.093. THE SCALE FACTOR USED TO ADJUST THE POINTS TO GROUND DISTANCES: 1.00013545994269. 7. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN CALCULATED FOR CLOSURE AND IS FOUND TO BE ACCURATE WITHIN ONE FOOT IN 798,544 FEET. X X X CH AIN X LIN KF E X 8. EQUIPMENT USED FOR MEASUREMENT: GPS: TRIMBLE R12I GPS BASE & RECEIVER X O OH HE E X ENC X X 10. STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL BUFFERS AND SETBACKS MIGHT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. OVERHANG X OOHH EE 13. LJA SURVEYING DOES NOT WARRANT THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY WETLANDS OR HAZARDOUS WASTES LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. X PVC STUB OH OHE E KF 14. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC CURRENT SITE ADDRESS: 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD CURRENT PID #:S33-01052000 FENCE 1.2' OVER P/L X ING OH E OH E BU ILD RIPRAP WATER METER W WATER MARKER/ MONUMENT X X O OHHE E IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WATER VAULT IPS OHE GUY WIRE A/C UNIT /L X X 'B ELECTRIC METER X X GAS METER IRON PIN FOUND X X PVC STUB COMPUTED POINT IPS X LIN KF X CE (M) (R) R/W MARKER X X 80' PROJECT #: LJAS3940-2516 RECORD DISTANCE SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION THIS PLAT IS A RETRACEMENT OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND AND DOES NOT SUBDIVIDE OR CREATE A NEW PARCEL OR MAKE ANY CHANGES TO ANY REAL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. THE RECORDING INFORMATION OF THE DOCUMENTS, MAPS, PLATS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH CREATED THE PARCEL OR PARCELS ARE STATED HEREON. RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY LOCAL JURISDICTION, AVAILABILITY OF PERMITS, COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS OR REQUIREMENTS, OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE OF THE LAND. FURTHERMORE, THE UNDERSIGNED LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFIES THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY SURVEYS IN GEORGIA AS SET FORTH IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE GEORGIA BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS AND AS SET FORTH IN O.C.G.A. SECTION 15-6-67. 120' M. Chayce Bell, GA P.L.S. #3465 Date Know what's below. Call before you dig. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 12 40' AKC MCB MCB MEASURED DISTANCE 10/24/2025 0' DRAFTED BY: MAP CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: SET 5/8" CAPPED REBAR X N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 Date M. Chayce Bell, GA P.L.S. #3465 11 EN FOUND 1/2" REBAR X CH AIN 10/24/2025 SINGLE WING CATCH BASIN MAILBOX SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM SEWER LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE FENCE 10 20 GRAVEL STORM SEWER MANHOLE CLEANOUT UTILITY POLE X X FENCE 0.6' WEST FROM P/L INITIAL: X WATER VALVE ~GRAVEL~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 13, 16, 17 AND 19 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED DURING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER OF 2025. 9 X SIGN ISSUE: DATE X E OH OH E X TO: VULCAN MATERIALS & FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COPYRIGHT 2026 LJA SURVEYING INC NO REPRODUCTION SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF LJA SURVEYING INC SHEET NO: 1 INCH = 40 FEET REV. 7: SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION REV. 6: INK CH X AIN L DESCRIPTION FE X NC E E OH OH E 10 10 'B /L 'B /L X ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN LAND LOT 62 OF THE 12TH DISTRICT OF HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, IN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, CONTAINING 1.40 ACRES AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY FOR JUDY B. MILLER PREPARED BY MATHIS-MILLIGAN SURVEYORS, INC., CERTIFIED BY DONALD R. MILLIGAN, GEORGIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 2472, DATED MAR 17, 1997, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 REV. 5: X TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION REV. 4: 8 EX X IST ING X 15. Matters as would be disclosed by a current and accurate survey and inspection of the Land. 15. ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY #23 HAS BEEN RELINQUISHED PER DB 1115 PG 196 EXCEPT WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. 10/24/2025 CH ELL BO ANEO X US X 14. Terms and provisions of an unrecorded Lease by and between Ekstedt Properties, LLC and Better Letter Mailing Services, Inc., dated September 13, 2005, as evidenced by Lessee's Assignment of Lease and Subordination among Ekstedt Properties, LLC and Wachovia SBA Lending, Inc. and Better Letter Mailing Services, Inc., filed October 20, 2005, and recorded in Deed Book 8582, Page 168, aforesaid records. LEASE INCLUDES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SC X AIN LIN MI 12. THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF HUMAN BURIALS OR CEMETERIES ON SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY. 7 13. Easements and conveyance of access rights granted in Right of Way Deed from Skateland Atlanta, Inc. to Department of Transportation, dated October 17, 1989, filed for record October 21, 1989, and recorded in Deed Book 1115, Page 196, aforesaid records. DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON. REMAINING RIGHTS OF ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY #23 HAS BEEN RELINQUISHED. X OVERHANG POST X ENC E 11. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A GEORGIA LICENSED SURVEYOR. REV. 3: X OVERHANG GA POST TE THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY NAMED HEREON. THIS PLAT DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY THE SURVEYOR NAMING SAID PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY. 6 9. ~ASPHALT~ FENCE 7.7' OVER P/L N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 6. H W 50' B/L 12. Terms and provisions of easements granted in Warranty Deed from Stockbridge Property Development Company, Inc., a corporation of the County of Henry to Roller Way Rink, Inc., a corporation of the County of Henry, dated December 9, 1969, filed for record December 12, 1969, and recorded in Deed Book 107, Page 511, Henry County, Georgia records. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON NORTH ARROW AND BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GA WEST ZONE NAD83 ADJUSTED 2011. USING GLOBAL POSITIONAL SYSTEM (GPS) AND OBTAINED BY RTK OBSERVATIONS ON 10-15-2025 USING THE LEICA SMARTNET SYSTEM. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS EXPRESSED IN U.S. SURVEY FEET (1-FOOT = 1200/3937 METERS). IF CONVERSION TO INTERNATIONAL FEET (1-FOOT = 0.3048 METERS) IS REQUIRED APPLY A SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000002 TO DISTANCES SHOWN. 5 DENIE (DB 11 D ACCESS 15 PG 196) ASPHALT 4.5' OVER P/L 5. REV. 2: K FENCE X REV. 1: 01/22/2026 ADDRESS ATTORNEY COMMENTS. CHAINLIN INV:840.19 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT (DB 107 PG 511) OH E X SECURITY POLE E " RC P 11. Rights of tenants in possession, as tenants only, under unrecorded occupancy agreements. File Location:s:\sectors\survey\projects\ljas3940 (vulcan materials)\2516 (stockbridge quarry)\06 survey cad\stockbridge quarry 3. OH 18 10. Rights of upper and lower riparian owners in and to the waters of any creek or stream that bounds or traverses the Land, free from increase, decrease or pollution. Said parcel contains 59,992 square feet, or 1.377 acres. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD BOTH WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN. 4 FOUND RWM 9. No insurance is afforded as to the amount of acreage or square footage contained in the Land. Said point lying on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1,813.62 feet, a central angle of 04 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds, a chord bearing of South 79 degrees 20 minutes 47 seconds East, and a chord length of 138.86 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way for a distance of 138.90 feet to a set 5/8” capped rebar (L.S.F. #1390); thence leaving said right-of-way run South 31 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West for a distance of 484.91 feet to a found 1/2” rebar; thence run North 58 degrees 42 minutes 20 seconds West for a distance of 130.11 feet to a set 5/8” capped rebar (L.S.F. #1390); thence run North 31 degrees 18 minutes 49 seconds East for a distance of 435.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 2. 4. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. PRIOR TO ANY PLANNING, EXCAVATION, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES (E.G., 811) MUST BE CONTACTED TO IDENTIFY THE PRESENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE, SERVICE DISRUPTION, OR SAFETY HAZARDS. OHE FOUND RWM ASPHALT 18.2' INSIDE R/W 24" RC P 8. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment, unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy and not otherwise excepted from coverage herein. Commence at a point being the centerline intersection between U.S. Highway 23 (Variable R/W) and Stephens Ave (50' R/W); thence leaving said centerline run South 40 degrees 44 minutes 26 seconds East for a distance of 61.73 feet to a found right-of-way monument on the Southerly right-of-way of the aforementioned U.S. Highway 23; thence run South 87 degrees 32 minutes 44 seconds East along said right-of-way for a distance of 7.03 feet to a point, said point lying on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1,864.71 feet, a central angle of 06 degrees 25 minutes 31 seconds, a chord bearing of South 84 degrees 19 minutes 59 seconds East, and a chord length of 209.00 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way for a distance of 209.11 feet to a point; thence run South 27 degrees 32 minutes 44 seconds West along said right-of-way for a distance of 37.01 feet to a found right-of-way monument, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF WHICH THE SURVEYOR HAS KNOWLEDGE ARE SHOWN HEREON; OTHERS MAY EXIST OF WHICH THE SURVEYOR HAS NO KNOWLEDGE AND OF WHICH THERE IS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE. OHE JB TOP:842.19 INV IN:835.99 INV OUT:835.89 FOUND RWM 7. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest covered by this Commitment. A parcel of land lying in Land Lot 62, of the 12th/ District, City of Stockbridge, Henry County, Georgia, and being more particularly described as follows: 1. E OHE FOUND RWM The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia personal property taxes, assessed to Better Letter Mailing SVC Inc., were paid in the amount of $397.67 for Tax Account Reference Number 16913. TO FIND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 (WHICH IS GEORGIA HIGHWAY 42 AND HAVING A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY) A DISTANCE OF 1,375.6 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF LAMBERT DRIVE (30 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.38 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING THUS ESTABLISHED, THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH HAS A RADIUS OF 1829.86 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 139.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET [SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 139.62 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A BEARING OF SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST]; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 493.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 130.11 FEET TO A FLAT IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 442.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY NOTES OHE LAND LOT 62 12TH DISTRICT, CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA OHE 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD FOR VULCAN MATERIALS OHE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OHE SWCB TOP:839.40 INV IN:832.9 0 INV OUT:932 .50 Any minerals or mineral rights leased, granted or retained by current or prior owners. The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia taxes were paid in the amount of $10,225.04 for Tax Map Reference Number S33-01052000. (base amount due was $10,061.77) The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia personal property taxes, assessed to Pitney Bowes Global Fin SVCS, were paid in the amount of $58.18 for Tax Account Reference Number 79663. D LOCATED IN: OHE 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 6. Taxes and assessments for the year 2025 and subsequent years, not yet due and payable, and taxes for prior years arising from reassessments or digest disputes. LV 3 OHE 2. Any facts, rights, interest or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 5. EB VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachments, encumbrances, violations, variations, or adverse circumstances affecting Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land or that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land. LO TT 4525 SOUTH LEEP ShT oR neE 7 ET 13.953.5200 BUFORD G,A 3LS 0F N 5 1.1 o 3 8 90 TITLE COMMITMENT AR 2 THIS BLOCK RESERVED FOR THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. SPRING ST NORTH HENRY BLVD (A.K.A. U.S. HWY 23) CH LAMBERT DR ANY SETBACKS AND BUFFERS SHOWN ARE GOVERNED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING PRIOR TO LAND PLANNING OR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ROCK QUARRY RD GRID NORTH GEORGIA WEST STATE PLANE NAD 83 (2011) FRONT: 50 FEET SIDE: 10 FEET REAR: 20 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 35 FEET LANE DR THE SETBACKS FOR ZONE C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PER CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE MUNICODE ACCESSED ON 10/24/2025 ARE AS FOLLOWS: STEPHENS AVE DEED BOOK 1115 PAGE 196 DEED BOOK 107 PAGE 511 MANN BLVD 1. 2. 1 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-2 PER CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE ZONING MAP ACCESSED ON OCTOBER 24, 2025. 1 OF 1 Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 147 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S33-01052000 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 1.4 Address EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC 508 GUINEVERE CT MCDONOUGH, GA 30252 Land $167,700 Value: Building $473,400 Value: Misc $11,440 Value: Total $652,540 Value: Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/29/2005 $502,000 FM Q 9/26/2002 $0 U U Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/29/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/29/2026 1:13:22 AM Developed by Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 294 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S33-01052000 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 1.4 Address EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC 508 GUINEVERE CT MCDONOUGH, GA 30252 Land $167,700 Value: Building $473,400 Value: Misc $11,440 Value: Total $652,540 Value: Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/29/2005 $502,000 FM Q 9/26/2002 $0 U U Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/29/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/29/2026 1:13:22 AM Developed by Applicant Campaign Disclosure Form (Must be completed by the applicant, the property owner, and the agent. Use as many forms as needed.) Has the applicant made, within two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of this application for a conditional use permit, campaign contributions aggregating $250 or more, or made gifts having in the aggregate a value of $250 or more to a member of the City of Stockbridge Planning Commission or Stockbridge City Council who will consider the application? Yes No If Yes, the applicant and the attorney representing the applicant must file the following information with the City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Division within ten (10) days after this application is first filed: Planning Commissioner and/or City Council Member Name Dollar Amount of / Campaign Contribution We certify that the foregoing information is true and correct, this I Description of Gift $250 or greater, which was given to Board Member day of~ — Applicant’s Name - Printed Signature of Applicant/Property Owner/Agent Applicant’s Attorney, if applicable - Printed Sign0(ire of Applicant’s Attorney, if applicable Sworn to and subscribed before me this J IA iN 'day of _________ _________________ lotary Public NOTARY PUBLIC GEORGIA MARSHA L. GILLESPIE MONROE COUNTY * Applicant means any individual or business entity (corporation, partnership, limited partnership, firm enterprise, franchise, association, or trust) applying for a variance. Citv of Stockbridoe Community Develooment Deoartment-4602 North Henry Blvd : Sfockbridoe. GA 302S1 770-389-7900 TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN LAND LOT 62 OF THE 12th DISTRICT OF HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, IN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, CONTAINING 1.40 ACRES AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY FOR JUDY B. MILLER PREPARED BY MATHIS-MILLIGAN SURVEYORS, INC. CERTIFIED BY DONALD R. MILLIGAN, GEORGIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 2472 DATED MAR. 17, 1997, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TO FIND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 (WHICH IS GEORGIA HIGHWAY 42 AND HAVING A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY) A DISTANCE OF 1,375.6 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF LAMBERT DRIVE (30 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.38 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING THUS ESTABLISHED, THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH HAS A RADIUS OF 1,829.86 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 139.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET [SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 139.62 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A BEARING OF SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST]; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 493.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 130.11 FEET TO A FLAT IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 422.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 231 Riverside Drive Suite 100 Macon, Georgia 31201 0 478.742.4280 BRANNAN GROOVER F 478.742.8720 Jack Nichols Direct Line: (478)749-9982 Email: jnichols@jamesbatesllp.com - Please Reply to the Macon Office - June 1,2026 Ryan Anderson Community Development Director Stockbridge, Georgia randerson@stockbridgega.org Veronia Green Chief Planner Stockbridge, Georgia vgreen @st ockb ridgega. or g Re: Letter of Intent for 4231 North Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, GA 30281 Parcel No. S33-01052000 (the “Subject Parcel”) Dear Mr. Anderson and Ms. Green: I represent Vulcan Lands, Inc. c/o Vulcan Materials Company (“Applicant” or “Vulcan”), and I am submitting this letter of intent along with Vulcan’s Application to the City of Stockbridge (the “City”) relating to three zoning related requests for the above-referenced Subject Parcel. The three requests are for: 1. Rezoning of the Subject Parcel from C2 (general commercial district) to HI (heavy industrial district); 2. Special Use Permit for the Subject Parcel to allow the development of natural resources including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery; and 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Subject Parcel’s designation on the City’s Future Land Use Map from Low Density Mixed-Use to Heavy Industrial. The Subject Parcel is 1.4 acres currently zoned C2 that is owned by Ekstedt Properties, LLC (“Ekstedt”). There is one building on the property that is used in Ekstedt’s business. Ekstedt is fully aware of the Applicant’s requests to the City and supports the Applicant’s requests for the Subject Parcel. The Subject Parcel has approximately 140 feet of frontage along North Henry Boulevard. All remaining sides of the Subject Parcel are surrounded by property owned by the Applicant and currently used in the Applicant’s Stockbridge Quarry. The Subject Parcel juts into the Applicant’s property (parcel no. S33-01053000), creating a rectangular incision into the 30+ ATLANTA ATHENS MACON jamesbatesllp.com Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Veronica Green, Chief Planner June 1,2026 acres of property owned by the Applicant that surrounds the Subject Parcel. All the Applicant’s property surrounding the Subject Parcel is already zoned HI and used as part of Applicant’s quarry. In total the Applicant owns over 787 acres of property associated with the Stockbridge Quarry. The Applicant requests that the Subject Parcel be rezoned to HI in order to allow the Applicant to utilize the 1.4 acres as part of its quarry operations. If rezoning is approved, the large majority of the Subject Parcel would be utilized as a berm with a small portion of the 1.4 acres being used as an edge of the Applicant’s mining pit as shown on the Site Plan submitted with this Application. Pursuant to the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) at § 3.2.25, mines and quarries are allowed in the HI zoning district. That section states, “The development of natural resources, including removal of minerals and other natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery, is allowed in the HI zoning district. . . .” Section 3.1 of the UDC states that mines and quarries are Permitted Uses in the HI district, but it also says that the “[d]evelopment of natural resources, including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery” requires a Special Use in the HI district. Thus, to try and fully satisfy any discrepancies in the UDC, the Applicant is also requesting that it be granted a Special Use Permit pursuant to § 3.1 of the UDC to allow the Applicant to build a berm and conduct mining operations on the Subject Parcel. Finally, the Applicant is also asking that the City’s Comprehensive Plan be amended to the extent that the Subject Parcel is currently designated as Low Density Mixed-Use on the Future Land Use Map. The Applicant asks that the Subject Parcel’s designation on the Future Land Use Map be changed to Heavy Industrial to conform to what the Subject Parcel would actually be used for if rezoning is approved. This change would also make sense so as to correspond to what all the property surrounding the Subject Parcel is currently used as, which is the Applicant’s Stockbridge Quarry. If you have any questions about the above requests, or if any other information is needed in support of the requests, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, Jack Nichols cc: Vulcan Materials Company 51748.0012 Page 2 of 2 REZ-2026.06.1186 Address: 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD, STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Web Form City of Stockbridge Plannin Community Development D Rezoning Request Application Name of Applicant First: Vulcan Lands, Inc. Applicants Address: 1200 Urban Center Drive City Birmingha m State: Alabama Name of Owner: First Ekstedt Properties, LLC Owner's Address 4231 North Henry Boulevard City: Stockbridge State: Georgia Zip: 35242 Zip:30281 Name of Second Owner: First Second Property Owner's Address: City: State: Name of Third Owner: First Zip: Third Property Owner's Address: City: Name of Agent: State: Zip: First Jack Agent's Address: 231 Riverside Drive City: Macon State: Georgia Zip: 31201 THE APPLICANT NAMED ABOVE AFFIRMS THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER OR AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW AND REQUESTS The property will be P Request from C-2 (General Commercial District) to property owner shall n (Current Zoning) property for no less th HI (Heavy Industrial District) (Requested Zoning District) For the Purpose of: Further development of natural resources in conjunction with the existing quarry pursuant to Section 3.2.25 o (Type of Development) Case Name: Rezoning Application for 4231 North Henry Boulevard Is Development of Regional Impact (DRI)? Size of Tract: 1.4 acres Yes No Nearest intersection to t Land Lot Number(s): 62 Gross Density: units per acre Net Density: units per Vulcan Lands, Inc. Applicant Signature Property Owner Authorization Form please click here Parcel S33-01052000 (City of Stockbridge) Legend Stockbridge Quarry Boundary Quarry 100 ft Buffer Berm Ultimate Pit Boundary Parcel To Be Rezoned ± Stockbridge Quarry Pre-Application Meeting Notes: 1. Feature Representation: All features shown are conditional and for representation purposes only. 2. Latest Revision: December 10, 2025. Microsoft, Vantor 0 140 280 Feet A B D C E F H G I K J L M N P O Q ZONING REFERENCES: SURVEYORS COMMENTS ON B-II TITLE EXCEPTIONS AS SHOWN IN THAT COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, SAID COMMITMENT HAVING A COMMITMENT NUMBER: NCS-1274709-ORL AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 25, 2025, SAID COMMITMENT BEING ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES. OHE LVD DR S IT E SC OT TB PIN EH U RS T NEAL AVE ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, (COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 13151C0086D, DATED OCTOBER 06, 2016), ALL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X, DEFINED AS "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN." OH OH E C/L DITC X DRIVE CONST WAY .E D.B. 1 115, PSMT. X G. 196 GAT E OHE DENIE (DB 1 D ACCESS 115 P G 196 ) IPS THE FIELD DATA UPON WHICH THIS PLAT IS BASED WAS GATHERED USING BASE AND ROVER USING MULTIPLE SETUPS AND DUPLICATE OBSERVATIONS ON CORNERS. THE PROCESSED DATA HAS A HORIZONTAL POSITION OF LESS THAN 0.093. THE SCALE FACTOR USED TO ADJUST THE POINTS TO GROUND DISTANCES: 1.00013545994269. 7. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN CALCULATED FOR CLOSURE AND IS FOUND TO BE ACCURATE WITHIN ONE FOOT IN 798,544 FEET. X X X CH AIN X LIN KF E X 8. EQUIPMENT USED FOR MEASUREMENT: GPS: TRIMBLE R12I GPS BASE & RECEIVER X O OH HE E X ENC X X 10. STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL BUFFERS AND SETBACKS MIGHT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. OVERHANG X OOHH EE 13. LJA SURVEYING DOES NOT WARRANT THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY WETLANDS OR HAZARDOUS WASTES LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. X PVC STUB OH OHE E KF 14. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC CURRENT SITE ADDRESS: 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD CURRENT PID #:S33-01052000 FENCE 1.2' OVER P/L X ING OH E OH E BU ILD RIPRAP WATER METER W WATER MARKER/ MONUMENT X X O OHHE E IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WATER VAULT IPS OHE GUY WIRE A/C UNIT /L X X 'B ELECTRIC METER X X GAS METER IRON PIN FOUND X X PVC STUB COMPUTED POINT IPS X LIN KF X CE (M) (R) R/W MARKER X X 80' PROJECT #: LJAS3940-2516 RECORD DISTANCE SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION THIS PLAT IS A RETRACEMENT OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND AND DOES NOT SUBDIVIDE OR CREATE A NEW PARCEL OR MAKE ANY CHANGES TO ANY REAL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. THE RECORDING INFORMATION OF THE DOCUMENTS, MAPS, PLATS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH CREATED THE PARCEL OR PARCELS ARE STATED HEREON. RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY LOCAL JURISDICTION, AVAILABILITY OF PERMITS, COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS OR REQUIREMENTS, OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE OF THE LAND. FURTHERMORE, THE UNDERSIGNED LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFIES THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY SURVEYS IN GEORGIA AS SET FORTH IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE GEORGIA BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS AND AS SET FORTH IN O.C.G.A. SECTION 15-6-67. 120' M. Chayce Bell, GA P.L.S. #3465 Date Know what's below. Call before you dig. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 12 40' AKC MCB MCB MEASURED DISTANCE 10/24/2025 0' DRAFTED BY: MAP CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: SET 5/8" CAPPED REBAR X N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 Date M. Chayce Bell, GA P.L.S. #3465 11 EN FOUND 1/2" REBAR X CH AIN 10/24/2025 SINGLE WING CATCH BASIN MAILBOX SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM SEWER LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE FENCE 10 20 GRAVEL STORM SEWER MANHOLE CLEANOUT UTILITY POLE X X FENCE 0.6' WEST FROM P/L INITIAL: X WATER VALVE ~GRAVEL~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 13, 16, 17 AND 19 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED DURING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER OF 2025. 9 X SIGN ISSUE: DATE X E OH OH E X TO: VULCAN MATERIALS & FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COPYRIGHT 2026 LJA SURVEYING INC NO REPRODUCTION SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF LJA SURVEYING INC SHEET NO: 1 INCH = 40 FEET REV. 7: SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION REV. 6: INK CH X AIN L DESCRIPTION FE X NC E E OH OH E 10 10 'B /L 'B /L X ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN LAND LOT 62 OF THE 12TH DISTRICT OF HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, IN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, CONTAINING 1.40 ACRES AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY FOR JUDY B. MILLER PREPARED BY MATHIS-MILLIGAN SURVEYORS, INC., CERTIFIED BY DONALD R. MILLIGAN, GEORGIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 2472, DATED MAR 17, 1997, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 REV. 5: X TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION REV. 4: 8 EX X IST ING X 15. Matters as would be disclosed by a current and accurate survey and inspection of the Land. 15. ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY #23 HAS BEEN RELINQUISHED PER DB 1115 PG 196 EXCEPT WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. 10/24/2025 CH ELL BO ANEO X US X 14. Terms and provisions of an unrecorded Lease by and between Ekstedt Properties, LLC and Better Letter Mailing Services, Inc., dated September 13, 2005, as evidenced by Lessee's Assignment of Lease and Subordination among Ekstedt Properties, LLC and Wachovia SBA Lending, Inc. and Better Letter Mailing Services, Inc., filed October 20, 2005, and recorded in Deed Book 8582, Page 168, aforesaid records. LEASE INCLUDES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SC X AIN LIN MI 12. THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF HUMAN BURIALS OR CEMETERIES ON SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY. 7 13. Easements and conveyance of access rights granted in Right of Way Deed from Skateland Atlanta, Inc. to Department of Transportation, dated October 17, 1989, filed for record October 21, 1989, and recorded in Deed Book 1115, Page 196, aforesaid records. DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON. REMAINING RIGHTS OF ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY #23 HAS BEEN RELINQUISHED. X OVERHANG POST X ENC E 11. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A GEORGIA LICENSED SURVEYOR. REV. 3: X OVERHANG GA POST TE THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY NAMED HEREON. THIS PLAT DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY THE SURVEYOR NAMING SAID PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY. 6 9. ~ASPHALT~ FENCE 7.7' OVER P/L N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 6. H W 50' B/L 12. Terms and provisions of easements granted in Warranty Deed from Stockbridge Property Development Company, Inc., a corporation of the County of Henry to Roller Way Rink, Inc., a corporation of the County of Henry, dated December 9, 1969, filed for record December 12, 1969, and recorded in Deed Book 107, Page 511, Henry County, Georgia records. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON NORTH ARROW AND BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GA WEST ZONE NAD83 ADJUSTED 2011. USING GLOBAL POSITIONAL SYSTEM (GPS) AND OBTAINED BY RTK OBSERVATIONS ON 10-15-2025 USING THE LEICA SMARTNET SYSTEM. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS EXPRESSED IN U.S. SURVEY FEET (1-FOOT = 1200/3937 METERS). IF CONVERSION TO INTERNATIONAL FEET (1-FOOT = 0.3048 METERS) IS REQUIRED APPLY A SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000002 TO DISTANCES SHOWN. 5 DENIE (DB 11 D ACCESS 15 PG 196) ASPHALT 4.5' OVER P/L 5. REV. 2: K FENCE X REV. 1: 01/22/2026 ADDRESS ATTORNEY COMMENTS. CHAINLIN INV:840.19 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT (DB 107 PG 511) OH E X SECURITY POLE E " RC P 11. Rights of tenants in possession, as tenants only, under unrecorded occupancy agreements. File Location:s:\sectors\survey\projects\ljas3940 (vulcan materials)\2516 (stockbridge quarry)\06 survey cad\stockbridge quarry 3. OH 18 10. Rights of upper and lower riparian owners in and to the waters of any creek or stream that bounds or traverses the Land, free from increase, decrease or pollution. Said parcel contains 59,992 square feet, or 1.377 acres. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD BOTH WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN. 4 FOUND RWM 9. No insurance is afforded as to the amount of acreage or square footage contained in the Land. Said point lying on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1,813.62 feet, a central angle of 04 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds, a chord bearing of South 79 degrees 20 minutes 47 seconds East, and a chord length of 138.86 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way for a distance of 138.90 feet to a set 5/8” capped rebar (L.S.F. #1390); thence leaving said right-of-way run South 31 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West for a distance of 484.91 feet to a found 1/2” rebar; thence run North 58 degrees 42 minutes 20 seconds West for a distance of 130.11 feet to a set 5/8” capped rebar (L.S.F. #1390); thence run North 31 degrees 18 minutes 49 seconds East for a distance of 435.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 2. 4. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. PRIOR TO ANY PLANNING, EXCAVATION, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES (E.G., 811) MUST BE CONTACTED TO IDENTIFY THE PRESENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE, SERVICE DISRUPTION, OR SAFETY HAZARDS. OHE FOUND RWM ASPHALT 18.2' INSIDE R/W 24" RC P 8. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment, unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy and not otherwise excepted from coverage herein. Commence at a point being the centerline intersection between U.S. Highway 23 (Variable R/W) and Stephens Ave (50' R/W); thence leaving said centerline run South 40 degrees 44 minutes 26 seconds East for a distance of 61.73 feet to a found right-of-way monument on the Southerly right-of-way of the aforementioned U.S. Highway 23; thence run South 87 degrees 32 minutes 44 seconds East along said right-of-way for a distance of 7.03 feet to a point, said point lying on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1,864.71 feet, a central angle of 06 degrees 25 minutes 31 seconds, a chord bearing of South 84 degrees 19 minutes 59 seconds East, and a chord length of 209.00 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way for a distance of 209.11 feet to a point; thence run South 27 degrees 32 minutes 44 seconds West along said right-of-way for a distance of 37.01 feet to a found right-of-way monument, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF WHICH THE SURVEYOR HAS KNOWLEDGE ARE SHOWN HEREON; OTHERS MAY EXIST OF WHICH THE SURVEYOR HAS NO KNOWLEDGE AND OF WHICH THERE IS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE. OHE JB TOP:842.19 INV IN:835.99 INV OUT:835.89 FOUND RWM 7. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest covered by this Commitment. A parcel of land lying in Land Lot 62, of the 12th/ District, City of Stockbridge, Henry County, Georgia, and being more particularly described as follows: 1. E OHE FOUND RWM The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia personal property taxes, assessed to Better Letter Mailing SVC Inc., were paid in the amount of $397.67 for Tax Account Reference Number 16913. TO FIND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 (WHICH IS GEORGIA HIGHWAY 42 AND HAVING A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY) A DISTANCE OF 1,375.6 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF LAMBERT DRIVE (30 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.38 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING THUS ESTABLISHED, THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH HAS A RADIUS OF 1829.86 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 139.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET [SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 139.62 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A BEARING OF SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST]; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 493.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 130.11 FEET TO A FLAT IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 442.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY NOTES OHE LAND LOT 62 12TH DISTRICT, CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA OHE 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD FOR VULCAN MATERIALS OHE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OHE SWCB TOP:839.40 INV IN:832.9 0 INV OUT:932 .50 Any minerals or mineral rights leased, granted or retained by current or prior owners. The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia taxes were paid in the amount of $10,225.04 for Tax Map Reference Number S33-01052000. (base amount due was $10,061.77) The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia personal property taxes, assessed to Pitney Bowes Global Fin SVCS, were paid in the amount of $58.18 for Tax Account Reference Number 79663. D LOCATED IN: OHE 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 6. Taxes and assessments for the year 2025 and subsequent years, not yet due and payable, and taxes for prior years arising from reassessments or digest disputes. LV 3 OHE 2. Any facts, rights, interest or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 5. EB VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachments, encumbrances, violations, variations, or adverse circumstances affecting Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land or that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land. LO TT 4525 SOUTH LEEP ShT oR neE 7 ET 13.953.5200 BUFORD G,A 3LS 0F N 5 1.1 o 3 8 90 TITLE COMMITMENT AR 2 THIS BLOCK RESERVED FOR THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. SPRING ST NORTH HENRY BLVD (A.K.A. U.S. HWY 23) CH LAMBERT DR ANY SETBACKS AND BUFFERS SHOWN ARE GOVERNED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING PRIOR TO LAND PLANNING OR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ROCK QUARRY RD GRID NORTH GEORGIA WEST STATE PLANE NAD 83 (2011) FRONT: 50 FEET SIDE: 10 FEET REAR: 20 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 35 FEET LANE DR THE SETBACKS FOR ZONE C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PER CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE MUNICODE ACCESSED ON 10/24/2025 ARE AS FOLLOWS: STEPHENS AVE DEED BOOK 1115 PAGE 196 DEED BOOK 107 PAGE 511 MANN BLVD 1. 2. 1 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-2 PER CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE ZONING MAP ACCESSED ON OCTOBER 24, 2025. 1 OF 1 Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 147 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S33-01052000 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 1.4 Address EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC 508 GUINEVERE CT MCDONOUGH, GA 30252 Land $167,700 Value: Building $473,400 Value: Misc $11,440 Value: Total $652,540 Value: Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/29/2005 $502,000 FM Q 9/26/2002 $0 U U Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/29/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/29/2026 1:13:22 AM Developed by Henry County, GA Overview Legend Parcels Roads 294 ft Parcel ID Property Address District S33-01052000 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD City/Stockbridge SSD Class Commercial Owner Acreage 1.4 Address EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC 508 GUINEVERE CT MCDONOUGH, GA 30252 Land $167,700 Value: Building $473,400 Value: Misc $11,440 Value: Total $652,540 Value: Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/29/2005 $502,000 FM Q 9/26/2002 $0 U U Parcel lines depicted on the maps do not re ect a true and exact representation of property boundaries and should not be relied upon for said purpose. Property boundary lines are depicted on recorded plats available at the Henry County courthouse or can be determined by employing the services of a licensed surveyor. Date created: 6/29/2026 Last Data Uploaded: 6/29/2026 1:13:22 AM Developed by Applicant Campaign Disclosure Form (Must be completed by the applicant, the property owner, and the agent. Use as many forms as needed.) Has the applicant made, within two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of this application for a conditional use permit, campaign contributions aggregating $250 or more, or made gifts having in the aggregate a value of $250 or more to a member of the City of Stockbridge Planning Commission or Stockbridge City Council who will consider the application? Yes No If Yes, the applicant and the attorney representing the applicant must file the following information with the City of Stockbridge Planning and Zoning Division within ten (10) days after this application is first filed: Planning Commissioner and/or City Council Member Name Dollar Amount of / Campaign Contribution We certify that the foregoing information is true and correct, this I Description of Gift $250 or greater, which was given to Board Member day of~ — Applicant’s Name - Printed Signature of Applicant/Property Owner/Agent Applicant’s Attorney, if applicable - Printed Sign0(ire of Applicant’s Attorney, if applicable Sworn to and subscribed before me this J IA iN 'day of _________ _________________ lotary Public NOTARY PUBLIC GEORGIA MARSHA L. GILLESPIE MONROE COUNTY * Applicant means any individual or business entity (corporation, partnership, limited partnership, firm enterprise, franchise, association, or trust) applying for a variance. Citv of Stockbridoe Community Develooment Deoartment-4602 North Henry Blvd : Sfockbridoe. GA 302S1 770-389-7900 TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN LAND LOT 62 OF THE 12th DISTRICT OF HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, IN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, CONTAINING 1.40 ACRES AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY FOR JUDY B. MILLER PREPARED BY MATHIS-MILLIGAN SURVEYORS, INC. CERTIFIED BY DONALD R. MILLIGAN, GEORGIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 2472 DATED MAR. 17, 1997, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TO FIND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 (WHICH IS GEORGIA HIGHWAY 42 AND HAVING A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY) A DISTANCE OF 1,375.6 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF LAMBERT DRIVE (30 FEET RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.38 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING THUS ESTABLISHED, THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH HAS A RADIUS OF 1,829.86 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 139.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET [SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 139.62 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A BEARING OF SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST]; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 493.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 130.11 FEET TO A FLAT IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 422.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 231 Riverside Drive Suite 100 Macon, Georgia 31201 0 478.742.4280 BRANNAN GROOVER F 478.742.8720 Jack Nichols Direct Line: (478)749-9982 Email: jnichols@jamesbatesllp.com - Please Reply to the Macon Office - June 1,2026 Ryan Anderson Community Development Director Stockbridge, Georgia randerson@stockbridgega.org Veronia Green Chief Planner Stockbridge, Georgia vgreen @st ockb ridgega. or g Re: Letter of Intent for 4231 North Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, GA 30281 Parcel No. S33-01052000 (the “Subject Parcel”) Dear Mr. Anderson and Ms. Green: I represent Vulcan Lands, Inc. c/o Vulcan Materials Company (“Applicant” or “Vulcan”), and I am submitting this letter of intent along with Vulcan’s Application to the City of Stockbridge (the “City”) relating to three zoning related requests for the above-referenced Subject Parcel. The three requests are for: 1. Rezoning of the Subject Parcel from C2 (general commercial district) to HI (heavy industrial district); 2. Special Use Permit for the Subject Parcel to allow the development of natural resources including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery; and 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Subject Parcel’s designation on the City’s Future Land Use Map from Low Density Mixed-Use to Heavy Industrial. The Subject Parcel is 1.4 acres currently zoned C2 that is owned by Ekstedt Properties, LLC (“Ekstedt”). There is one building on the property that is used in Ekstedt’s business. Ekstedt is fully aware of the Applicant’s requests to the City and supports the Applicant’s requests for the Subject Parcel. The Subject Parcel has approximately 140 feet of frontage along North Henry Boulevard. All remaining sides of the Subject Parcel are surrounded by property owned by the Applicant and currently used in the Applicant’s Stockbridge Quarry. The Subject Parcel juts into the Applicant’s property (parcel no. S33-01053000), creating a rectangular incision into the 30+ ATLANTA ATHENS MACON jamesbatesllp.com Ryan Anderson, Community Development Director Veronica Green, Chief Planner June 1,2026 acres of property owned by the Applicant that surrounds the Subject Parcel. All the Applicant’s property surrounding the Subject Parcel is already zoned HI and used as part of Applicant’s quarry. In total the Applicant owns over 787 acres of property associated with the Stockbridge Quarry. The Applicant requests that the Subject Parcel be rezoned to HI in order to allow the Applicant to utilize the 1.4 acres as part of its quarry operations. If rezoning is approved, the large majority of the Subject Parcel would be utilized as a berm with a small portion of the 1.4 acres being used as an edge of the Applicant’s mining pit as shown on the Site Plan submitted with this Application. Pursuant to the City’s Unified Development Code (“UDC”) at § 3.2.25, mines and quarries are allowed in the HI zoning district. That section states, “The development of natural resources, including removal of minerals and other natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery, is allowed in the HI zoning district. . . .” Section 3.1 of the UDC states that mines and quarries are Permitted Uses in the HI district, but it also says that the “[d]evelopment of natural resources, including the removal of minerals (such as rock quarries) and natural materials, together with necessary buildings and machinery” requires a Special Use in the HI district. Thus, to try and fully satisfy any discrepancies in the UDC, the Applicant is also requesting that it be granted a Special Use Permit pursuant to § 3.1 of the UDC to allow the Applicant to build a berm and conduct mining operations on the Subject Parcel. Finally, the Applicant is also asking that the City’s Comprehensive Plan be amended to the extent that the Subject Parcel is currently designated as Low Density Mixed-Use on the Future Land Use Map. The Applicant asks that the Subject Parcel’s designation on the Future Land Use Map be changed to Heavy Industrial to conform to what the Subject Parcel would actually be used for if rezoning is approved. This change would also make sense so as to correspond to what all the property surrounding the Subject Parcel is currently used as, which is the Applicant’s Stockbridge Quarry. If you have any questions about the above requests, or if any other information is needed in support of the requests, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, Jack Nichols cc: Vulcan Materials Company 51748.0012 Page 2 of 2 Parcel S33-01052000 (City of Stockbridge) Legend Stockbridge Quarry Boundary Quarry 100 ft Buffer Berm Ultimate Pit Boundary Parcel To Be Rezoned ± Stockbridge Quarry Pre-Application Meeting Notes: 1. Feature Representation: All features shown are conditional and for representation purposes only. 2. Latest Revision: December 10, 2025. Microsoft, Vantor 0 140 280 Feet SPEC-2026.06.1187 Address: 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD, STOCKBRIDGE, GA 30281 Web Form City of Stockbridge Planning and Community Development Departm Special Use Permit Application Name of Applicant: First Vulcan Lands, Inc. Applicant's Address: 1200 Urban Center Drive City: Birmingham Last c/o Vulcan State: Alabama Name of Agent: First Jack Agent's Address: 231 Riverside Drive City: Macon Last Nichols State: Georgia THE APPLICANT NAMED ABOVE AFFIRMS THAT HE OR SHE IS THE OWNER, OR AGENT OF THE OWNER, OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW, AND IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Special Use Permit(s) being requested: Conditional use in the HI district to allow the development of natural resources pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Unified Development Code. Nearest intersection to the property: North Henry Boulevard and Pinehurst Drive Size of Tract: 1.4 acres Land Lot Number(s): 62 Property Owner Authorization Form please click here A B D C E F H G I K J L M N P O Q ZONING REFERENCES: SURVEYORS COMMENTS ON B-II TITLE EXCEPTIONS AS SHOWN IN THAT COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, SAID COMMITMENT HAVING A COMMITMENT NUMBER: NCS-1274709-ORL AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 25, 2025, SAID COMMITMENT BEING ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES. OHE LVD DR S IT E SC OT TB PIN EH U RS T NEAL AVE ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, (COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 13151C0086D, DATED OCTOBER 06, 2016), ALL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X, DEFINED AS "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN." OH OH E C/L DITC X DRIVE CONST WAY .E D.B. 1 115, PSMT. X G. 196 GAT E OHE DENIE (DB 1 D ACCESS 115 P G 196 ) IPS THE FIELD DATA UPON WHICH THIS PLAT IS BASED WAS GATHERED USING BASE AND ROVER USING MULTIPLE SETUPS AND DUPLICATE OBSERVATIONS ON CORNERS. THE PROCESSED DATA HAS A HORIZONTAL POSITION OF LESS THAN 0.093. THE SCALE FACTOR USED TO ADJUST THE POINTS TO GROUND DISTANCES: 1.00013545994269. 7. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN CALCULATED FOR CLOSURE AND IS FOUND TO BE ACCURATE WITHIN ONE FOOT IN 798,544 FEET. X X X CH AIN X LIN KF E X 8. EQUIPMENT USED FOR MEASUREMENT: GPS: TRIMBLE R12I GPS BASE & RECEIVER X O OH HE E X ENC X X 10. STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL BUFFERS AND SETBACKS MIGHT EXIST ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. OVERHANG X OOHH EE 13. LJA SURVEYING DOES NOT WARRANT THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY WETLANDS OR HAZARDOUS WASTES LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. X PVC STUB OH OHE E KF 14. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: EKSTEDT PROPERTIES LLC CURRENT SITE ADDRESS: 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD CURRENT PID #:S33-01052000 FENCE 1.2' OVER P/L X ING OH E OH E BU ILD RIPRAP WATER METER W WATER MARKER/ MONUMENT X X O OHHE E IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WATER VAULT IPS OHE GUY WIRE A/C UNIT /L X X 'B ELECTRIC METER X X GAS METER IRON PIN FOUND X X PVC STUB COMPUTED POINT IPS X LIN KF X CE (M) (R) R/W MARKER X X 80' PROJECT #: LJAS3940-2516 RECORD DISTANCE SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION THIS PLAT IS A RETRACEMENT OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND AND DOES NOT SUBDIVIDE OR CREATE A NEW PARCEL OR MAKE ANY CHANGES TO ANY REAL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. THE RECORDING INFORMATION OF THE DOCUMENTS, MAPS, PLATS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH CREATED THE PARCEL OR PARCELS ARE STATED HEREON. RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY LOCAL JURISDICTION, AVAILABILITY OF PERMITS, COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS OR REQUIREMENTS, OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE OF THE LAND. FURTHERMORE, THE UNDERSIGNED LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFIES THAT THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY SURVEYS IN GEORGIA AS SET FORTH IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE GEORGIA BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS AND AS SET FORTH IN O.C.G.A. SECTION 15-6-67. 120' M. Chayce Bell, GA P.L.S. #3465 Date Know what's below. Call before you dig. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 12 40' AKC MCB MCB MEASURED DISTANCE 10/24/2025 0' DRAFTED BY: MAP CHECKED BY: REVIEWED BY: SET 5/8" CAPPED REBAR X N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 Date M. Chayce Bell, GA P.L.S. #3465 11 EN FOUND 1/2" REBAR X CH AIN 10/24/2025 SINGLE WING CATCH BASIN MAILBOX SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM SEWER LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE FENCE 10 20 GRAVEL STORM SEWER MANHOLE CLEANOUT UTILITY POLE X X FENCE 0.6' WEST FROM P/L INITIAL: X WATER VALVE ~GRAVEL~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 13, 16, 17 AND 19 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED DURING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER OF 2025. 9 X SIGN ISSUE: DATE X E OH OH E X TO: VULCAN MATERIALS & FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COPYRIGHT 2026 LJA SURVEYING INC NO REPRODUCTION SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF LJA SURVEYING INC SHEET NO: 1 INCH = 40 FEET REV. 7: SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION REV. 6: INK CH X AIN L DESCRIPTION FE X NC E E OH OH E 10 10 'B /L 'B /L X ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN LAND LOT 62 OF THE 12TH DISTRICT OF HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA, IN THE CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE, CONTAINING 1.40 ACRES AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SURVEY FOR JUDY B. MILLER PREPARED BY MATHIS-MILLIGAN SURVEYORS, INC., CERTIFIED BY DONALD R. MILLIGAN, GEORGIA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 2472, DATED MAR 17, 1997, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 REV. 5: X TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION REV. 4: 8 EX X IST ING X 15. Matters as would be disclosed by a current and accurate survey and inspection of the Land. 15. ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY #23 HAS BEEN RELINQUISHED PER DB 1115 PG 196 EXCEPT WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. 10/24/2025 CH ELL BO ANEO X US X 14. Terms and provisions of an unrecorded Lease by and between Ekstedt Properties, LLC and Better Letter Mailing Services, Inc., dated September 13, 2005, as evidenced by Lessee's Assignment of Lease and Subordination among Ekstedt Properties, LLC and Wachovia SBA Lending, Inc. and Better Letter Mailing Services, Inc., filed October 20, 2005, and recorded in Deed Book 8582, Page 168, aforesaid records. LEASE INCLUDES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SC X AIN LIN MI 12. THERE WAS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF HUMAN BURIALS OR CEMETERIES ON SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY. 7 13. Easements and conveyance of access rights granted in Right of Way Deed from Skateland Atlanta, Inc. to Department of Transportation, dated October 17, 1989, filed for record October 21, 1989, and recorded in Deed Book 1115, Page 196, aforesaid records. DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON. REMAINING RIGHTS OF ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY #23 HAS BEEN RELINQUISHED. X OVERHANG POST X ENC E 11. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A GEORGIA LICENSED SURVEYOR. REV. 3: X OVERHANG GA POST TE THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY NAMED HEREON. THIS PLAT DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY THE SURVEYOR NAMING SAID PERSON, PERSONS, OR ENTITY. 6 9. ~ASPHALT~ FENCE 7.7' OVER P/L N/F VULCAN LANDS INC DB 3613 PG 192 PID#S33-01053000 6. H W 50' B/L 12. Terms and provisions of easements granted in Warranty Deed from Stockbridge Property Development Company, Inc., a corporation of the County of Henry to Roller Way Rink, Inc., a corporation of the County of Henry, dated December 9, 1969, filed for record December 12, 1969, and recorded in Deed Book 107, Page 511, Henry County, Georgia records. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON NORTH ARROW AND BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GA WEST ZONE NAD83 ADJUSTED 2011. USING GLOBAL POSITIONAL SYSTEM (GPS) AND OBTAINED BY RTK OBSERVATIONS ON 10-15-2025 USING THE LEICA SMARTNET SYSTEM. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS EXPRESSED IN U.S. SURVEY FEET (1-FOOT = 1200/3937 METERS). IF CONVERSION TO INTERNATIONAL FEET (1-FOOT = 0.3048 METERS) IS REQUIRED APPLY A SCALE FACTOR OF 1.000002 TO DISTANCES SHOWN. 5 DENIE (DB 11 D ACCESS 15 PG 196) ASPHALT 4.5' OVER P/L 5. REV. 2: K FENCE X REV. 1: 01/22/2026 ADDRESS ATTORNEY COMMENTS. CHAINLIN INV:840.19 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT (DB 107 PG 511) OH E X SECURITY POLE E " RC P 11. Rights of tenants in possession, as tenants only, under unrecorded occupancy agreements. File Location:s:\sectors\survey\projects\ljas3940 (vulcan materials)\2516 (stockbridge quarry)\06 survey cad\stockbridge quarry 3. OH 18 10. Rights of upper and lower riparian owners in and to the waters of any creek or stream that bounds or traverses the Land, free from increase, decrease or pollution. Said parcel contains 59,992 square feet, or 1.377 acres. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD BOTH WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN. 4 FOUND RWM 9. No insurance is afforded as to the amount of acreage or square footage contained in the Land. Said point lying on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1,813.62 feet, a central angle of 04 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds, a chord bearing of South 79 degrees 20 minutes 47 seconds East, and a chord length of 138.86 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way for a distance of 138.90 feet to a set 5/8” capped rebar (L.S.F. #1390); thence leaving said right-of-way run South 31 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West for a distance of 484.91 feet to a found 1/2” rebar; thence run North 58 degrees 42 minutes 20 seconds West for a distance of 130.11 feet to a set 5/8” capped rebar (L.S.F. #1390); thence run North 31 degrees 18 minutes 49 seconds East for a distance of 435.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 2. 4. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT LOCATED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. PRIOR TO ANY PLANNING, EXCAVATION, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES (E.G., 811) MUST BE CONTACTED TO IDENTIFY THE PRESENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE, SERVICE DISRUPTION, OR SAFETY HAZARDS. OHE FOUND RWM ASPHALT 18.2' INSIDE R/W 24" RC P 8. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment, unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy and not otherwise excepted from coverage herein. Commence at a point being the centerline intersection between U.S. Highway 23 (Variable R/W) and Stephens Ave (50' R/W); thence leaving said centerline run South 40 degrees 44 minutes 26 seconds East for a distance of 61.73 feet to a found right-of-way monument on the Southerly right-of-way of the aforementioned U.S. Highway 23; thence run South 87 degrees 32 minutes 44 seconds East along said right-of-way for a distance of 7.03 feet to a point, said point lying on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1,864.71 feet, a central angle of 06 degrees 25 minutes 31 seconds, a chord bearing of South 84 degrees 19 minutes 59 seconds East, and a chord length of 209.00 feet; thence run along the arc of said curve and said right-of-way for a distance of 209.11 feet to a point; thence run South 27 degrees 32 minutes 44 seconds West along said right-of-way for a distance of 37.01 feet to a found right-of-way monument, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described. ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF WHICH THE SURVEYOR HAS KNOWLEDGE ARE SHOWN HEREON; OTHERS MAY EXIST OF WHICH THE SURVEYOR HAS NO KNOWLEDGE AND OF WHICH THERE IS NO OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE. OHE JB TOP:842.19 INV IN:835.99 INV OUT:835.89 FOUND RWM 7. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest covered by this Commitment. A parcel of land lying in Land Lot 62, of the 12th/ District, City of Stockbridge, Henry County, Georgia, and being more particularly described as follows: 1. E OHE FOUND RWM The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia personal property taxes, assessed to Better Letter Mailing SVC Inc., were paid in the amount of $397.67 for Tax Account Reference Number 16913. TO FIND THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 (WHICH IS GEORGIA HIGHWAY 42 AND HAVING A VARIABLE RIGHT OF WAY) A DISTANCE OF 1,375.6 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST SIDE OF LAMBERT DRIVE (30 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.38 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING THUS ESTABLISHED, THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 23, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHICH HAS A RADIUS OF 1829.86 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 139.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET [SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 139.62 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A BEARING OF SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST]; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 493.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 130.11 FEET TO A FLAT IRON PIN FOUND; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 442.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 23 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY NOTES OHE LAND LOT 62 12TH DISTRICT, CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA OHE 4231 NORTH HENRY BLVD FOR VULCAN MATERIALS OHE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OHE SWCB TOP:839.40 INV IN:832.9 0 INV OUT:932 .50 Any minerals or mineral rights leased, granted or retained by current or prior owners. The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia taxes were paid in the amount of $10,225.04 for Tax Map Reference Number S33-01052000. (base amount due was $10,061.77) The 2024 City of Stockbridge, State and Henry County, Georgia personal property taxes, assessed to Pitney Bowes Global Fin SVCS, were paid in the amount of $58.18 for Tax Account Reference Number 79663. D LOCATED IN: OHE 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 6. Taxes and assessments for the year 2025 and subsequent years, not yet due and payable, and taxes for prior years arising from reassessments or digest disputes. LV 3 OHE 2. Any facts, rights, interest or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 5. EB VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachments, encumbrances, violations, variations, or adverse circumstances affecting Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land or that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land. LO TT 4525 SOUTH LEEP ShT oR neE 7 ET 13.953.5200 BUFORD G,A 3LS 0F N 5 1.1 o 3 8 90 TITLE COMMITMENT AR 2 THIS BLOCK RESERVED FOR THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. SPRING ST NORTH HENRY BLVD (A.K.A. U.S. HWY 23) CH LAMBERT DR ANY SETBACKS AND BUFFERS SHOWN ARE GOVERNED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND SHOULD BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING PRIOR TO LAND PLANNING OR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ROCK QUARRY RD GRID NORTH GEORGIA WEST STATE PLANE NAD 83 (2011) FRONT: 50 FEET SIDE: 10 FEET REAR: 20 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 35 FEET LANE DR THE SETBACKS FOR ZONE C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PER CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE MUNICODE ACCESSED ON 10/24/2025 ARE AS FOLLOWS: STEPHENS AVE DEED BOOK 1115 PAGE 196 DEED BOOK 107 PAGE 511 MANN BLVD 1. 2. 1 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-2 PER CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE ZONING MAP ACCESSED ON OCTOBER 24, 2025. 1 OF 1